Comments by "Kong" (@Koushi82) on "Will the Housing Bubble Burst?" video.

the investment firms need to be banned from buying any property. limit landlords to 2 properties as there is a shortage and they are consuming too much.
13
@gumer.gg1 yep pretty much no one should own more than 2 houses at most. meaning corporations need to sell houses not rent them out.
7
simple objective should be to destroy demand for homes by oversupplying housing and crash the housing market. whomever wins the lotto should be doing this as an objective instead of blowing money on stupid things.
3
@costaet meaning cheaper to build it ourselves. Lower construction costs. Rn construction makes lots of money making lux homes. So best to undercut them
2
some companies want us to live in boxes for 1000s of dollars now a box roomshared with others less than 100 sqft and they want us to pay 1000s. HELL NO. 100 dollars a month maybe for short term but these mofos want leases signed?
2
@addanametocontinue there are ADU sold for 50k now for 300-400 sqft. in reality housing is cheap to build but idiots make it expensive. cost of production is likely 30k at most. meaning you can build 10 units on a 3000-4000 sqft lot single person of couse. since cost of children are so expensive and housing unaffordable there is no point having kids become japan and have no kids.
2
from the boomers the most spoiled generation in existence
1
@AnyVideo999 cause offices are over supplied and going bust. commericial realestate is trash in the usa actually because they are over built since people wanted more money but they over priced as well so no one wants them.
1
@AnyVideo999 that is the only thing gov should be taxing not income. Humans do not own land the earth does. The moment you cannot def the land you lose it. Gov is there to protect property. So therefore landlords should be the ones paying tax. Income earners don't need to stay in one area or gov.
1
Actually these mofos will build smaller MORE EXPENSIVE with lower quality housing instead. Wut we really need is to undercut these mofos to the bone and crash housing market completely. Small amount of land = built upwards apt complexes and charge 50% of rent for same size apt and zip codes.
1
@shahmeeresmail967 yes in fact Palo Alto regions are higher priced than even sf.
1
@aaliyahfoster2705 someone told me that Stanford was buying up all the property as well probably to make money all students attending the school the cost of education is not tuition but rent
1
@aaliyahfoster2705 see the real cost is not tuition but rent. Even if u get a Stanford scholarship they charge u rent then u still fked.feed. Them buying all the property around and not increasing dorms isn't gonna help anyone. They making money with real estate instead of tuition.
1