Comments by "thewaytruthandlife" (@thewaytruthandlife) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ooh what a laugh..... what a message......just a pissed off scientist blew her gasket....
    1
  2. dear sabine I wrote a little paper in which I comment on this Idea of decoherence: www.academia.edu/44216319/Quantized_Quantum_Decoherence_and_its_consequences_for_objects_and_some_more_issues or www.researchgate.net/publication/344454382_Quantized_Quantum_Decoherence_and_its_consequences_for_objects_and_some_more_issues
    1
  3. 3:05 part II here watch this movie at 5:25 and beyond: "Transformations - Revival - Almolonga Guatemala" A woman with gangrene in her intestines was instantly healed after 1 prayer for her health. She lives to tell the story. now THAT factually means God MUST have altered the tissue structures to the utmost deepest level of change. Turning bad chemicals and destroyed tissue into healthy ones instantaneously. We don’t know how that happens.
    1
  4. own power : see where that led us....so far war, rapes, murder, drugs addictions, terrorism, house vilocence, boose abuse. incest, theft, violence, nucleair weapons, molestation, environmental problems, animals being driven to extiction, gay sex with aids and so on. polution , climate problems, poverty wolrd wide, desertification due to deforestation etc etc etc etc etc...
    1
  5. 7:45... well abiogenesis is highly unscientific.... it keeps promissing stuff without delivering the real deal proof... living cells (exactly as we know them) that can mutate to higher organisms like a worm (exactly as we know them) made from nothing more then starting from bare elements.
    1
  6. 3:10 No relativity does NOT predict its own demize whith respect to the big bang... since there WAS never a big bang.... Thing is the big bang theory is incorrect. of course this is NOT accepted by secular science THATS why you people think the theory fails... but no it is your pre assumptious idea's BLOCK the ways of clear thinking... for that matter your religious atheistical thinking BLOCKS the way of CORRECT scientific thinking.. Your assumptions that a big bang MUST have occured induces a cascade of all kinds of false assumptions due to which some of your theories go wrong as well. There was no such thing as a big bang or abiogenesis/evolution. Why ?? simple In the Beginning GOD CREATED heaven and earth and all that in them is... so there can never have been a big bang... Just as Jesus created the best wine ever from water.... just as people get healed in Jesus's name even today... people get healed from cancers, deafness, blindness, gangreen and even DEATH to this VERY DAY !!!!
    1
  7. at least....
    1
  8. next to this all the big bang is NOT a realistic model of reality. it may seem so but it is not...there are way to much objections against it. like how can galaxies at the edge of the universe look so mature while in fact they should look so young, but they do not. why havent some celestial objects NOT cooled of it had supposedly serval nbillions of yrs yet they are still warm even so that magnetic fields can exist and even for very small objects ??? doesnt make sense. how did the 1st stars form from nothing but H and He ?... gasses dont gravitate into themselves.
    1
  9.  @michaelanderson4849  I happen to be a scientist (chemistry&physics) and based on science I tell you gasses do NOT spontaneously implode on themselves. and things cool off way to rapid to be still warm today IF there billions of yrs and THAT is the whole issue... THEERE ARE NO BILLIONS OF YRS God created this universe ONLY 6000 yrs ago and correct science confirms this
    1
  10.  @michaelanderson4849  best you have ????? that lying crap.....?
    1
  11. 3:14 you cannot explain how God works and its non of your business How God works. those secrets God keeps to Himself as He pleases.
    1
  12. God has a free will we are created in His Image.. so we have a free will....simple....
    1
  13. Yes you have a FREE will, why ? simple your body is submitted to your spirit/soul.... something science can hardly grasp... spirit and sould are not materialistic and no mattrer how science tries to couple quantum effect to consiousness... our spirit and soul have NO connection with materials and does NOT come forth from matter in no way.... so THAT makes that our soul and spirit are FREE from physical laws. THERFOR we do have a free will. the MECHANISMS in our body are NOT free from naturalistic laws... agreed... BUT they are submitted to our spirit and soul Where does spirit and soul comes from ... yes God gave them to us....as the Bible clearly teaches.... that we are body, spirit and soul, 3 in 1, Just as God is 3 in 1. And science is unable tocomprihend soul and spirit.... it can understand body for a small deal but sul and spirit are a total mistery for science and HOW do we know scinetifically that what I say is CORRECT ???? well simple STUDY ... Near Death Experiences.... and NO they cannnot be explained by lack of oxygen OR hormoes etc etc etc there IS no materialistic explanation for what happens there in the moments of dying. THERFOR everything you say about free will is totaly INCORRECT....
    1
  14. There is a lot of bending of the space-time grit on Sabine must be a lot of gravity, not black holes though.... just waiting for the gravitaional waves of the merger...
    1
  15. 15:50 damaging my body (my property) by means of radiation is EQUALLY not a "legitimate respons". So people who are burning antenna's are simply returning the favor of damaging our property / goods / bodies.... there are people who gained cancer by wearing mobile phones on their bodies.. meaning that radiation used by mobile phones are NOT healthy therefor it IS kind of legitimate to return the damaging "favor". NDont get me wrong I am NOT active as such, but I do understand their antenna damaging actions.... mobile phone compagnies damage our goods (our bodies) so THESE people damage THEIR GOODS (the antenna) an eye for an eye an tooth for a tooth....an antenna for our health....
    1
  16. your argumentation would be close to correct IF AND ONLY IF we would be nothing more than atoms.... and thus nothing more than chemical "clockwork" BUT we are NOT ONLY chemical clockwork.... for example WHY IF we would be nothng more that chemical clock have come into ecxistence by pure random processes (abiogenesis) would we want to defend our existence ???? why would we fight against death...?? IF you are correct .... our lifes are nothing more then emotionless machines happening to be here by indifferent random processes so why care to exist at all or defend our existence ?? doesnt make sense IF we are no more than chemical clockwork Itr ONLY makes sense IF we are Created with a materialistic body and a non-materialistic soul and spirit THEN it make sense since THAN and ONLY than our lives have a purpose which we want to achieve and THEREFOR we fight to survive.... to fulfill the sense of existing
    1
  17.  Hilmar Zonneveld  It would only make sense because in THAT case we have a drive to live and survive it gives meaning to life and something worth fighting for. IF we are no more then chemical clockwork then why defend our life against attackers we would then be nothing more then food to sustain the life of other organisms. we would be here just by coincidens without any purposeand being alife or not would not matter at all so why fight ... it would be nothing more then exchange of nutrients... and sustaining life in general. but NO living organisms defend themselves in order to stay alive..... why ???? if it is only chemistry ? there is no usefullness to defend yourself IF it is no more then nutrient exchanging.... you would be happy to be recycled in an other organism.... but no thats NOT what we see.... And we are not more than the sum of the lose components. we ONLY have added value due to the fact that we have a soul and spirit. which is worth defending. which only make sense it THAT aspect is given by a Creator who gave us this soul and spirit AND gives us a reason to fight for.... namely IF one dies our soul and spirit end up in either HEAVEN (worth FIGHTING for) or HELL worth fighting AGAINST... the whole good and evil COMES from this .... other wise fighting to stay alive would totaly make no sense ONTOP of this we humans are the ONLY advanced organisms exactly as God tells us in the bible in genesis... rule over the world and submid her (in the sense of take care of her) and YES If we are no more than chemicals there is no emotion attached to it.... just as a rock doesnt care what happens to it... chemicals are no more than dead material whoch doesnt care if it part of a living body or not... thats why individual cells exchange chemicals all over the place as our sanitairy system testifies. look at virussses... they are the closest things inbetween life and being simple chemical mechanisms/chemical robots.... They dont care what happens to the body of an infected person and that it dies ... EVEN if that means that they can not exist beyond that if they kill their host they dont care even IF that means that they have no place to go next.... THAT is how "life"would be without soul/spirit. and in this period of our existance this should be very obvious with the corona thing
    1
  18.  Hilmar Zonneveld  The ONLY thing you said is that the sum of all chemicals is MORE than the lose chemicals And what has survival for meaning otherwise than there MUST be a reason to survive .. chemicals have NO purpose to create life and they didnt chemicals left on them selves NEVER Create life... as abiogenesis falsy claimes: watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU7Lww-sBPg&t=1180s Like I said before otherwise what would there be against it to be part of a living blob that does nothing more than exchange nutrients.... so be happy then to be eaten by a lion... according to sabine and youj you are nothing more than an exchange of nutrients.... be happy ever after to be a part of eating and also BEING eaten... but NO that is NOT what life strives for... we all strive for survival and YES it does prove God... ONTOP of all proof via Near Death Experineces (NDE)....and No...... lack of oxygen or hormones is NOT what causes that, if you STUDY that subject out you know that that is NOT what causes it... what do people see in NDE's a heaven ly place OR a hellish place... INDEPENDANT of their religious back ground.... and ontop of way much more stuff that ONLY point to Gods existence..... We have a higher purpose: getting into heaven; THAT is why there is a srtuggel and fighting for LIFE.... just in order to get you into heaven... and satanm wants you in hell torturing you... so there is your struggle fight for life... THAT is our purpose..... God wants us in heaven... and NO that is NOT wishfullthinking it is reality !!!! you may not LIKE or BELIEVE it but it is true non the less correct wishing something doesnt always make it true.... BUT with respect to our lives .. we are here by divine intervention.... God CREATED US. There is also NO OTHER way how we came here..... NO BODY has created artificial life ever since Hutton, Lyell, Darwin..... proving life did NOT emerged spontaneously.... sorry you may indeed wish that and EVEN call it science but it is not.....that is reality
    1
  19.  Hilmar Zonneveld  what is so immoral about the bible ??? please tell me ? mostly peoples Idea's of the biblical immorality is based on misunderstanding of the situiations.... so please tell me where is the bible immoral ???? I never came across immorality in the bible from Gods part and I read it & understood it more than once... so please tell me
    1
  20.  Hilmar Zonneveld  you want proof for God... no you dont... you only come here to ridicule God/Bible and christianity and people like me even if you ahve to lie for it.... you simply hate God and all that God stands for based on NOTHING.... simple BLIND hatred.... and eventually out of ignorance and lack of knowledge with respect to God.
    1
  21.  Hilmar Zonneveld  OOH then why have Rocks no life in them other then real life bacteria, insects or why doesnt the air or why is there no life on other planets they are ALL a bunch of elements gathered and bound together.... yet dont have life in them .... so your argument is silly at best..... no reproduction ??? well without that they are simpy being eaten and contribute in THAT way for sustainig your idea of life.... reprodcution is NOT important IF your vision of life is correct.... just participating even by being eaten is then enough..... no reproduction needed.. simpy existing is then enough... very machine like...... yes NDE's DO prove our purpose in life..... since it does give us a view in what lays beyond ... after we physically die..... and it shows us heaven .... or hell... which confirms the bible..... even over all ages..... You see Jeroen Bosch alredy in the 1500's painted the tunnel and meeting of beings of light in an either heavenly environment OR in a hellish environment... so it not only matters but it is over all ages.... so proven to be very relevant including in our discussion..... I dont admit what I do not agree with... so why would I ??? our purpose in life is THE most impoirtant question is these kind of discussions.... and our purpose in life is given to us by God..... Proving God created us; all aspects of our lives match with what the Bible tells us about it. also the way life is constructed proofs that ONLY a higher being could have made it.... it is infinitly too complex to emerge spontanioulsy...... for example read this: https://www.academia.edu/42979330/Is_mathematical_probability_the_same_as_physical_reality_the_power_of_the_average_and_how_life_began bunch of claims..... well that must be familiar then..... secular science doenst do any different..... they even claim we emerged from chemicals without delivcering the proof for it evers since darwin, Hutton, lyell presented their silly idea's so I am going to challenge you: 1) make us living cells (exactly as we know them) from the bare elements (CHNOSPCaNaK etc) 2) let them evolve into higher organisms like a worm (exactly as we know them) a) first or parallel in the laboratory as proof of concept b) second or parallel in real life as abiogenesis/evolution suggests has happend. You see IF LIFE is no more than a chemistry process. then science demands it to repeat it. Seculars tell us that this is scinece ... OK then do it again.... that is doing real science.....
    1
  22. 1:46 I hear you were there when this all supposedly happend ????
    1
  23. It is chaos but still deterministic .... right ??? Well there lays our problem, we cannot measure accurately enough to make it deterministic.... next to that even measuring is influencing the meaurements as the 2 slit experiment clearly shows us..... so there is a limit to our predictibility....and due to Heisenberg that always remain that way....
    1
  24. 4:03-4:35 Ones consiousness is NOT part of our physical world but of the spiritual realm. it does NOT com forth from the materialistic interactuions of atoms/molecules. After one dies his atoms are rearranges but his spirit/soul goes beyond to the spirit realm with God. one becomes an angelic like being. And there is where your consiousness is originated. it has nothing to do with materialistic things. absolutely nothing.
    1
  25. Gravity must have a quantum basis to be gravity... and do its thing since gravity emerges from a whole bunch of quantum particles... wave functions must have to do something with it since a partcile can be most accurately described as a wave function. there is no other option. that we dind find the correct solution yet doesnot mean that its not there. Just as Newton was encapsulated within Einsteins theory so a gravitational quantum theory must also encapsulate Einsteins theory....there is no other option
    1
  26. 5:10 no the quantum effects do not disappear they may chance to other quantum states but the quantum effects never disappear... since .... why would there be quantum effects to begin with.... You see quantum states alter due to interaction. Just as in qauntum entanglement. Entanglement is a way in which quantum states can change due to interactions with other objects. A measurement of a quantum behaving particle with a large instrument simply chances the quantum state WF1 of the particle into a quantum state WF2 but WF2 <<<<< WF1 because of the sheer size of the measurment instrument. So basically quantum states constantly chance due to interactions no matter how small. THAT is why entanglement experiments are so sensitive due to environmental influences. To TEST this an experiment can be designed as such: https://www.academia.edu/37049597/Collapse_or_not_to_collapse_that_is_the_question_verification_or_reject_the_interaction_of_a_wavefunction_with_a_detector_docx Let there be a 2 slit set up including an observer (*) to watch where the particle goes. The result a 2 blob pattern. Meaning that the interference patern is changed due to interaction with an measuring device. Now make extremely sure that the measuring device (*) is extremely small so that its debroglie wavelength of it is small but still measureable. Put behind 1 of the blobs another hole for a repeating the 2 slit experiment for interference and behind that a detection screen. Predicted result: the interference pattern will re-appear BUT way much smaller as in the order of magnitude of the observation instrument (* which has ben made extremely small !!) ....IF ....I am correct ( I may not be but OK...we might see that) then the wavelength/function must have SHRUNK to the smaller (in the order of magnitude of the extreme small measuring instrument) wavelength. Not collapsing BUT shrinking !!!! due to interactions and thus simply altered. This should result in a wave interference pattern that coud have been obtained by particles that have a similar wavelength as the deBroglie of the extreme small instrument has (*). I know technically this is a challenge... how to make an measuring instrument with such an extreme small dimensions/mass (*). But nowadays in the IBM moving atoms ("a boy and his atom" youtube.com/watch?v=oSCX78-8-q0&t=3s ) era this should be possible.... difficult but possible non the less.
    1
  27. so in 100% of the situations there are no aliens...which makes sense since abiogenesis / evolution are a non existing and are from the realm of pseudo science. even here on earth people have never a) made living cells (exactly as we know them !!!) from the bare elements (CHNOPS CaKNa etc) b) Never had these cells evolve to gigher organisms lets say a worm (extacly as we know them).
    1
  28. Its pretty simple humanity will not go extinct, but will strongly be reduced in a short while (<100 Years) why well since humanity has become wicked "as in the days of Noah" as the bible teaches us. Meaning God /Jesus christ will come back soon (donty know when.. only He knows) and He will wipe out the majority of people who didnt listen to Him via the bible. People will be more seldom than gold as Jesaja teahces us, som max about 3 million people will remain. This will happen in most probably the next maximum 100 Yrs or sooner. And then Jesus has returned and He will reign earth for 1000 yrs and then He will destroy the entire universe as is predicted in 2 peter 3:10-12 and confimred by science via the unstable (meta stable) Higgs field.
    1
  29. 10:22 "in science its evidence that counts and not opinion".... wow that is or would be a worlds first.... well how about where we came from .... that one is loaded with false opinions and unscientific statements like abiogenesis and evolution......
    1
  30.  @RoninTF2011  there is absolutely NO proof for evolution what so ever. All can perfectly explained by the destruction of the genetic code by mutative agences.... You try to avoid them like the pest why ? because you know that mutative agences will destroy your health. It makes you sick, it destroys your immune system, gives you (food) allergies, syndrome of down etc And that is what mutative agences will do ... destroy and destruct. THAT is the only thing that has factually been observed. There is NOTHING constructive with respect to mutations, since the driving forces of mutations are highly destructive. BUT that is exactly where the silly idea of evolution is based upon.....that mutations would be constructive.....but they are simply NOT !!! But If you dont believe that then feel free to get mutations and see how you will "evolve". Dont blame me for warning you....
    1
  31.  @RoninTF2011  nope only 10 minutes ago....as a scientist its my job to stay on top of it.... unlike yourself seemingly.... you got your nose still stuck in the comic book section...
    1
  32.  @RoninTF2011  ooh did I ?? well let me tell you there is nothing wrong with my knowledge in these fields.... and all of the correct findings in these fields all confrim what the bible teaches us. The only sad thing is that this goes against all you might have learned on the public schools....why ? well since you have been lied to by the mainstream secular science community. They've duked you my dear fellow. As they have done so many years with me untill I found out the truth behind it all.... and they keep on doing so just to get their evil ways (in order to kill people).... thats how it works my friend.
    1
  33.  @RoninTF2011  and I dont care what you THINK you know about me.... I realy dont.... sadly enough people like you never choose to believe the truth to begin with.... sad but true.....well I hope you come around in the end.... and if not well too bad then....then at least my conciousness is clean towards you...
    1
  34.  @RoninTF2011  well lets test your smartness then with respect to evidence based statements. I challenge you: 1) make us living cells (exactly as we know them) from the bare elements (CHNOP etc etc) 2) let these cells evolve to higher organisms lets say a worm (exactly as we know them) a) first in the lab as proof of concept b) then in real life as supposedly happend in real life...
    1
  35.  @RoninTF2011  well yes God gave us many things for proof a whole book (the Bible) full. It is full of statements that we can see happening in the past present and future.... which indirectly proof God is really real....ontop of that God is an interactive God who ineracts with us on a daily basis.... so stating that God is not real is simply not true... you may not beiev it, because you dont KNOW God. But I hope to change that with Gods help..... you see God wants you to go to heaven and not to hell... and thats why guys like me are here for....its up to you in the end whether that is going to happen in the end or not.... you see its your choice in the end to go to heaven and your choice to go to hell... no body will push you into heaven... it is by YOUR own free choice....
    1
  36.  @RoninTF2011  Ok what is so disgusting about: love your fellow man, forgive the people who tresspass against you ? dont steal, dont lie, honour your farther and your mother. what is so disgusting about that ??? please explain !
    1
  37.  @RoninTF2011  well lets test you geology knowledge: How did the grand canyon form and how old is it ?
    1
  38.  @RoninTF2011  well all is nice bits. a woman who is married to you is your property as you are hers.....you belong to eachother.... condoning slavery ? well you condone slavery as well..... you are a slave of your own sins... and you buy stuff that is produced by slavery.... even to this very day. where does God sanction rape murder pillaging ??? show me.... and well where is the proof of making a living cell from elements and let that on evolve to a worm ??
    1
  39.  @RoninTF2011  of course I read it... couldnt find what you accusing it off....that cannot be logically explained.... and yeah if you are married you belong to each other, no sugar coat.... its a fact you sign for it in a marriage contract too.... your marriage document is a mutual ownership document..... adultery is touching another mans/womans property.... !!!! so considered theft ..... for which one has to pay a dept in one way or the other.... many judges can testify of that as well.....
    1
  40.  @RoninTF2011  where is your answer about the living cell from elements pal ... so far I answered your questions/objections so its fair to start to answere mine.... or do you lack that knowledge......
    1
  41.  @RoninTF2011  dont see the problem there so please adress the problem .... be more specific
    1
  42.  @RoninTF2011  yeah so ? whats your point ? have you also read the part where the midjanites mistreated Israel ? I guess not ... The midianites behaved very nasty towards the Israelites EVEN after the israelites being friendly to them.... read numbers chapter 22 to chapter 25 ...but you seem to forget that part.....as most of you bible scoffers do. ALL the people that rose against Isreal were defeated since they attacked Israel without any cause.... and thus being evil against Israel and thus against Israels God..... Israels God who IS the CREATOR of the entire universe .... including you .... You see EXACTLY the same happening TODAY.... ALL countries that attack Israel TODAY are being punished JUST as in the days of OLD.... exacty as God promissed in zacharia 14 verse 3. YOU CANNOT HURT Israel/the Jews without being destroyed yourself.. you see that ALL over History..... because you are not fighting against ISRAEL... but against GOD Himself.... your creator.... If you THINK you can fight your Creator... you will unavoidably LOSE !!!! always !!!! As you see happening in the middle east right as we speak. Watch the news broadcasts and see how all countries around Israel always LOSE their fights against Israel... ALWAYS !! why well simple God fights FOR Israel/the jews. God, the creator of this Universe is the God of Israel and who ever will stand opposing God is opposing his own very life..... so on whoms side are YOU ON my friend ???? learn the lesson quickly and well for your own good. God has NOT changed
    1
  43.  @RoninTF2011  with respect to the grand canyon; well got some news for you watch this from 9:00 to 14:40 you actually might learn something: www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_OlX7M5MLA
    1
  44.  @RoninTF2011  op top of this I like to point you to your own inconsisency with repsect to life and death you should NOT care as a true atheist or secular individual for the midjanites..... I mean according to you folks we came here by pure accident, right ?, with moralless random processes that you call abiogenesis/evolution. Even you BELIEVE that death has caused life to develope, costing billions of lives of all kinds of animals/humans over unprovable millions of yrs..... and NOW you all of a sudden you care about what the bible says about the midjanites ??????? Well you didnt care about the billions of lives of animals/humans that your silly idea of evolution supposedly required so why now care for the midjanites ???? dont you think that is hypocrite ????
    1
  45.  Bertrand de Born  are you always so unpolite by calling people idiots before you even know them ????? well you know what they say......... it takes one ...... to know one
    1
  46. sabine sabine sabine..... so smart.... yet SO ignorant.....well the Bible propheszised it already.... professing themself to be wise they became "silly" (very politely translated) from the Romans letter chapter 1 verse; 22
    1
  47. 2:51 there lays the problem..theory and reality diverts here. what matters is that in reality it is NOT reversible. You cannot undough your dough. It will be dough from that moment on (untill you bake it ...PS... was it a good pie/cake ?? in other words are you a good cook ???)
    1
  48.  @Dragrath1  because there is no evolution..... its just simply created that way. same with the chicken egg problem.... which was first ? well it is solved by God creating a chicken able to lay eggs ... no evolution needed.
    1
  49.  @picksalot1  why do nuts ?
    1
  50.  @wolfgangsimons9183  Nuts ? why do you call me nuts ??? I am not unpolite to you so stay polite to me.. that fact that you dont agree with me is no argument to call me names right !!! well you think I am nuts in discarting abiogenesis/evolution OK then I am challenging you: a) make me living cells (exactly as we know them !) from the bare elements (CHNOPCaKNa etc) b) let these cells evolve in to higher organisms lets say a worm (exatcly as we know them 1) first or parallel in the lab as proof of concept 2) Second or parallel in real life as supposedly happend supposedly billions of yrs ago. succes.... prove to us we are wrong, Nobody has seen evolution happening. Not the slightest bit. variation yes that has been observed, mutations yes they have been observed... evolution has NOT been observed and is NOT part of CORRECT science. it is NOT existing except in text books and in the minds of misled people (as you are). and my advice read these: https://www.academia.edu/42979330/Is_mathematical_probability_the_same_as_physical_reality_the_power_of_the_average_and_how_life_began https://www.academia.edu/39311403/Life_An_update https://www.academia.edu/38591420/The_4th_law_of_thermodynamics_docx
    1