Comments by "Nigel Johnson" (@nigeljohnson9820) on "Fifth aide resigns as 'Partygate' pressure continues for Boris Johnson" video.

What is not clear is how many of those leaving are linked to organising parties at No10. Are they leaving before they are forced out?
3
@tjmarx at least one who has"resigned" says she has done so as a matter of principle, but I suspect this is a face saving exercise. I can't imagine that the pm spent much of his time organising parties at No 10. Iris obvious that such arrangements must have been made by people lower down the food chain, though the PM may have been aware of such arrangements and not objected. If those attending such parties were working closely together anyway,then mixing at a party is not going to increase their covid risk, which is really the point of the regulations. There is certainly an element of hypocrisy, but what many of the general public resent is that they were suffering and lossing loved ones while those in government were apparently enjoying themselves. Of all the reasons to hold government to account, the parties at No 10 are trivial and should be at the bottom of the list. Those calling for the pm to go may well be more involved in more important scandals, such as the purchase of PPE and its subsequent waste. The closure of the UK gas storage facilities, that made the UK vulnerable to the gas price spike. The failure to react sufficiently fast to prevent the very high deaths from the pandemic. The failure to equip our military with state of the art weapons, and the procurement waste associated with this failure. The failure to use brexit to make the UK better. There is a litany of government failures and scandals which have resulted in suffering and loss of life that are more significant than local parties at No 10. These are the things for which the whole of government should be held accountable. Sacking Boris will effectively let those responsible off the hook, and the cronyism, corruption and incompetence will continue. For decades the UK has had a succession of governments which have been the greatest threat to UK prosperity, its time we had a government that worked for the UK and not for a select elite. Don't fire them, make them do the job for which they are paid.
1
@tjmarx no, the best were the WWII government and its post war replacement. Certainly the creation of the NHS was a high point. Unlike some other countries, the UK is particularly bad at having a government that works for the good of the country in general. The aristocratic elite and the super rich are always willing to sell out the country if it will improve their wealth. It is worth making a distinction between those governments that work for the people and those who work for the country, for example, I think the current New Zealand government works for both the good of the country and the people,while the french government certainly works for the good of France and not necessarily the french people in general. It could even be argued that the Chinese government work for the good of the state, but against the interests of the people.
1
@tjmarx I am surprised that the NZ government is so poorly rated. From news reports, I would have thought it was doing a good job. Regarding the royal family, I do not see them as a particular problem. I do however regard the undemocratic, selfserving, anachronistic, house of lords as a problem. Any changes must be carefully done, as democracy is inherently unstable and can easily tipped into a dictatorship, like that in Russia or China, both of which serve the needs of the elite and the state. The problem is that globalisation has allowed the super rich elite to shed their allegiances to their country of origin. There was a time when the acquisition of wealth by the elite class,automatically benefited their country of origin, even if it did not make the population of that country much richer. It is now the case that the elite can prosper by making their country poorer. It is the way the rich and powerful have managed to modify the rules of the global financial system in their favour. Iris a fact that the super rich do not pay as, or at least not much. If this were not the case, the wealth gap would not continue to grow. The problem is that anyone who enters politics with the best intentions has the system stacked against them, meaning that even the most democratic countries, are not truly democratic. Certainly the system in the UK is biased towards preserving the status quo, the best that can be said for it is that it maintains a level of stability, but fails to correct the slow decline of the country. This is evident by the decisions of government that clearly serve the vested interests of a minority. In most cases this is legalised corruption. The process of inefficiently moving public money into private pockets, creating huge amounts of waste in the process. I suspect that is what happened with PPE procurement during the pandemic. It is what happens with a lot of UK construction projects. This illness is not unique to the UK, it is also rampant in the US, which why the US is in rapid decline. What is baffling is the popular right wing support that is give to the obviously corrupt political elite.
1