Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "'We have something to answer with': Putin's chilling nuclear threat to West over Ukraine tanks?" video.

@MinutemanRadioNetwork My thoughts exactly! 👏👏👏👍 The channel owner, however, will not listen and seems only interested in subjecting the viewers to adverts to increase revenue.
4
@Ulf Skarphagen NATO, who were crowding Russia's borders with military manoeuvres, until 24th Feb, last year. Soon as Russia mobilised they shat their drawers and fled to a safe distance, like bullies, hiding behind one guy they're egging on to fight, because they're too gutless to openly fight themselves. 😂😂😂
4
@sunil kumar Iron dome is not Asian. It is israhelli and is a piece of junk! Saudi Arabia bought the system and it did not prevent Iranian missiles hitting the Saudi oil refinery, causing it to close, at the cost of billions of dollars, for two weeks, while a deal was brokered by the US. It's as useful as a chocolate frying pan. 🍳😂
2
@Pascal Ramael Kharkiv was an abbatoir. The Ukrainazis thought they had the Russians on the run. Russians do not concede ground that holds the advantage. We have seen this time and again, in this conflict. Kharkiv no longer gave Russia any advantage, would have cost lives, unnecessarily, so they withdrew and set a bottleneck trap, into which the Ukrainazis rushed to their deaths. Boobytraps, mortars, missiles, all hit them at the congestion point, at the rear, then in between. The Russians utterly decimated them and they lost over 40% of their troops! I have to assume their Western military advisors cautioned against the move, but were ignored. That left Bellendsky and NATO with a major problem of replacing the fallen. NATO began recruiting mercs from around the planet, accepting even Taliban and Al Qaueda fighters, which still wasn't enough, so they conscripted thousands of Polish soldiers into Ukrainazi ranks. Conservative estimates say at least 30,000. Yes, there have been and always will be volunteers, but their numbers are miniscule, in comparison to what was required. For at least a fortnight the majority of radio chatter was in Polish. This is how independent Western military analysts knew Kharkiv had been much worse than official statements would allow. A nearly similar incident occurred in Kherson, but wiser heads prevailed that time. Bellendsky had threaten to blow up the damn that sat above, which would have flooded the area under at least fifteen feet of water, crushing and drowning all in it's path. Again, no advantage to Russian forces, around 45,000 of them, so they withdrew, however, they offered to relocate the Ukrainian civilians first. 115,000 accepted, while the rest opted to remain. The Russians evacuated those willing to leave, then withdrew to the other side of the river and deployed. It took the Ukrainazis four days to slowly move in, destroying boobytraps, etc, but Russia didn't shell them. CNN and another channel (I can't recall their name, sorry) filmed the so-called 'Liberation', basically the locals, eyes all agog, maybe a couple of hundred of them, going to meet the troops, while the others were doing what folk normally do, in their homes, working and so forth. Hardly the heroic rescue Western msn would have everyone believe, however, bear in mind the msn is owned and controlled by just six corporations! The two channels present also filmed the Ukrainazis committing war crimes on their own people, accusing them of being Russian collaborators! As soon as Bellendsky heard he enacted a news blackout, but was too late, as CNN had already aired it and it went viral, on the Internet, within an hour! That is why no news came out for a day or two and why CNN, formerly pro Ukrainazi, Pro Bellendsky, was barred from the country. The next day Germany and a couple of other countries announced that from then on they would only provide humanitarian aid, but no arms or cash. A bit of arm twisting, once the affair was no longer prominent, saw them change their minds, though. Right now, the Ukrainazis, at this stage in the game, probably run at about 20% of their forces, while the other 80% are mercs, who stand more chance of staying alive, due to previous mliitary experience, with a small percentage of volunteers. If you want to follow what's going on check out the independent analysts or download satellite apps, four free ones on Google Apps, to witness for yourself.
2
Nonsense! Russia made public, only this week, a new missile nicknamed the tank-buster. Try not to buy into the bullshit propaganda this channel often employs.
1
@T - Bone Don't worry, they're gutless, scared of anyone that stands up to them, like Russia. Even now, they don't dare face Russia openly, preferring to hide behind LIttle Hitler's petticoats, offering him rocks to throw at Russia. Pathetic cowards without backbones. 😂😂😂
1
He has publicly stated Russia will only use it's nuclear weapons if it comes under nuclear attack. Anyone claiming otherwise is a paid Western mouthpiece spouting propaganda.
1
@ASHOK KURIAN Putin appears totally in control. That's the whole point of rhetoric.
1
Bullshit! Just report on what is being said without spouting utter drivel based on uninformed speculation. Putin has stated, categorically and emphatically, that, if under nuclear attack, Russia will use it's nuclear arsenal to retaliate and only under those circumstances! Obviously, this channel lacks researchers or you'd have known Russia possesses a conventional missile called the tank-buster, that will make short work of Leopards, Abrams and Challengers. Is this channel being run by idiots? Or are they a mouthpiece, paid handsomely, no doubt, by the US, to spread Western false propaganda?
1
@Steffi Reitsch You are totally shit at trolling, kid. I'm right in guessing you were thrown out of the Academy of Trolls and Clowns for being too stupid and substandard, aren't I? Of course I am! Just think, if your IQ had reached double digits they might have given you a controller to further your education, but, as it is, you were thrown out, alongside the garbage. Looks like the garbage collectors didn't see you, though, hiding under your rock. 😂😂😂
1
@Hibo Maxamad Risking fewer Russian lives, while depleting NATO's weaponry. Looks good from where I'm standing.
1
@andrewworth4810 Your selective amnesia is evident. NATO seemed to be on constant manoeuvres, regardless of how many troops were there then or now. Can your simple brain compute that irrefutable fact? They tried to scare Russia and Russia called their bluff. Ffs, talk about dumbed down. 😂
1
@andrewworth4810 You didn't really think your point through, before posting, did you, son. The war began back in 2008. Go and research, the Minsk and Minsk II Agreements and the roles played by Merkel and Nuland, in particular with reference to their recent public confessions that their agreements, but not implementation, was just a ploy, playing for time, while they performed military exercises on Russia's borders to intimidate, as they were training UkraiNazi troops, who intended invading Russia. Like I say, their confessions are a matter of public record having been made in the last two months. Naturally, there are more NATO forces on Russia's borders, especially in Poland, than there were a year ago, because they've used up most of their own stockpiles of weapons and munitions and are concerned Russia might have plans for more than UkraiNazi, but they have no reason to worry, as, unlike them, Putin keeps his word. You should maybe consider having a look at vids that include guys like Col. Doug Macgregor or, say, Scott Ritter to get your head out of that msn bullshit and into reality.
1
@Harold McButtface Sovereignty doesn't count, if you slaughter thousands upon thousands of your own unarmed civilians, over an eight year period, just because they speak Russian. That's war crimes, plain and simple, no matter who you are and in what country you commit them. US and UK toppled the legitimate govt of Ukraine and replaced it with a neoNazi regime and that's when this current shit began. Putin begged US, UK & NATO to prevent it. They turned a blind eye for eight years and started crowding Russia's borders with NATO troops, trying to cow and silence Putin. Now they're reaping what they sowed.
1
👏👏👏👍
1
@casey malambo Russia has a new missile,. They revealed it earlier this week, which they call tank-buster. Guess what it was designed to do? 😂😂😂
1
@Donald Grab them by the pussy Trump You forgot RiShit Ratboy Snake, the tiny, but exceedingly irritating PM of the UK, who is as statesman like as a five day old dog turd.
1
I take it you're one among the 320 million, bar a few here and there, unwitting, but legal slaves, living on the US plantation, still convinced you're free and living in a Sovereign country with an elected president and that your constitution was the only one that was enacted, or have I picked you up wrong? 😂😂😂
1
@spectrum Should rename yourself speculum, as your head is so far up your own ass you talk utter shit. 😂😂😂
1
@Peter Davis Have you always been backward, Peter, or maybe taken a few dull thuds to your head? Putin has mentioned the nuclear option only once, in the context of using them in retaliation, if Russia comes under nuclear attack first. Try, really try, to prove me wrong! You certainly didn''t witness him make any such threat in this vid, nor did he use the word. Obviously, you aren't smart enough to figure out this channel has so easily manipulated you. Earlier this week, Russia unveiled their new missile and they've given it a nickname...the tank-buster. What, you honestly imagined they'd waste nukes on a few tanks? Man, you are so dumb it's hilarious! 😂
1
@Pablo Reyes Two decades, at least, of hard times ahead for the West. Lots of folk are going to die that can't afford food, heating, even a roof over their heads, even now, but the incoming suoer-recession is going to make this the good old days, because countless millions won't even qualify for the title poverty, things will be so desperate and they'll die in even higher numbers. Population control, basically.
1
@Frans Rabie Did you swallow the propaganda about Russia running out of munitions within weeks, if not days? Hilarious, considering they'd been stockpiling for half a century. 😂 That's right, the West mistakenly believed all the old USSR munitions factories had closed, expecially once the bloc had broken up. Both Putin and Lavrov have publicly stated that Russia will only ever use the nuclear option, if Russia comes under nuclear attack itself! They are about 20-25 warheads shy of six thousand! They have hypersonic capability. Putin offered the technology to both the US and China, in order to level the field. China accepted and have their own hypersonic missiles now. The US, under that numbskull, Trump, refused. It could have been the best deal he and the US ever made, but the self-proclaimed master of the deal rejected it! Bottom line, ignore what you read by this channel and focus solely on the translation subtitles. Earlier this week Russia unveiled a new missile. They've nicknamed it the tank-buster. That was what Putin was referring to, or did you think he intended wasting nuclear warheads on a few tanks? 🤪😂😂😂
1
@Jenly Ramli That's how propaganda works, my friend...a truth or two, but mostly lies and before you know it the unwary have swallowed the lies and spread them. You know he didn't threaten to use nuclear arms, I know he didn't threaten to use nuclear arms, unless Russia comes under nuclear attack first, but some folk aren't smart enough to figure out how easily they can be manipulated.
1
@Love My life You, being a congenital imbecile, clearly do not understand Russian or the context of his words, so stop talking shit, okay?! Tank-buster. That's the nickname the Russians have given their new missile, which they revealed, earlier this week. Obviously, you know nothing about it and were trying to make yourself look clever, but have only succeeded in making yourself look ridiculous on a public, social media platform. The good news is that folk, for generations to come, for as long as the internet exists, in fact, will be able to see your comment and they will laugh at your stupidity! Like I'm doing now...😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@Pieter Van Tonder Only if you believe the propaganda being peddled by this channel. Putin unveiled Russia's new missile, earlier this week, which is nicknamed the tank-buster, as it was specifically designed to do just that. The idiotic speculation that Putin was talking of a nuclear confrontation is utter nonsense and totally irresponsible, but I' ve come to expect little better from this channel and their devious slant on some events.
1
@radio9 Gremlin, little troll? I see you now project your father onto those you hate. Such bitterness filling such a tiny little mind. 😂😂😂
1
@Mao Narin 😂😂😂😂 Study Ukraine from 2012, until now. Research the subject with an unbiased view and you will learn enough to laugh at your own comment.
1