Comments by "thewaytruthandlife" (@thewaytruthandlife) on "Is Most Published Research Wrong?" video.

  1. Want to Change Name but Cant Decided yet 雪乃 鷹だ yes there is an absolute: God-Jesus Christ of the Bible is the absolute standard to live up to. The whole human endeavours, how well meant is full of flaws.
    3
  2. Then Jesus Christ is the right answer for you, He can make you live for ever. Truely, no kidding.
    1
  3. it is a good video, which everybody with a slight of interest of science MUST see. It shows clearly what I have personaly experienced in my carreer; science is OFTEN WRONG..... !!! this is a very very important finding and conclusion. However it is the question that the statistics is correct: I mean the normal Gauss-distribution is a theoretical model and my experience, with reality is that the gaussian curve works pretty ok and is sufficient for a major of fields where accuracy is NOT that important. BUT it turns out that lots of experimental data is NOT neatly Gaussian but skewed Gaussian. Now Gaussian bell curves gives you an idea, but need NOT to be, the correct statistical model for this issue, I do not know. It turns out that theory and practice deviate lots and lots of times in many different subjects ending up with not so neatly gaussian curves as theory indicates. Now theoretically (IF the gaussian curve is the correct curve to apply !!) the standard deviation sigma S is used and 3S is a frequent heard limit to accept or reject an answer since it represents 99.7% of all possible correct answeres. But S values should be established over many measurements before the S can be accepted it self. Thing is with each measurement taken the S value changes a little bit since it is dependent on the measurements it self. and how to know if a measure ment is not an out-lier so should be rejected. it turns out to be, as I found in practise. that applying statistics is not that easy. the S value is determined by the measurements and the measurements to be accepted or rejected depends on the S value; THAT is circular reasoning to begin with. I know we do not yet have a better instrument and we have to start somewhere, but lets keep things in correct perspective.
    1