Comments by "Nigel Johnson" (@nigeljohnson9820) on "UK's Rwanda asylum flight cancelled after European Court order" video.

  1. The europian court of human rights will now be complicit in any further deaths in the English channel. What exactly does the court not understand about the word illigal when used to describe migrants entering the UK iligally. The UK government must have the means to deter economic migrants from entering its border without authority. Current levels of migration are unsustainable, amounting to the population of a small city each year. UK resources are finite, and illigal migrants are taking away resources that could be used to support those migrants that enter legally. The UK must have the right to decide who is allowed into the country, excluding undesirables, such as criminals. So far every attempt made by the UK government to make the UK a less attractive destination for illigal migrants has been thwarted by legal challenges. Challenges which are made by people who do not have to pay for the consequences. It should be noted that these economic migrants are coming from a safe country, but have decided that they have a better chance of exploiting the social benefits on offer in the UK. By entering the UK iligally they have already committed a crime on entry, this alone should be sufficient to ban them forever from applying for UK citizenship. The UK government has done its best to provide a humane way to make the him a less attractive destination for economic migrants. In every case so far the measures have been subject to legal challenge. Maybe the UK should simply not provide any support for those entering the country illegally, and make the offence the subject of long term imprisonment, with release dependent on successful deportation, with no possibility of gaining UK citizen ship.
    6
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 1
  9. 1