General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

thewaytruthandlife
Veritasium
comments

Comments by "thewaytruthandlife" (@thewaytruthandlife) on "Veritasium" channel.

agreed... but how to solve it ?
8
thats is the whole point... your Life is NOT MEANINGLESS... God made you... GOD is the ONLY Person who could have made this increadably genious mechanisms... so your LIFE is NOT meaningless... YOU have a PURPOSE..... your life does have a meaning... God did create you for a reason....and that reason you can find via Jesus Christ...... go for it....
5
Juno Donat simple: since abiogenesis/evolution never could have done this, not over bilion s of billions of billion of years. It si simply TOO ingeneous... so God has done it... and what you see is designed by God/Jesus.... that is why we are here.....
5
Juno Donat debunking God can ONLY be done by accepting lies about God, there is no other way..... thus factually untrue... and you see God is undebunkable.....He is real.... people are easily misled by false information and satan is the kind of false information and lies.... If you believe God is debunked than you have chosen to accept lies about God...
4
Dear Derek, where did you get your cro cooler and what did it cost (if I may be so rude/blunt) ???
4
OK i like this way of reasoning. but from this point of view I ask you diamonds and dinosaurbones are said to be millions of yrs old c14 is detectable only till a max of 60.000 to 90.000 ys old objects why do we still find C14 in diamonds and dinosaur bones??? dinosaurs are said to have been wipes out 60-70 million yrs ago it is being said that humans came to be only about 3 million yrs ago maximum why then do we still find drawings and carvings of dinosaur like animals on all kinds of human artworks world wide ? (ankor wat temple cambodja 800 yrs old, Ica burial stones, just to name a few) it is being said that earth layers form over millions of yrs yet we do find earth layers that have been deposited in matter of hours or days (mt st helens, tsunami deposits, surtsey island). it is being said that continents are 100's of million yrs old yet englands and australia's and frances coast is eroded away meters per year. it is being said that animals like the coulancanth, dragonflies, daddy longlegs, frogs lived 100's million yrs ago, yet we see them unchanged as living fossils and so in fact could have ended up in any earth layer you dug up.... it is being said that dinosaurs lived 60-70 illionyrs ago yet still fresh blood tissues and blood cells are being found in dinosaur bones with enough c14 to measure it is being said that living cells (as we know them) originate from 100% dead materials/chemicals and that these evolved into higher organisms like lets say worms (as we know them) Yet science has never ever reproduced ths proces to the full More surprisingly it is that in chemistry an newly found synthesis route can only be recognised scientifically, when it is reproduced by other scientists.... This has been standard procedure for every chemical around to day... EXCEPT for the chemistry of our origens.... it is the countre tests and proof to explore the validity that makes a theory interesting you kind of said in this video... about which I agree. but why does that go for all kinds of theories EXCEPT when the theory deals with our origens ???? einstein said one day when he was interviewed and people held in front of him that if 100 would oopose his theory that it was a worthless theory then einstein replied back ooh 1 was enough..... why does that go for all kind of science subjects EXCEPT when it deals with our origens ????
3
Want to Change Name but Cant Decided yet 雪乃鷹だ yes there is an absolute: God-Jesus Christ of the Bible is the absolute standard to live up to. The whole human endeavours, how well meant is full of flaws.
3
Juno Donat life didnt need a starting point ?????????? sorry ????? since its chemical reactions ??? what ???? are you realy that simple ???? evidence ?? please tell me where... ?? never seen it ..... ooh Yeah God is emperically been proven to be factual..... there is so muc evidence that He is real.... man... the movie above is just one of it.... ooh yea there are tests you can do yourself at home..... read the bible and keep track of history and the news.... you see in the bible God gave us prophesies.... and ALL you can test them yourself.....you see there are about 3000 prophesies, of which about 2500 have already been fullfilled and about 500 are for the future and some of them you CAN see them being fulfilled RIGHT as we speak.... so test material enough.. BUT let me guess... you do NOT WANT it to be true....... but that is no argument of God not BEING fatcually true... you see Gods existence does NOT depent on your believe in Him.... He does NOT disappear because you dont believ in Him.. either God is there for real or He isnt as simple as that... there is no other choice... and coming/bringing up many other gods is simply the same as saying that the ONE and only TRUE God of the bible isnt real and just a mental thing of humans....so it falls in the category of denial of God being real.... you see ther IS only ONE God ... nothing else..... the other "gods" are nothing more than demons pretending to be God.... and yeah they have some power.....IF YOU GIVE it to them. the fact that the world is a mess is because people refuse to accept the ONE and ONLY true God Of the Bible... that means people prefer t follow demons (the so called other "gods" ) in stead of God.... even YOU choose to follow other gods.... you may not know or realize it but you do.....
3
and how on earth can one BELIEVE that such an highly advanced machinery just evolved by nothing more than unitelligent random processes as abiogenesis and evolution suggests.... man, nature can not even cook up a radio transmittter or a pen or a metal pot to cook food in it.. yet "science" BELIEVES it can create this by pure random processes... how unscientifical. and pure sillyness. No folks God created the heaven and the earth and all that in them is. including you.. you are not here by accident... and as you can see you even to the most teeny tiniest level are DESIGNED this way.
3
NOPE THERE IS NOT ! Random processes without intelligence can only be destructive and not creative. especially things like mutations are driven by desytructive forces (cosmic radiation decay of chemical elements UV light etc) and we all avoiud them since they lead to cancers and other sicknesses. natural processes ponly decay us; thats why people have more deseases liek alergies and immune deseases. because mutations breaks our bodies down instead of building them up.
2
nope the opposite is true... NOT believing in God is dumbing us down... recently it was found that people are getting less smarter these days, more than people get smarter in the previous 50 yrs. and this goes hand in hand with more people losing their faith in God.... churches are runing empty more and more etc... the coutries that have been most succesfull over all ages are the ones that were christian or jewish... eversince the biblical religions were soem where in a region the people got smarter and more in advance and ahead in reinging ruling. Europe has accepted christianity since about 2000 yrs and were ruling the Globe.... but now that they leave christianity they are loosing grip knowledge wise, politicaly economically ect etc. most nobel prize winners are christians
2
Juno Donat indeed the devil is willing to destroy it any way he can.... and due to our/your sinning he has also got the legal right to damage your body and thus make you sick.....
2
@billkeithchannel first proof the earth is flat.... it isnt... watch the video's made from the ISS... it proves a spherical earth....over and over and over again...
2
Juno Donat well dont worry... IF for some reason ... you will NEVER change your mind on this before you die (yes..... BEFORE !!! you die.. not after you die... since then it will be TOO late !!!) .... then you will meet with the devil yourself ... when he comes to torture you or some of his demons.... so one day you WILL find out its not mythical but more real that you want it to be.... so lets see how mythical you then think about them...... you see there are 2 options either God but also the devil are real ..they exist for real or they do not... there are no other options. Now it turns out to be that they ARE factually real.... that is why this world is so well and super highly organized on one hand (Gods input see the above movie.. that can ONLY be designed very carefully and put together miticulously) .... but on the other hand that we are able to make a mess of it ... due to satans influence on us and in our lives and our FREE CHOICE to listen to his lies..... so if you end up in hell it is by your own free choice NOT to listen to God.... you see ...our universe ....but also living organisms (see above movie again) are so highly organiszed that can only mean that there MUST be a God who cooked this all up.... there is no other realistic option. it wold be strange to you if only a bunch atoms due to some energy input would get organized to a space shuttle or cray super computer right ??? these objects ahve also been designed and created by human hands... well our bodies are even far far afr more advanced than the sapce shuttle or a cray super computer and they would be here by random chance ????? Here there is an interesting paper about this subject... academia.edu/42979330/Is_mathematical_probability_the_same_as_physical_reality_the_power_of_the_average_and_how_life_began and It ONLY doesnt carry weight for people like yourself....
2
Juno Donat nope... I point out to you the consequences of your choices... on top of your denial of satan/the devil as being real... you started that one....not me... my respons would be different if you said tht God would be mythical.... but no you said yourself that the devil is mythical according to you... well then that was my respons and no I was NOT indoctrinated.... I was looking for God myself.... I asked Him myself in 2004 I wanted to know if God was real and asked Him to open my eyes for the truth..... I never truisted people in these matters since people can tell me loads of crap... so I thought to myself OK IF God is real... then HE is the only one who canb give me the correct answer... so I asked the Creator of the universe (since I didnt know who He was so I kept it neutral) and from that momenbt on God started to acted more openly to me in my life... He was always present on my back ground since I was not aware of Him being real.... sa you do right now. so NO I was NOT indoctrinated as you are ..... you see YOU are indoctrinated by anti-God information. Which makes sense from a pure rebellious against God point of view. No church was involved, I accepted God/Jesus Christ in my own house without anybody being present then God and me..... He showed me He is real..... so no infleuence of out side when God opend my eyes for HIS truth.... it was like Neo after swallowing the red pill.... God opend my eyes for reality..... The other gods that you describe are the troicks of satan to keep you away from the ONE and TRUE only God.... just as you want to find YOUR most favorite chocloate of all time in the shop of willy wonka where 10.000's different chocolates are being presented to you..... you get confused ... satanis trick and it seems to work on you (and on most people) ... the more religions the devilk presents ... the harder it for people like you to find the one and Only true God but there is a solution as I told you; SIMPLY SINCERELY as the ONE and ONLY GOD to open your eyes for the truth ....
2
Juno Donat so you do deny God.... non the less... it doesnt make any difference to God or the devil HOW you deny God... as long as (from the devils perspective) you deny God.... well I got some news for you with God it is FIRST believing and then God will let you see the facts not the other way around you FIRST have to be willing to make the choice to TRUST God/Jesus in what GHe says in the bible and THEN He gonna show you things... close to never the other way around..... if you want to see proof.... you fisrt have to star believing in God via Jesus and only THEN God will OPEN YOUR MIND !!!!! for the proof.... you FIRST must be willing to allow God to communicate to you by accepting Him as your creator, via the way that Jesus.... has pointed out in the new testament.. today folks like you want to see the proof first.... well thats not how God works.. why ? well if you cannot accept God as He tells He is in the Bible..... why would you believe the proof ???? and that is proven in our conversation.... you first want to see the proof.....just as the pharizees in the Times of Jesus... they wanted to see signs and wonders of Jesus before the choise to believe Him...... well taht is not how God works... with God it is.. FIRST believing..... Then seeing.....
2
welcome to the real world where people want money and power.... sorry to inform you....
2
michelson and morley already proved that light speed does not depend on the direction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment. Also later experiments with way much more precision confirmed this. so why question it now ???
2
7:41 well it can be tested IF the definition that Einstein and you take to question.... measure it.... in all directions... measuring is he closest thing to knowing.
2
7:40 we evolved ??? sorry dereck we did not. my critical grumpy analytical mentality tells me, next to many scientific correct facts that life did not evolve at all. Abiogenesis-evolution is one of these things that fall in the category easy acceptable because it sound intuitive but is wrong non the less if you look at the facts that are associated with it. Please be more grumpy suspicious analyticaly correct about this subject. 8:00 Abiogenesis-evolution falls certainly in the category of hearing a lot thus it must be true ... but in reality it is not true at all.
1
Then Jesus Christ is the right answer for you, He can make you live for ever. Truely, no kidding.
1
As far as I know mutations are favoring evolution isn't it ? at least if you believe the evolution baloney to begin with. so why avoid radiation in the beginning ? Don't people want to become mutant Ninja turtles ??? Or does it proof that evolution indeed is nothing more then a HOAX BIG TIME. If evolution is Not a hoax as many people BELIEVE (since there is no factual proof of it). Then what is the objection to avoid mutations by radiation or by sun UV, or by blackened barbeque meat, or by other mutagenic agents. why avoid it ??? why block your evolution ??? IF evolution is true (which I do not believe) It makes no sense folks If you accepted evolution as truth..... THAT is 1 of the many many reasons why it is a HOAX. ... fact is: Evolution never happened.
1
Yeah right, mutations know several sources and it does not matter what source induces the mutation. since mutations are just 100% pure random and coincidental including for the hypothetical process of evolution. You see what you call the natural form of mutation that supposedly cause evolution is exactly 100% the same as what I am talking about, there is no difference, and cells do not distinguish between one or an hypothetical other form of mutation. that is crap. Mutations are mutations. since mutations are caused by random processes WITHOUT any form of intelligent input/mechanism that can differentiate between cancer mutations and supposed evolution mutations. This statement of yours is 100% baloney and crap. Mutations are caused by a) cosmic radiation b) chemicals (carcinogenic, like blackened BBQ meat ) c) UV light from the sun, d) copy errors e) natural decay of elements in your body (c14 to N14 of 40K to 40Ar) f) natural decay of elements outside your body. (and 1 or 2 more). there are no other sources. and in neither of these cases organism cells can distinguish between damaging mutations or dangerous cancerous mutations. your hypothesis is crap, sorry.disproving evolution ? watch my youtube channel. improving evolution is not realistic since there is nothing to begin with so how to improve something that isn't there ?? The model; used to be called evolution has never been proven; the lesser fossils the deeper we dig ?? well maybe you haven't look every where around, the bottom of the oceans for example. You see the sea creatures in a Noah flood model would be buried to the lowest places and since the mountains rose and the valleys sank due to the flood (according to the bible), the majority of fossils are being formed by the flushing away of these sea creatures to deeper grounds; in the sea/ocean bed floors. But that has not been researched yet, has it. only land fossils have been investigated. so your model could be 100% wrong because of misinterpretations of data and missing data.
1
Karlo Grba do you ?
1
Karlo Grba problem with you atheists is that you have gotten used to look with the eyes of today and project that back into the past. you should have read the bible more clearly and studied creationism more .... then you would have understood before asking me this question about Noah, his family and how we got here today without any problems.
1
Karlo Grba So I ask you again: do you understand what it means ?
1
1) mutations are mutations, by which eaver means at which ever places. why because mutations happen at random at random places. there is no intelligence behind mutations and thus it is no constructive guided process. so it cannot distinguish between yes or not being evolutionistic. it is random. 2) read the bible: the fountains of the deep broke open: there was and is water in the earths crust lok at "the bejing anomaly" there is still an entire ocean in the earths crust. enough to wipe out all life except 8 people in a boat and to create the 95% of sedimentairy rocks that the world has today including the fossils. you skipped 3) 4) Noah never saw a chiwawah he saw a wolf like dog.... from which all other dogs were breeded in the last 4500 yrs, that is VARIATION..... Noah never saw a african and indonesian elephant: he jsyt saw an elephant. Noah never saw a leopard, tiger, cheetah, lion, etc he just saw a big cat like animal from whic all these animals have VARARIATED. Human kind has breeded ever since 1000's of different variations of animals plants etc just by breeding. The ark was more then big enough to carry al the basic kinds of land animals he could probably carry 4 times more. 5) wrong assumption, God was NOT created: God was always there. God is from eternity to eternity. You ASSUME / BELIEVE that God is just as us stuck in time.... He is not stuck in time. God is out side of time space and matter. do I fully understand that ?? no but that is what God states about Himself if you study the bible very well. I do not recognize the pope as my religious leader since I am not catholic, I am an independently messianic zionistic creationistic christian I have nothing with the pope and next to that even if I would have: the pope is WRONG in accepting evolution. he is no scientist so how can he judge evolution correctly. I am a scientist s I amke my own judgements about that. I am not above the pope NOR is the pope above me. He is just as human as you and I am. we are all on the same level towards God. I do not believe the pope is God send, nor catholisism, man your question are so much a portrayal of your ignorance I could write a book based on your silly question alone. Yes I have contact with God: He is my Father. and He wants to be yours too. to do in heaven ? ooh by that Time God will show me. Other gods ??? there are no other gods. there are demons PRETENDING to be God to distract you from the Only and ONLY TRUE God... other gods are a trick of the devil to keep you away from God-Jesus. It seems to work with you and the majority of people. Deutronomy 22: So you do factually approve of adultery, free sex outside the marriage and that YOUR wife has sex with other man ?? that is what you basically say.... well good luck with that one then in your future..... lets see how much you realy like that .....that your partner cheats upon you..... it will be a cryer for you pal, can tell you that..... its no fun .... but hee I imagine you will surely enjoy it...... imagen your wife being banged by an other fellow..... good luck with that one pal... you are going to need it. ooh and please leave the stones in the floor when you find your wife cheating on you, in front of your own eyes. Try to avoid the desire of killing her... will you ??
1
before talking about life on other planets can we first please give a definitive answer to the question IF life could emerge spontaneously from 100% dead materials/chemicals...... so basically I am asking secular science to make us living cells (exactly as we know them) and let these cells evolve into higher organisms like lets say a worm (exactly as we know them. thing is IF secular science is NOT able t proof this then why look for other exoplanets and waste a lot of money that could have been put in something useful to preserve life here on OUR planet first like saving starving people in Afrika by feeding them....as we were asked to pay as private persons to support the red cross by donating money for that while our taxmoney is wasted on these stupid exo-planet projects
1
Dami B OK question is an amino acid a living cell (as we know them) ???? Nope .. then do not claim that you have created life already... science demands the full 100% proof and not just a teeny weeny small part of it. A brick is not a house yet is it ? you cannot live in a brick of 4 by 8 by 3 inches can you ? What do I care whether it would take billions of yrs...?? you are simply saying that it is impossible to test it, well speed up the chemical prosesses, I am a chemist you can speed up prosesses. So you save a lot of time. And if that does not help well petty then, it turns out that you will be unable to proof you hypothesis... and still calling it and teaching it as science... how dare you folks ??? that is indoctrination and misleading.
1
there are many ways to speed up chemical reactions: catalysts, temperaturerize, pressure, light, shockwaves sonic compressions, radioactivity, stuff like that. But it will not help you because life will not emerge from it. Life making is only for the ONE who invented it: God-Jesus. life is more then just a bunch of chemicals.
1
Dami B God does not need to have a universe to evolve. God created it as ready as it was about 6000 yrs ago. In full running mode. God did not need to use billions of yrs. and as a matter of fact God did fine tune it. you can see that in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_Universe and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clockwork_universe Not that I necessary support their ideas but it it recognized that God did made our universe for our lives to fit in. The bible tells you all about it: God made the whole universe ready to be used as it was from that moment on. Whether you accept it or not is not my problem. Out of nothing in 6 days made an entire universe including us. There is no such thing as uniformitarianism; slow graduate processes to get where we are now. that is a blatant lie.
1
***** because GOD cares about them so should we ! get it. every single individual life is important, no mater how insignificant in your eyes, GOD thinks different and so do I. Suppose it would be YOU that was starving as such and I would say that about YOU, how would YOU feel ??
1
there then goes your inheretance, petty for you
1
it is a good video, which everybody with a slight of interest of science MUST see. It shows clearly what I have personaly experienced in my carreer; science is OFTEN WRONG..... !!! this is a very very important finding and conclusion. However it is the question that the statistics is correct: I mean the normal Gauss-distribution is a theoretical model and my experience, with reality is that the gaussian curve works pretty ok and is sufficient for a major of fields where accuracy is NOT that important. BUT it turns out that lots of experimental data is NOT neatly Gaussian but skewed Gaussian. Now Gaussian bell curves gives you an idea, but need NOT to be, the correct statistical model for this issue, I do not know. It turns out that theory and practice deviate lots and lots of times in many different subjects ending up with not so neatly gaussian curves as theory indicates. Now theoretically (IF the gaussian curve is the correct curve to apply !!) the standard deviation sigma S is used and 3S is a frequent heard limit to accept or reject an answer since it represents 99.7% of all possible correct answeres. But S values should be established over many measurements before the S can be accepted it self. Thing is with each measurement taken the S value changes a little bit since it is dependent on the measurements it self. and how to know if a measure ment is not an out-lier so should be rejected. it turns out to be, as I found in practise. that applying statistics is not that easy. the S value is determined by the measurements and the measurements to be accepted or rejected depends on the S value; THAT is circular reasoning to begin with. I know we do not yet have a better instrument and we have to start somewhere, but lets keep things in correct perspective.
1
sorry, I like dereck and his veritasium, but this is just total crap at least the largest part of it.
1
stuff is not spooky at all, you see in order to get entanglement you have to have a splitting object that used to be a whole object like an atom or photo... or what ever.. as they drift appart thery REMAIN connected and thus communicating with eachother since nothing can travel faster the light if a matter particle splits apart in 2 parts they can never travel faster then light no matter how great the distance as son as one property is meansured lets say spin then since they are still connected to eachother and since they travel at lower speeds then light and you know the spin property of 1 particle then automatically the other spin is determined as well.. nothing traveled faster then light since the particles do never travel faster then light; they are simply connected thrue their wave functions simple and actually they are 1 wave function and remain that way until they interact with an other item and merge with that/those wavefunctions
1
2:00 OOH dereck you are so wrong, petty that you let your conclusions be blurred by evolution thinking. why ? a) evolution is an invalid unproven idea of a bunch of people who hate God in their life b) since 1000s of yrs ago apperently people sun sneezed it has got nothing to do with spreading diseases around how do I know.... well simple only after Noahs flood bacteria mutated to gain more and more disease causing micro organisms, not before the flood, this is testified by Noahs drinking grape juice not knowing it turned into wine with alcohol due to fermentation, so he became unknowingly drunk. Next to the fact that people after the flood became lesser old as before the flood due to sicknesses due to mutated micro organisms after the flood. so sun sneezing has nothing to do with the hypothetical and unproven evolution.
1
0:12 scientifically proven ???? WHAT ??? then I ust have missed something big time ..... since it has not even been proven that life can come spontaniously from non living things like chemicals..... lts proof that first before assume that life elsewhere in the universe exists.....
1
Becoming obsolete will always happen; why ? simple... the indecandescent lightbulk became more and more obsolete due to TL type of lights and the developement of the LED for example. Making something close to perfect (which is never possible) stimulates producers to even make better & more ingenious stuff. And no matter how perfect objects may be made... they will in the end always break. Granted it may take longer periods of time that is true, but better make some thing durable than you have more time to research new even better stuff. But the planned obsoleteness is just a sign and shows us the reality of profit minded people instead of durability environmental minded people. profit minded people dont care about the health of our planet they only care about their own big time wallets. so basically it is the profit minded industry that is to blame for the environmental issues we currently have. These producers who are profit minded need to be banned and replaced by durable minded producers; we have a planet to save from polluting. BUT there is a downside: Products that are durable are MORE expensive, but they last longer. We can thus see that poluting of the planet is caused by production/profit minded people. It also means more jobs in the R&D field. More people who think of new & better stuff on a continuous basis. I go for durability. No shops like IKEA for me... thats a cheap & a polluting way of living in the long run. And we see that the environmental issues are piling up and in the end cost MORE than tackling that problemn right from the beginning by minimizing the polluting ways of production. Durability is a new market.
1
5:44 matter - anti matter ratio is there to prove that the universe didn develope by itself but was created, yes created by God. And many things point in that direction.
1
love it... great invention....
1
@ @CNCmachiningisfun ..... simple because folks like yourself prefer to listen to a destructive devil/satan who destroys all that God has made wonderfully and fully perfectly functional into disfunctional diseases… like indeed childrens cancer… Its easy to for you to blame God but in the meanwhile you prefer and you listen only to the destructive kiling raping murdering abusing devil/satan in your lives…. Dont blame God for childrens cancer….blame your OWN disobedience to God for that….. people like you introduce, by your own unbelieve in God/Jesus these evil things but you keep blaming God for your own satans worshipping and listening to his evil lies... THAT is where childrens cancers come from … your own unwillingness to accept God/Jesus Christ as your saviour and Creator. and that started with eve eating from the fruit of the tree of KNOWLEDGE of good and EVIL... also YOU choose to eat from the Fruit of EVIL... THAT is where childrens cancer comes from….. You blame God but you should blame yourself…….
1
@ @Horses4life1001 right you are God is REAL, these people are only close minded in their own right thinking they are their own "gods" thinking they know better then God/Jesus. God bless you.
1
@CNCmachiningisfun Kiddo ???? well so to see by your vids we are about the same age.. sunny boy...so dont patronize me … BOY And yes right now I am working on a science paper where people are strongly under influence of evil voices in their head….and due to that perform terroristic actions because these voices force them to do that…. exactly as the bible tells us that people behave after being infected by evil satanic spirits (what we know as being demon possesed….) so yes thats the proof of it..... the psychiatric institutions are FULL of people who are demon posessed….. not many people recognize it as such but that does not change the fatcs….. and let me predict you…. as long as people do not accept God/Jesus christ…. and people turn to other non-christian/non biblical religions….. the more people (including in YOUR environment) will GET factually demon possesed…. and will TURN evil and will turn to terroristic actions... so do NOT be surpriced when 1 day als o YOU encounter a demon possesed person trying to hurt you or one of your loved ones….you see the FACT that you dont believb in God/Jesus… is enhancing the demon possesion of people…. maybe even with yourself…… so now that you have some knowledge of what may happen in the future…. there is no excuse any longer of saying that you didnt know….. Now you know !!! so YOU stop lying to us !!! BOY
1
0:27 you call it evolution, we call it degeneration.... it is the same as losinig your arms so that the police cannot handcuff you... that is basically what happens.... there is no genetic information gain.. only loss. and yes mutations cause genetic info LOSS never a gain..... losing some abilities can appear beneficial but it isnt in the long run... it always is associated with a fitness cost.... like people withh sickle cell anemia... yes these people are NOT affected by malaria BUT they dont grow old like max 40-45 yrs old... same happens here with these bacteria that mutate... yes they can resist hogher concentrations but that means a mutations that makes them lose other features.
1
@GeroG3N 1) you catch my drift... seemingly 2)nope mutations are always damaging never constructive... why ? mutataions are driven by random agressive media like radiation, radioactive decay etc and harmfull chemicals since they are random they have no constructive objective behind them... so they can only be destructive. constructiveness comes ONLY with the input of uintelligence to guide the energetic input... randomness brings only noise... not information...
1
12:45 which proves my statement/point or REGAINING an lost mechanism. it was lost by mutation and regained by the opposite mutation. no evolution since the rest of the codeinstill must have been there to be abel to REGAIN the cirtic acid cycle (which is very common in bacteria since it is one of the energy generatin mechanisms in all living beings...) No evolution; but a regain of exitsing features.
1
@katamas832 evolution is a non existing suggested process... in reality it does NOT exist.. lenski's bacteria are... still bacteria... they are NOT worms fishes or horses or dandelions.... THAT would be evolution.. what lenksi showed is NOT part of evolution.. it is part of variation... and JUST as darwin he is mistaken variation for evolution.... just as most people do variation happens .... (as shown by lenski) evolution doesnt !
1
@katamas832 well than probve me evolution took place if you think I am a dumbass... no one has seen evolution... what we do have seen in history is degeneration... wolves turning into chiwahwahs ... thats degenerative variation.... a) its a loss of genetic coding b) its degenerative c) its still a dog thus variation not evolution evolution is supposed to be the total opposite: a chiwahwah turning into a wolf.. no one has ever seen that happen... but the degenerative variation HAS been observed... and even till the level of genetic meltdown...(yeah thats an official term google it) where kinds of animals/plants are so far degenerated that its beyond repai since even the repair system has been corrupted... genetic melt down would NOT occur IF evolution takes place... but it doesnt... the clock only winds downward.. never upward... all in all I cannot other that conclude (based on OBSERVATIONS and NOT wishfull fantasies) that evolution does NOT exist... the opposite does exist but evolution doesnt.... so who doesnt understand evolution here... and its not me ... I perfectly understand it, even to the atomic level... since I happen to be a chemist professionally...
1
@number-ey8lz evolution is the suggested process (by means of mutations) on which a simple organism like a bacteria can evolve to a multicellulair being like a dandelion, horse dog, crab, ant and human.... suggesting an increase of genetic information. THAT suggested process has never been observed... ever.... so dont lie to me or try to fool me... What HAS been observed is mutations BUT always producing LESS usefull information in the organism and MORE NOISE or non information holding genetic base sequences.... OR neutral at best ... evolution from bacteria to horses, dogs etc was NREVER ever observed... petty for you folks. But this is factuall....and thuis scientific correct... the suggested processes of mutations leading from bacteria to horses, dogs, shrimps, roses and humans is part of Pseudo science or even better said: wishfull thinking fantasies....
1
@number-ey8lz Nope mutations induce a NOISE in genes.. why ? simple mutations are random by nature and NEVER with a directive constructive information inputting actions... mutations bring about NOISE in DNA....not order.... Why ? again simple; because of the randomness of the DRIVING forces of mutations: radioactive decay, radioactive radiation , cosmic radiation, UV light, agressive chemicals... and behind these influences on mutations there is NO plan for building/constructing information.... so they can ONLY bring about NOISE... and that means LOSS of information. and you know that I am speaking the truth here...
1
11:00 no there was a REGAIN of an already existing mechanism, just as finxing an old car with other old cars spare parts.... old timers lovers do that the whole year around... nothing new....you see the citric acid cycle is present in all living organisms.. BUT it may have been lost due to NOT using it.... use it or lose it... now what Lenski found was that remnants of that broken down system are able to regain function.... just as blind born cave fishes can regain their eyes once ex[posed to light again, but it takes many generations to have them regain an old existing mechanism.. NO evolution
1
@hamham9862 well than show me an evolved organism if that is so.. show me a dog who gained wings or an umbrella tail against the rain.. THAT would be evolution.... what you see displayed here is variation... not evolution ! evolution is a hoax.... variation is often mistaken for evolution... variation happens: little/big dogs short/long haired short/long tailed that has been observed but THAT is variation.. not evolution so this proves that YOU and your type of folks know nothing about evolution... and blam folks like me for it... evolution (bacteria to worms to fishes to apes, horses, dandelions) has NEVER been observed including not in these experiments....
1
4:50 c = 0,5 of c in 1 direction and instantiously in the opposite direction ???? sorry dereck thats not part of reality. see michelson&morley
1
why am i not surpriced that the money does not go to other people than invents something that is the most useless ideas... finding planets... OK great achievement in itself.... but a) we will never get there anyhow b) no garuantee life is possible there, c) finding life on other planets is useless since abiogenesis is impossible ontop of that evolution is impossible as well (chemically spoken) now the 1st guy and 3rd girl made something usefull for LIFE of which we know does exist... right here on our own home planet and for people who really need that kind of stuff... glasses and clean water... so sending money to girls that find other far far far away planets is 100000% useless spend money.... I dont mean she is not smart, she is, but to my opinion it is not worth 250 K$ sorry. And I see that a lot; spending BILLIONS and BILLIONS of money on life on other planets while we KNOW that abiogenesis is not even possible here on our own planet.... and evolution is still an unproven concept.... so spending that money s a 100000% pure waste.... while people factually do need good glasses and clean water right here and right now on OUR planet of which we factually know that life DOES exist without spending billions of money to find life here ..... we should focus on OUR home planet to make it better..... we will never be abe to travel such distances anyhow.. not now not in the far future... it is far far to dangerous....
1
IT IS pall, this is way ,uch to complex to come into existance JUST by random processes. random processe without intelligence is only ging tro mes things up. so this all testifies that God is real. He designed it.
1
10:16 better competative yeah some existing features have been enhanced but its still the same already existing information... no evolution just enhancement of alread present features.
1
its a camera obscura and it always gives us a circle since the sun is a circle...the shape of the hole does not matter. Its the shape of the sun that matters.....
1
well every one of us is eternal; BDE's show us clearly that this is a fact. and no BDE's are not the effects of hallucinating chemistry while you die the events dureing BDE's proof that idea wrong long ago. so that is not the question; the real question is; where does one spend eternity... you see these BDE's people speak of a real heaven but also of a real hell.... where do you go to ??? so the question is not: do you exist for ever... (you do, just as energy exist forever but is faint non he less and at the same time, compared to rocks) question is .... where ..... does something require solidity to exist for ever ???? no it doesnt.....something exists just because it may be very soft, untouchable in stead of rock solid, stirdy seemingly unmovable.... no it is more the soft things that last for ever.
1
@scottatutube1 agreed !!! go for it bro
1
Juno Donat 1 thing ???? man all misery is from the devil there are BILLIONS of things... this world is in misery cant you see ??? but Ok I'll name a few: abortion.... killing/murdering people before they are born prostitution, drugs abuse boose abuse, rape, murder genocide, child abuse, agression, segregation, racism, dictator ship, suppression extorition torture, divorces, sicknesses. all that is bad and evil is from the devil. recently corona of course... all prophesized in deutronomy 28 and leviticus 26 IF people listen God ill bless them if they dont then all these curses will come over you.... and that realy happens right as we speak....LITERALLY !!! read it: deutronomy 28 and leviticus 26... that is what you see happening in the world... right as we speak. and last but not least... YOU ..... you are in the denial state with respect to God.... you yourself are proof of satans actions in this world.. how you are finding ONLY arguments to be able (on false grounds how ever) to deny Gods existence.... why ... because THAT is what YOU want.... well the devil is very very very willing to deliver you ALL you can get to be able (on false grounds) to deny Gods existence.... the devil is very willing to help you seek informatin about finding reasons to say no to God... so even in your own life he proofs his presence... getting close right ??? getting personal right ??? yeah thats how it works... the more you want to deny God the more easier the devil will make it for you to find reasons for it......that is exactly what he wants to achieve in your life... why ?? so that he can destroy you as soon as he gets the chance.... and drag you into hell to torture you ... why ? well you (and all humans) look a bit like God, since God created you/us in HIS image and to hurt God the devil takes his revenge on you ... he is unable to hur God directly so he takes his reveng on us humans... thats why people kill eachother... by setting us up against eachother.... and the more YOU give him way.... the easier the devil can get you in his grip... just to drag you down.... by your own choice !!!!!
1
Juno Donat and no it has nothing to do with personal interpretations; it has all to do with what God has showed, revealed to me.... you I KNOW factuall that God is real Just as you know that your parents are real.... due to a relationship with your parents... os I have a personal relationship with God.....He is my FATHER and we have communication ... there is interaction.
1
Juno Donat you keep double standards my friend if evil happens (like the people before the flood were extremely evil and wicked) then you ask why doesnt God do something about them..... Now ALL the examples you show there are actions from God to do something about evil/wicked people ... and then you call them cruell...... that is a double standard son... in other wordss according to your reasoning God can never do good in your and you peoples eyes.... if God does He is cruell if He doesnt He is also cruell as well because of doing nothing..... hypocrites
1
Juno Donat and ooh by the way... God is taking care right now of evil people... thats why we have corona.... if people refuse to listen God allows some bad sicknesses EXACTLY as Deutronomy 28 and leviticus 26 tells us....so these prophesies are being fulfilled RIGHT as we speak..... so better watch out on whom's side you're on ... you may be next....
1
Juno Donat no its not illogical... why not ? well God has given u s all that there needs to be required to be with Him and it is all written in the bible the ONLY thing that God wants you to start with is JUST BELIEVE what He says is true.... and that God tells the truth.... why would an all power full God lie ??? there is no reason for God to lie.... He is AL - Mighty so God doesnt need lies... so He jsut want you us to put your our trust in that, thats where it starts.... just trusting Him... just as you trust your father and mother.... when you were born did you also not trust your father and mother ???? no you didt... same with God and He is is even a FAR FAR more loving Father then you parents ever are possible to be...and who means the utmost best for you and your fellow men... so.... learn to trust Him, thats where it starts...
1
Juno Donat coroina doesnt come from God... it is the consequence of rejecting Gods protective hands... exatcly as deutronomy 28 and leviticus 26 tells us.... you see IF people start more and more rejecting God then God cannot do els than pull back Hids protective and blessing hands.... He wants to bless us with all goods ... but he allows the devil to do his dirty works IF people do NOT listen.... and God pulls back His blessing Hands in 3 phases.... and each phases will be harsher then before. since God allows the devil to stricke even MORE harder then before... and if you then STILL refuse to go back to God. after these 3 times of pulling back His blessing hands.. Then God will hurt you Himself.... first He allows the devil .... and if that doesnt work... man then God Himself spanks you..... and then there is NO one who can come inbetween... So i am telling you now that IF people like yourself will NOT turn back to God.... corona is only a childs play... and things in the future will get FAR worse..... better get back to God via Jesus before that happens. .... Good luck with that....
1
Juno Donat ... hee.... what ever you like... its your life that you toss yourself into hell.... you choose hell.... dont blame others once you're there ... and you can find out from own experience how mythical satan is..... ooh and IF (I hope not but IF) you end up there in hell .... please tell that devil sucker I hate him in every my fibres my body holds...... so for the rest.... have a nice life..... not gonna waste my time with you ..... I did what I could to convince you .... but you prefer hell above heaven.... fine..... listen its your free choice... not Gods choice and also not mine..... you are free to choose......hope you change your mind..... but thats up to you.....I am just doing you a favor.... nothing lost nothing gained form me.....so.... bye now.....
1
Juno Donat again ... what ever you choose pal..... just doing you a faovor.... you choose....like I said before people like you are ONLY evidence oriented before believing just as the pharizees in Jesus's time.....they want proof with out the willingness to believe first... well fine... your choice....
1
Juno Donat ..... what ever..... I told you what you need to know... now its up to you to take it serious... or not.... again... YOU choose.....
1
Juno Donat and there you are dead wrong..... they are demonstrable correct. unfortunately you do NOT want NOR accpet their correctness due to your stubborn unwillingness to study the whole thing out. the ONLY arguments you listen to and are willing to listen to or willing to accept and find is the devils lies and the devils arguments......as I told you before.... well fine that is your choice... you are Not FORCED to listen to them ... YOU FORCE yourself to listen to them.... you can reject satans lies,,, but you choose not to.... that is a CHOICE ! well to begin with IF you realy want to now the truth... here this a sgood one to start with: lets test YOU out how willing you are to listen to good reasoning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szBTl3S24MY this man explains perfectly how things realy are.... now I am curious what you think of his arguments; I think I already know but lets test you're choices out... lets test how willing you are ... and ... which choices you CHOOSE to make and thus see how much you are realy FORCED .... (which you are not) I have to work to day so I will be here later on in the evening (in holland) so for now have to keep it short....
1
Juno Donat again that is your choice... how you valuate the bible.....
1
Juno Donat well IF you are FORCED by evidence then your eyes must be full of dirt........ the dirt of imagination and false assumptions and plain lies and nice looking tricks.... why ? well There is absolutly NO shred of evidence of life emerging from chemicals nor of evolution ...... so where you get the evidence from is a riddle to me, I am doing this for some years now and so far... no evidence....not a shred of a shred... and if you have (as all other people though they did) please show me....you made me curious.. throw it is my face..... did you read the article I send you earlier ??? but again I have to work today so I will be back later....
1
Juno Donat as I though alsready... you do not WANT To accept any reasons and like i already said That is a CHOICE... you are not Forced ... you deliberatly CHOOSE to ignore factuall reasonings and I dont care what the community says..... the fact that he is ignored doesnt mean he is wrong !!!!.... ignoring correctness is not the same as telling that other are correct ... that is NOT how truth is established..... it is simply DELIBERATLY BY CHOICE IGNORING fatcuall data and thus proof... fine if you choose to toss atway correct facts ... thatr is YOUR CHOICE as I told you before.... you simply do not WANT it to be true... and again.... fine.... please tell the devil I hate him when you (I hope not) get there with him..... have to go now....
1
Juno Donat and your opinion of Ken Ham ??? same I guess ? and all the other guys ??? they all tell kind of the same story.... so ? dismissed as well ?? why .. because you people CHOOSE To dismiss their truths... its by CHOICE.. why ? because you HATE God so much.....just as the devil does.... you CHOOSE to stick with satans lies.... Therefor you CHOOSE to go to hell....God made it possible to go to heaven... but no you choose to go to hell yourself..... well dont worry nobody is going to PUSH you into heaven... it is by free choice......God made taht possible... you only have to choose.....
1
Juno Donat nope, creation science is correct science. BUT as again people dont like the out come of God being the cause of all secualrs skipp it and pretend it to be pseudo, while in real life secular science is pseudo science ESPECIALLY when it deals with the subject of our origins.... why ? wel thats EXACTLT what satan wants tyou to be lieve s thathe can torture youy in hell.... and tyou swallow it like sweet potato pie... have you yourself studies Hovinds arguments or are you just like a sheep followin the secual flock ???? and no creationism has NO harmfull consequences... yes thats what they tell/lie to you .. of course thats what the devil would do indeed, just to keep you away from the truth and correct science and from the One and only True God... fact is how ever creation science is MORE factuall and observable than secular science .. BUT you need to dive into it to know it.... so my advice is... dive into it....watch Hovinds vids and make up YOUR own mind by yourself.... and the bible is correct in ALL it says....you see God doesnt lie....
1
Juno Donat creation science looks exactly at the facts and gives the correct interpretations of the observed things. like geological biological astronomical features that can ONLY be perfectly explenaid when the biblical history is correct... so creation science puts the observed features in the right correct and mos scientific logical perspective... now seculars dont LIKE that because THEN they have to admit that God indeed did it... but hee what can we do aboutr it facts are facts... and that the facts doisprove their idea's is not our problem.... so basically it is SECULAR science that is the harmfull way of seeing things and blaming creationistic science.... why ??? well the root of all evil... is money.... and power...without secular vision they lose the big money and their jobs... THAT is how secular scinece works... its all about money... and In kow it to be factuall I worked in secualr institutes as a scientist.... and doid you know that FACTUALLY 80% of ALL peer reviewed secular science is PROVEN WRONG !!! an MUST be retracted !!!!! you folks are being duked by secular science here watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42QuXLucH3Q&t=11s and look for the website "retraction watch".. you are being misled by secular science.... pal.....
1
Juno Donat and what do I care what the consensus is ???? THAT is NOTR how CORRECT science is suppose to work.... Correct science should be judged on the FACTS alone... NOT by majority of opinion.....as is happening now..... we are NO longer oin the middle ages where they tried to find making gold from lead.... we are NOW in 2020 science shouold be FACTUALL CORRECT and secular scinece is FALSE especially when it comes to our origin... abiogenesis... unproven idea evolution ... unproven idea big bang ..... unrpoven idea and all facts speak against these idea's no matter what opinions say.... and that is where craetionism comes along .. it places the facts back again in the right perpective.... that this includes the existence of "God did it" yeah that is true... and THERE LIES the HOT ISSUE .. YOU PEOPL DO NOT WANT GOD TO BE REAL... Including your good old self you dont WANT God to tell you how you should live... and THAT is heavily dishonets that based on your opinion you exclude God before you even gave Him a chance..... why well the bible is clear... due to your LUSTS you dont want God to be real.... you JUST want to DO what YOU want to do without being responsible for your actions and THAT can only be achoieved IF there would be no God to whom you have to answer... well nice for you that you WANT that...... but your desires do NOT make God go away.... He remains no matter what you believe... so better face reality about Him then being tossed in hell by Him... because you choose to be tossed in Hell. you see God has got better plans for you. IF you accept them ... and THERE comes your free choice into vision.
1
Juno Donat and you folks do the 100% opposite.. there is NO-God as a given.... well that is NOT scientific to begin with ... as long as you dont know for sure you cannot rule God out..... THAT should be the coirrect scientific assumption.... on TOP of that you even make claims that have absolutely NO proof for it and yet you still call it proven science (abiogenesis/evolution big bang etc etc etc) that is not science .. that is selling the hide before shooting the bear or even seeing the bear and you folks call us unscientific ??????? hypocrits and what does it matter that some christians have accepted evolution ??? THAT doesnt make it real .... THAT is not how science works as I told you before... correct science is about FACTS.. and the FACTS are on the hand of what the Bible teaches us....independant of what people THINK in their OPINION... the majority of opinion doies NOT determine what truth is.... petty for you pal... you may disagree... but facts remain.... and you think abiogenesis / evolution exist ? ok where is the proof... deliver me the proof for it.... i have seen non of it.... so be a man about it and deliver me the proof. The proof that can with stand ALL critique....hand it over to me....overwhelm me with it... hit me with it....
1
Juno Donat well abiogenesis and evolution vcannot be separated... if abiogenesis is not true... there is ismplky NOTHING to evolve.... now it is impossible to make life out of chemicals therefor evolution is also nonsence you cannot have one without the other... you cannot dinner IF thee is no food... no food - no dinner simple as that exactly the same goes for: so no abiogenesis... no evolution so they are linked.... but each separatly are equally impossible for their own separate reasons....
1
Juno Donat quote 1 "Science doesn't rule anything out, that's your straw-man." quote 2 "Nope, "God," or, more specifically anyone's particular god, is NOT a given. You cannot link your concept of a god to measurable, quantifiable, testable, repeatable attributes, nor can you test your concept of a god (as a causal agent or otherwise), nor can you yield repeatable results that you can base predictions upon. In other words, when it comes to your god, it's a meaningless word you invoke behind which there is nothing." quote2 contradicts quote 1 ... its your own word pal... meaning I didnt use a straw man.... you proven it in your own words that my argument is correct.... sleep well... maybe till tomorrow...
1
Juno Donat OK I challenge you: prove to me that life emerged from chemicals: 1) make us living cells (eaxactly as we know them) out of the bare elements (CHNOS etc) 2) let these cells evolve to higher organisms, lets say worms (exactly as we know them) a) first in the lab, as proof of concept b) than naturalistic as is supposed to have happend some billion yrs ago then we talk further.....
1
Juno Donat yes science does rule out God.... any one who claims other wise is fired from his(/her) job, literally. that is not science thats sovjet style dictator ship oohh you explain chemistry to me ??? ooh how nice... dont need to I happen to be a university degree chemist including biochemistry... its my bread and butter.... I studied evolution to the atomic level... so dont patronize me.... OK ? can YOU do that ? I know what it si supposed to be... well let me tell you .. it is NOT !
1
Juno Donat evadet evolution well i am not evade or avoid it..... but eovlution si simply a impossible idea.... I will explain why it is so simple: you see the idea of evolution is floating on beneficial mutations.... they do not exist..... there is NO benecifial mutation ever reported in peer review science magazines..... how ever the 100% opposite of beneficial mutation have been peer reviewed published in science papers... millions of them..... why is that ... well beneficial muattions dont exist... and that makes sense as well... why ?? simple the agences that drive mutation are ONLY Destructive or Neutral (without effect) at best. That means that what we see is only the cause of destruction of genetic information..... NEVER has GAIN of new information in the genes been obeserved.... BUT that is EXACTLY what he idea of evoltion would need..... but what it needs is 100% invisible .. while what it does NOT need the opposite is what we in 100% of the times see.... that means there s factually no such thing as evolution..... and that is verified by the following: we only see little dogs big dogs, hairy Dogs or less hairy dogs, small tails dogs big tail dogs.... we see variation... and thats is fine ... what we do NOT see is Dogs gaining for example an umbrella tail against the rain, or humans gaining pencil fingers or cats gaining chlorophyll THAT would be REAL evolution the ADDITION of NEW genetic information.... but we dont see that factually..... if you can show me an exampe of beneficial evolution ... please tel me about it.... non has been found unless you know more than I do.... so surprice me
1
Juno Donat nope thats why we do our own research.... as I do.... to test verify and come back with a real correct answere.... we unduke peple like you.... but you prefer to remain in a state of being duked... fine that is entirely your own choice......
1
Juno Donat show me which has been descended and modified ??? deliver us the proof........
1
Juno Donat all bable talk in the air... deleiver us PROOF rock solid PROOF for you people CLAIMS.. science demand PROOF !!!! stopp talk around te subject ... deliver proof....
1
Juno Donat not evolution ... its variation within the kind... has nothing to do with evolution... and is fully explained by LOSING genetic information... not gaining genetic info... so 100% opposing the idea of evolution....
1
Juno Donat dog kind, horse kind, bee kind.... man do I have to teach you everything.... genetic information the DNA 4 bases Uracil thymine guanine adenine.... codons....
1
Juno Donat meaning ???????
1
Juno Donat no no no man you are realy hard headed.... each 3 set of DNA base codes fro 1 amino acid.. change/destroy the bases by radioactivity, by agressive chemical etc and then you change the information, the information of making proteins.... now all these destructive agences chemicals and radiation destruct the information therefor damaging the formation of proteins... there for damage the organism.... man man man do I realy have to teach you evrey detail..... ???????? now ALL the nutative influences are destrcutive OR ... Neutral at best..... meannig an organism can ONLY get worse off due to mutation then it started of. get it ??? there ie NEVER ever being seen and IMPROVEMENT in BETTER proteins there for evolution is a LIE !!!!! you see agressive and dangers chemical ALWAY make an orghanism sick and kills it..... it NEVER improves it... that has never been observed..... nor ever been repored... there is no such thing as beneficial mutations.....
1
@johnlemon5904 No it has nothing to do with you being good or evil... we are all evil. so no one can EARN a place in heaven, we will never bee good enough to EARN it....as if you can work for it... you cannot... your doing "good" is still way to evil to get yourself a place in heaven.... the way to get to heaven is to BELIEVE in what God says to us.... do you BELIEVE that God is telling the truth and are you willing to do what God wants you to do God tells us in the bible that BELIEVE and listening to God is the most important thing... not the "doing good" part... no body does good enough But do you believe in Jesus Christ ? do you Believe that He payed the price for your sinning..... and do you love Him in all you do.... and thus does as He wants you to do.... THAT is how you get to heaven... not by your behaviour.... our behaviour will never bring any of us in heaven.... also not my behaviour.... we are all evil compared to God/Jesus.
1
@johnlemon5904 and no if the devel rightfully drags you down in hell he will torture you eternally, why ? well you remind him of God since you are made in Gods image and God kicked him out of heaven into hell so the devil will torture you eternally....for that... unreasonable... yeah thats how the devil is.... an unreasonable creature that projects his unreasonable angre on God unto you/us. satan rebelled against God and unsreasonably projects that on us... into all eternities...
1
@johnlemon5904 the evil in this world... is still there because people choose to.... folks like you choose to be with the devil more then to be with God ... so you are maintaining evil on this planet yourself.... by your own free choice.... and you ask why ??? you kind of people maintain the evil...by rejecting God and not listening to Him... and yeah one day God is going to take care of evil, but at HIS time/agenda ... not on our time/agenda's....
1
@johnlemon5904 OOh yea I do understand the complexity ... you see I happen to be a university degree chemist and I also studied some biochemistry so I understand it even to atomic level what happens there.... dont worry about that .... THAT is why I can surely say that an idea as abiogenesis is eternally IMPOSSIBLE chemically spoken... and chemically spoken so is evolution.... here read this paper: https://www.academia.edu/42979330/Is_mathematical_probability_the_same_as_physical_reality_the_power_of_the_average_and_how_life_began
1
@johnlemon5904 well let me tell you people STILL do NOT understand what the supposed ways of abiogenesis would have been and surely they never have repeated it ... let alone proved abiogenesis/evolution..... there is no way they can repeat the chemistry BUT as science DEMANDS they MUST repeat the chemistry that supposedly brought life into existance OTHERWISE it is NOT part of obeservable repeatable SCIENCE and thus a fairytale....a hoax and thus pseudoscinece at best and a false religion at worst.
1
@johnlemon5904 well if all of it is no more then science tricks.... OK then I challenge you folks again and again and again.... repeat it as CORRECT science demands ... science is about observationals repeatable processes... so SCIENCE DEMANDS you folks MUST do it again in a repeatable way or it has no part in science no matter how nice graphics you can make... science demands physical proof by .. doing it repeatably again.... so far... Nothing has been repeated that confirms abiogenesis/evolution or even big bang, starformation, etc etc etc to be real part of science... you are free to BELIEVE IT !!! that is for sure !!! but then it is part of religion... not of observable provable evidence based science.... so stop indoctrinating innocent children with "silly" (heavy understatement) secular science which are no more then blatant lies... FIRST the factuall proof THEN the teachings not the other ways around. !!!! as is being done to this very day... THAT is blatant hideous indoctrination soviet style and thus highly repulsive manipulation of people... including yourself.... you have been duked my friend with "silly" idea's why ?? well liek I saidf before the devil hates you and he will tell you ANYthing that you are willing to believe in order to keep you away from God and thus from heaven..... why as I told you before he hates you asnd desires to torture you in hell.... and making people believe in lies is an easy trick for him.....folks like you believe anything that he pushes into the world. satan is the master of lies....
1
man this is realy realy realy amazing... this could NEVER EVER been evolveld from simple chemicals... this is way way way to complex... Yeah God has done it... there is NO other logical explanation..... just as we humans made ingenious machines so did God.... evolution could never have cooked this up... not in a billion billion billion yrs... it is way to ingenious.....
1
@SmarterEveryDay its always good to question assumptions untill they become facts or are being replaced by other findings/assumptions/facts that fit with reality better.
1
@oop483 no we cannot do without some kapitalism like way of doing, but it needs to be transformed back to a more durable sustainable way of producing and longer lasting products.... the LED's are a great example for that. By producing more durable we pollute our planet less and in the end more cheaper... since the pollution of our enevironment costs more than anticipated The kapitalistic compagnies MUST be held responsible for polluting the world based on this planned obsoleness way of production and THUS forcing them to become more aware of the evil world wide consequences of producing in planned obsoleteness ways.
1
3:11 Archimedes could have even be more closer by (3.1429+3,1408)/2 = 3,14185 which is only little less than 82 ppm off from the real value, not bad for those days.
1
9:20 - 9:32: well that proves that our solar system, calculated into the future cannot be stable, BUT it also proofs that calculating BACK intime the same argument goes... it coul not have been stable for BILLIONS of years... Well in that being said: why is it so strange to say that the earth acording to the Bible is only 6000 yrs old. if it was billions of yrs old it would not be in a stable manner positioned to sustain life. Even it it was stable for ONLY 1 billion yrs that was not enough time for this as abiogenesis/evolution to take place..... MEANING that here secular science has a huge problem !!!
1
now do you realy want me to explain you that you are wrong...or are you educated enough to figure it out yourself ???????
1
@ Nox .......be patient......I will milk you in a minute......
1
already found where your error is ?????
1
@NOX ... me lesbian ???? sorry for you but no... I am straight, you have to keep looking further.....succes with that.
1
well... planned obolescence... in action...
1
The trick is not to look from closeby but from farther away....and see it rotating in a stand alone situation agains a neutral back ground and where you do not see a back ground to which the sizes do not/hardly change in the by you observed sizes.
1
3:03 so basically Newton got his integral and differentiion idea's from archimedes... archimedes used the subdivisions of the circle and thus paved the way for Newton to intergrate and differentiate...
1
what has your lust for sex to do with light speed ???
1
9:20 Solar system is indeed unpredictable and therefor cannot be billlions of yrs old... as Derek said not even 10 million... so as a bible believing Christian I am very satisfied with that, since the earth according to the bible is about 6000 yrs old which fit perfectly in the scientific knowledge of the solar systems stability.....
1
in matter forces are also trasported by light speed interactions and you keep the sampe problems. electomagnetic forces are light speed traveling... and electromagnetic forces are making matter... since it consists of electrons which have charge and protons which also have charges.. thus electromagnetic thus light speed...
1
according to maxwell this would mean also the permitivity and permeability must be different in all directions e0 and u0 c= 1/SQRT( e0*u0) with all its consequences including in all electrical divices (like computers and other electronics) Our present day life would get a chaos if these differ depending on direction. Even chemical reactions would be different since they are electromagnetic interactions crystal stability etc etc Its an interesting question but does it hold in reality and the rest of the physical properties we encounter.
1
well Laplace was right, except for the name, about the super intelligent being: We Know Him as the Biblical God/Jesus Christ. He does know everything in past present and future,.... He even got it written done for us to check it out in what is known as the bible... yes the bible hold some future statements that we even can see coming true right as we speak.....
1
8:20 check with their genome and see if indeed thet have IMPROVED genetcis.. let me throw a prediction: they didnt.. they only Lost genetic information, which yes can indeed lead to being better suitable for THAT particular envirnonment but NOT for all other evrinoimnets so basically they have been weakend... like fish that get caught into a dark cave they lose over the generations their eye sight... in mutations it is use it or lose it.... same with bacteria... now lost abilities can be regained... just as spare parts of old cars can be used to fix a old model car... but alos that is not evolution but simply restoring an old already existing mechanism like lenksi dit with the citrus cycle...
1
14 meters apart on a 6371.0 km earth = 6.371.000 m is 1m in 455071,429 m
1
I wonder how one can BELIEVE in abiogenesis /evolution after seeing this..... abiogenesis/evolution could never have created this.... it is way way way to ingenious and complex for randomness to produce this... leaves only 1 logical conclusion: ...Yeah God has done it.... dont ask me how ... but He did/created this.... no other option possible
1
@rd3k3k3k3 It is used as an argument by the producers of course... not of the common people.
1
like m both each for their own reason.... both are interesting for their own reasons....turbulance is more common, laminar flow is harder to get and maintain... it is more special... turbulent flow is more common. turbulent flow is more like infinite mandelbrot mathematics.... fractals like. so maybe the navier stokes equiations should be correlated to fractal/mandelbrot math. next to this laminar and turbulent flows are brothers of each other.
1
EUREKA Problem solved: construct the next thing: a load of atomic clocks 10 to 1000 or so. Put 1 in a central spot. Now put all the other clocks (10 to 1000) - in a sphere around the central one at an exact known standard distance. Let all clocks have the exact same click/tick counter that at every tick of the clocks adds a digit. And let them run in arbirtairy starting points, of course really fast. Let the central clock fire in all directions a light pulse at the same time or not the same time but directed to each individual clock on the sphere. Note the click/tick when (at which pulse of itself) the central clock fires in which direction. Also note the number of the click/tick at which the pulse arrives at each individual clock on the sphere. OK IF ... the light speed is the same in all directions then over time (many years, since the earth is rotating around its axis and the sun and the galaxy etc) the differences in pulses (Pcentral - Psphere_clock_i where i is running from 1 to 200 if you have 200 clocks on the sphere) should remain constant no matter when you measure them. Its about the click tick differences since one can let these counters run arbitrairily. They dont necessarily need to be synchronized or even running at the same rate/pace ! as long as the change in digits is preferably (! not necessarily) the same as the central clock counter. Even if there is a slight difference in change rate, this is no issue, because it is always about the difference between the counts between Pc and Ps_c_i. THAT must remain constant or CHANGE constantly over time. IF ... However light speed is different in any direction this difference in pulses should be varying over time dramatically/significantly. Now of course each individual pulse of light should be separated in chronology from each other in an unmistakenly way. so that no errors occur over there. This is measuring light speed in a single directional way but at the same time in different directions ((the sphere) and over time since earth rotates in several ways in even other directions. There is NO 2 directional measurments per couple of clocks (central and one on the sphere) you just count the tick/click differences. my prediction: there will be no to extremely small variation at best.
1
3:22 put these back in a normal bacterial loaded environment they will be vanished in a hurry... which means being weaker due mutative losses. proving : no evolution...evolution is a suggested but non existing process. mutations do happen no doubt about that BUT that will bring about VARIATIONS not evolutin... fact is all these bacteria.... are .. still bacteria... evolution would be that thye gained wings, or legs or a nose or etc and they didnt they are still bacteria... NO evolution: variation yes but NOT evolution...
1
If this is indeed an issue then Maxwell would be wrong in the end. And Einstein also would be since he assumed that physical laws apply everywhere in the universe the same way. and luckely that turns out to be realistic so far. if not that would already have led to asymetrical observations where ever light speed is part of or related to the measurments directly or indirectly.
1
Solution: for the 1 way speed of light: still use 2 clocks and move one of them extremly slowely. Yes Einstein is correct and the higher the speed, the bigger the gamma factor and thus the effect.. so transport the clock very slowely like 1 mm each hour Wait a full year it has moved 365*24 = 8 meters and 76 cm or 1 mm/minute and do that 1 year long it has moved 525,6 meters and start measuring. A mm per second is also ok, then it takes 11,57 days to reach 1 km. At 0,1 mm/sec it takes about 115,74 days And the gamma factor is more negligable and the slower you go the smaller it will be. So the more accurate your lightspeed measurement will be. One could do this vey accurately at the LIGO site, they have long paths in their building to do so. In that way we can also check if light speed is and remains constant over the ages. I mean IF lightspeed changes over time there is NO way to define a meter as such and so many wavelengths right ? There are people who question this and I am wondering about myself if I am one of 'm. So to verify lightspeeds constancy it MUST be verified over the time thats where physics assumption MAY (!) have gone wrong in the first place since 1983. Now LIGO is even 4KM so it would take 46,3 days and some days to measure but since the length is bigger it is more accurate. and one only need a hollow pipe at the roof of a LIGO facility, next to 2 accurate atoms clocks. and an extremely slow clock mover. wit todys technogoly... no problem, right ? Now this can be done for ALL desired directions of measuring.
1
16:19 No its not hidden. One can test it. By measuring 1 way speed in all possible directions individually. With a slow moving clock at the far end. Make a sphere of slowely outward moving clocks 1mm/minute and leave one clock in the middle all synchronized to the middle clock. let all clockes move simlutaniously. Have lasers pointing in all directions that the clockes moved to and measure. Measure the time differences and start comparing. Start just with 7 clocks; 1 in the middel and 6 on the far ends of the axis. Now in measuring other directions simply turn the direction of this construction. PS best done in open space without any gravity influence so no gravitational time dilation. What also can be done is while the clocks are moving outward (slowely of course) the measurements can also be done.
1
Dear Derek, your statement assumes that either the permitivity or the permeability of space-time is not equally distributed all over space-time. So far known this is not the case. And space-time is or seems to be isotropic all over the universe with respect to these two features. It may be worth testing the consistancy of this null hypothesis of course. But that means one has to shoot 1 or more spacecraft(s), which is/are extremely fast into space into all directions and let it measure these two features to validate your assumption and send back to earth these measurements. Which in itself is interesting to validate of course.
1