Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. It would appear officialdom, once again, has buried the factual information, in favour of the moneymaking racket. No mention was made, in this vid, of the carbon dating, which places the shroud as being no older than the 14th century! The Vatican refused to accept the scientific result and also refused to allow another small patch of the shroud to be tested, in order to verify the result. That is what scientific evidence comprises of - repeatable, consistent results! Very disappointing, considering we have argued that modern so called 'science' fails to deliver on this prerequisite, in favour of big Pharma sales. Google 'gods born of a virgin' or maybe try gods born 25th December' or something along those lines, at which point you should end up with about two or more dozen names; Heracles, Osiris, Sol Invictus, Buddha, Tammuz, Dionysuis, Horus, Brahma, the list goes on, all of them predating christianity. We have to go back to ancient Sumer to locate the archetype of the Sun gods. Suffice to say, we are replete with examples, the character of Cheesuz being no more or less imaginary than those who preceded him, as the myth showing us he was the new kid on the block, another identikit saviour, yet one more paint-by-numbers-messiah, all of these, more than two dozen, sharing the exact same story, wherein a god disguises himself in an entirely different form, in order to have sex with a human virgin, the bastard resulting taking on the rank of a demigod! In fact, Dionysuis was being worshipped, until just 200 years before christianity raised it's murderous head, whilst we know the other two Abrahamic death cults also plaigiarised the religions that predated them! There's nothing new under the sun, as an equally imaginary character once expressed it, (Ecclesiastes 1:9) and includes imacculate conception, wise men/kings attending the birth, a temper tantrum, at puberty, a disappearing act by the protagonist for eighteen years, then a re-emergence with abilities, such as curing the sick, halting the lame, raising the dead and the old 'crowd favourite' of turning water into wine. Plus he had his posse of homies, as well as groupies. Naturally, the myths all include the hero antagonising the old guard by stirring up the folk, as well as local authorities, while they have him speaking in riddles/parable, followed by him being sacrificed, in order to save humanity, himself rising from the dead - it would be pointless, if the main character could bring others back from the dead, but couldn't perform the same feat on himself - then ascending to sit at his dad's right hand, the staple position of the most trusted. Basically, we're talking of an old religion being supplanted by a new one, the anology being a staple of these myths. Chresuz Crisp did not exist! There is not one single record of his existence, during his alleged lifetime, from the jews, Romans or any other contemporary writers! All of the stories attributed to his timline turn up decades after his alleged appearance. This matches his alleged Sun god predecessors, his own story a total mishmash of conflicting accounts, those only given credence among a small tribe of followers, requiring pope Constantine and his Council of Bishops to knock the story into some kind of plausible narrative 320 - 390 ad, omitting inconvenient books by the likes of some of the other fictitious characters, such as Judas Iscariot, Mary Magdalene, etc. We know Constantine was an ambitious individual, insofar as he re-wrote the entire NT, while excommunicating and putting to death thousands, when they initially rejected the edit, particularly his changing of the sabbath from Saturday to Sunday! It took him a couple of years to cower the followers. How do we know this? His papal Bulls, no less. There are also the notes from his Council of Bishops, his own writings, plus those of contemporary writers, as well as those by historians (Murray Hope is another writer who reconstruct the past, particularly that pertaining to religions) and it was most definitely his hand that was behind the rise in antisemitism, blaming jews for the crucification! Bottom line? I'll leave that to Mark Twain - Religion was invented when the first conman met the first fool
    2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. Now, there's a theory, held dear to my heart for quite a few decades, as to why females' immune systems are stronger than males, purely as a means of ensuring species don't die out, so it's good to hear it echoed. I have both lung disease and rheumatoid arthritis, but had no fear of covid, as I simply cut back on my autoimmune suppressants. With my systems running rampant throughout my body, I figured covid didn't stand a chance. Catch it? Doubtless I did, as I have probably done with a great many other viruses, but the immune systems did their job. They isolated it, took a small sample for the genetic library, then utterly eradicated the virus. Meanwhile, the arthritis went into flares, however, better alive was my policy and I certainly must have been asymptomatic, as I have no recollections of having possibly contracted it. Already on steroids for my lung condition, I had no fear there, either. Anecdotal evidence, but going back, when I attended the hospital, after first being diagnosed with the arthritis, quite a few years ago, I couldn't help but notice most patients were female, outnumbering we males about eight, maybe ten to one, to my mind a clear indication their immune systems were stronger, giving further weight to my pet theory. I have also posited that barometric pressure plays an important role in the onset of arthritic flares, as well as periods of difficulty with my breathing. Some consultants took me seriously, whilst others would give me bemused, indulgent looks, each time I voiced my thoughts. I didn't mind. Knowing your own body, it's weaknesses and susceptiblilities, is a useful tool for management of everyday life, never mind handling specific conditions. I'm chuffed that research is now bearing out that my idea of barometric pressure has credibility, according to results in at least one study. A most interesting video and thanks for uploading.
    1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1