Comments by "Nigel Johnson" (@nigeljohnson9820) on "VkusVill: Russian retail chain criticised for removing LGBT family from ad campaign" video.

Afonso Henriques I am inclined to agree, though my reasons will upset many. The LGBT movement is busy attempting to rewrite history, and worse biological science. There is a fundamental principle of live and let live, but the LGBT community appears to have crossed a line in its zeal to be recognised. Society has allowed the definitions of historic concepts such as marriage to be modified to indulge the sensitivities of the LGBT community, who want what biology has denied them. But they cannot alter the facts of biological science, without advanced medical intervention, natural human procreation requires a male and a female, so the standard family unit will always be dominated by this relationship, anything else is western society playing let's pretend. So with regard to the substance of the report, I am inclined to agree with the Russians.
3
That is complete nonsense, as has been demonstrated by the Royal Navy recent challenge to Putin in the Crimea. For comparisons with russia, you need to look closer to home, and the EU determination to model its future organisation on the former USSR.
2
@Pigdowndog given the subject matter, your somewhat crude reference seems apposite, since it is about the acceptance of biological science, or its denial for purely political and self indulgent reasons.
1
@Pigdowndog analysis suggest some kind of thought or reasoning, I have seen no evidence of that, just simple crude abuse. I suggest that you continue this approach, as analysis is clearly beyond your capabilities.
1
@Pigdowndog are you sure you understand that word? So far you have not said anything of any meaning, not put forward any argument. You might like to explain what you find so ironic. I will admit it is not often that I find my self agreeing with the Russians. Maybe you can search the dictionary for some other random word you can post, so you can pretend to have a considered opinion.
1
@Pigdowndog my position is not homophobic, it simply recognises the facts of biological sciences, something that political correctness would like us to ignore. I do not care about the sex lives of others, it does not concern me. What I dislike is when their fantasies are incorporated into the fabric of public life. It's the let's pretend that the relationship between those of different sexes can ever be equivalent to those of the same sex. They are measurable different, and that is just a scientific fact. I make no judgement as to which is better, except form the point of view the natural procreation of children, which is where the difference is manifested.
1
@Pigdowndog I suggest you reread my post above, as I think I make it clear, failing that I suggest you buy a human biology text book, to further your understanding of the subject.
1
@Pigdowndog it makes a distinct difference between heterosexual relationships and homosexual relationships. Simply put, they are different as a result of biology, nothing can change that.
1
@Pigdowndog are you stupid. I have answered your question, you just don't like the answer.
1
@Pigdowndog no I am not wrong, the proof is the size of the global human population. It would certainly not as big if homosexual relationships were more common, or dominant. Some heterosexual couple is giving birth to all these children, or have their been record sales of Turkey basters? You are simply in denial about the biological facts. I really do not care, you can play let's pretend as much as you like.
1