General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Chip \x26 Steve
PsycHacks
comments
Comments by "Chip \x26 Steve" (@chipsteve) on "With women, hire SLOW, fire FAST: understanding the selection process" video.
All 100% true. The problem remains that once a man commits, he's "all in". So he relinquishes his options. And that's exactly when modern women do a 180 & become awful.
371
@sIMODINHO I don't disagree that'll help prevent divorce / cheating. But that means marriage vows are faithless lies.
48
7:00 - 7:36 BRIFFAULT'S LAW - even if you choose a woman exclusively from many options, she'll be elated for a minute, then your commitment will mean nothing. And she'll do a 180 & become awful.
12
@thecurrentmoment I'm more cynical than you on this. I believe it's that women will emotionally appeal for a man's commitment, professing their own desire to commit to him - buuuut... really only saying whatever it takes to obtain that commitment from him, knowing full well that this tactic will give her the leverage & security she seeks. And - Knowing she has no intention of closing off HER options - it's just to pursue power via deceit. So she gets it, then she loses attraction & respect for him. She pushed for it, so logically it's her fault. But again, no accountability...
9
@im1who84u Preach, senior brother. Your experiences in granting exclusive relationships (yes, at women's request) exactly resonate with mine.
4
No disrespect or shade, I genuinely see 0 value in putting in work to keep the same woman attracted, just to smash that same woman over & over again. Definition of scarcity.
2
@Schopenhauer69 women are incentivized to Break their vows. Even when there's equal incomes, society will still give a woman a pass for breaking her vow just cause she's bored or unhaaaaapy
1
Absolutely 💯. And why is the "lineup" situation not legal in many countries? To answer your question, because then men would never trust or commit.
1
Your 1st paragraph is blatantly dishonest. "If he finds a woman is not a good fit" - MANIPULATIVE - he specifically said if a woman is untrustworthy, hostile, argumentive, a liar. Your 2nd paragraph - yup. You wanted feminism, you got it. Then y'all got social media & told on yourselves. Can't put toothpaste back in the tube. Your "high value" is FUBAR, gone forever. That's 99% of you over age 30 in the feminist Western world.
1
@JS-mh1fh that is illogical, & proof that your claim is illogical: countless millions of single mothers & 40+ women pull this same "wasting my time" shaming gambit. For them, it has ZERO impact on any "biological pressures" you cite. They either already breeded or factually cannot breed any longer, yet still pull the "wasting my time" guilt trip😂.
1
@JS-mh1fh i don't want another female perspective actually. I've wasted too much time listening to female perspectives & watched those perspectives contradicted by female actions. Notice you mention the "wasting my time" guilt trip tactic ALSO applies to securing a "lifetime romantic partnership". Ok, so there we have it. It's about saying whatever it takes to get whatever you want, however manipulate and/or false, while all of society gives you a pass for breaking your word because you're female. Meanwhile, a man who breaks his word to you is considered a jerk or a monster or worse, & you know this - you weaponize this, & you play that dynamic to the hilt at the man's expense if he doesn't give you what you want.
1