Comments by "Chip \x26 Steve" (@chipsteve) on "Women and ACCEPTABLE LOSS: the other side of female hypergamy" video.

  1. You know what would be hilarious - to phrase it in a way that might plausibly be true from the outset. Specifically - "would you sleep with me for $115,000?" She might actually believe you mean it, and say yes. Then say "ok, how about $10" - it would really fry her brain.
    12
  2. ​ @bendowney5822  that's absolutely accurate, but it also implies that any man is a helpless simp who fails to constantly give her more, more, more. Men do not have to play this losing game.
    4
  3. Yes. I do not know of a single long-term relationship comprised of people under the age of 60 - where the man is not tolerating disrespect. It's sickening. Men have lost their spine.
    2
  4. Synergy lol. My problems are my problems and her problems are our problems. Her money is her money in my money is our money. Come on, seriously.
    2
  5. Not true at all. She may hate you, but if anything she'll be more sexually attracted to you and chase your validation.
    2
  6. 1. Decriminalize the p word 2. Remove welfare for single mothers Everything would change (in the USA).
    1
  7.  @TheDiamondNet  the single mothers can be s3x workers to provide for their children. The true market value in the USA should be somewhere around $50-75 an hour for her services - that's plenty to put food on the table.
    1
  8. Holy crap is that wrong. We do not need to work constantly to survive. We have grocery stores for chrissakes. We have it 1000x easier than our ancestors.
    1
  9. Romantic relationships are vastly different from economic ones. In economic relationships, 2 parties can be of objectively equal value (different complimentary things to offer) & therefore it's win-win. In romantic relationships, hypergamy ain't satisfied with objectively equal value. At least not for long.
    1
  10. Esther Vilar said that women have two basic drives - to get a sugar daddy (beta) & to compete with other girls (alpha)
    1
  11. Shout it from the mountaintop. This would change everything. And nobody in a prominent position has the balls to say it, including Orion here.
    1
  12. That certainly is another way of saying that women are biologically programmed to get all their needs met through men.
    1
  13. Yes, exactly. Sarah Dawn Moore had a recent video citing stats that in 1970, only 2% of women had a lifetime notch count of 10+. In 2015, 80% of women had a notch count of 10+ & that number continues to rise ("I'm sure it's even higher today in 2023" she said). So it's a nihilistic reality that women in general are FUBAR today.
    1
  14. That's a catastrophic perspective for (innocent) children brought into the world accordingly.
    1
  15. Why would dating suck for women...unless they didn't enjoy sex, to which they have omnipresent access? Hmmm 🤔. It's almost as if even when they're having fun, they can't be happy.
    1
  16. Women are almost all inherently dishonest in all important matters with men, therefore it's flat-out stupid for men to be honest with them.
    1
  17. Your comment is nothing but a long-winded, manipulative, passive aggressive ad hominem. Btw- women's primal instincts haven't changed in the last 50 years. But in the 1970s, only 2% of women had a 10+ notch count. Today over 80% of women have a 10+ notch count. If you take issue with those stats, take it up with Sarah Dawn Moore who is actually a vocal critic of Dr Taraban.
    1
  18. I think what you're missing is that the overwhelming majority of women only want relationships with the top 10% of men, and those men can have multiple partners, so that leaves a miniscule percentage of men who both qualify for a relationship with women and also want monogamy for whatever reason.
    1
  19. Not in many countries - It's actually affordable in many countries, could be pursued daily if one wanted, and wouldn't break the bank.
    1
  20. Holy crap dude. She was an awful wife & an awful human but still walks away with 1.5 million for doing nothing other than betraying you? What a nuclear grade red pill that is.
    1
  21. Some men don't want children. Pretty much all men do want sex. Why not do what women do when they need to have their car fixed, their roads paved, their AC repaired, their toilet fixed, their ceiling fan rewired, their house built, their roof replaced, their furniture moved, etc etc etc & pay the opposite gender to meet their needs.
    1
  22. That's a curious way of saying that for a woman, sex without a resultant lifetime partnership equals irreversible trauma & permanent damage to her as a human being, which is why she is fundamentally malicious. Hmmm 🤔
    1
  23. That's a musical collaboration of different skillsets coming together in a complimentary way where no one voice is objectively "better" than the others. Women operate on hypergamy therefore she's only gonna be "happy" (for a time) with a man who's objectively "better" than her. If that man over time treats her as an "equal collaborator" rather than a subordinate (for lack of a better term), she'll become less "happy" and then it's hello zero-sum darkness my old friend. That's why hetero romantic couplings are almost impossible to establish true win/win synergy.
    1
  24.  @lari5891  you have no idea what hypergamy is, and you don't get to redefine words. Women get turned off believing that their man is merely their equal, and at that point of realization they will go looking for someone else if they can. Newsflash: today in 2023, they can. And a lot of men genuinely don't want children. Good grief.
    1
  25. What a load of crap - in many species, the mating isn't even consensual. But keep on believing that women want to actually give and be a complimentary partner in perpetuity in 2023. Good luck with that.
    1