Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "Hindustan Times"
channel.
-
2
-
@ahhahchuang5926
Germany has had the highest influx of refugees, so far.
It is Germany's partners in NATO and the EU that are dragging their feet.
Cast your mind back to the Axis of Evil speeches, issued by the nwo US mouthpieces.
All those countries illegally attacked, under the pretence of democracy or WMDs.
Do the research and discover which country was swamped with refugees each and every time, then you'll see the pattern emerging.
At the time Germany was riding high.
The economic giant of Europe, re-unified, too strong for the saxon nations' tastes.
Besides, they were starting to object to these unjustified wars.
How best to silence their protests, drain their economic resources, weaken their position?
Easy, just keep flooding their borders, then topple any elected govt opposing you with smear campaigns and large sums of cash to any party opposed to them and liable to see things your way.
This is how they play their game; continents, intergovernmental organisations, political parties, politicians, movers and shakers...overthrow, infiltrate and control.
Just six Corporations own all of Western msn, the nwo's propaganda dept.
WEF, including Central banks, the nwo's financial arm.
Industrial military complex, including NATO, nwo's military arm.
If you don't stack the deck you cannot guarantee to win.
Putin played a dangerous game, in the early '90s.
He borrowed an incredible sum of money from the Rothschilds to drag Russia into the 21st century.
It's all been paid back.
One of his daughters, incidently, is married into the Rothschild dynasty.
Love or cementing an arrangement, dynasties, as monarchs and Emperors once did?
That I can't tell you.
Only those involved can.
At the same time our Western economic forecaster were busy doing their magic.
They forecast the 2000, 2008 and 2025 recessions.
They were bang on target with the first two and would have been with the third, but Western greed has hastened it in, ahead of schedule, for reasons I won't go into here.
However, they said the third would be a super-recession that would dwarf all recessions in history combined!
They went on to forecast that only two countries would be able to withstand and come out the other side, more or less intact.
No prizes for guessing who have been presented to the West as their enemies, ever since.
Embargoes, then sanctions on the flimsiest pretext.
My mother never raised fools.
I've been studying and researching matters for over half a century, using the dinosaur version of google, the Dewey System, accompanied by snailmail, in the UK and airmail outside of it, for articles, books, film, corrospondence, etc, so have a more accurate picture of how we are led to the current affairs and who is nefariously connected and why.
The current leadership of most countries are nothing more than puppets, nowadays, permitted to Rob the populace blind by their masters.
Asking someone to exhort their leaders to do the right thing is like pissing into the wind; the goal cannot be achieved and the results embarrassing.
2
-
2
-
@alicenchang1944
There was a prisoner exchange, between the US and Russia, recently.
An ex US basketball player, a young woman, was swapped for a guy called Bout.
Bout is an interesting character.
Assassin, arms smuggler, arms dealer with known connections to most major terrorist organisations around the world.
A close friend of Putin's, in fact.
I'm cynical.
The recent missile attack on Russian soil struck me as a very stupid move.
US weaponry was used by Ukrainazi.
The US denied plausibility, saying they only provided the missiles and were not responsible for how the Nazis employed it.
Of course, they're absolutely correct.
In the same way Russia would not be responsible, if, say, Bout was to supply some 'nasty' Russian weaponry to one or more domestic terrorist groups in the US.
Similarly with NATO members, but, like I stated, I'm cynical.
Of course, Russia may choose to continue as they are, depleting NATO's weaponry stockpiles and watching the machinations of the member states, which will splinter the organisation from within, as costs rise and each looks to come out of the situation in Ukrainazi with as minimal a financial cost as possible.
As it stands, they have their own peoples to whom they have to justify the costs of the conflict, so far.
Then there's the extra costs to those peoples to replace all the weaponry Russia has, thus far, destroyed, via increased taxes.
Then, no doubt, military budgets will have to be increased, putting further tax burdens on those peoples.
Or Russia and OPEC could turn the screw and refuse to supply gas and oil to NATO countries, singling them out, including provisos to the countries they do supply that they cannot sell on to NATO countries.
As it is, the West is walking on a tightrope.
It is going to be hit by a super-recession that will dwarf all other previous recessions combined.
It will take it at least two decades to recover.
Russis has the means to cut the rope and watch them all plummet with no hope of recovery.
Someone cursed the West.
An adage you may know springs to mind.
That someone wished the West live in interesting times.
😉😂😂😂
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Richard Honeysett
Putin has set terms he knows Bell-endsky won't accept.
That has obviously escaped your limited attention span, as you're so busy laughing at your own pathetic joke.
Putin has, in effect, deliberately ensured the conflict will not be resolved any time soon, affording Russia the opportunity to further destroy Ukrainazi and eradicate more of the Nazis, while further depleting NATO weaponry and personnel.
Had you an IQ that reached double digits this might have occurred to you, but I somehow doubt it would have, as thinking isn't one of your abilities, nor seeing the bigger picture.
There must be a village, somewhere, sorely missing you.
😂😂😂
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
My reply to your comment has been shadow banned, because it contains a similar answer to @Jiri Svoboda, but goes into a lot more detail, all factual and researchable, however, it doesn't gel with the false 'official' narrative.
Suffice to say, those countries investing in this war have given loans to the country to the tune of BILLIONS upon BILLIONS, which will take the people many generations to pay off just the interest alone!
Effectively, they've more or less bought the country, assisisted by their man on the inside, Senselessky.
It was (and will be again, at some point in the future) one, if not the main, exporter of wheat across the planet.
He has knowingly sold the people into abject poverty for at least hundreds of years!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hg6996
Don't be so bloody naive!
What, you think Germany supplied weapons and gave cash to Ukrainazi out of the goodness of it's heart?
Like all NATO members they gave cash loans with interest.
Similarly with the weapons...given on credit!
Just how gullible are you?
The only act of charity from Germany, throughout, is the recent offer of 350 generators.
Credit where credit's due, they were the only country to make such a practical gesture.
The rest, meanwhile, offer more loans and weapons...no charity in their hearts!
No room for kindness, while they're conducting business.
Grow up and face facts; the Western governments now financially own Ukrainazi!
When the dust has finally settled, they'll be able to dictate, according to how much they invested, in the commodities Ukrainazi sells, how much, to whom and at what cost.
It is probably, when not at war, the biggest producer of wheat, across the globe, for example.
How many generations it will take for them just to pay off the interest, alone, on all those loans, is anybody's guess.
1
-
1
-
Kharkiv, where Senselessky lost 40% of his forces, by ordering them to chase after the Russians he thought were on the run, only to discover they were actually the bait in a bottleneck trap?
NATO weren't happy with General 🤡 and they were forced to recruit thousands of mercs, including ISIS/ISIL and Taliban fighters, but that still wasn't enough to replace all those dead nazis, so they supplemented them with NATO troops, Poles, to be exact, who had to swap their uniforms.
Man, you're as bad a strategist as the 🤡
Kherson, where the Russians offered to evacuate the civilians, because the 🤡 had threatened to blow up the dam above it, flooding the entire area under at least fifteen feet of water, crushing and killing everything and everyone in it's path, including his own civilians?
The good news is that the Russians evacuated 115,000 civilians, then deployed on the other side of the river.
The bad news is that it took the Azov shitbags several days, before they grew the balls to enter Kherson, at which point they began committing war crimes on their own people, those that had refused the Russian offer to relocate them!
The good news is that CNN, ardent supporters of Ukrainazi and the 🤡 were there to film the atrocities and they aired it, but are now banned for letting the world see the truth.
A piece of advice...do research in future, before posting comments...that way people won't find out just how dumb you really are.
Alternatively, continue posting comment without thinking first, as it gives folk the opportunity to laugh at your expense, like I'm doing right now.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1