Comments by "thewaytruthandlife" (@thewaytruthandlife) on "The Most Common Cognitive Bias" video.

  1. OK i like this way of reasoning. but from this point of view I ask you diamonds and dinosaurbones are said to be millions of yrs old c14 is detectable only till a max of 60.000 to 90.000 ys old objects why do we still find C14 in diamonds  and dinosaur bones??? dinosaurs are said to have been wipes out 60-70 million yrs ago it is being said that humans came to be only about 3 million yrs ago maximum why then do we still find drawings and carvings of dinosaur like animals on all kinds of human artworks world wide ? (ankor wat temple cambodja 800 yrs old, Ica burial stones, just to name a few) it is being said that earth layers form over millions of yrs yet we do find earth layers that have been deposited in matter of hours or days (mt st helens, tsunami deposits, surtsey island).  it is being said that continents are 100's of million yrs old yet englands and australia's and frances  coast is eroded away meters per year. it is being said that animals like the coulancanth, dragonflies, daddy longlegs, frogs lived 100's million yrs ago, yet we see them unchanged as living fossils and so in fact could have ended up in any earth layer you dug up....  it is being said that dinosaurs lived 60-70 illionyrs ago  yet still fresh blood tissues and blood cells are being found in dinosaur bones with enough c14 to measure it is being said that living cells (as we know them)  originate from 100% dead materials/chemicals and that these evolved into higher organisms like lets say worms (as we know them)  Yet science has never ever reproduced ths proces to the full More surprisingly it is that in chemistry an newly found synthesis route can only be recognised scientifically, when it is reproduced by other scientists....  This has been standard procedure for every chemical around to day... EXCEPT for the chemistry of our origens.... it is the countre tests and proof to explore the validity that makes a theory interesting you kind of said in this video... about which I agree.  but why does that go for all kinds of theories EXCEPT when the theory deals with our origens ???? einstein said one day when he was interviewed and people held in front of him that if 100 would oopose his theory that it was a worthless theory then einstein replied back ooh 1 was enough..... why does that go for all kind of science subjects EXCEPT when it deals with our origens ????
    3