Comments by "Curt Gevert" (@curtgevert5664) on ""Grand Theft Government": Federal Workers Send SOS over Musk's DOGE, Mass Firings u0026 Service Cuts" video.

You tried that before, Trump got stronger
6
Impeach for what?
5
So far what trump is doing is constitutional
4
btw 77 million americans wanted this so bad they voted for trump
4
for what?
3
@ Are they over 120 years old?
3
@ Brush up on Article II Section 1 of the US Constitution.
3
I have a similar background soldier and federal LE, I had also worked for several contractors. I can confirm what you're saying. I have seen the same things and then some. Friends have confided into seeing illegal stuff that was reported to IG, who did nothing.
3
@ Well 75,000 accepted, paid resignations. Probationary employees can be let go at any point during their probation period. If you truly paid attention to what I said, let me repeat, THERE IS TALK, TALK, TALK, of each taxpayer getting $5k whether or not it happens, we will wait and see.
3
@ So how does cancelling social security for 200 year old people imperil your social security? Continuing those payments does more damage.
2
What lesson would that be?
2
Yes, but a lot of it's staff is civilian DOD employees.
1
Try it in 4 years
1
@ Why?
1
what for?
1
@royharper2003 and both were garbage, you need 2/3rds in the senate, where are you gonna get that? Also, he was elected by popular vote and college vote, few Republicanw are gonna vote for another impeachment
1
@sheepwshotguns42 Why does USAID need a SCIF and access to National Security information, if all they do is run programs for the needy?
1
@ I think the bull in the china shop works fine
1
54% of americans approve of Pres. Trump, so apparently not.
1
@royharper2003 a lot are paid resignations. It's already improving life for amreicans if there is talk of each taxpayer getting $5K
1
@royharper2003 Boy oh boy you getting all worked up over a speculative talk
1
@ Simple question, asking what "lesson" you need to take from Mangione
1
@ What is the lesson you speak of?
1
@ For example
1
@ How was he trying to change the 14th Amendment? Impounding appropriated funds is allowed under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution and further in the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. Again under Article II he can zero out an agencies employees and remove employees, he is the head of the executive branch, so he has full authority under Article II over the executive branch agencies.
1
@LiamRappaport Birthright citizenship needs to be clarified by SCOTUS. If you read the legislative history if the 14th Amendment along with the commentary by the drafters of the amendment, it was never intended to convey birthright citizenship. The EO restores the original meaning at the time the amendment was drafted. Either way I do think SCOTUS should examine it in detail so that the confusions that have distorted the original intent can be cleared up.
1
@LiamRappaport In what rulings? If you're talking about United States v. Wong Kim Ark, (1898), the circumstances of that case are not the same as the circumstances of the EOs. Wong Kim Ark was born to lawful residents of the US, therefore he was a US citizen that was wrongfully denied entry into the US. LAWFUL, is the important part of that.
1