Comments by "thewaytruthandlife" (@thewaytruthandlife) on "Why No One Has Measured The Speed Of Light" video.

michelson and morley already proved that light speed does not depend on the direction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment. Also later experiments with way much more precision confirmed this. so why question it now ???
2
7:41 well it can be tested IF the definition that Einstein and you take to question.... measure it.... in all directions... measuring is he closest thing to knowing.
2
5:44 matter - anti matter ratio is there to prove that the universe didn develope by itself but was created, yes created by God. And many things point in that direction.
1
4:50 c = 0,5 of c in 1 direction and instantiously in the opposite direction ???? sorry dereck thats not part of reality. see michelson&morley
1
@SmarterEveryDay its always good to question assumptions untill they become facts or are being replaced by other findings/assumptions/facts that fit with reality better.
1
what has your lust for sex to do with light speed ???
1
in matter forces are also trasported by light speed interactions and you keep the sampe problems. electomagnetic forces are light speed traveling... and electromagnetic forces are making matter... since it consists of electrons which have charge and protons which also have charges.. thus electromagnetic thus light speed...
1
according to maxwell this would mean also the permitivity and permeability must be different in all directions e0 and u0 c= 1/SQRT( e0*u0) with all its consequences including in all electrical divices (like computers and other electronics) Our present day life would get a chaos if these differ depending on direction. Even chemical reactions would be different since they are electromagnetic interactions crystal stability etc etc Its an interesting question but does it hold in reality and the rest of the physical properties we encounter.
1
EUREKA Problem solved: construct the next thing: a load of atomic clocks 10 to 1000 or so. Put 1 in a central spot. Now put all the other clocks (10 to 1000) - in a sphere around the central one at an exact known standard distance. Let all clocks have the exact same click/tick counter that at every tick of the clocks adds a digit. And let them run in arbirtairy starting points, of course really fast. Let the central clock fire in all directions a light pulse at the same time or not the same time but directed to each individual clock on the sphere. Note the click/tick when (at which pulse of itself) the central clock fires in which direction. Also note the number of the click/tick at which the pulse arrives at each individual clock on the sphere. OK IF ... the light speed is the same in all directions then over time (many years, since the earth is rotating around its axis and the sun and the galaxy etc) the differences in pulses (Pcentral - Psphere_clock_i where i is running from 1 to 200 if you have 200 clocks on the sphere) should remain constant no matter when you measure them. Its about the click tick differences since one can let these counters run arbitrairily. They dont necessarily need to be synchronized or even running at the same rate/pace ! as long as the change in digits is preferably (! not necessarily) the same as the central clock counter. Even if there is a slight difference in change rate, this is no issue, because it is always about the difference between the counts between Pc and Ps_c_i. THAT must remain constant or CHANGE constantly over time. IF ... However light speed is different in any direction this difference in pulses should be varying over time dramatically/significantly. Now of course each individual pulse of light should be separated in chronology from each other in an unmistakenly way. so that no errors occur over there. This is measuring light speed in a single directional way but at the same time in different directions ((the sphere) and over time since earth rotates in several ways in even other directions. There is NO 2 directional measurments per couple of clocks (central and one on the sphere) you just count the tick/click differences. my prediction: there will be no to extremely small variation at best.
1
If this is indeed an issue then Maxwell would be wrong in the end. And Einstein also would be since he assumed that physical laws apply everywhere in the universe the same way. and luckely that turns out to be realistic so far. if not that would already have led to asymetrical observations where ever light speed is part of or related to the measurments directly or indirectly.
1
Solution: for the 1 way speed of light: still use 2 clocks and move one of them extremly slowely. Yes Einstein is correct and the higher the speed, the bigger the gamma factor and thus the effect.. so transport the clock very slowely like 1 mm each hour Wait a full year it has moved 365*24 = 8 meters and 76 cm or 1 mm/minute and do that 1 year long it has moved 525,6 meters and start measuring. A mm per second is also ok, then it takes 11,57 days to reach 1 km. At 0,1 mm/sec it takes about 115,74 days And the gamma factor is more negligable and the slower you go the smaller it will be. So the more accurate your lightspeed measurement will be. One could do this vey accurately at the LIGO site, they have long paths in their building to do so. In that way we can also check if light speed is and remains constant over the ages. I mean IF lightspeed changes over time there is NO way to define a meter as such and so many wavelengths right ? There are people who question this and I am wondering about myself if I am one of 'm. So to verify lightspeeds constancy it MUST be verified over the time thats where physics assumption MAY (!) have gone wrong in the first place since 1983. Now LIGO is even 4KM so it would take 46,3 days and some days to measure but since the length is bigger it is more accurate. and one only need a hollow pipe at the roof of a LIGO facility, next to 2 accurate atoms clocks. and an extremely slow clock mover. wit todys technogoly... no problem, right ? Now this can be done for ALL desired directions of measuring.
1
16:19 No its not hidden. One can test it. By measuring 1 way speed in all possible directions individually. With a slow moving clock at the far end. Make a sphere of slowely outward moving clocks 1mm/minute and leave one clock in the middle all synchronized to the middle clock. let all clockes move simlutaniously. Have lasers pointing in all directions that the clockes moved to and measure. Measure the time differences and start comparing. Start just with 7 clocks; 1 in the middel and 6 on the far ends of the axis. Now in measuring other directions simply turn the direction of this construction. PS best done in open space without any gravity influence so no gravitational time dilation. What also can be done is while the clocks are moving outward (slowely of course) the measurements can also be done.
1
Dear Derek, your statement assumes that either the permitivity or the permeability of space-time is not equally distributed all over space-time. So far known this is not the case. And space-time is or seems to be isotropic all over the universe with respect to these two features. It may be worth testing the consistancy of this null hypothesis of course. But that means one has to shoot 1 or more spacecraft(s), which is/are extremely fast into space into all directions and let it measure these two features to validate your assumption and send back to earth these measurements. Which in itself is interesting to validate of course.
1