Comments by "jorge luis barrios mur" (@jorgebarriosmur) on "Russia Storms Strategic Krasnohorivka u0026 Chasiv Yar" video.

The problem I see, is that this war is actually PROFITABLE for the russian average people, who have seen their wages increased, and are no in a full-employment scenario, while, the only ones dying in Ukraine are "volunteers", wich seems acceptable for the russian public opinion. So, at the end of THIS war, Putin will have a thriving economy based on war-time production, and around 500.000 battlehardened veterans with nothing to do..........What could possibly go wrong? Not that I think they would attack any NATO-member, but there are some ex-soviet republics in the Caucasus and Asia that will be probably "invited" to re-join a "greater union" under Putins leadership........
1
They will conquer all the territory they want once the cohesion of the ukranian army collapses do to their heavy losses........ But Ukraine simply dosen`t seem to get it. They insist in defending positions till they are LITERALLY undefendable, without any regards for their own losses........ They should aim to inflict as many losses as possible to the attacking russians, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, keeping their forces as intact as they can, even if this means retreating as soon as the reatio of losses is no longer "profitable" for them. Even if they manage to inflict heavy losses to the russians, if they get their own forces depleted in the process, it is a victory for Russia, because Russia can replace their lost manpower, while Ukranine is reaching a point where they have problems to do so, and mantain the quality of their fighting units........ Just look at the oposite forces: Russia is able to attack ANYWHERE at the same time, because their REGULAR TROOPS are capable of cunducting offensive actions, while the ukranians can only counterattack when (and where) they send their elite troops, with the rest of the ukranian army basically filling the gaps and offering a tempting oportunity for a russian attack.
1