Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "GBNews"
channel.
-
418
-
41
-
Unfortunately, your life won't change, if she ever wakes up.
The lockdowns, as was intended, have sundered society.
The mistrust engendered remains, but not only the fears fostered in the vaccinated towards the unvaccinated, but generation against generation, family members against family members, against friends, neighbours, colleagues.
Divided individuals mean less concerted attempts to call those supposed to represent us to account, as folk focus, instead, on acrimonious events in their personal lives.
My condolences on your situation.
I hope you can eventually work things out for the benefit of your family, but that will, at best, take quite some time.
5
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
@alanladams
Have a look at your second constitution.
No, it isn't a typo or error, Alan.
It was enacted in secret in 1871 by Grant and both parties and is entitled US Inc!
It opened the door for birth certificates, in 1900, then the Fed, in 1910.
Both set the ground for 1913, at which point, forty-two years later, Wilson and, again, both parties sold the land, goods and people to a cartel of zionist bankers, who legally converted the entire deal into a Corporation that pays taxes directly to the English Crown!
Do you understand what this meant and means?
All 97 million Americans (the last Americans in the legal sense!), became the property of the Corporation, they became legal slaves, as are their current 300 million or so descendants!
Birth certificates became the means of keeping track of them, while the Fed controlled the vast wealth they continue to generate annually.
Of course, a Corporation is a business and, as such, is not permitted to name itself after a country, past or present, so the owners named their business United States, dropping the America part of the title.
The American people were stabbed in the back by two presidents, all of the politicians, the zionist bankers and the Crown and the betrayal continues to this day.
Both 'parties' are an illusion.
It's a Corporation!
Since when do politicians run a Corporation?
They are overseers to the 300+ million slaves, acting as proxies for the legal masters/owners, serving their interests, not those of the slaves!
Naturally, I don't expect you to take my word for it, so encourage you to undertake your own research.
It won't take you long to verify what I'm stating is true.
Welcome down the rabbit hole!
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Peter Gordon
Why deny the irrefutable?
Scotland already is independent!
I actively encourage you to actually research the subject, instead of gullibly pursuing the 'official' narrative in a programmed manner.
The matter at hand is the repeal of the political and financial treaty of 1707, namely, the Act of Union, wherein articles 18 and 19 clearly state that the act is not being signed in perpetuity and the Sovereignty of both Scotland and it's equally Sovereign people is not up for grabs, then, now or at any point in the future.
England consigned the document on that understanding.
Please, desist from posting ill informed and ignorant comments on social platforms pertaining tto something you clearly know nothing about!
Forget Sturgeon and the SNP, operating out of a shared asset building, (Holyrood) unlawfully applying English parliamentary procedures, contrary to Scottish law and the Scottish Constitution.
She/they and Wastemonster have a vested interest in maintaining the farce.
That, however, does not excuse your woeful lack of familiarity with facts.
I'll leave you to your studies, hopefully resulting in you becoming wiser, as a consequence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ah, but the UK public, in general, is entirely responsible.
Those that didn't vote enabled the vile beings to gain power.
Those that voted tory enabled the vile beings to gain power.
The modern labour party are no different, they're just mildly diluted tories that performed a coup in the labour party on behalf of their zionist controllers.
That was their remit, get the socialists and pro Palestinian members out of the party.
The plan went no further than that.
Suddenly the tories began regularly pressing the self-destruct button and Stammer's controllers saw the opportunity of a lifetime, so instructed him to get off his now fat, lazy arse and try looking like a viable choice, hence the big change in him in recent months.
If the tories hadn't imploded he'd still be sitting, moping on the opposition bench, offering half hearted, wishy-washy protest.
1
-
1
-
@jamiemcaloon5548
Of course it's rigged, Jamie.
Wastemonster arranged it that way.
That's what devolved power is all about...authority invested by Wastemonster into their Scottish branch, Holyrood, operating under English parliamentary laws and regulations, themselves retaining the important powers.
It's a foreign agency on Scottish soil and Holyrood is collaborating, contrary to Scottish law and the Scottish Constitution.
Had Sturgeon or the snp truly had Scotland's best interests at heart they would not have wasted time and money jumping through ridiculous legal hoops that were designed to lead to a dead end.
The Act of Union, 1707 is a series of articles.
Article 18 sets out clearly that the fiscal and political treaty, because that is all it ever was, nothing more, is not being signed in perpetuity, therefore either or both parties can walk away from the deal at any point they want.
Article 19 states that every man, woman and child in Scotland are Sovereigns/Lieges and so is Scotland.
As such they were, are and will always be independent.
That's why we have seperate laws, because our Sovereignty and independence are both written into our's.
England willingly co-signed their copy and our's on those terms.
England is the exact opposite.
When the nobles cornered King John, forcing him to sign the Magna Carta 1215, they not only divested him of total authority, but bestowed Sovereignty upon themselves.
They then carried that authority through to the creation of the English parliament, investing parliament with equal Sovereignty.
Remember, at that point, they were the only ones allowed to vote.
In time, rich benefactors, landowners, etc, bought their way to the vote.
The working class, the Commoners, fought battles for the right and, eventually, women fighting their own battles, finally won the right to vote.
Parliament and the Monarchy are Sovereign, neither of them truly answerable to the Commoners.
In Scotland any Scottish govt (Monarchy, too) is answerable to we Sovereigns/Lieges.
We can dismiss them without letting them finish any term they imagined they still had left to serve in office.
In the case of the Monarchy we can replace it or dispense with the office entirely.
With govt we can dissolve it, having instructed it to arrange a general election.
Should either Monarchy or govt refuse to follow our will it is an act of High Treason, according to our law!
Naturally, once we have revoked the Union, a GE will be required, within a short period of time, allowing us to shape our own future.
Can you imagine the repercussions, not just in England, but around the world, as the first true democracy in modern history emerges?
Robert the Bruce, 105 years after the Magna Carta, was nobody's fool.
He deliberately divested himself of total authority, but bypassed the nobility, bestowing the authority of Sovereignty upon the people, then put total control beyond the reach of the nobles in the Declaration of Arbroath 1320.
He made himself first among equals.
Is that ringing any bells?
We'll see a major move, later this year, when SALVO drag Wastemonster though the ICJ on charges of fraud.
Nothing will be held in camera, so the whole dirty business will be shown to the entire world.
I'm looking forward to it.
Me, I distrust Holyrood and some parties equally.
I don't gamble, myself, but hear the bookies have earmarked this year for a GE.
I'll be voting tactically, as they're all a means to an end in my eyes.
As my wee, fat maw used to say: "Why have a dog and bark?!"
1
-
@Jack29245
My statement still stands, Jack.
The non voters hold the balance.
If they continue refusing to vote, then an snp alliance will take the day, again.
The entire nation is not obliged to vote.
All that is required is that the majority of those that do vote do so for a party determined to revoke the Union.
No law requires it must be a majority of the populace, only that it be a majority of those that vote.
Many unionists were in the older age group, seduced by promises of MaxDevo and scared by propaganda.
May they rest in peace, but many of them have passed on, since 2014, replaced by younger folk who know only Westmonster's austerity, corruption, mismanagement and so on, so they will judge on those issues.
The younger voters will also be aware of their own lack of opportunities, etc and I cannot see them as gullible enough to fall for the better-the-devil-you-know routine, as others have in the past.
Some will even be first time voters.
Wastemonster's day is almost over.
Sadly, it lacks dignity and good grace and I, personally, look forward to the coup de grace being applied, so Scotland can move forward to a brighter, better future.
1
-
@Lee Mollison
And who will we punish, Lee?
Big Pharma and the politicians are legally exempt.
The Western media are owned by just six corporations, who will claim they were misled by the other two.
And where, with the vast majority of the public vaxxed, would we find support to prosecute the others that have no immunity?
We can only create a partial boycott of news outlets, as the gullible will continue to keep them in business.
Me, I haven't bought a newspaper or watched tv in over forty years.
It isn't much, in the grand scheme of things, but I haven't, as a result, been complicit in their lies by financing them.
Seven and a half billion folk on the planet.
If every non vaxxed person, plus those that now finally understand what they actually signed up to in the first place, let's say 5%, decided to boycott these news oulets, then it would make quite a dent in their revenue stream.
They own the system, or at least those that control them do, so they will never face justice, but at least we can ensure their bank accounts don't overflow with our cash.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dovetonsturdee7033
I require evidence to back up the spurious claim that at least half of Scotland is in support of the Union.
That's me applying critical thinking.
I didn't state figures, the commentator did, displaying confirmation bias, ergo the onus of proof is upon them, that's how it works and you, demanding proof to the contrary on my part, is a piss poor example of constructive argument, evading the issue either out of fear of cognitive dissonance or out of ignorance.
You obviously have an oversensitive nature, if a matter of banter is, in your eyes, abuse.
This is gentle repartee by Scottish standards.
1
-
@sugarkane4830
2014.
Time and circumstances have moved on in the intervening years and all of it detrimental to not only Scotland's interests, but the UK, as a whole.
62% of Scotland voted to stay in the EU.
As a consequence of Brexit the Scottish economy has suffered badly.
Even the BOE stated it was a colossal mistake to not just Scotland's economy, but the UK, too.
The billions squandered or given to friends, etc, by the Wastemonster govt, during the pandemic, not only beggars belief, but the pockets of every taxpayer.
The removal of bonus caps for bankers springs to mind, the rapid increase in taxes, in inflation, in food costs, in rents and mortgages, in utility bills, in food banks, in child poverty, in general poverty, etc bear looking at.
The Wastemonster govt is not fit for purpose.
Just a few reasons for revoking the union, you understand.
Besides, were you to know anything about Scottish law or the Scottish Constitution, you would understand that, unlike England, every man, woman and child in Scotland is Sovereign/Liege.
In other words, our govt is not, therefore is answerable to us.
If we tell it we want one referendum or ten referenda, it is obliged to carry out our will.
You can see the advantage over Wastemonster, which can and often does trample over the Commoners, I trust?
The snp is currently under investigation by Police Scotland for the sum of £600,000 mysteriously *disappearing'
Can you imagine if the people had the power to compel the English police to investigate the missing pandemic £billions?
So, to recap, the Act of Union 1707 was never anything more than a straightforward fiscal and political treaty, contrary to what many are deliberately misled into believing.
Naturally, I do not expect you to take my word for it and actively encourage you to undertake your own research into the subject.
Basically, the deal is no longer to Scotland's taste, so we intend revoking the union.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti English.
Few Scots are, in the same way few English folk are anti Scottish.
That doesn't suit Wastemonster and the Establishment, so they try stirring things up, as divide and conquer has proven so successful for them, throughout history.
Take the media, for example.
Let's say you buy the Mirror, for argument's sake, before getting the train from London to Glasgow.
It will have an anti Scottish slant to it.
Having read it on your journey, you might pass it on to a fellow traveller or bin it, as you alight at the station, but if you go to the newsagent on the concourse and buy the same paper, a few hours and a few hundred miles apart you will find it has an anti English angle to it.
Fact of the matter is I lived and worked in England for 30 yrs and only returned to Scotland for work.
I have family still there and friends, too.
I hope that has helped you understand a few things.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@William Rogers
The vast majority of the folk in Scotland bear no ill will towards their English counterparts.
Similarly, most English folk, like yourself, feel the same about Scotland.
Unfortunately, on both sides of the border, we are cursed with the tiniest minority, all of them pathetic excuses for human beings with low IQs and high levels of inferiority complexes, that thrive on bigotry, zenophobia and racism, who are, rightly, ignored by decent, intelligent folk, especially when these imbeciles claim to be speaking for everyone.
The majority of Scots have an unabiding hatred of Wastemonster and the ruling English class.
Many English folk do, as well, however, msn, the propaganda arm of the self appointed elites, is only too happy to exploit the vitriolic bile of the brainless few, making a mountain out of a molehill and, in the process, the neanderthals imagine there are far more of them than the ragtag little gang there is, due to their gullibility.
Many of us have relatives either side of the border.
At the very least, trade will continue and folk will visit kin, etc.
Scotland will be wealthy, England will be vastly poorer and I strongly suspect many folk will relocate to Scotland, in order to give their families a better life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@M N
Tell me, when was the divorce between you and reality finalised?
For the last twelve years, in both local and general elections, the people of Scotland have returned the SNP to government.
To have done so means the party has been elected by the majority of voters.
That's how democracy works in the real world, outside of your little world, in your head, where fantasy appears to be running rampant.
The majority of voters, North of the border, vote for the SNP, because it is part of the party's manifesto.
In other words, the majority of Scots voters would probably think you are soft in the head, unable to understand basic facts or are a barefaced liar.
😂😂😂
1
-
1
-
Those media outlets, every last one of them, in the West, are owned by just six corporations!
Now do you understand?
I had a video, about seven or eight years ago, in one of my utube collections.
Forty-eight English speaking TV channels, UK, US, Oz, etc, every last one of them giving verbatim news reports with not one single change in coverage!
Those six Corporations have more finance behind them and batteries of lawyers than we have sticks to shake.
We cannot silence their lies, unless we collectively agree to stop reading and viewing them, thereby starving them of income.
No viewers, readers, means advertisers would abandon them, but too many remain gullible for that to even be a remote possibility.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ScottishRoss
Well, Eleanor's opinion has been dismissed by NS, because NS has disagreed with Eleanor's programmed opinion.
Eleanor, like all narcissists, who take any form of disagreement to their self appointed authority based, not on it being bestowed by merit, but simply on the process of osmosis, has taken it as a personal attack, as they are unable to distinguish between themselves and the stance they take, said stance being one of never being wrong, ergo above criticism.
Sadly, Eleanor never developed the ability of critical thinking, so will never progress beyond her mentally and emotionally arrested stage and is rightfully deserving of pity, as she casts about seeking reasons for umbrage, demanding apologies for imagined slights.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thanks but no, thanks, Clark.
Scotland has suffered enough at the psycho hands of Wastemonster and a more narcissistic business partner cannot be imagined.
That, after all, is what the Act of Union 1707 is about...a political and business treaty and not, as everyone has always been led to believe, anything more than that!
Within the treaty can be found article 18 and article 19, both of which make it abundantly clear that Scotland, the country, is Sovereign, therefore independent, and has been, since the Declaration of Arbroath 1320 will always remain so and the matter was not up for discussion.
The articles further state that every man, woman and child in Scotland are Sovereigns/Leiges, therefore independent people and are subjugate only to Scottish Law.
England, in co-signing, was totally conversant with these terms.
Scotland was, is and always will be independent.
What we seek, in essence, is the annulment of the business partnership.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mickyboy7586
Nonsense, Micky.
I can provide reams of evidence that proves Scotland will flourish, while England will wither.
Just look at the UK debt alone.
Wastemonster borrows, yet Scotland never recieves any of the money borrowed.
The same is true of Wales and Ireland, but let's just deal with Scotland, here.
It comprises 5.4 million people, which makes up 8.3% of the UK population, yet it pays 22% of England's debt!
And before paying that it has 1.8% of it's GDP taken by the UK defence budget.
Just look at SHELL's recent posted profits...£32.2 billion.
Scotland's oil, let's not forget, but more about that later.
Anyway, Wastemonster taxed them 75%, leaving them with £8.05 billion to pocket.
From the remaining £24.15 billion Wastemonster gave Scotland just 20%...£5.030 billion and kept the remaining £18. 837 billion!
Not to worry, though.
SALVO intend dragging them through the ICJ, later this year, on charges of fraud!
The charges will go back to the very first barrel, when Wastemonster first began lying, saying no oil was being extracted, up to the point they admitted oil was was being drawn, but lied about how many barrels, until current days, when the truth and evidence emerged.
Scotland's resources, not England's or the UK's.
Scotland outright legally owns 95% of the North Sea oil and gas fields, regardless of Wastemonster trying to illegally shift boundaries.
Funnily enough, England owns the other 5% of the fields, just no drilling, other than exploratory, has ever taken place in their area.
Payment, all the way back to the 1960s...that's a lot of cash.
Throw in the renewable energy Scotland provides to the National Grid, which we receive no payment for and, indeed, even have to pay for, when we use it, well, Scotland is energy resource wealthy.
£billions upon billions, Micky.
I think Wastemonster will be in danger of declaring bankruptcy, as I don't see how they could ever repay what's owed.
Right now the UK economy is screwed with rising inflation, energy costs, food prices, etc and I can't see any change for the better in the next decade.
They could always refuse to pay, but the IMF would automatically remove their credit rating, (currently at AA-, while Scotland's sits at AAA) which means nobody would give them credit.
I suppose they could always sell off our shared assets; Bank of England, Houses of Parliament, House of Lords, Big Ben, Downing Street, Portcullis House, all of the museums, (more, but I can't recall them right now) various estates and plots of land, in fact 18% of London.
Moving further afield, there's close to 13,900 buildings alone, plus larger estates and plots of land, including MOD, plus anything and everything on them or under them, from nuclear attack subs to paperclips.
Of course, we have to take into account the 84 embassies, situated overseas.
I totted it all up, about a decade ago, where it came out at just under £14,000 billion.
Staggering, isn't it?
Scotland's 22% slice comes out at £3.080 thousand billion.
These are just quick calculations, covering a couple of areas.
This can a be checked out with the ONS, incidently.
The sums are probably much higher now, who can say, but that's where they stood a decade ago.
They biggest problem for us, in Scotland, is the deliberate lies and deceit, the fraud and constant corruption of Wastemonster and their msn cronies and that won't change.
The vast majority of Scots have no problem with the people of England.
Many of us have family and friends down there, but we really can't take Wastemonster any more, so we have to get out, before we get dragged down with their psychotic insanity.
The good folk of England get little choice in the matter, but we're about to use our Get Out Of Jail Free card.
As I said, I have reams of information, a of it verifiable and researchable.
Do yourself a favour, get you and your's up here, at the earliest opportunity, for a better quality of life.
Good things are going to happen. 👍
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Event 201
It can be found, here on utube, as one documentary (approx' run time around 50 mins or as shorter vids, labelled segments).
The blueprint was drawn up.
How to deal with a viral pandemic.
Everything was covered!
Medical, logistics, travel (or lack, thereof) communication, commerce, ie furlough payments, etc.
Everyone was agreed.
They did a dry run, a dress rehearsal, in 2019, computer simulated.
Our esteemed leaders managed to lose 65 million lives in the exercise!
They went back to the drawing board and revised the plan, putting in the finishing touches and it was a done deal.
Coincidence, that the real pandemic occurred just a couple of months later?
Coincidence, they didn't take the steps agreed, until too late?
The only coincidence, and a lucky one at that, was that 65 million people didn't die!
They ignored the blueprint and did the exact opposite.
They must have been so disappointed.
So much so that, upon examination, it can be found that the Omicron variant has strange characteristics that could only have been produced in a lab and is not a natural progression of the first variant.
Me, I've been following the fcuktardery developing over the last half a century.
I've watched it unfold to this over fifty years.
Nothing they do could surprise me and there are no depths to which they will not stoop.
1
-
@Daryl Foster
Not trying to be pedantic, Daryl, but it depends on the comorbidities.
Mine are emphysema and RA.
Had my immune systems not been the perpetrators of the RA I would still have refused the vax.
Why, with naturallly overactive systems, would I even dream of relying on a synthetic concoction that required governments around the world to provided blanket exemption for Big Pharma?
It made no sense, just as the virus and the response to it made no sense from the beginning.
My own experience, in regards to my acqaintences, are similar to Drew's.
Two, along with me, refused the vax and we're ticketyboo.
Of the others, all contracted the virus, four dying, but from heart and lung disease, where none were previously diagnosed, while another, having spent six weeks in an induced coma on a ventilator, is now permanently wheelchair-bound.
The issue will never be dealt with, because manufactured crisis after crisis while arise every time it seems that society is settling and the matter can finally be addressed, just as happened with all the illegal wars in recent decades, fictitious WMDs, missing trillions from public purses in various countries, similar sums in faulty or non existent PPE, et al.
The public, in general, sadly, really do possess a short attention span and this will prove no different.
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I cannot understand is the view that, once free of the Union, the Scots will cleave to the SNP, as if it would be the only political party in Scotland...in perpetuity.
Most Scots see the party as a means to an end.
Granted, they carry out the will of the majority of Scots voters, in pursuing a referendum, but that, in and of itself, has always been a major part of their manifesto.
Other policies are unpopular, however, are worth suffering for the outcome of dissolution of the UK to many.
Many mistakenly believe it is an obssession of just a political party, failing to see it as the wishes of, as I said earlier, the majority of Scots voters.
It stands to reason the party would be obliged to throw their hat in the ring, along with all the others, in a GE North of the border.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Your problem, Tony, is you see a political party and assume, without putting your brain into gear, that they represent everything about Scotland, when, in fact, the one deciding factor that determines they have and will continue to be returned in govt in Scotland is that they offer the most feasible likelihood of attaining the break up of the union, which is the desire of the majority of voters in Scotland, not because we're anti England, but because we're anti Wastemonster.
You compound your error by further assuming that once the union has been broken that the people of Scotland will automatically vote the SNP into govt.
Why?
The party will have achieved the will of the majority of Scottish voters and, that having been achieved, all bets are off and they will have to take their chances with all the other parties.
Not everyone in Scotland wants to return to the EU, for example.
Does that surprise you?
It's all very well the SNP saying it's a given and there will be no need for a vote on it, however, as I said, they will have to take their chances, because the Scottish Constitution clearly states that any govt voted into power is contracted only for as long as it is the will of the people.
In other words, they are on constant probation and can be removed at a moments notice, regardless of how long they imagined they'd be in office, to be replaced by a govt better suited to the wishes of the people.
Scotland, the country, is Sovereign.
Every man, woman and child are also Sovereigns/Lieges.
The govt is not.
The govt is subjugate to the people, who are the highest authority in the land.
The English monarchy is also subject to the will of the Scottish people and reigns on invite, not over Scotland, the land, but over the people, who, like the govt, can be given a P45, if that is the will of the people.
So, in short, not the Scottish govt, the English govt or the monarchy have the lawful right to dictate to the people of Scotland, who are the highest authority in Scotland.
We will decide who governs in Scotland and for how long!
That is how democracy works.
The people in England have the Magna Carta 1215, so could easily mirror Scotland to a degree, under Common Law, but few of the people are aware of the authority it gives them.
As is said: Knowledge is power.
1
-
@julian shepherd
England, owning only 5% of the oil and gas fields in the North Sea, outright, could survive for a short while on their own resources.
We could easily up our renewable electricity output from it's current 80% to 100% and, buying more of our excess, England could get by, as we could well afford to cover much more than the South East of England's electricity needs at a fraction of what the French are charging them.
Our own 95% of the oil and gas fields, which we don't need to use ourselves, could either be sold or left in situ, as an asset for gilts in a Scottish Central Bank.
The bank, itself, could quite easily be underpinned, using our portion of the shared assets, Holyrood included.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Many here are missing the point.
Scottish and English law are different.
We, in Scotland, have a Constitution, for example.
Within, it clearly states that any Scottish govt is subject to the will of the people, because the people are Sovereign/Liege, not the govt!
The same applies, when it comes to the Monarchy.
We Sovereigns can dismiss our govt or the monarchy to replace it with one more suited to our needs.
No, we're not talking about a set time in office.
If we aren't happy we can sack them any time we like, providing it's the will of the majority of those voting.
That's one of the reasons the snp have been dragging their heels.
They operate (unlawfully, under Scottish law) by Wastemonster parliamentary laws and statutes.
With the union revoked, there will be one major reason for folk to stop voting for them.
I know it's the opposite, in England, having lived there for a few decades, but try to imagine the difference it would make to your lives.
The snp are allowed to dream, but the fact of the matter is they cannot make decisions without consulting the Sovereigns first to seek permission, so forget about any plans you have heard or read.
They don't get to make the decisions, we do.
They can ignore us, yes, but will face charges of High Treason, as set out in Scottish law.
Me, I'm 100% certain they won't try it.
Would you? 😂😂😂😂
1
-
@iangreenhorn544
Newsflash....62% of Scotland voted to remain in the EU, but ended up out, due to Brexit.
Since then the majority of Scotland's voters have elected parties intent on revoking the union, because the promise of MaxDevo, amongst others, was never kept.
The majority.
That's democracy, whether you like it or not!
Polls are not worth the time or effort, as they are dependent on demographics.
Take a poll in a staunch unionist area and, well, what a surprise, the majority want to stay.
The opposite for leaving the union.
Cold hard facts, such as voting results, are the only reliable figures.
More voters opt for parties that want to split the union.
The snp are haemorrhaging members?
Boo-hoo, cry, cry, so what?
You think that because they're disillusioned with one political party that they'll give up and go home?
😂😂😂😂😂😂
You need to get a grip.
They'll swap allegiance to one of the other parties set on booting Wastemonster out the door or were you hoping they might do a 180° and vote a yoony party?
Stick to facts, Ian, not fantasy numbers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@James Mason
You appear to dislike statistics, James, preferring, rather than dealing with what they represent, undeniable facts, to resort to deflection.
Is the ability of critical thinking beyond you, that you cannot rebutt the points presented by ScottishRoss?
Has it not occurred to you that in refusing to engage on these points that you are, inadvertently, presenting the opportunity to have said lists posted, again and again, for more and more readers to ponder, undermining your own case, in the process?
I guess not.
Smh and lol.
1