General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
The New York Times
comments
Comments by "" (@shauncameron8390) on "The New York Times" channel.
Previous
3
Next
...
All
On Black people.
1
And starve later like the USSR under Stalin.
1
@elbertcortes He's a Chavista living the good life.
1
That's a Western problem as Westerners foolishly sacrificed the family and future for career and comfortable lifestyle.
1
But average people are every bit as corrupt and greedy as the governments they elect.
1
Correct!
1
The USA is responsible for Venezuela's problems that are entirely within the Venezuelan government's control such as price-fixing, the mismanagement of the oil resources, the seizing and shutting down of private enterprise, etc?
1
Because the rich are their biggest campaign and treasury contributors.
1
@ingvi frey Exactly.
1
Maybe, but certainly not with the Chavista regime in charge.
1
@swedishmarxist986 LMAO. How? By keeping the people at his mercy for just about every need?
1
No. The lack of God is the downfall of humanity. You might have freedom, but you'll never have any peace (in your heart).
1
No. That's been the world since time immemorial. The government didn't care about the people even in Jesus's time and before that. So why all of a sudden would it care now, aside from maybe sparing itself from a overthrow?
1
No. Babies are not dying like this in America even in the most poverty-stricken areas.
1
Hoàng Nguyên Only because Vietnam adopted capitalism so as to not end up like its neighbor, Cambodia. US relentless sabotages. What was Ethiopia's excuse as it suffered none of such under Mengistu's communist regime and yet still struggled and collapsed anyway? Or the whole of Eastern Europe with all the Soviet protection?
1
Be it democratic (Jamaica), national (Nazi Germany), scientific (Ghana), etc. Nope. And not even the biggest socialist cheerleaders.
1
It does. It's the reason why the West even have money to help out the poor, starving 3rd-worlders in the first place.
1
Only for the riches to get squandered and then it's right to square one if you don't take the riches for yourself first.
1
The lack of human capital is the reason for it. All the resources, yet no one had enough sense to build the infrastructure and technology to make use of them.
1
@comradeboris167 Nope. In Angola's case, it's greed and socialism.
1
@OpVanquisher What about the general lack of economic freedom due toe total state control of the economy?
1
Or George W Bush?
1
You mean Portugal.
1
No, because after that food is gone, they'll just go back to starving and doing whatever it takes to survive. They need to learn how to help themselves. The reso of the world can't hold their hand forever.
1
This is the world without God you so asked for.
1
Better than dying of starvation. That's for sure. Hardly any of you are in a hurry to trade places with a South Sudanese or a North Korean.
1
@ c cc Exactly. The people are just as much a part of the problem as the government.
1
No. This is America in most cities run by Democrats.
1
What does Jeff Bezos have to do with this? The problem is the Angolan government.
1
Oh yes it is. The government controls everything there. Those are the said workers who own the means of production and have the final word on who gets what.
1
That would be Eritrea.
1
But the vast majority of Angolans live in poverty. And the only rich people in Angola are the ruling MPLA government and their well-connected families and friends.
1
Angola is a one-party state.
1
Not their kids. Not their problem.
1
Overpopulation is not the issue with Angola. It's kleptocracy.
1
But with no medicine, no supplies and dilapidated infrastructure due to the lack of funds and maintenance.
1
@bodhitree7764 No more liars than the Chavista government.
1
<The propaganda is very strong on this one..> Agreed. Except it's from the Chavista government.
1
Actually it's Venezuela. Brazil is 7th.
1
Like the North Koreans do literally?
1
Liberals don't believe in helping out at their own expense.
1
@heathertaylor8904 But to have peace, there has to be law and order. And South Sudan currently doesn't have it.
1
This is the secular humanist society mankind asked for.
1
Angola under Marxist leadership, that is.
1
Nah. More Zimbabwe with a bit of modern-day South Africa in Latin America.
1
Previous
3
Next
...
All