Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "Jeremy Corbyn DESTROYS The Establishment" video.

  1.  @weediestbroom  I'm 100% certain you are absolutely correct.
    16
  2.  @grtcara8386  Stop taking drivel and, please, stop chewing your crayons! I'm actually cringing with embarrassment on your behalf. Smh and lmao.
    12
  3.  @geordiedog1749  You credit them with human qualities, none of which they possess. Had their smear tactics failed he'd have been made to suicide in a manner that would have discredited his reputation further than the hatchet jobs they had already subjected him to.
    11
  4. You typify a lot of folk, who lack faith in a corrupt system. I don't think, but actually know, that if he did as you suggest and started his own party not only would he have the public backing, but also the backing of the unions. Too many millions lack a voice and he's the perfect candidate to speak for them.
    8
  5. No, let him start a new socialist party, maybe aligned to the Greens, as some have suggested. Labour was infiltrated and they will never let go their grasp, so trying to fight them from within is pointless. Better a fresh start, no confusing policies and a direct goal.
    8
  6. 👏👏👏👏👍👍
    7
  7. @mulli 👏👏👏👍
    7
  8. Couldn't agree more.
    6
  9.  @grtcara8386  Stop taking drivel and, please, stop chewing your crayons! I'm actually cringing with embarrassment on your behalf. Smh and lmao.
    6
  10. Similar to the hatchet jobs they did on Neil Kinnock.
    6
  11.  @keeplovealive9882  Sadly, you have it spot on. A second smear campaign against him would likely fail and they'd have no compunction in removing him permanently to protect their own interests.
    5
  12. We desperately need soul food.
    4
  13. Ditto.
    3
  14. He's the best PM the UK never had! Edit: anyone else getting Neil Kinnock vibes?
    2
  15. I believe in the multiverses theory, so know he improved countless other realities for countless millions, when he did win, changing the entire course of politics in those worlds.
    2
  16.  @errolreilly  Neil Kinnock, as memory serves me, was also taken by them as a serious threat.
    2
  17. On the contrary, their sensibility of a future contained only themselves gaining personal power or wealth and to hell with anyone else, particularly any that might curb their selfish or misguided ambitions.
    2
  18. Public is limited to the choice they are given and msn propaganda.
    2
  19. A critical thinker. Welcome aboard, John! There are a great many others, like yourself, who need to access unbiased or censorshipped interviews of this guy and his views.
    2
  20. The Beeb has always shown bias towards paedos and zionists.
    1
  21. You, me and too few others, probably Jeremy, himself, as well. I've wondered if he decided to pursue his path, as a means of highlighting how they've stacked the system in their favour. I often consider how it might have ended for him, had their smear campaigns proven unsuccessful.
    1
  22. They'd become over confident. I hope he brought on heart attacks, ahead of their time, for many of them.
    1
  23.  @The.world.has.gone.crazy...  He was the greatest threat the establishment have faced in a great many decades, so they set about to destroy his credibility and character with assistance from many in his own party playing the role of Brutus collectively, including the pink tory/red zionist, Stammer. Jeremy's aspirations reflected public need, not private greed, so they brought him down, but that's what the lowest of the low do.
    1
  24. Just six Corporations own all of Western msn. We cannot take this from them, as it is undemocratic. All we could do was set up a truly independent Watchdog and give it teeth, so they would be required to provide proof of any spurious and false allegations, which would result in them facing punitive fines or losing a licence. Other than that I see no other means to rein them in.
    1
  25. Nah, labour is now firmly under the control of zionist/tory usurpers and they have no intention, whatsoever, of relinquishing control to socialists. He cannot change the party back from within, so better he starts his own party. The public response would be immediate. Aligning himself with the Greens would further swell membership, as well as giving the Unions party blessings. My only reservation with this idea is he'd make himself a bigger target and this time smear campaigns against him might not be considered as the only option the establishment has at it's disposal.
    1
  26.  @gillsimo5610  Why would you think it a joke, sick or otherwise?
    1
  27. Then you'll be a life long ex Labour supporter, as the party is now firmly under the control of zionist tories, disguised as socialists.
    1
  28. Unfortunately, some of us did, but could only watch the predictable car crash unfold.
    1
  29. Just watch your cost of living expenses rise exponentially; fuel, food, taxes, mortgage, etc. If they aren't real enough, hitting home and bringing personal experience and understanding, to instil inspiration within you, then it's probably best you stay in your armchair.
    1
  30.  @tom4od  Not gonna rub it in. 😂
    1
  31. Should, but won't be. That's how they set everything up, so it's only ever to their advantage; voting, laws, taxes, you name it, a stacked deck, always. They allow us our self delusion of a level playing field, as happy sheep are productive sheep.
    1
  32. The things we could've been.
    1
  33. Obliged. 👍
    1
  34. Immoral code. They wouldn't know a moral if it spat in their faces.
    1
  35. They aren't actually politicians. Fact of the matter is they are two competing teams of overseers! That's the correct title for those supervising slaves, acting as proxies for the legal owners. The second constitution should never have happened, considering the constant dire warnings of the Founding Fathers to the people to never trust their government, but trust them they did to their detriment! US Inc, as the 2nd Constitution is titled, was enacted in secret in 1871 by Grant and both parties, clearly indicating the politicians were already corrupted and in someone's pocket that far back in time. US Inc opened the door to birth certificates, 1900, the Fed, 1910, then the big sale, 1913, when 97 million folk and their former sovereign country were sold by Wilson and, again, both parties! The cartel of zionist bankers, who bought the land, goods and people, converted the entire package into a Corporation...paying taxes to the English Crown! Irony at it's most brutal. A Corporation is an ongoing business entity. Businesses are not permitted to carry the titles of countries, past or present, so the new owners dropped America from the title of their new venture, naming it plain _United States. Apologies for this long winded explanation of why I stated those running the US (without the _A) are not of political parties. Truth be told, they have no more legitimacy than the NSA, CIA, FBI, the rest of the alphabet agencies, courts, laws, etc, all being agents of the masters. Naturally, I expect you'd want to undertake your own researches to determine the truth of my claims, hence my provision of the pertinent details. Jack was the only one that never needed the approval of the legal owners to occupy the WH, having won with the backing of the Unions. Foolishly, he publicly threatened the owners. He was the plantation's last hope of winning freedom and democracy. I cried on his assassination. Jeremy is lucky, so no need of further tears from me.
    1
  36. Not as infuriating as watching it unfolding, fully aware of what they were up to and now, from a party built on socialism, it's descended into a not fully to the right, yet, watered-down tory/zionist party.
    1