Youtube comments of thewaytruthandlife (@thewaytruthandlife).

  1. 89
  2. 51
  3. 48
  4. 42
  5. 19
  6. 14
  7. 14
  8. 13
  9. 12
  10. 12
  11. 10
  12. 10
  13. 9
  14. 9
  15. 8
  16. georgia guide stones: de 10 geboden van de nieuwe wereld orde (new world order) keep world population under the 500.000.000...... staat zelfs in steen gebeiteld 80% van het wetenschappelijk onderzoek dat nota bene is gepubliseerd in gerenomeerde wetenschappelijke vakbladen (science Nature etc) blijkt in de loop van de tijd vals zijn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42QuXLucH3Q Dus waarom 100% vertrouwen in de wetenschap hebben als die ons in 80% vd gevallen bedonderd ?????? Er gebeurd erg veel achter de schermen door mensen met ontiegelijk veel geld waar wij (jan met de pet op) geen inzage in hebben en waarschijnlijk niet het beste met de mensheid voor heeft. De rijken der aarde hebben altijd er al belang bij gehad om het gewone volk onder de duim houden... dat is sinds de periode voorafgaand aan de franse revolutie niet anders dan nu... die revolutie was er niet voor niets...des tijds mooi voorbeeld daarvan wat zowiezo werkelijkheid is geworden in onze tijd het open gooien van alle EU Grenzen zodat goedkoop werk volk de makrt konden en kunnen over spoelen om de lonen kunstmatig laag te houden... met succes helaas veel mensen in NL DE en Fr trekken aan het kortste eind als het gaat om inkomsten... met als gevolg dat de nieuwe daklozen mensen zijn met een goede opleiding en die door een tegenvallertje hun inkomsten kwijt raken en op straat belanden... met dank aan de lobbyisten en de VVD-Rutte die daarvoor wetgeving erdoor hebben gekregen tav bv ontslag regeling versoepelingen etc etc uiteraard uit de koker van de multinationals maw de rijken der aarde die maar al te graag diverse bonussen in eigen zak steken ondanks allerlei crises. maw complot theorieën hebben ook een aanwijsbare oorzaak uiteindelijk... de rijke elite is gewoon niet te vertrouwen. dat bleek al rond om de franse revolutie en die mensen zijn nog steeds niet veranderd...
    7
  17. 7
  18. 7
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23. 6
  24. 6
  25. 6
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4
  51. 4
  52. OK i like this way of reasoning. but from this point of view I ask you diamonds and dinosaurbones are said to be millions of yrs old c14 is detectable only till a max of 60.000 to 90.000 ys old objects why do we still find C14 in diamonds  and dinosaur bones??? dinosaurs are said to have been wipes out 60-70 million yrs ago it is being said that humans came to be only about 3 million yrs ago maximum why then do we still find drawings and carvings of dinosaur like animals on all kinds of human artworks world wide ? (ankor wat temple cambodja 800 yrs old, Ica burial stones, just to name a few) it is being said that earth layers form over millions of yrs yet we do find earth layers that have been deposited in matter of hours or days (mt st helens, tsunami deposits, surtsey island).  it is being said that continents are 100's of million yrs old yet englands and australia's and frances  coast is eroded away meters per year. it is being said that animals like the coulancanth, dragonflies, daddy longlegs, frogs lived 100's million yrs ago, yet we see them unchanged as living fossils and so in fact could have ended up in any earth layer you dug up....  it is being said that dinosaurs lived 60-70 illionyrs ago  yet still fresh blood tissues and blood cells are being found in dinosaur bones with enough c14 to measure it is being said that living cells (as we know them)  originate from 100% dead materials/chemicals and that these evolved into higher organisms like lets say worms (as we know them)  Yet science has never ever reproduced ths proces to the full More surprisingly it is that in chemistry an newly found synthesis route can only be recognised scientifically, when it is reproduced by other scientists....  This has been standard procedure for every chemical around to day... EXCEPT for the chemistry of our origens.... it is the countre tests and proof to explore the validity that makes a theory interesting you kind of said in this video... about which I agree.  but why does that go for all kinds of theories EXCEPT when the theory deals with our origens ???? einstein said one day when he was interviewed and people held in front of him that if 100 would oopose his theory that it was a worthless theory then einstein replied back ooh 1 was enough..... why does that go for all kind of science subjects EXCEPT when it deals with our origens ????
    3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. I am really surpriced that people so easily accept evolutionistsic ideas. no scientist has ever made a living cell (as we know them) from 100% dead material/chemicals NOR let those artificially living cells (as we know them) EVOLVE into worms (as we know them).....  but yet it is accepted world wide as PROVEN science  ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? well hold on for a minute....... when a new way for making methanol was found this was reproduced by other scientists to confirm this scientific corrrect new synthesisroute....  fact is this has been done for the most if not all NEWLY found synthesisroutes for all kinds of chemical components EXCEPT for the SUPPOSED CHEMICAL origen of LIFE that SUPPOSEDLY happend 3,8-3,5 billion yrs ago that one has NEVER been tested in reality YET IT HAS BEEN CLAIMED to be PROVEN science ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? isnt that weird ???? methanol production with a new synthesis route needed to be reproduced in order to gain sceintific status.... which is fine since that is the way science works and should work.... newly found fenomenon SHOULD be reproducted in order to get a reality check so to say..... thats correct science..... a reality check...... but for the most important issue.... the suppossed chemical origen of life does NOT need that in order to get scientific status  ?????? I am baffled ...... this isnt much of science but rather de defence mechanism of a religion....... a wrong evil religion well sounds like PSEUDO science to me then.
    3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 3
  64. 3
  65. 3
  66. It is pretty simple: in 2012 I think it was the Higgs Boson/Higgs field was confirmed to be real. But there is a down side: the Higgs field is meta stable. IF the Higgs field moves to a more stable version of itself it would destroy the entire universe in doing so. And that is how the world will end, in fact the entire universe will end in that way. Now the Higgs Boson is also called "God particle" by Leon Lederman a jewish professor in particly physics who discovered a thing or 2 at least. so a big man in that area. So it is no coincidence that about 2000 yrs ago that anopther Jewish man also called Peter, but this time a hardly educated fisherman, predicted the end of the universe as well. how do we know .. we this Peter received this information from the Creator God Himself. and write that down in the book we all know as Bible. in 2Peter 3 starting from verse 10 fisherman Peter described the end of the unverse by it being blown up to smithereens and elements to be melting to their end on the day of the Lord God. so now these 2 are linked together...now since the bible predicts that the earth will be by then about 7000 yrs of age (7 days of each 1000 yrs long for God) ... we still have anything between 1000 and 1500 yrs to go roughly speaking before the universe/earth will end in a big bang. You see 1 day is as a 1000 yrs and 1000 yrs is as 1 day for God as the bible tells us. And God has a love for the number 7 - 7 days of creation, 7 days a week, 7000 yrs of earth history. So in about 1000- 1500 yrs (estimated) from now it is over. a NEW heaven and a NEW eartrh will be created by God.
    3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71.  Juno Donat  life didnt need a starting point ?????????? sorry ????? since its chemical reactions ??? what ???? are you realy that simple ???? evidence ?? please tell me where... ?? never seen it ..... ooh Yeah God is emperically been proven to be factual..... there is so muc evidence that He is real.... man... the movie above is just one of it.... ooh yea there are tests you can do yourself at home..... read the bible and keep track of history and the news.... you see in the bible God gave us prophesies.... and ALL you can test them yourself.....you see there are about 3000 prophesies, of which about 2500 have already been fullfilled and about 500 are for the future and some of them you CAN see them being fulfilled RIGHT as we speak.... so test material enough.. BUT let me guess... you do NOT WANT it to be true....... but that is no argument of God not BEING fatcually true... you see Gods existence does NOT depent on your believe in Him.... He does NOT disappear because you dont believ in Him.. either God is there for real or He isnt as simple as that... there is no other choice... and coming/bringing up many other gods is simply the same as saying that the ONE and only TRUE God of the bible isnt real and just a mental thing of humans....so it falls in the category of denial of God being real.... you see ther IS only ONE God ... nothing else..... the other "gods" are nothing more than demons pretending to be God.... and yeah they have some power.....IF YOU GIVE it to them. the fact that the world is a mess is because people refuse to accept the ONE and ONLY true God Of the Bible... that means people prefer t follow demons (the so called other "gods" ) in stead of God.... even YOU choose to follow other gods.... you may not know or realize it but you do.....
    3
  72. 3
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. Geloof in God/Jezus helpt weldegelijk tegen corona !! MITS je allereerst ZELF de verantwoordelijkheid neemt om je uit de gevaren zone te blijven en dus NIET persé op de Staphorstse wijze... Als christelijk gelovige (ik ook) mogen we God OOK niet op de proef stellen. allereerst hebben we ZELF de verantwoordelijkheid om gezond te blijven. Dus maw; tenzij het niet anders kan, geen gevaar op te zoeken, denkende dat God je wel uit red. ALS je er aan gedaan hebt wat je er aan hebt kunnen doen en je bent dan NOG iets krijgt, dan helpt God je er echt wel uit als je er om bid.... maar je mag God niet uit testen daarop. Veel mn super orthodoxen doen dat wel.... zoals ook in Staphorst.. dat is NIET de juiste wijze om op God te vertrouwen. Ik breng bij Staphorst even in gedachten het stukje waar Jezus zelf door de duvel verzocht werd: satan nam Jezus mee naar het tempel dak en zei; als U Gods Zoon bent spring dan van het dak... want er staat geschreven (in het oude testament) dat God aangaande U (Jezus) Zijn engelen zal uit zenden opdat u uw voet niet aan een steen stoot. Jezus op Zijn beurt ontkent die uitspraak niet MAAR zegt Jezus: ER STAAT OOK GESCHREVEN.... Gij zult de Here Uw God NIET verzoeken.....!!! En dat is wat de staphorsters broeders/zusters even vergeten zijn, blijkbaar. In Azie was er een aantal maanden geleden OOK een kerk waar 100-den mensen bij een kwamen en kennelijk op God vertrouwde en daar is het FOUT gegaan... men heeft daar God verzocht en Hij heeft niet of bijna niet ingegrepen tav de gezondheid van mensen. beste Broeders en Zusters in Jezus... wees wijs en ga NIET God verzoeken in deze gevaarlijke tijden.... blijf thuis !!!!
    2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138.  Juno Donat  well dont worry... IF for some reason ... you will NEVER change your mind on this before you die (yes..... BEFORE !!! you die.. not after you die... since then it will be TOO late !!!) .... then you will meet with the devil yourself ... when he comes to torture you or some of his demons.... so one day you WILL find out its not mythical but more real that you want it to be.... so lets see how mythical you then think about them...... you see there are 2 options either God but also the devil are real ..they exist for real or they do not... there are no other options. Now it turns out to be that they ARE factually real.... that is why this world is so well and super highly organized on one hand (Gods input see the above movie.. that can ONLY be designed very carefully and put together miticulously) .... but on the other hand that we are able to make a mess of it ... due to satans influence on us and in our lives and our FREE CHOICE to listen to his lies..... so if you end up in hell it is by your own free choice NOT to listen to God.... you see ...our universe ....but also living organisms (see above movie again) are so highly organiszed that can only mean that there MUST be a God who cooked this all up.... there is no other realistic option. it wold be strange to you if only a bunch atoms due to some energy input would get organized to a space shuttle or cray super computer right ??? these objects ahve also been designed and created by human hands... well our bodies are even far far afr more advanced than the sapce shuttle or a cray super computer and they would be here by random chance ????? Here there is an interesting paper about this subject... academia.edu/42979330/Is_mathematical_probability_the_same_as_physical_reality_the_power_of_the_average_and_how_life_began and It ONLY doesnt carry weight for people like yourself....
    2
  139.  Juno Donat  nope... I point out to you the consequences of your choices... on top of your denial of satan/the devil as being real... you started that one....not me... my respons would be different if you said tht God would be mythical.... but no you said yourself that the devil is mythical according to you... well then that was my respons and no I was NOT indoctrinated.... I was looking for God myself.... I asked Him myself in 2004 I wanted to know if God was real and asked Him to open my eyes for the truth..... I never truisted people in these matters since people can tell me loads of crap... so I thought to myself OK IF God is real... then HE is the only one who canb give me the correct answer... so I asked the Creator of the universe (since I didnt know who He was so I kept it neutral) and from that momenbt on God started to acted more openly to me in my life... He was always present on my back ground since I was not aware of Him being real.... sa you do right now. so NO I was NOT indoctrinated as you are ..... you see YOU are indoctrinated by anti-God information. Which makes sense from a pure rebellious against God point of view. No church was involved, I accepted God/Jesus Christ in my own house without anybody being present then God and me..... He showed me He is real..... so no infleuence of out side when God opend my eyes for HIS truth.... it was like Neo after swallowing the red pill.... God opend my eyes for reality..... The other gods that you describe are the troicks of satan to keep you away from the ONE and TRUE only God.... just as you want to find YOUR most favorite chocloate of all time in the shop of willy wonka where 10.000's different chocolates are being presented to you..... you get confused ... satanis trick and it seems to work on you (and on most people) ... the more religions the devilk presents ... the harder it for people like you to find the one and Only true God but there is a solution as I told you; SIMPLY SINCERELY as the ONE and ONLY GOD to open your eyes for the truth ....
    2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. Infinite punbishment for a finite crime: good question.... so it deserves a good answer: God is infinitely Holy; there is not a split split split splitter-di-split second God can tolerate sin in His presence. His tolerance for sin is ZERO !! And if YOU are NOT willing to confess your sins so that Jesus can do away with them, you cannot be with God infinitely.... and THUS being separated infintely from God.... thats how simple it is. God wants to have you infinitely with Him in heaven, and THAT can only be achieved IF you, in a FINITE time, confess your sins to Him via Jesus Christ and for a finite time live as Jesus wants you to. So with repect of time and a finite crime.... God has put a finite time you need to confess your sins..... so it is not Infinite punishment against a finite crime..... It is a finite crime against a finite time required to confess your sins via Jesus Christ AND a finite time to live according to Jesus ways that He wants you to live (the rest of your finite life and which is described in the bible)..... and God has given us that opportunity..... via Jesus Christ.... so its not infinite punishment for a finite crime. its a fininte living as Jesus wants you to live (see NT) and then you have infinite life in heaven..... and NOT a infinite time in hell... .....BUT... ...YOU CHOOSE ....! ....WHICH WAY TO GO.......! WHOMS SIDE ARE YOU ON ? God has already chosen for you....... thats why He gave Jesus's sacrifice to save your life... what do you choose ????
    2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. It is so amusing and sad at the same time to see grown up man highly educated and being esteemed by other highly educated people talk so much nonsens and iscard the obvious. Well as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle once said via his creation Sherlock Holmes; If you discard all the impossible options than the remain solution however seemingly improbable must be the only solution to the problem. Well It seems to me that mr Green and lots of people with him has never heared of sherlock holmes or even arthur conan doyle or deliberatly chooce to ignore this very statement because they dont like the "seemingly improbable solution". well the universe is the only one we are in and we can factually observe. other universes have NOT been observed and thus are not part of reality. why is the universe so fine tuned for life.... because it IS FINE TUNED for life..... then the question rises why ? and by whom ? and then theanswer MUST BE; BY an almighty GOD Only HE is able to created such a setup so that we can live and thrive and study our universe to see God loving care for us. and that is where these people turn their heads away because people dont like that answer that is the exact reason why people have looked for ages for different sollutions that dont include God... hence... the unproven idea's of multiverses..... As long as God remains out of the picture......according to Green and associates.....they cannot and will not accept that God is a reality and is able to create an entire universe hyper fine tuned as it is... that is too much to swallow for them. well it is real non the less and like it or not like it..... but seeing the utter fine tuned state of our universe with all its constants and settings... this is the only realistic and observable solution.
    2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. PART 2Now these prophesies are about 6000 to 2000 yrs. old maximum, and they have become true, factually. There are also prophesies that are about to become true in the future. To name a few:a) There will come one person to rule the world, don't listen to him he is evil, and will proclaim a false non-real peace. He will set himself in the Jewish temple in Jerusalem, pro-claiming to be God, but he is the devil or a false prophet. b) Gods temple will be rebuild in Jerusalem. the Jewish people are already preparing this event and are collecting goods to make it real.  c) There will be one world currency. the bit coin may be a fore runner for this. d) People will only be able to pay by means of a special mark on their right hand or forehead. There are already chips that can be implanted in the body so you can pay. e) The world economy will drop in a very short time. today with the all connectedness of all world markets this is from time to time happening on a small scale when economically bad news hits the market. this was unthinkable in the ancient days. But it became real in our days. f) People will kill each other massively. look at the news broadcasts. g) In +/- 20-100 yrs. (maybe 200 yrs.) the majority of humankind will be wiped out, due to its own wickedness and unwillingness listen to God-Jesus. h) Jesus will return and establish peace for 1000 yrs., when he returns He will stand on the mount of olives and that mountain will split in 2 creating a sea. (There is already a geological fault line from Ethiopia to the lake of galilee and underneath the mount of olives trembling more and more) i) After this 1000 yrs. of peace the entire universe will be destroyed (most probably due to the Higgsfield decay.) j) All countries (UN) will attack Israel in the valley of Megiddo or the valley of Yisreel (which is the same). There they will fall and lose. All attacking people as militaries will get killed. It will take 7 yrs. to get the bodies removed and buried. Statistically it is IMPOSSIBLE that this all occurs via random chance. Prophets wrote these down under Gods-Jesus's authority at least 2000 yrs. ago. This proofs mathematically that God is real. Only God knew the future in these details.The Creation science:  And there is more scientific evidence. Watch creationism on YouTube by searching on YouTube on these titles:* the age of the earth, dr Kent Hovind * starlight and time, dr Russell Humphreys * Fossils in Layers Made By Mt. St. Helens * Geo-Blunder: No "Millions of Years"! (Dr. Steven Austin) * Mutations Prove Creation with Dr. Jerry Bergman, Part 1 - Origins * Mutations Prove Creation with Dr. Jerry Bergman, Part 2 - Origins * Origins - The Fossil Record with Dr. Jerry Bergman * Carbon-14 dated dinosaur bones - under 40,000 years old * Dinosaur Soft Tissue Destroys Millions of Years Ideas - HD * Soft tissue in dino & other fossils(notes)-nothing in science justifies millions of years ages * Stegosaurus carving at 800 year old Ta Prohm Temple in Cambodia * Secret of the Incas. Stones Collection of Dr Javier Cabrera, PeruGod-Jesus is real. God bless.
    1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. The Anal Atheist that is what many people think but it is not true..... allah is not God.... the God of the Jews in the old testament and the christian God in old and new testament is the same I agree upon that, but all other "gods"are nothing more then demons fallen angels of satan, who pretent towards people to be God in order to distract people like yourself from the one and ONLY true God, who is Jesus Christ. yes I agree if you are not in tothis matter, it is confussing... which is exactly what the satan (devil) tries to accomplish and with most people he succeeded. That is why I advice you, if you REALY want to know who God really is...... to ask GOD Himself.... He can answer for Himself you see.... just ASK Him... simple as that..... you do not need me or anybody else to find out who God really is..... If you really are looking for who God is and if He is real (He is I know)... just simply ask Him..... He can answer for Himself and in HIS TIME !!! (not necessarily your time and in your ways !!!! ) He can answere you.....but ONLY IF you are truely interested in knowing Him..... God is no monster, you have strongly be lied to about God...... God is a very very very extremely very good Father..... but Yes He can take or allow harsh measures, because of peoples OWN CHOICES .... you cannot fool around with God you see. And there you have it again, that the devil does cruel things to them..... If people do not listen to God by choice, then the only thing God can do is pull back His protective hands, and then people suffer from the devils willingness to destroy people..... God has limited Himself by HIS CHOICE, to let people have their own free will even if it means to rebel against God..... but that means there are strings attached to that..... allowing the devil to torture you...... so people get tortured by their own free choices...... but NOT because God want this to happen ... it is 100% by Peoples OWN free choice..... That goes also for you: you can Choose to receive Gods eternal love and care and go to heaven OR you can choose God to withdraw His carring hands from you and allow the devil to torture you.... YOU CHOOSE PAL...... YOU CHOOSE.... but do not blame God for YOUR wrong choice..... God is no monster.... He just gave you free will .... THAT is how much God loves you...... God prefers and I prefer that yu start to listen to God in order that you will go to heaven. It wold be the best choice you could possibly every make and the most important one too
    1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. if one embrases secular science then you embrase a new religion but with nothing more then other believe statements: in order to become a scientist orented person you need to accept certain unproven assumptions in order to BELIEVE that secular science is correct..... and fact is secular science IS a religion eventhough they claim they are not and they claim to be 100% pure science. They might wish that but they are NOT..... example: in order to accept for instance radioactive dating you MUST accept some false assumptions in order to accept the dating as a working methode...... you are required to accept that a) decay rates have always been constant.... thats an unproven assumption and even contradicted many times over (by peter sturrock, jere jenkins, efraim fishbach for example) b) you MUST accept that alle the daughter elements that you measure are coming from a mother element that has been always in the object of study which is a false assumption since elements leak in and out of objects objects are NOT closed systems ( the Leaching of stones is the key proces of this). c) you MUST accept that at formation all the daughter elements and mother elements are 100% linked together and not have an other origen. Now its is totaly crap to accept these assumptions to be true. No one can test or verify these assumptions. Well there are many many examples in which secular science fails to prove these assumptions to be correct valid. An other example there is is the formation of earth layers. in order to embrasse secular science as truth you MUST accept the false assumption that earth layers form over millions of years. this assumption is proven wrong many times over in many sedimentation experiments: earth layers for in matter of seconds-minutes even 100's of meters thick layers..... that MEANS that there ARE factually No millions of years..... since 95% of the earths surface is made out of sedimnetairy rocks which are deposited very rapidly.....thats a science FACT..... ignored by secular science so in order to become indoctrinated by secular science you MUST accept the lie that sedimentairy rocks form over millions of years... contradicting every CORRECT scientific evidence against it. In order to step out of christian religion you must step into the secular religion and leave behind the proven facts and embrasse the lies of secular science...... you choose Thats why you must BELIEVE !!!! (read religion !!!) these assumptions are all met, in order to accept secular science. This way of doing is nothing more then CREATING a NEW type of religion.... which is called : secular science....... secular science is this way has become an INDOCTRINATIVE evil way of manipulating people.... which has all characteristsics of a dangerous cult..... it should be banned from the planet.... before 2004 I used to be an atheist a scientific oriented atheist..... so I happen to know both sides of the story..... God how ever opened my eyes for the truth about the bible and about creationism....... the bible is right also on scientific level.
    1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. Yeah right, mutations know several sources and it does not matter what source induces the mutation. since mutations are just 100% pure random and coincidental including for the hypothetical process of evolution. You see what you call the natural form of mutation that supposedly cause evolution is exactly 100% the same as what I am talking about, there is no difference, and cells do not distinguish between one or an hypothetical other form of mutation. that is crap. Mutations are mutations. since mutations are caused by random processes WITHOUT any form of intelligent input/mechanism that can differentiate between cancer mutations and supposed evolution mutations. This statement of yours is 100% baloney and crap. Mutations are caused by a) cosmic radiation b) chemicals (carcinogenic, like blackened BBQ meat ) c) UV light from the sun, d) copy errors e) natural decay of elements in your body (c14 to N14 of 40K to 40Ar) f) natural decay of elements outside your body. (and 1 or 2 more). there are no other sources. and in neither of these cases organism cells can distinguish between damaging mutations or dangerous cancerous mutations. your hypothesis is crap, sorry.disproving evolution ? watch my youtube channel. improving evolution is not realistic since there is nothing to begin with so how to improve something that isn't there ?? The model; used to be called evolution has never been proven; the lesser fossils the deeper we dig ?? well maybe you haven't look every where around, the bottom of the oceans for example. You see the sea creatures in a Noah flood model would be buried to the lowest places and since the mountains rose and the valleys sank due to the flood (according to the bible), the majority of fossils are being formed by the flushing away of these sea creatures to deeper grounds; in the sea/ocean bed floors. But that has not been researched yet, has it. only land fossils have been investigated. so your model could be 100% wrong because of misinterpretations of data and missing data.
    1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1) mutations are mutations, by which eaver means at which ever places. why because mutations happen at random at random places. there is no intelligence behind mutations and thus it is no constructive guided process. so it cannot distinguish between yes or not being evolutionistic. it is random. 2) read the bible: the fountains of the deep broke open: there was and is water in the earths crust lok at "the bejing anomaly" there is still an entire ocean in the earths crust. enough to wipe out all life except 8 people in a boat and to create the 95% of sedimentairy rocks that the world has today including the fossils. you skipped 3) 4) Noah never saw a chiwawah he saw a wolf like dog.... from which all other dogs were breeded in the last 4500 yrs, that is VARIATION..... Noah never saw a african and indonesian elephant: he jsyt saw an elephant. Noah never saw a leopard, tiger, cheetah, lion, etc he just saw a big cat like animal from whic all these animals have VARARIATED. Human kind has breeded ever since 1000's of different variations of animals plants etc just by breeding. The ark was more then big enough to carry al the basic kinds of land animals he could probably carry 4 times more. 5) wrong assumption, God was NOT created: God was always there. God is from eternity to eternity. You ASSUME / BELIEVE that God is just as us stuck in time.... He is not stuck in time. God is out side of time space and matter. do I fully understand that ?? no but that is what God states about Himself if you study the bible very well. I do not recognize the pope as my religious leader since I am not catholic, I am an independently messianic zionistic creationistic christian I have nothing with the pope and next to that even if I would have: the pope is WRONG in accepting evolution. he is no scientist so how can he judge evolution correctly. I am a scientist s I amke my own judgements about that. I am not above the pope NOR is the pope above me. He is just as human as you and I am. we are all on the same level towards God. I do not believe the pope is God send, nor catholisism, man your question are so much a portrayal of your ignorance I could write a book based on your silly question alone. Yes I have contact with God: He is my Father. and He wants to be yours too. to do in heaven ? ooh by that Time God will show me. Other gods ??? there are no other gods. there are demons PRETENDING to be God to distract you from the Only and ONLY TRUE God... other gods are a trick of the devil to keep you away from God-Jesus. It seems to work with you and the majority of people. Deutronomy 22: So you do factually approve of adultery, free sex outside the marriage and that YOUR wife has sex with other man ?? that is what you basically say.... well good luck with that one then in your future..... lets see how much you realy like that .....that your partner cheats upon you..... it will be a cryer for you pal, can tell you that..... its no fun .... but hee I imagine you will surely enjoy it...... imagen your wife being banged by an other fellow..... good luck with that one pal... you are going to need it. ooh and please leave the stones in the floor when you find your wife cheating on you, in front of your own eyes. Try to avoid the desire of killing her... will you ??
    1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. Uber Laufer well i know what you mean ...... but science has NEVER proved that life has a chemical start supposedly 4,5 billlion yrs ago... no scienctist on earth performed abiogenesis-evolution.... do you understand THAT way of fraising what I mean ???? no chemist has made a cell out of bare elements NOR letting those cells evolve to a human or even a worm..... that should be not TOO hard to understand....... and yes we are made out of chemicals thats true... but where started human life ? or for that matter where did life start and in what way... science has NO answer to that question...... you see everytime when a chemical synthesis route was found in the past .... other scientist MUST have done the same claims in order to get scientific recognision for that claimed synthesis route.... for example the synthesis route of NH3 ammonia or Na2CO3 soda.... or HCl  hydrochloric acid or making CH3-CH2-CH3 from methane CH4....... all these synthesis routes MUST have a scientific backup by other researchers in order to give and get scientific trust worthy status for a science claim to make one of these chemicals..... well this has NEVER ever been done for the supposed chemical ORIGEN of life... the chemical synthesis route for making life out of chemicals has NEVER been given......and science has NEVER given the proof of that THOSE cells can evolve into higher organisms as worms...... BUT STILL science CLAIMS that abiogenesis-evolution is the origen of life ..... HOW CAN THAT BE ???? is it the job of scientist to present facts or imagination..... yes science has made building blocks thats true.... but a building block IS NOT a living cell let alone be an evolved worm from those cells ...... so where does science has the guts to say that life emerged from a pre-biotic soup..... you see the only thing scinece did is making building blocks and letting us IMAGINE that the rest also happend...... yes boys and girls   we found out that it is possible to create miscels.....and you can IMAGEN that from this cells have came to be..... OOH yeah I can IMAGEN a whole lot..... trainloads full of comic books I can IMAGEN .... BUT THATS not science !!!!! thats comic book fairy tale telling..... science MUST present the achieved FACTS and not the IMAGINATORY fake stories......
    1
  236. Miku Chan well you may be right for the middle ages... yes in some cases the church has hindred science ..... but hee... i remember you that we live in 2014 now...... and religion is no more hinderance to science any more... but thing is science is a hinderance to it self..... Mary H Schweitzer found fresh tissue in supposedly 60-70 million yrs old T-rex bones.....scientifically this is impossible since organic material decompose under the MOST optimal laboratory conditions WAY too fast to allow for mary schweitzers findings ..... IF THESE would be indeed 60-70 million yrs old..... so science is hindering itself with the false assumption that there are billlions of yrs. other issue: c14 in diamonds... c14 has a halflife of 5730 yrs lets say 6000.... so 1 kg of PURE c14 is totaly gone in 600.000 yrs and it is unmeasurable in 50-90.000 yrs.... people find diamonds in the earth from which science claims they are millions to billions yrs old...... OK IF thats true... why do we still find C14 in these diamonds ???? ooh uranium thorium decay explains it..... EEUHH sorry NO it doesnt..... the U-Th decay explains only 1 C14 atom in every 2 hours and 45 minutes per gram of C.... it would take 7000 BILLLION YRS ! to get a detectable amount of c14 (ASSUMING that in the meanwhile the formed c14 doesnt decay, which of course does decay). well science HINDERS itself by again accepting billions of yrs instead of accepting the biblical time frame of about 6000 yrs earths age... the shrinking of the sun.... we know the sun shrinks: the sun is using H to for He and Li Be B C N O etc well since the volume of the sun is determined by the atoms then the only particles tht contribute to the suns volume are; H He Li Be B N O etc .... well since 4 H atoms make 1 He and 2 He make 1 Be etc that means that volume determining atoms are getting lesser and lesser. next to that if fusion goes from H to higher atoms then the energy release is getting lesser and lesser per ongoing reaction..... next to that we see the sun burning and thus loosing energy in the form of light next to particles, next to magnetic filed energy etc. so all these processes together there is only 1 option left for the sun to do: shrink..., but that means it used to be bigger.....and when it was bigger there was more H-He fusion which is the most energetic fusion reaction so the temperature MUST have been higher and the sun MUST have been bigger... well in a time span of 6000 yrs thats no problem..... but in a time span of supposed billions of yrs THIS creates a problem for the earth AND the water on the earth AND thus LIFE on earth..... 1st there would be no water several 10's of (supposed) millions yrs ago. next to that IF there was no water then HOW on earth (Hhaha) could life emerge from water.. as theories claim.... AGAIN science hinders itself by NOT accepting that there are no billions of yrs.....6000 yrs as the bible says is NO problem sediments...... in the billions of yrs much rain must have fallen. so we EXPECT lots of delta's in the oceans near the huge rivers ends...... we dont find these huge deltas..... with a world wide flood and only 4500 yrs since Noahs ark.... then waht we see is perfectly explainable.... so again science hinders itself by not accepting 6000 yrs of earths history...
    1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. so James.... unfortunately for you and your atheist religion (1st that proves you are wrong) 2nd) science already HAS supported the biblical accounts in numerous occasions... dozens of archeological findings to start with.... evidence for the bible been proven with science: The expansion of the universe; the bible tells us the universe expands 1000's of yr before Hubble found this to be true. the bible says mountains have roots..... science proved it to be correct The paths of the sea where even found WITH the help of the bible....Matthew Fontaine Maury 1806-1873 found this AFTER he read the bible ABOUT it.... and told himself OK if the bible says there are paths in the ocean I am going to find them and he found them. the principle of telecommunication by electricity is in the bible.... the future ripping appart of the mount of olives is in the bible ....guess what there is a fault line exact in THAT area..... the noah ark dimensions are in a perfect rate with what we know to be a good boat to go over the oceans washing your self with water to remain clean and cleans your self (ignaz semmelweis) things people had to do to stay clean from bacterial intake toileting by going out side the camp eating the correct and healty animals not marrying brothers sisters and nieces from the days of moses till now..... its all in the bible...... James and we know that its all sceintifically correct and that the bible is correct LONG before sceince discovered WHY this is correct.... the bible is simply sceintific accurate..why Be cause God invented it all and letting have His people wqrite it down...... apperently God knew what he was talking about. all this PROOFS YOU WRONG
    1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. it is a good video, which everybody with a slight of interest of science MUST see. It shows clearly what I have personaly experienced in my carreer; science is OFTEN WRONG..... !!! this is a very very important finding and conclusion. However it is the question that the statistics is correct: I mean the normal Gauss-distribution is a theoretical model and my experience, with reality is that the gaussian curve works pretty ok and is sufficient for a major of fields where accuracy is NOT that important. BUT it turns out that lots of experimental data is NOT neatly Gaussian but skewed Gaussian. Now Gaussian bell curves gives you an idea, but need NOT to be, the correct statistical model for this issue, I do not know. It turns out that theory and practice deviate lots and lots of times in many different subjects ending up with not so neatly gaussian curves as theory indicates. Now theoretically (IF the gaussian curve is the correct curve to apply !!) the standard deviation sigma S is used and 3S is a frequent heard limit to accept or reject an answer since it represents 99.7% of all possible correct answeres. But S values should be established over many measurements before the S can be accepted it self. Thing is with each measurement taken the S value changes a little bit since it is dependent on the measurements it self. and how to know if a measure ment is not an out-lier so should be rejected. it turns out to be, as I found in practise. that applying statistics is not that easy. the S value is determined by the measurements and the measurements to be accepted or rejected depends on the S value; THAT is circular reasoning to begin with. I know we do not yet have a better instrument and we have to start somewhere, but lets keep things in correct perspective.
    1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. Mcalister never seen the proof for your claims... sorry to dissappoint you and since millions of yrs are NOT observable it is still part of imagination... you have to assume millions billions of yrs have taken place... you have no proof for that there is no evidence... yes i know you going to throw RadioActive Dating  RAD into the game etc etc  sorry to inform you  RADs have no fundament to build upon.... your assumptions fail to backup these methodes.....  If science need assumptions to keep up their believes sorry the science has fallen back to a believe system.... we call that religion.... in seculair science (dealing with where we come from, not the hard practical science to make TVs and rockets !!)  the most words that are used are: might be, might have been, would have been, imagen, assumed, supposed, we think, theory, hypothesis, and all these kind of suggestive type of words.....why ??? what happend to repeatable facts ?? I mean I can put a laser infront of a 2 slit and there it is an interference patern: repeatable by any person.....and I did......thats controlable....testable visible THATS the ways science is supposed to work but it doesnt when it comes to our origens.... its all hypothetical.... imagination... when do you folks open your eyes for the truth instead of imagination and yes I agree the pictures/animation look great... but animations can fool you in picturing a fantasy... i prefer hard reality ... not animated suggestions..... thats not science thats make believe, fairytale telling....  and no mutations have the property of being destructive or neutral never constructive.... constructive or beneficial mutation has never been reported. and milions and millions of mutation has factually been studied for it.... its never beneficial... and thats what you see in society as well people get weaker and weaker over the 100's of yrs of ages. more sicknesses more, allergic reactions even with babies etc etc... people get older just because the better healthcare and better hygene not due to improved genetics....  in Jezus days people were like what we call todays athlethes.... just ordinairy people like you and me.. today being an athlethe is exceptional. micro evolution is no more then variation WITHIN the KIND like you have danish dogs and chiwawa's.... but ist NEVER going to be an other KIND. it will always remain a DOG-kind... So evolution is NOT a part of observable science and thus imagination..... and in that way its easy to fool people: just imagen that it happend long ago and far away..... fairy tale telling..... they have tried to nuke al kinds of short living animals like fruit flies and 1 day flies etc ..... they all deteriorated upon mutative influences. not even after multiple generations they didnt improve ooh lenski you will reply.... sorry pall but bacteria ALL of them have always a citric cycle in them... With living organisms it is: use it or loose it......  What happens when you put those kind of bacteria expossed to citric acid again ?? they reuse the old system to digest citric acid..... its like fixing back an old rusty car back to work.... just fix it shine it clean it put parts in the right place together and uppa you go.....  so even lenski didnt prove eovlution ... he just shows the ability of bacteria to put an old citric-cycle-system that was already present back to work again....  nothing more nothing less..... no evolution sorry to disappoint you again. 
    1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. Mcalister OK i'll show you where time near heavy masses is reduced...  http://www.genesismission.4t.com/Physics/gtd.htm  here it is....this means time runs 6 million km from the sun 60 seconds faster in 1 yr then on the surface of the sun..... and you are right one of the effect is that the wavelength changes... and that is even measured by pound and rebka in 1959-60.... and indeed the speed of light doesnt change ........ relative to a lokal observer....but NOT from the reference frame of a distant observant..... If I stand far from a black hole and I throw in a blinkering flash light I see several things.. a) the frequency of the blinkering slowes down ( b) the light becomes redder and more and c) more delayed that is lesser fotons due to time dilataition on the speed of light so a light bundle is more streched...because in the reference frame of the flashlight it sends out light at a constant light speed but since its time is more and more streched in reference to our time reference frame the beam becomes more stretched and thus fotons will come more and more as individual particles due to time dilatation of course they will have the same light speed as we expect them to have since in our time frame they have sped up again to normal light speed that we expect in our reference frame. but strongly reduced in wave length. thing is our reference frame is a different one then the flashlights.... our reference fram is much less distorted in time and space then is the reference frame of the flash light... so by the time the light is passing us it has sped up to our perception of light speed If I send in a blue led light at constant lighting (not blinkering)  then I see it turn redder and redder and lesser and lesser amount of fotons due to beam strechting due to time dilatation at the reference frame of the led light.  thing is it cannot do different since time AND space are streched and everything in it becomes streched so from our point of reference light speed slowes down closer to a black hole. it cannot because from our point of reference the space gets more streched.... since space time (4D are equealy streched... and THAT fact that the 4D space tiem is streched makes also that light speed slows down in my view point... simple.. while suppose I hold the led lamp then I measure a constant speed of light at a constant amount of fotons lets say 500 per second. and suppose you were standing far away... you would also measuring a constant speed of light from the light particles passing by....  but you would see only 50 fotons pass by in 1 second. that would mean that time would have been delayed by a factor 10 (beam stretching) the other 450 will also come but NOT in that same second.... that will come in the remaining 9 seconds....   why?  4D space time stretching. einstein made the same mistake too in the beginning of his discovery.... the effect is twice as big as you expect since its AND space that gets stretched AND time that gets streched....   so yes wavelength shift  AND  slowed down light speed....  its pretty much like light send thrue a glass... in the glass light is slowed down but once its out of the glass again it has sped up to he same light speed as we are used to.... but it lags behind a beam that has not passes thrue the glass.  and in the same way you could measure the speed of light being slowed down> send a beam of light in open space and at a same distance close to the surface of a heavy object... then it wil be bend off toward the heavy object and ariving later at the detector... both at the normal speed of light since you are in your own reference frame of time measurment. but one beam will be delayed which is logical since it traveresed more (bend) space-time. And that will appear to us a slowing down of the speed light.... 
    1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. Mcalister OK Alice and Bob and (maybe Charlie if needed). A B&C Alice she is a woman (from the woman and children first to safety decency) is the far away observering at a safe place.. she is measuring the speed of light at the place where she is: 0,3M km/s (M= Mega= 10^6)  Bob is positioned at a distant from a black hole where time runs 1000 times slower and he is also measuring light speed with exactly the same type of instruments as Alice.... he also measures 0,3M km/s... now you would say see you admit that light speed doesnt change .. I say then: yes you are right. for ANY LOKAL!!!! observer the lightspeed he observes LOKALY IS the same thats true BUT !!! now Alice and Bob also have a radioactive sample that radiates gamma-rays and decays at a half life rate of 10 days and they are also with the same instruments measuring this. Alice ath the safe place and bob at the position where time is slowred down 1000 times.  now Alice and Bob also measure eachothers data which is send to each other. so alice measures the light speed of bobs light beam and bob measures the light ray of alice also for the decay of the radio active goodie. what alice sees at bobs place is that the light that bob has send will also pass her with the speed of light she is used to: 0,3M also bob measures the light of alice at 0,3M.. you see I was right ...you might respond.... NO wait hold your horses.... alice also measures the gama ray bursts from bobs radioactive source from which she knows that its the same as hers since before leaving they have splitted the homogenious sample in 2; 1 for bob 1 for alice.  alice measures her own sample 10 days as a halflife, bob measures his 10 days of half life.  now alice measures also bobs decay rate by measuring the incoming redshifted gamma rays from bobs sample......  the redshift is 1000 times next to the fact that she will measure not 10 days of decay but 10.000 days of halflife decay... hee something has changed bob on the other hand measures alices gamarays blueshifted and become 1000 times more energetic next to the fact that thehalf life decay rate of her radioactive sample has decreased to 0,01 day what does this tell us... it shows us that yes where we are we measure the speed of light the same every where..... but an other observer doesnot measure that from a distance LOKALY the speed is the same everywhere as measured ..... but looking to other people in another reference frame(position/lokation where the time is different then the speed of light THERE must also be different) so this is due to the time dilatation due to gravity since gravity distorts time then also the speed of light MUST be affected.... in order to make bobs light speed measurements measure 0,3M (FOR HIMSELF !!!!) that can only be true IF time has an effect on light speed seen from a distant point (alice) and the fact that radioactive decay proofs that time indeed has been affected AND the fact that bob measures light at 0,3M this can only mean that the light speed also MUST have been affected..... sorry thats how physics works....   listen dr russle humpreys is not a stupid guy: he is a physics guy... I am a chemistry guy who also studied physics  (i never said i have a degree in physics... please show me where is said that i have a degree in physics...I dont and  i never said that either) but dont worry i have studied einsteins theory long before i went to college..... at the age of about 15-20 yrs old so  so yes light speed is everywhere the same  IF you travel along with the light beam.....(if you could)  so where ever YOU ARE light speed is the same.... BUT if you look to a far way happening, light speed does slow down IF it comes close to a heavy body like a black hole..... since time slowes down there and a lokal observer wold measur light speed 0,3M only in HIS time reference frame.....  it also makes sence from this perspective: light is a wave and EM wave...EM is alternating electric and magnetic wave propagation. this requires time to propagate. an alternating E field induces a alternating magnetic field. now since time slows down if i look to a black hole then also these processes must slow down, down there closer to the blackhole schwartsschild radius.... but if i would travel along with the light wave i would see no change in alternating wavespeed and thus no alteration is light speed.... but ONLY due to the fact that i travel along with the light.. so LOKALY !!! i notice NO difference.  time measurement has all got to do with the position i am as an observer..... in respect to a gravitation field..... 
    1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. RedStarBelgradefan ok IF evolution is an observed proces then show me proof of it that one type of animal- or plant has evolved into anothe type of animal or plant in such a way that they could NOT reproduce..... show me proof it to me. that has never been observed. you see IF evolution is true that THOSE are key featuires to test it.... a) an organism MUST be genetically different b) they must NOT be able to reproduce like apes and roses do not reproduce if you can show me OBSERVABLE evidence for that then you might have a case....  next to that i like you to  make a living cell (as we know them) out of 100% dead materials that is bare elements AND letting THESE artificial cells (as we know them) evolve into, lets say.....a worm (as we know them). if you can OBSERVABLY do that in front of the entire planet you might have a case for life emerging spontaniously out of 100%  dead stuff without interference of God.  In all other case life from dead material (abiogenesis-evolution) is 100% CRAP and based on pure UNOBSERVABLE BALONY and pure speculation.... so deliver me te proof  please.... and NO building blocks like amino acids DNA starnds in lipid vesticles are NOT proof for that... we demand the 100% FULL proof... dead chemicals to living worm as we know them..... you see an amino acid/DNA strand is NOT a living cell its nothing more then a building block... and NO craig venters experiment is NOT valid since he just replaced a spare part .... we call that SURGERY... humans do that already for 1000's of yrs and ints NOT making living cells out of 100% dead materials/chemicals. and NO lenski did NOT show evolution ... he only showed restoration of an already present citrus cycle mechanism that wssnt used for a long time... but still was present in ANY bacteria. ALL bacteria have it present in theyir interior whether ist used is a differnt matter but it is present non the less... it may be broken down but present non the less... just like fixing an old car with spaer parts from other old cars.... so again deliver me proof...
    1
  273. RedStarBelgradefan what you say is a modern anti biblical defenition..... and no lizards remain lizards mouse remaind mouse flowers etc remaint flowers ect bacteria remained bacteria... simpel and yes mutations are happening that true but beneficial is also not observed.... gene duplication yes but they contain the same info still and all mutation that occurs in duplicated genes are not beneficial since from creation on the genes were perfect to strat with and only degeneration is observed OR at best neutral mutations....  lizards never obsevably gained wings or fins or hairs....  THAT would be evolution and THAT has never been observed... what IS observed and that is all ove the site you refer to is VARATION within the species or kinds  lets look at the origen of mutations: there are several origens of mutations a) false copying which is not evolution but degeneration... its an error in all cases leading to 1) neutral or 2) damaging the organism (like cycle cell anemia for example)  b) radioactivity within the chemical components of the organism in organisms are several elements that can decay (like C14) and cause a mutation c)  external radiation; cosmic radiation is hitting our bodies every single second and that causes damaging of genetic material... more then we like too. d) chemical agences that influence our bodies. all these mutations alter things in such a way that the effects are at best neutral and have no effect the rest is all damaging and degenerating organisms... yes there are repair systems but if repair systems get damaged what is there to repair. ever heared of the genetic melt down ?? you scientists KNOW that our gene pool is degenerating and that repair systems are failing more and more.  this causes problems for the next generations since the kinds on earth are degenerating and tha=e degeneration is due to failing reoairsystems excelerating well this KNOW effect is TOTALY counter evolutionistic...   but NOT many people know this ... since it is destroying evolutionistic world views.... where the OPPOSITE of genetic melt downs is expected..... in contrast to evolution.... sorry pal we dont buy your crap
    1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. RedStarBelgradefan ooh dont worry I do understand evolution hypothesis its fake..... yousee you dont even have the billions of yrs required for evolution.... so i know its crap... crap made up just in order to be able to deny Gods plans for you.... tell me explain me the c14 in diamonds and dino tissue ??? diamonds are supposedly billions-millions of yrs old yet still contain c14..... how is that possible ? please explain me the saltiness of the worlds oceans 3,6% as it is today is achieved in les then 10.000 yrs altogether please explain met a shrinking sun... you see the shrinkage rate of the sun is WAY far to high (on top of the oscilating motions) to account for a billlions yrs old hypothesis.... you see about 20- 100 million yrs ago (at the rate the sun shrinks) the sun was simply to hot for the earth that water could be present here.... ther goes your evolution... please explain me living fossils... couclancanth, frogs, dragon fleis all look the same as their preflood counterparts... seems to me evolution never took place.....  and since these animals are still aruond ALIFE thats a big issue for your supposed evolution even MORE since lots of these critters are highly sencitive for environmetal changes... yet they still look the same as their found fossils.....exactly the same.... please exlain me the fresh blood vessels in Trex bones that mary schweitzer found a couple of yrs ago AND these tissues still containing c14 while evolution hypothesis dictates that they became extinct 60-70 million supposed yrs ago... please explan me the graphical recordings of DINO-DRAGONS....carvings and drawings that were made by humans only several 100s yrs ago ....?? and guess what they 100% resemble how we NOW KNOW how the looked... my conclusion would be that these people a several 100 tyrs ago just plain SAW them with their own eyes... GET IT ??? and I dont deny mutations occur.... thing is at best mutations are NEUTRAL and worst case they are degenerative..... thats why people develope more allergies for all kinds of goodies..... Genetic MELTDOWN..... we grow worse and worse genetically every year... 
    1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. +Advancedgod No that is NOT how evolution SUPPOSED to work according to your theory (because it never happened in reality since its is not observed). Evolution is supposed to ADD extra genes (or genetic information) to the total which help improve the organism.... variation is nothing more then husseling the same genes over and over again without changing anything to them other then destroying them.... no NEW information is added. A dog remains a dog.... a rose remains a rose.... a rose will never ever grow wings or eyes and fly away.... . (only some people see roses change in to pink elephants but that is a different matter) The adding of EXTRA !!! .....NEW !!!!...genetic information has NEVER been observed. Never ever and that is COUNTER evolution.... because THAT is EXACTLY what evolution processes need in order to be evolution. and science has FAILED in proving that over and over and over again and again... conclusion: evolution does exist (yes it does..... ) ONLY IN THE HEADS of people who BELIEVE in evolution and in text books ... but NOT in reality... in testable reproducible reality, it has never been observed NOR has it been documented in scientific peer reviewed papers what so ever... The very first person that detects, beyond any reason of doubt, 1 BENIFICIAL mutation (adding EXTRA !!NEW !!! genetic information as the hypothetical evolution requires) will win the nobel price 50 times over...... and that has never happened. Now me being a Christian yeah kind of: more a Jewish messianic Zionistic creationistic type of Christian indeed. Evolution and Christian faith clashes in the next ways: A) It suggests that God is cruel and that God was not able to do things right from start on. A God that uses evolution to put living beings on this planet is not worth worshiping and I will not worship that kind of god. B) evolution requires death and destruction, which is NOT Gods character, God made everything perfect from the beginning, BUT !!! DUE to our sins, things started to break down as God said..... God said: do not eat from that tree because if you do, you will ......DIE.... that means death was NOT in the world BEFORE Adam and Eve sinned. Death was introduced in Gods creation due to the rebellion against God by Lucifer and his fallen angels. Lucifer is the angel of death, evil and destruction, the theory of evolution is his stupid invention, not Gods invention. Lucifer tricked Eve and Adam into rebellion against God and the punishment for that is death due to causes of diseases, structural failures of our bodies, genetic deterioration (degeneration) etc etc .... C) Evolution is the origin of things like racism while God created all humans equally. D) evolution causes people to think they are no more then worthless animals or decendants of bacteria, that per accidentally came to be, due to random chance, while God says you are specially created and you are here due to HIS divine will and love and that you are super very special in Gods eyes. E) Evolution says that the baby in a mothers belly is nothing more then a lump of cells, so whether you kill it or not is not relevant (abortion). in Gods eyes every conceived egg cell is a FULL human being from the very first start and killing it IS considered 100% MURDER by God... and He will punish you for it..... IF you do not repent over that matter very seriously ..... (I happen to know that from very close by..... ) So no evolution thinking is absolutely a BIG NO NO in Christian faith although lots of not-well-informed-Christians do embrace evolution, I am aware of that. Including the pope..... but like I said he is not well informed on this subject.... most Catholics don't understand their own bible, including the pope.....but the few Catholics that DO understand the bible well, get out of Catholicism OR try to change it from within (without big successes as far as I know). But hee I am not catholic so let them defend their own ways..... So there are LOTS and lots of reasons why evolution is unacceptable by Christianity but not all people are aware of that.....F) Jesus said something about the beginning of where everything started that has to do with the creation of human kind and the earth so Jesus (who is God coming in the flesh) says that about 6000 yrs ago everything was CREATED and started....
    1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. +SS4Inferno yep it is a colony you see a single yeast cell taken from this coagulated flake of yeast could still survive perfectly on its own.... a nerve cell of a TRUELY higher organism like a worm or a horse can not. a single blood cell of a higher organism can never survive on its own.....you see THAT is typical of the difference of higher organisms and singlular cells or colonies of single cells (volvox, yeast and many more other singular cells or colonies there off). youhave to do better then this pal..... NEXT thing is yeast and other singular cells is known to do this for many years already, at least I knew about this already 20-30 years ago when I was much younger, for me back then it was the confirmation of evolution hypothesis too.....UNTILL I found out it all was not true....  next to the fact that this feature of yeast has never changed no matter how long you look back into the past.... after SUPPOSED 200-500 million years of existence you would expect more then yeast flakes... I at least expect a yeast worm or a yeast horse etc. etc..... but petty for you there is no evidence of higher then yeast flakes is observed.....And OOH you discard the abiogenesis argument way too easy pal we are not going to buy that crap of yours so easily......you see the SUPPOSED evolution is SUPPOSSED to start some where.... well where did it SUPPOSEDLY start ????? the supposed processes of abiogenesis and evolution are very much related because with out the supposed abiogenensis there could NOT be the supposed evolution you MUSTY have abiogenesis before having evolution... at least according to your own beloved hypotheses. That is what science CLAIMS that hapend.now for the alternative model: simple: God did it.......read the bible.....
    1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. +wooe "observed Evolution is a change in gene frequency over generations."This hypothesised proces has never been observed let alone been documented by science papers….the opposite proces degeneration of genes HAS been observed by the millions but that again is counter evolutionairy…. "A short term effect of this how we breed plants and animals for certain traits" You aswell as the majority of people including darwin are mistaken VARIATION fort he hypothetical evolution. Variation happens I agree but that is NOT under discussion….. evolution however. From bacteria to banana is never been observed… "but this is not any requirement for demonstrating evolution"It is a requirement for EVERY part in correct science. Including the CLAIMS of secular scinece of evolution being a science. Science MUST be kept pure science so observation MUST be part of the hypothesis of evolution. "This step take more than than any human species has existed."2 answeres tot his: A) that is not my problem I dont believe in evolution any how so why ask me how to solve this problem…..you folks claim that evolution is proven science… for me evolution just as all billion years related hypotheses are nothing more then secarian religions…. B) conditions can be optimized in such a way that these processes can be sped up many times over… they have done so with fruitflies and bacteria (lenski experiment which failed non the less but OK) that is short living creatures….(so i gave you a solution after all) "The fossil layer is a good example that show how life has changed in the past"Fossils do not count as proof for evolution, let me explain why: a) the only thing a fossil tells us that there was once an animal or plant that died and got burried and preserved. A fossil does NOT proof to us that it had offspring/kids….a fossif does NOT proof to us that the animal from which the fossil is had GENETICALLY different kids, OR that the kids where different in any way then the parent animal….a fossil is nothing more then a dead organism burried in some earthlayer. Now the earth layers MUST be layed down rapidly in a catastrophic event inorder to make the organism being fossilised… and the larger the organism the sooner the burrial must have taken place….. now we FACTUALY know that sedimentation under catasrophivc events (like a flood) happen very very rappidly in contrast to what geolscience tries to make us believe. Sedimentation of multiple earth layer for 100’s of meters can take plase in matters of seconds-minutes hours and NOT as secular science wants us to believe in millions of years. The whole million/billion years assumption is based on false conclusions of correct observed fenomenon like earth layers…. Proof for my statements: mt st helens, various tsunami sediment deposits and so on… formation of island in the ocean by means of vulcanic eruptions …they ALL show super rapid earth layer deposition….so there ARE no millions/billions of years of earth history and there fore also NO evolution. This explaines perfectly why there are living fossils nowadays…. Speeding up processes billion fold. I happen to be a chemist… and thats what we do in some situations…. Create optimal conditions so that chemical reactions go a lot quicker… ever heared of the “rule of thumb ”that every 10 degrees C the speed of a normaly slow reaction doubles…. This is a general rule of thumb in chemistry. This is just one way to speed things up. Catalysis is an other way of doing so….there are just many trick to do it. Pushing a reaction by extraction/removal of the reaction products…. To force a reaction in a desired direction stuff like that.
    1
  297. +Advancedgod no pal variaty is nothing more then what people also call micro evolution but that is NOT evolution as supposed to happen from bacteria to a dog that is macro evolution and macro evolution has nevre been observed.... micro variaty brings about all kinds iof different type of dogs.. I fully agree with that..... but it wil into eternity remain a dog....... it will never turn into a dog with wings....macro evolution SUGGESTS that bacteria can become dogs roses, apes and humans but that has never ever been observed... reay never ever...... but green or whit... its still the same organism.... and that is what macro evolution suggests ... and that has never been observed.... and no it is never going to take place... and LOSSING body parts is LOSSING genetic information it is COUNTER evolution..... and yes organisms are OBSERVED to LOSE abilities... that is true... but loss of abilitie only proofs the counter part of eveolution: degeneration.... yes that has been observed.... ... and als o RE-GAINING back the lost ability has also been observed after many generations that is what lenski has observed.... but that is like fixing an old car with the good fumctional parts form 5 other old car..... it is not evolution..... like the lenski experiment where bacteria that had lost their ability to deal chemically with citric acid... but after many generations of bacteria they RE-GAINED this abillity..... yeah right that is not evolution ...... that is no more then fiixing an old mechanism from which many bacteria delivers old parts to rebuild the old system. you see the ability was lost but still some parts of it were present in each bacteria so after many generations all or a majority of these pieces came back together in a few bacteria and were RE constructed again.... you see the citric acid cycle the klebbs cycle is present in EVERY bactery since it is part of the bacterias enegry system. now bacteria can lose it... ... and regaining it by fixing with old scratched together parts of other bacteria can get the bacteria back again its klebbs cycle again...... but it will NEVER be better then the original that they have lost..... and big chances are that it is less then the original one..... now ALL of theis Proofs that there is NO macro evolution in the sence that bacteria can become worms or birds... THAT suggested proces has NEVER, NEVER been reported beyond any reason of doubts.... nowhere in science literature...and THAT is what the hypoothesis of evolution requires to most to even be called evolution..... without it it does not deserve the title evolution or science....
    1
  298. +tzokke ooh and you accept the big bang hypothesis that makes all the magic shit out of nowhere ??? yes boys and girls in the begining there was NOTHING, absolutey nothing... and NOTHING exploded....... LONG LONG times ago and FAR FAR away.........FFFFAAAIIIRRRYYY TTAALLEE !!!! pal FAIRY TALE is written all over it...... now you tell me there is a difference in what I believe to be our origins compare to what you BELIEVE is our origens....??? man, you take me for a fool or what????? you seriously think that I am going to BELIEVE, because you lack the proof for it, that NOTHING EXPLODED SUPPOSEDLY 20 billion yeras ago... and that from NOTHING, were are here... just add a lot of time into it will do the trick... man you are gullible... God makes more sence to accept: you see the Universe is perfectly constructed in such a way that we even CAN live....... there are super many factors that determine that we are here or not: the distance from earth to the sun... if it is only off by 1 % no life can exist here. the fact that Jupiter, uranus saturn are there to catch away big asteroids, makes it possible to be here the 4 forces of nature if they are stronnger or weaker by 0.000001 % then we could not be here or stars could not burn.....and tehre would be no universe our atmosfere is perfect for us to live in... the composition of the elements is perfect for us to live.... our bodies are perfect for us to exist and do the things we can do the food on earth is perfect for us to stay healty and grow the sun is not to hot and not too cold the moon keeps our trajectory stable and so on and so on....... sorry pal It is WAY much more acceptable that God created this entire universe because it is WAY to much perfect that it could all be here by a chaotic proces of a big bang explosion....... big bang is a silly idea of people who dont klike God to be in their equations..... but they have a HUGE problem to explain why everything is so 100% perfect for our lives to even BE here..... yes... God has created this and designed it this way. something a random big bang can never ever do......the chance for our universe to be so perfect pure by random processes is next to zero... so yes God is the only logical alternative: HE DESIGNED IT this way exactly fit for what we need....... if even one of these 100's of paranmeters be off just a teeny weeny bit.... we would NOT be here .... even secular science knows and acknowledges this and they seek answers outside of God to explain it...... It is a nagging problem for secular scientists and it is calle the ciosmological fine tuning
    1
  299. 1
  300. please explein me a few things just in order to make you understadn that the earth is indeed no more then 6000 years old.... Diamond do contain measurable amounts of C14....now diamond are said to be millions/billon yrs old.... why then is there still measurable C14 in them....???? you see 1 kg of pure C14 is totally gone in 600.000 yeras... so hwo can diamond still contain C14  which indicate that the earth cannot be much older then a few 1000s of yrs. please explain to me that the moon is receding in such a way that calculating back the moon was so close to earth that it was totaly impossible for us to be here on earh .. ooh only 1.2 billion yrs old..... please explain..... please explain living fossils....... that hev NOT evolved in SUPPOSED all these billions /millions of years  please explain human made artifacts in earth layers that are SUPPOSEDLY 100's of million years old at least according to secular science..... please explain...... please explain.....the shrinking of the sun in such a rappid temp that calculating back... it woudl cause water to have been evaporated  ONLY about 20 MILLION years... please explain please explain: the low amount of sediments in the oceans near all big river deltas.... an amiunt that can easily be explained with a global floood and a few 1000s of yrs seimentation rate.... BUT NOT with sedimentations rate for MILLIONS of yeras.... there is way to low amount of sediments for millions of years please you MUST have a perfect explaination for all and more of these time limiting factors that limit the earths age to maximum of indeed about 6000 years....... science can not explain these matters in a sound  way without lying or make fools of them selves to  only show how desperate they are to keep God out of the equation.....  there are many many more limiting factors..then this. its just a hand grip of what came first to mind.... helium in zirkons fits a creationistic earth age the strentgh of the magnetic field of all the planets are perfectely fitten in creationistic ptime scales but are a problem in billions of yrs time scales... the niumber of super novae fit perfectly in 6000 yrs but do not fit with billions of yrs models and so on and so on....
    1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. +Salmon Saladsandwich whoahahahahahahahahahahahahah are you realy that naieve ?.... then I have some serious bad news for you: the only place that the fossils are ined up as the evolution hypotheisi desires... is in text books and in the heads of evolution believers....... it is hardly, IF at all, found in reality........  the majority of fossils are found totaly mixed... which makes only sence in a world wide catastrophy like a flood..... there have been found human related goodies in the same layers as dinosaurs... b ut they are kept very top secret and are discarted by secular science....sorry pal but secular science is keeping these findings from the main public .... just to keep on venting the evolution story at the cost of the biblical histry recording.... even human footsteps have been foudn in the same layer as dino footprints... stuff like that... no pal if you realy believe that then you are more duked then you realise...... secularscience is covering up all evidence against evolution... the smithsonian as a big time leader in this attempt to cover things up..... you see there is God in theis world BUT also satan... and satan does not like that you get to hear the truth about where you realy come from..... and he manipulates all kinds of TRUE scientific findings because that would mean people would follow God without any doubt..... so he finds people who are willing to keep the truth form folks like yourself..... let me tell you pal there have been found even human artifacts in the same earth layers as dinos and even older fossil remains..... but who will believe this... since it is kept sectret for the majority of people..... the ica stones are a nice example: but let me guess you prefer to believe the coverup story that they are fake... yeah right..... keep on dreaming pal... if you seriously think that secular science tells you the truth ... man then you are gullible and naieve at the same time or bluntly a seculair liar too....
    1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. I dont want to spoil the fun you all had that day the film looked amazing and great. But non the less I wonder, apart from mathematical curiousity and testing and encrypting computers and stuff like that, what the physical use of knowing pi to such an extend is. I mean its great to have billions of digits and please keep on finding them. But I see no or hardly any use in physical formulas related to the physical reality. Because our instruments can never get to the accuracy that a billion of digits have. Pi is used in physics as well but since our instruments have only limited accuracy and quantum mechanical principles only allow us to go to a certain amount of accuracy at the most, at present I see hardly any use of physical use of knowing so much of a number like Pi or e or what ever kind of number of that sort. Of cours again apart from mathematical curiousity and see how far one can go. But next to that I dont see any connection to reality anymore….. and by the way I hope I am wrong and some one here can point me out the physical meaning for physical mechanical of quantum mechanical or astrophysical use of it..... please show me.  And yes i have seen "the pi and the size of the universe" numberphile film which actualy underlines my point one needs only less then 100 digits (to state it generously) for praktical physical use maximum. and that includes the planck length issu as wel i estimate.. well below that it is physical balony ... so ???? my wondering remains beyond the first 100 digits of knowing Pi.... 
    1
  329. 3:20 evidence to serve God OK here it is:PART 1 There is evidence on several levels: a) Personal experience with God, but that is hard to share, I could only tell you about it and its up to you to accept it or not, I know it is true but do you believe what I say. But if you really want a personal experience yourself, then what holds you back to ask God (the Creator of the universe) Himself to open your eyes for the truth about this. If you choose not to believe people in this matter, ask God-the Creator of this universe, Himself. He knows best who He really is would He not ? And that is independent of who ever or what ever institution. You can ask God in Person. You do not need to ask humans whether or not God exists. Be patient on His answer, He may or may not answer you immediately. And God may answers in different ways, different then you may expect.b) There is the bible which , in order to be true need to be testable with respect to daily reality. and it turns out to be just that, correctly testable with respect to reality. it is simply true what it says and you can test it. You see 2 parts of the truth can never contradict each other that also goes for the bible and reality.c) There are prophesies in the bible that have factually and historically became true which also you can test and prove to be correct. I come back to that in a moment.d) There is creation science which is correct science that prove the bible to be valid also on scientific level in what it says. I com back to that too. Prophesies: The bible contains about 3000 prophesies. About 2500 of these prophesies are already being fulfilled.Now mathematicians have in the past gone over this subject and estimated how big the chances are that one prophesy would be fulfilled by random chance. It turns out to be ranging from 1 in every 10.000 up to 1 in every 10.000.000.000. Now lets say for arguments sake that all prophesies have the same random chance of lets say 1 in every 100.000 which is reasonable and scientifically fair to do so. Then for 2500 prophesies being fulfilled by 100% pure random chance there is a statistical probability of 1 chance in 100.000 ^ 2500 = 10^12500 which is ridiculously small or just statistically zero.Now I know by heart about 34 prophesies from which the factually historically came true, and I will show them as well in just a moment. But that would mean that for alone these 34 prophesies to become true by pure random chance it would be 1 chance in 100.000^34 = 1E5^34 = 1E170 (a 1 followed by 170 zero's.)Also this number is ridiculously small and also called statistically zero.Here are the prophesies, that I know by heart: Remember the bible is a Jewish book.1) The Jewish people would be taken out of Israel. that happened in the years 70 and 135 After Christ. 1b) And they would return after about 1800-2000yrs. that happened starting from 1880 till now. 2) As such they would be sold as slaves and they would even be given away for free; that happened: the romans emptied a big part of Israel around 70 and 135 after Christ, transported them to Egypt and sold them there but there were so many Jewish slaves that they were given away for free. This way the Jewish people got scattered all over the world 3) The Jewish people would be a mockery in all places they would be scattered to, that happened 4) The Jews would be killed and God would send a sword behind them. That happened massively world wide. 5) The first Jews would return via Turkey to Israel. 6) Israel would be re-established as a state on 1 day ( that happened on 14 may 1948) 7) The gates of all cities would be left open (in the days of Isaiah that was the most stupid thing to do but today its normal). 8) The Jews would fly home. Which was not possible before the plain was invented and developed to carry lots of people so several decades after 1904. This became true. 9) The coin (shekel) would be restored. 10) The first Jews would return from Russia (the land of the North as the bible calls it). 11) The first Jews would return by boat. They did after the Russian pogroms in the 1880's. 12) The Jews would be invited to come to Israel and if they would not listen they would be hunted to Israel (pogroms of Russia, Hitler's WWII) 13) Israel would produce fruits that would be sold over the world (you probably know the Jaffa oranges and-or the Medjoul dates). 14) The East gate of Jerusalem would remain closed till the messiah would enter thrue it once more. 15) The language of Israel would be re-established (they speak Ivriet-Hebrew right now). 16) The Jews would return from all over the world to Israel (that happens since several decades). 17) The Jews would fight a lot of wars with the surrounding countries.  18) They would also win all these wars (because God would fight for them). 19) God would fight for the Jewish people/nation as in the days of old. He does, many enemy soldiers saw Gods hands above Israel while they were fighting Israel in the several wars that Israel had. 20) The country Israel would be left as a desert for nearly 1800 -2000 yrs. That happened after that the Jewish people were sold as slaves (70 and 135 after Christ). 21) All these changes would not happen all of a sudden but as a slow process just as a day turns into the night gradually and since God said 1 day for God is as 1000 yrs. and 1000 yrs is for God as 1 day. That is why it is a slow process. 22) Jerusalem would be destroyed, and that happened due to the Romans in 70 after Christ and 135 after Christ. 23) Jerusalem and Israel would be left to be a desert for nearly 2000 yrs. 24) Non Jews (heathens in Jewish eyes would come to former Israel and trample the whole land down in these +/-2000 yrs. They did; the Muslim and Christians came to fight over it during the crusades. 25) The Jews would rebuild their cities with the help of foreign people, that happened and is still happening this very day. 26) Many people from all over the world would come to Jerusalem Israel to celebrate the Sukkoth feast. And they already do so. 27) In the last days many people will lose their faith in God. more and more people do not believe in God anymore, atheism is rising, as was prophesized. 28) In the last days people will hate each other more and more and love will cool down. 29) In the last days people will be persecuted and even killed for their believe in God-Jesus. That happens on daily basis. 30) Even brothers sisters, parents and children will kill there own relatives for believing in God-Jesus. That happens on daily basis especially in Islamic coutries 31) In the last days people are not willing to listen to God and Gods words the good news. People don't like to hear that the Bible is correct, they mock you if you tell them so. 32) When Jesus would return He would place His foots on the mount of olives and that would split in 2, leaving a sea behind. There is already a fault line underneath the mount of olives all the way down to Ethiopia. It is trembling more and more. 33) Jesus would not return to Jerusalem until the Jews would learn to say: Baruch haba beShem Adonai which means; blessed is He that comes in the name of the Lord. That happens today in every Jewish messianic church-congregations, where more and more Jews find their Jewish messiah Yeshua-Jesus. 34) In 2 peter 3, apostle Peter says that the heaven and the earth will perish and the elements will be destroyed in fire. A couple of yrs. ago 2012, the theorized particle the Higgs boson was discovered. This particle is also called "the God particle". It makes that everything has mass. But it turns out to be that this particle and its associated field are unstable. Just as water vapor can turn into liquid water or ice, so can the Higgsfield decay into a way much higher density state. If that happens, the entire universe and all that is in it WILL PERISH and the elements will burn as fire. EXACTLY as the bible predicted about 2000 yrs. ago.
    1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. Becoming obsolete will always happen; why ? simple... the indecandescent lightbulk became more and more obsolete due to TL type of lights and the developement of the LED for example. Making something close to perfect (which is never possible) stimulates producers to even make better & more ingenious stuff. And no matter how perfect objects may be made... they will in the end always break. Granted it may take longer periods of time that is true, but better make some thing durable than you have more time to research new even better stuff. But the planned obsoleteness is just a sign and shows us the reality of profit minded people instead of durability environmental minded people. profit minded people dont care about the health of our planet they only care about their own big time wallets. so basically it is the profit minded industry that is to blame for the environmental issues we currently have. These producers who are profit minded need to be banned and replaced by durable minded producers; we have a planet to save from polluting. BUT there is a downside: Products that are durable are MORE expensive, but they last longer. We can thus see that poluting of the planet is caused by production/profit minded people. It also means more jobs in the R&D field. More people who think of new & better stuff on a continuous basis. I go for durability. No shops like IKEA for me... thats a cheap & a polluting way of living in the long run. And we see that the environmental issues are piling up and in the end cost MORE than tackling that problemn right from the beginning by minimizing the polluting ways of production. Durability is a new market.
    1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. Well Jesus christ has been more documented than any other person in history. first we have the Bible of course and next to that there are dozens of historical documents talking about Him, if you will , including false declarations. So Jesus is indeed historically relevant. next to the fact that He is relevant as a living person today....with whom you can have a living relationship... I know that is hard to imagine for you right now... but its true non the less. you see since God and Jesus are one and the same person.... Jesus died on the cross but who on earth can kill God ?? right... no one. So Jesus in the end rose from the grave (as many people today also rise from the dead like these people www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrpVNjySPok&t=111s www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm647n1360A&t=451s www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vj0qKthCgg&t=626s www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFFCzikHib4 www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWjH8hAFYkw&t=80s and so on well Jesus was the first who rose people from the dead in the new testament and who rose from the dead Himself after being crusified. that means that Jesus is not dead, but He is still here in heaven (as ost of these NDE people have seen to be real (independant of their back ground) So Yes Jesus is Historical but ALSO living to this present day, albeint in Heaven. and based on that one can have n actuall relationship with Him as a living Person. eventhough He died on the cross about 2000 yr ago. You see a persons spirit will keep on existing (read/study science books about this phenomenon)
    1
  371. Creation: Ok lets go back to Genesis 1 verse 1 it says: In the beginning (time) God created (power and energy), heaven (space) and earth (matter). So God created space time matter energy and power. Next to this He also controls it. Just as you can, out of nothing can create a computer programm by simply writing it and push the start button... now the creatures within the program have hardly any realisation of what is outside of their life space until you tell them and start communicating with them... same with God in a sort of way. proof of that is that Jesus Turned qwater in to wine and more recently: He heals all kinds of people (like from gangreen, cancer, blindness (even from birth on blindness) etc etc etc. This proofs that God has power over all matter. all that kind of healing powers still are active today which proofs that it is still valid. www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEqZ9qDOBoU&t=398s www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GEVX0Vtl4A&t=8s www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN325bUhCEw (5:25 Theresa who was instantly healed from gangreen which was killing her). what YOU talk abou is the secular point of view about it. THEY think it all started with a big bang (or many of them at least). but who claims they are right in their ways of seeing it ??? 80% of peer reviewed science publications are WRONG !!! (www.youtube.com/watch?v=42QuXLucH3Q&t=323s) We see evidence that the earth is no older than about 6000 years.... and that would confirm the biblical history. so yes all there is in the universe has been created.... is that hard to imagine... yes it is; but it is reality..... And you know what ? God is bigger than that... God holds the univers in the palm of His Hand to Him its like a spot on His robe, nothing more....You see God is infinitely unlimited in all aspects of it. For Him ALL things are possible.. Of course He makes choices of doing or not doing things, but God could do any thing that to YOU seem impossible...... Only we are limited in our abilities... God is not....limited.
    1
  372. Noahs flood: 95% of the earths surface is sedimentairy rock. all deposited by this main event of Noahs flood, yes there may have been smaller after floods due to this big one I will not say that there have not been. But we see that all kinds of creatures have been killed during the main world wide Noah flood about 4500 yrs ago. On top of that als Noahs ark has been found. Of course this has been kept silent to the people, but luckely we have the pictures and even films about it with the actuall remains of the ark. www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoTkguzRaCU www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENzV6l250SQ www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PSZNYdfawQ and of course it has been ridiculed by many people who does not want anything with God etc etc but facts remain and are even governmentally been acknowledged... there has even been placed a governmental kind of museum close to he ark remains.... so yes its real, no fairy tale... the noah flood also appears (even today) in about 300 world wide spreaded (indian) tribal stories that have been told from father to son... the gilgamesh epos is the most known next to the bible... but there are about 300 of these father to son told stories with most of the characteristics of the Noah Flood.... why is that ??? ALSO the bable tower story and the spreading of the people over the globe appears in the same way ..... why ???? if it was all fairy tale it would NOT spread as such... apperently it is a real happend event.. which over time became legends/myths.... BUT refer to real lif stories that realy happend.... Living fossils testify that it realy happend; ALL of the living fossils are close to 100% matches with their living counterparts, mary schweistzers findings of still fresh blood tissue in Dinosaur bones testify that it was NOT millions of yrs ago but rather several 1000's years.... a mixture of skeletons of animals and plants, including human skeletons being found in mass graves as one would expect with a world wide flood.... earh layer and canyon formation in matter of hours in stead of millons of years testify that these events drop down geological features as we can see that today in the geology. that testify that it did NOT happen millions of years but several 1000's of yrs and so on.... C14 dating of dinosaur bones show that it did NOT take milliosn of yrs but only a few 1000 yrs (which is perfectly possible with C14).
    1
  373. 1
  374. Prophesies: well for that I refer you to my quora channel where I listed a bunch of them: www.quora.com/Have-you-ever-found-real-proof-of-God https://www.quora.com/Is-it-actually-possible-to-prove-that-God-doesnt-exist-through-science this is a direct copy of it so there are more things in it....... Prophesies: The bible contains about 3000 prophesies. About 2500 of these prophesies are already being fulfilled. Now mathematicians have in the past gone over this subject and estimated how big the chances are that one prophesy would be fulfilled by random chance. It turns out to be ranging from 1 in every 10.000 up to 1 in every 10.000.000.000. Now lets say for arguments sake that all prophesies have the same random chance of lets say 1 in every 100.000. Then for 2500 prophesies being fulfilled by 100% pure random chance there is a statistical probability of 1 chance in 100.000 ^ 2500 = 10^12500 which is ridiculously small or just statistically zero. Now I know by heart about 34 prophesies from which the factually historically came true, and I will show them as well in just a moment. But that would mean that for alone these 34 prophesies to become true by pure random chance it would be 1 chance in 100.000^34 = 1E5^34 = 1E170 (a 1 followed by 170 zero's.) Also this number is ridiculously small and also called statistically zero. Here are the prophesies, that I know by heart: Remember the bible is a Jewish book. 1) The Jewish people would be taken out of Israel. that happened in the years 70 and 135 After Christ. 1b) And they would return after about 1800-2000yrs. that happened starting from 1880 till now. 2) As such they would be sold as slaves and they would even be given away for free; that happened: the romans emptied a big part of Israel around 70 and 135 after Christ, transported them to Egypt and sold them there but there were so many Jewish slaves that they were given away for free. This way the Jewish people got scattered all over the world 3) The Jewish people would be a mockery in all places they would be scattered to, that happened 4) The Jews would be killed and God would send a sword behind them. That happened massively world wide. 5) The first Jews would return via Turkey to Israel. 6) Israel would be re-established as a state on 1 day ( that happened on 14 may 1948) 7) The gates of all cities would be left open (in the days of Isaiah that was the most stupid thing to do but today its normal). 8) The Jews would fly home. Which was not possible before the plain was invented and developed to carry lots of people so several decades after 1904. This became true. 9) The coin (shekel) would be restored. 10) The first Jews would return from Russia (the land of the North as the bible calls it). 11) The first Jews would return by boat. They did after the Russian pogroms in the 1880's. 12) The Jews would be invited to come to Israel and if they would not listen they would be hunted to Israel (pogroms of Russia, Hitler's WWII) 13) Israel would produce fruits that would be sold over the world (you probably know the Jaffa oranges and-or the Medjoul dates). 14) The East gate of Jerusalem would remain closed till the messiah would enter thrue it once more. 15) The language of Israel would be re-established (they speak Ivriet-Hebrew right now). 16) The Jews would return from all over the world to Israel (that happens since several decades). 17) The Jews would fight a lot of wars with the surrounding countries. 18) They would also win all these wars (because God would fight for them). 19) God would fight for the Jewish people/nation as in the days of old. He does, many enemy soldiers saw Gods hands above Israel while they were fighting Israel in the several wars that Israel had. 20) The country Israel would be left as a desert for nearly 1800 -2000 yrs. That happened after that the Jewish people were sold as slaves (70 and 135 after Christ). 21) All these changes would not happen all of a sudden but as a slow process just as a day turns into the night gradually and since God said 1 day for God is as 1000 yrs. and 1000 yrs is for God as 1 day. That is why it is a slow process. 22) Jerusalem would be destroyed, and that happened due to the Romans in 70 after Christ and 135 after Christ. 23) Jerusalem and Israel would be left to be a desert for nearly 2000 yrs. 24) Non Jews (heathens in Jewish eyes would come to former Israel and trample the whole land down in these +/-2000 yrs. They did; the Muslim and Christians came to fight over it during the crusades. 25) The Jews would rebuild their cities with the help of foreign people, that happened and is still happening this very day. 26) Many people from all over the world would come to Jerusalem Israel to celebrate the Sukkoth feast. And they already do so. 27) In the last days many people will lose their faith in God. more and more people do not believe in God anymore, atheism is rising, as was prophesized. 28) In the last days people will hate each other more and more and love will cool down. 29) In the last days people will be persecuted and even killed for their believe in God-Jesus. That happens on daily basis. 30) Even brothers sisters, parents and children will kill there own relatives for believing in God-Jesus. That happens on daily basis. 31) In the last days people are not willing to listen to God and Gods words the good news. People don't like to hear that the Bible is correct, they mock you if you tell them so, even here on quora. 32) When Jesus would return He would place His foots on the mount of olives and that would split in 2, leaving a sea behind. There is already a fault line underneath the mount of olives all the way down to Ethiopia. It is trembling more and more. 33) Jesus would not return to Jerusalem until the Jews would learn to say: Baruch haba beShem Adonai which means; blessed is He that comes in the name of the Lord. That happens today in every Jewish messianic church-congregations, where more and more Jews find their Jewish messiah Yeshua-Jesus. 34) In 2 peter 3, apostle Peter says that the heaven and the earth will perish and the elements will be destroyed in fire. A couple of yrs. ago 2012, the theorized particle the Higgs boson was discovered. This particle is also called "the God particle". It makes that everything has mass. But it turns out to be that this particle and its associated field are unstable. Just as water vapor can turn into liquid water or ice, so can the Higgsfield decay into a way much higher density state. If that happens, the entire universe and all that is in it WILL PERISH and the elements will burn as fire. EXACTLY as the bible predicted about 2000 yrs. ago. Now these prophesies are about 6000 to 2000 yrs. old maximum, and they have become true, factually. There are also prophesies that are about to become true in the future. To name a few: a) There will come one person to rule the world, don't listen to him he is evil, and will proclaim a false non-real peace. He will set himself in the Jewish temple in Jerusalem, pro-claiming to be God, but he is the devil or a false prophet. b) Gods temple will be rebuild in Jerusalem. the Jewish people are already preparing this event and are collecting goods to make it real. c) There will be one world currency. the bit coin may be a fore runner for this. d) People will only be able to pay by means of a special mark on their right hand or forehead. There are already chips that can be implanted in the body so you can pay. e) The world economy will drop in a very short time. today with the all connectedness of all world markets this is from time to time happening on a small scale when economically bad news hits the market. this was unthinkable in the ancient days. But it became real in our days. f) People will kill each other massively. look at the news broadcasts. g) In +/- 20-100 yrs. (maybe 200 yrs.) the majority of humankind will be wiped out, due to its own wickedness and unwillingness listen to God-Jesus. h) Jesus will return and establish peace for 1000 yrs., when he returns He will stand on the mount of olives and that mountain will split in 2 creating a sea. (There is already a geological fault line from Ethiopia to the lake of galilee and underneath the mount of olives trembling more and more) i) After this 1000 yrs. of peace the entire universe will be destroyed (most probably due to the Higgsfield decay.) j) All countries (UN) will attack Israel in the valley of Megiddo or the valley of Yisreel (which is the same). There they will fall and lose. All attacking people as militaries will get killed. It will take 7 yrs. to get the bodies removed and buried. Statistically it is IMPOSSIBLE that this all occurs via random chance. Prophets wrote these down under Gods-Jesus's authority at least 2000 yrs. ago. This proofs mathematically that God is real. Only God knew the future in these details.
    1
  375. Growth of christianty: it simple there are 2 parties in this universe God and His angles who represent the ultimate Good satan and his demons who repreaent the ultimate evil From the beginning God treis to keep people straight on the good path of live and satan tries to mislead people from that good path. That is what we see during humans history. IN that process we See God/Jesus trying to convince us people to stay with Him and the devil trying to get people confused. in That proces God gave us the bible and the devil misleads people away from God with false religions.... since if satan can confuse people away from God, satan succeeded. that is the reason so many religions appear.... for people it is hard to pick the right one. And people are eagerly willing to follow and listen to lies, far more easy that to the truth... you see the truth is not always easy to swallow... If I tell you that you are a liar than that is true, but its not a pleasant message to accept. (dont worry all people are liars, including me) But we can repent from hat and instead of telling lies we can 180 degrees turn around and start to tell he truth..... but people dont like that so they keep living in their lies without accepting the truth and the devil favors that.... by even create more ideas of more lies...... the more people follow these lies the more satan has the right to drag these people into hell.... God does NOT want ytou go to hell.... and He motivates any one to repent over their wickedness and start to be good and honest....but people dont want that in general. That is the source of all these differet religions... well there are a few ays of getting to know the truth: 1st ASK GOD Himself... you see IF God is real (as I know HE is) then HE is the BEST Person to answer that question and open my and your eyes for the truth about it....let Him open your eyes for the truth abut this matter.
    1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 2:54 how can you say no observable consequences: look in the mirror... you exist because God exits..... without God you would NOT the there. we all agree that a book (lets say a math book can NOT have been formed by random chance right ?? I mean all logical statements of mathematics did NOT drop out of the sky by random chance forming a book of high advanced math... right we can all agree on that one dont we ??? well there is anothe book written..... and it is present in every single living cell that YOUR BODY consists of. DNA is our book of life. now 1 organism has so many DNA coding that IF it would be written in books it would make pile of books that go al the way to the moon. so much information there is. there is a chapter that deals with your the formation renewal and function of your eyes of your lungs, your nose, your little toe and so on BUT that SAME DNA has ALSO been used to program other organisms; plants bees, horses fishes birds etc now if a 800 pages thick math book cannot be formed by pure random chance than HOW on earth can YOUR book of YOUR life the DNA in YOUR body be randomy generated.......???????????? that makes scientifically spoken totally NO sence.... it is Ludecrous to think that we came here by NOTHING MORE that random chance.... that is SILLY and NOT part of observation..... NO BODY has SEEN /OBSERVED that life came here by random chance and that is FACTUAL, observable NOT EVEN by the smartest people a live to day 1 single living cell (exactly as we know them) has been MADE by design in the laboratory... it is ALL based on untestable hypothesis and ludecrous idea's..... and IF people are able to make a living cell (as we know them), than it ONL proofs that it requires INTELLIGENCE to make such a living cell..... random chance has NEVER produced a living cell out of the bare elements THAT is factually NOT part of observable & thus correct science.
    1
  447. well let random chance create me a rolls royce, I could use one right away, or a rolex, or a billion dollar on my bank account.....or do I sound to highly demanding ?..... Well lets start simpler than: let random chance create me my own house, since I am short in one. also OK would be a book that sells billions pieces. you see because random chances are well able to create books like moby dick or like gone with the wind or like the sherlock holmes series, or the jules verne series.....ooh also the lord of the rings is a great story that fell out of the sky of course..... you know this balony.... you know that BOOKS and their stories MUST have been though of first and than written roughly and shaped to the final story. so since we factually know that no one on earth has ever found a book some where in nature that evolved in the last 4,5 billion years that earth exists and that some one stumbled over while walking somewhwere in the jungle...... now what makes you think that the book of life...... your DNA could have done that ??????? you see your DNA - genetic coding is so complex that it would require millions of books written full of coding. just in order to make YOU a loiving being and that same DNA is used for all the billion spieces taht live on earth....in all its variety. now if random chance has NOT been able to form a single book, that some one stumbled over somewhere in the jungle...\what makes you think that YOUR book of life which is FAR FAR FAR more complex DID form by random chance... THAT IS SILLIYNESS AND UNSCIENTIFIC BALONY PAL.....
    1
  448. very good question, which God is the real one..... well we can agree on the next things a) God is real or b) God is not real Right ? there is no other option. Well I had the same question as you do 15 yrs ago... why the God of the bible why trust people in this matter...to begin with.... so I thought to my self OK IF God is realy real, then HE is the only one who can answer that question correctly... So I asked the creator of the universe to open my eyes for the truth... and guess what..... He did and as it turns out,.... God is the God of the Bible Now please do NOT take my word for it....... Ask God, the Creator of the Univers ... YOURSELF...God is perfectly capable of answering that question Himself... He does NOT need me or anybody else to let you see that He is real...... you see I can TELL you that it is God of the Bible BUT i prefer that you ask Him yourself.....so that God can open your eyes in His specific way that goes beyond words.... You see God is super natural and He can supernaturally make you undrstand what is going on in that realm.... Now I can tell you about it BUT the best thing is to open mindedly experinece it yourself....... so I am not going to prove you wrong.... Let God do that Himself..... IF you REALY want to know of course.... if you are here just to mock wth God well dont expect an answer.... but if you seriously want to find out the truth about this.... well go ahead... I got an answer...... in a way that ONLY God can do..... supernaturally....
    1
  449. 1
  450. OK pretty simpel: F= -G*M1M2/R^2 E=MC^2 E=hf-W V=V0+dS/dT PV=nRT m=mo/SQRT(1-(v/c)^2) dX*dP>= hbar/2 i hbar *dPHI/dt = - ((hbar)^2/ 2m ) Nabla^2 PHI + V(x)PHI EXACTLY as WE humans DESIGNED: int main() { // declareer twee strings en een integer string strNaam; string strVoornaam; int nLeeftijd; // vraag om voor- en achternaam cout << "Wat is uw voor- en achternaam? "; // ontvang invoer van de standaard input stream en plaats die in // de variabelen strVoornaam en strNaam cin >> strVoornaam >> strNaam; // vraag om leeftijd cout << "Wat is uw leeftijd? "; // ontvang een regel van de standard input en zet die om naar een int cin >> nLeeftijd; // toon de ingevoerde gegevens cout << "Hallo " << strVoornaam << " " << strNaam << endl; cout << "U bent " << nLeeftijd << " jaar oud." << endl; } exactly as we designed computers, cars, houses, books, knives, forks, radio's ect ect... IF there is an object that LOOKS DESIGNED.. THEN THERE MUST be a designer.. you see nature can not, by random chance produce objects like a painting, a TV, siccors You see NO ONE on earth has ever found a sciccor in wild nature that has evolved from metal ores... If I go to the jungle I will NEVER find a evolved type writer growing on a tree nor a stapler or a cooking pot, or a lamp, I will nevre stumble over an spontaiously evolved gitar in the jungle. or a pair of shoes. IF we find such things in the jungle we KNOW instinctively hee a human being MUST have been here losing this..... now all thses items ar FAR FAR FAR less complex than the universe and life .... so if random chances cannot produce THESE kind of items HOW on earth can you logically expecte the rest to be evolved ???? THAT is SILLY (at best)
    1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. Well it is NOT Gods fault that people have desided to go to hell.... people choose to follow the devil in stead of God... and that has placed humanity under he devils payment.... How ??? well simply by breaking Gods laws which EVERY ONE of us has done.... so by breaking Gods laws You CHOOSE Yourself to go to hell. Tthe devil has the legal right to drag you to hell if you break Gods laws. It is by peoples own choice to be on the path to hell... Not Gods choice.... God, via Jesus only points you to a way out of hell and it is YOU who choses to deviate from that path to hell.... and listen... The MORE you do NOT accept this of do NOT believe in God the faster your going to hell anyway... there IS simply NO other option.... The more you resist God/Jesus the faster the devil has the legal right to get you into hell... by breaking Gods laws/rules you are going to hell faster and faster... the more you break them God/Jesus is your ONLY way out..... You may NOT like/believe it but that is the way is has been set up... and your disbelieve is NOT going to chance that, not even in the minutest detail.... so NO I am NOT giving you a break.... this is the way it is.... accept it and redeem from your sins (breaking Gods rules) or go to hell anyhow .... Jesus christ is your only way to heaven.... simple as that... THAT is REALITY !!! whether you believe that or not... Now Gods rules are ONLY for your and other peoples benefits.... love your neighbour as you love yourself..... (what is wrong with that ???? so why shuff that aside ???)
    1
  454. OK let me give you a small indication of what hell is, as far as I know and heared about what hell is........ Have you ever had a litle cut in your finger, or a small nail sting ? that was not very pain full but more kind of irritating ?? Well in hell that same little cut will feel as if your entire body would be on a blazing fire and that for eternity. And than I am not even talking about the other torments you are going thrue because of sinning against God.. you see every sin has its own kind of torture and the feelings of that are magnified just as that little finger cut. If you think hell is a pleasure ride you are seriously wrong..... and NO God did NOT PLAN for people to go to hell... Hell was made actually for the devil and his demons..... not for humans.... God ONLY gave some rules of which HE KNOWS that they will give enjoyfull LIFE to you... now BREAKING these rules will THUS automaticaly give death and destruction... You see God does NOT lie to us, God is God He does not need lies, when He says that some rules are good for you and your fellow man to follow.... God is LIFE and gives life, God is the very source of life..... That also means that NOT following these rules brings death and destruction to you and your fellow man....since deviating from God as your life source brings death.... The nice thing about is; God is willing to redeem you from the consequences of your wrong choices and let you go free into heaven ... ONLY by accepting Jesus Christ as your saviour and repenting over you breaking Gods love and life giving rules Like said before breaking these rules has the automatic consequence that what you do, by breaking these rules, is bad for yourself and your fellow man/woman....God has made us so God knew that in advance so there for He Gave us these rules..... well by YOU choosing against God and Gods rules ... you automatically CHOOSE to go the paths of death and destruction (hell) of yourself and your fellow people so by your own choice YOU choose to go to hell.. God does NOT choose that you go to hell.. YOU DO !!!! you see GOD gave also a way out of that one way trip to hell: and that way out is ONLY via Jesus Christ as is written in the new testament Jesus took the punishment that YOU deserve by breaking Gods rules.... so the choice is entirely YOURS God already choose !!! God wants you in heaven !!!! THAT is why He gave us Jesus Christ so that HE can set you free from hell so YOU CHOOSE !!!!
    1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. and no it is NOT onl asking forgiveness and believe in Jesus Christ here is more to it; not sinning again as good as you can doing what Jesus tells you to do and all other stuff that the bibe teaches us... that is why the bible is such a thick instruction book... and dont get mistaken: christainity is not for sissies.... you see being a christian is a real adventure with God/Jesus....and it can get tough..... since the devil want to let you fail in being a good christian... so he is your direct opponent with whom you have to deal day in day out...... that si why christians and jews suffer so much in this world. that is why Israel is so much attacked in the world since God is the God of Israel and the devil hates that and attacks that.... but you will ONLY find out IF you start doing this (being a serious christian) SERIOUSLY..... you see as long as you do not believe in God etc etc the devil has you already, so he will NOT bother with you to give you a hard time... you will get that when he drags you into hell....(IF he gets you there) ONLY when you start following God/Jesus Christ he, the devil, will start to oppose you in your path with God.... (I experience that years in a row to tis very day from the moment I converted to christianity on a daily basis) there is a large price to it..... but hee better to pay the (relative small) price here on earth as long as you live on earth..... than spend eternity in hell.....(unpayable price into eternity)...... But again: seriously ask God about this ...only He can open your mind for these things... I can nly tell you about it but not impart you the experiences.. only God can impart you the reality of it by opening your mind/spirit to this new additional reality so SERIOUSLY sincerely ASK for it and be willing to get your mind blown away by it...... its a real challenge and adventure..... so I dare you....
    1
  458. 1
  459. earth layers are millions of years because we find indicator fossils in them. we find indicator fossils in them so they must be millions of years old we have accepted that the earth is boillions of years old so every thing MUST be expleained in that line of billions of years thinking. therefore: we assume that all daugther elements come from the mother elements we assume that an object is a closed system we assume that all daugther elements come from the elements within The object therefor we accept that these objects are millions of years by radioactive decay. we assume that elements decay in a constant rate. we measure these elements in this object therfore we assume that our assumptions are correct. but hee we find that recently formed stones by vulcanoes turn out to be radioactivelydetermined to be 100.000's to millions of years old even if we factually know and have seen them grow.... in the last 10 years.... We find fresh flesh in dinosauar bones which we found in earthlayers containing indicator fossils that tell us that these rocks are millions of years old therefor we assume these bones are millions of years old inspite of knowing that fresh flesh and blood vessels can never survive millions of years and hee C14 dating turns out that these fossils are not older than 20.000 years.... what else is that than circular reasoning in science and silly (if not worse) argumentations ???? no pal it is NOTHING BUT HOLLOW UNPROVEN ASSUMPTIONS and circular reasoning in science...... sceince tries to FOOL you people in to billions of years lies..... and YOU folks swallow it like sweet potato pie.... as gullible sheep....
    1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. well the secular science .....PEOPLE (!).... have indeed NOTHING to gain... its the devil that is the one gaining.... he is the one who want you to believe that there is no God. I know for you that is hard to swallow, but that is reality...... you see a person is either on Gods side or on the devils side.... now God does NOT lie... He does not need lies.... He is God The devil is the one who gains with lies.... You see God wants you into heaven..... the devil wants you to be tortured in hell the way he does that is to keep you away from God with filthy lies THAT is the exact reason why there are so many different (but wrong/false) religions (thus including secular science) most people swallow that and follow satan in his lies that is why the world is such a mess... satan has the juridical right to mess up peoples lives if they follow him in his lies.....and the more people do NOT accept Jesus/God the more rights he has to hurt people. Look at 3rd world countries they live in povery and suppression by the rich people but they are NOT christian nations from old times onward....they live the lives when people follow the devil: poverty starvation, suppression, early deaths, lots of sicknesses, wars ectetc....this is mainly in the east side of the world....in the west we have all christina nations olf old and they lived in relative prosperity (as long as they remained christian) Now satans lies are ALSO inside secular science, and the petty thing about it is that the people themselves do NOT EVEN realize this... they also follow these lies not realizing they follow satan. one of the biggest lies (and suported with tons of lies) is that the devil wants you to believe that you come from an ape..... and NOT that you are created by God you see THAT makes a super large difference ... and indeed secular science people do not gain antything in this proces... hey are the victims without even realizing it.....they dnt even know it... they think they perform good science... but they dont.... satan has shutted their eyes blind... with seemingly well sounding (but false) assumptions. and assumptions are NOTHING more than religious statements/confessions once you believe them you are trapped. BUT if you realy realy think them over they make no sense at all and THAT is what we in creationism try to do.... to let you realy think them over...are these fundamental assumptions ins secular science correct ??? and NO they are false .. THUS consequenctly your science based on these assumtions is false.... and that is exactly what the devil wants.....to make you believe is false but nice sounding assumptions so that you have a plausible reason NOT to believe in God.... you see the devil is the master of lies and he knows how to trick people like you ... that is why secular science is just as all other false religions also a false religion...why ?? just so that YOU put God aside and satan has you into hell eternally.....
    1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. ooh yes it has.. my chemstry teaches me that life coming about from NON living elements chemicals by spontaneous random processes is scientifically impossible. I'll tell you why: 1 the chemistry is against it.... since it requires no water present since water breaked down many biologcal molecules. if one wants to fabricate a proteine based on nothing more that random chance it would take longer that the SECULAR (1) estimated age of the universe. to get a functional but very small proteine/enzyme of lets say 100 amino acids. it would require billlions of bnillions times the secular age of the universe. EVEN if all atoms in the universe would participate to make it and EVEN if chemical reaction speeds would be insanely increased to unscientific and u realistic speeds.... in short: impossible. to give you a smal insight: it requires 10^-7 to 10 ^-10 seconds for a chemical reaction to take place. lets say on average 10^-9 sec now 100 amino acids long chain with 21 different amino acids and they all have to be in the right order to be functional. 10 in the right order by random chance would require: 10* 10^-9 sec * ((1/21)^10) = 46,33 hours to all make the possible combinations which are 1,7*10^13 posibilityies 20 amino acids would require: 20*10^-9 sec * ((1/21)^20 = 1,76 *10^11 YEARS.... which is al ready longer than the secular estimated universe..... you see there are about 2,8*10^26 possibile cmbinations of aminoacids most of them unfunctional bust since randomness rules all have to be made and tried well 50 would require: about 2 *10^51 years to be formed and tested on funcytionality so EVEN if you turn the reaction rates up a notch lets say 10^-20 seconds per reaction instead of 10^-9 S. you still requires MORE time than the secular estimated age of the universe.... I could go on and on but it boils down to this: IMPOSSIBLE !! same goes for many types of biochemicals.... but enzymes/proteines are one of the most important since THEY are the molecular machenery of any living organism......
    1
  469. a) again you ASSUME that God has a beginning or an end.. well He does NOT. You assume that God had to come from somewhere....well He didnt. God has always been there in to all eternities; do I understand that ?? No but that is what He tells about Himself. There was no beginning and there is no end to God/Jesus... He is in all eternities.... but in the same perspective one could argue... where did the energy from this universe come from IF one believes in a big bang story ??? well according to some that energy has always been around and will always be there as well... (that is what secular scientists say) so why is what seculars say acceptable (that the energy of this universe has always been there) ?? And why is it unaccpetable to say that God has always been there ?????? b) it was Urey/Miller makes things for you folks ONLY harder; let me explain. Urey/ miller produced only 8 of the 21 amino acids BUT in L and D form so a racemic mixture. (L&D are like a right and left hand but then of molecules) later experiments of U/M indeed produced even 23 different amino acids all in D and L form (racemic mixture FACT is ALL living beings have ONLY the L form of the amino acids in their system/construction... So NOW you have increased you problems by at least a factor of 2 so meaning the time required also at least 2 times longer. NEXT to the fact that there are 2 more amino acids so instead of 1/21 chance in picking the right amino acid you have 1/(2*23) = 1/46 chance to pick the correct amino acid.... so Urey Miller creates a larger problem than you initially had.....they make it worse for you folks..... get it ????
    1
  470. 1
  471. I will put my reply again.... well same goes for you people too accepting that the energy that builds up this universe is eternal without factually knowing it.... with God its the same thing......that is why it is called BELIEVE !!!!! We believe that God heaven and hell are eternal..... ( and we have observable testable evidence of that as well) difference between secular scientists is THEY claim that they have facts while they dont have observable facts, they also BELIEVE it so basically they hold up a religion since there are no facts supporting this....... and we say that we BELIEVE this because God tells us so in His words.... In both cases the statements are religious of nature....difference is .. we as God believing peolpe are honest about our BELIEVES..... secular science is so arrogant to do NOT convey it to he world as a believe/religion but as proven facts... which its NOT... they dont have proof of it.... even stronger... there are observable facts that counter the very statements of secular science ... but they are being whipped under the carpet if that suits them better. a) Who says this universe is eternal, coming in and out of existance just to start over again of expand for ever ???? only secular science. well the bible tells us that this universe is going to be destroyed in about 1000-1500 yrs from now, never to return again. the bible tells us clearly the universe began only 6000 yrs (earth days - due to Einsten) ago and will last only about 7000 yrs in total after that its over.... b) well look at what you accepted without understanding.... consiousness, love, hatred, beginning of life, death, how we got here, where we all come from, peole accept many things without understanding it..... so what ??? I cannot explain Gods eternal being.... but I know He is. I have accepted that as a truth.... babies and little children accept kind of all things as theyt are with out understanding it. so doing that is totaly human in nature.... you dont have to understand in order to accept it... so it IS acceptable..... with respect to God: we come to BELIEVE.... we do NOT always come to ..UNDERSTAND......that is irrelevant.. all of humanity understands (according to prof Robbert Dijkgraaf) only 4% of the universe.... well I think that this is a gross over estimation but OK lets assume he is right. that menas that 7,5 BILLION people understand about 4% of all that happens in the universe.... that means that YOU as an individual knows/understands about 1/1000.000 of al there is to know/understand...e that means that even YOU does NOT understand 99,999996% of all there is to understand/know... yet you accept it non the less.... so you contradict yourself in your own reasoning... you do NOT understand 99,9999996% of all there is to know .. yet you accept it...... Well nothing can not come from nothing..... sorry that is just a silly religious statement... no one of who claims this "theory" was there around to observe this idea..... and again one can call it "theory" or "assumption" or "hypothesis".. but it is all different words for the very same thing ........ religious believe statements.... in other words of..... religion.... you have to BELIEVE it ....... that does NOT make it true...... reality needs confirmation.... and the bible is confirmationable..... it is historic and accurate in what it says and prophesizes. of course organic molecules can come around.....but that is kind of as far as it goes..... emerging LIFE from them is yet another level .... and that is a level TOO high..... EVEN with the help of human intellect, scientists have NOT been able to create LIFE from basic chemicals..... NO ONE but God, has made life from non living materials... let alone that randomness can do the trick... and if you look at the ingenious ways of how life works........ man...... that HAD to be created by a super intelligent being.. it is realy amazing......how living organisms function here watch it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_tYrnv_o6A&t=1s and you are saying it your self....."maybe this" ... "maybe that" ... theorectially here" .... "hypothisis there" in other words....secular science religion.....there is no proof... its only religion...... and these organic moecules ONLY get around there after carefull designed experiments..... well that is engineering....... not random chance...... and engineering requires INTELLIGENCE...( a feedback system to controle and regulate) random chance (as is claimed to be the cause of life itself) does NOT have intelligence..... (no feedback and no regulation)
    1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. listen: secular science does NOT want God in their equations at for hand. that is their mindset always. unless a secular scientist is converted to christianity he/she will never allow God to be part of his/her theories. I dont have to read his book to know his mindset if it is nothing more than a hypothesis.... then..... what value does it have..it doesnt prove anything it is just scribling some idea's some fantasies in a book of how it MIGHT be ....I pettie the trees that went waste due to that and many other silly idea's.... well I tell you how it also might be..... this uni verse is the result of a fart of the african boboegoetse-fly that ate to many beans on one day afternoon... that is my hypothesis..... prove me wrong..... that is what scientists always do, coming up with an falling out of the sky idea claiming t is proven science ..... and gullible people like you swallow it like sweet potatoe pie because he is a reknown scientist....... well hip hip hurree... congrats. so what ???????? here watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=42QuXLucH3Q&t=323s 80 % of peer reviewed science is WRONG.... 80% !!!!!!!! You see people like yourself think that secular science is the holy grail to truth and knowledge... but its not..... 80% is wrong... so how on earth can mr krauss tell us that he is right about what he proclaims..... you may be inmpressed... I am absolutely NOT impressed by Krauss. yes science has produced may great things, yes science brings forth many inventive things, but there is a heavy down side: only 5-10% of what is being investigated is seriousl business. Roughly estimated 90-95% is wasted efford and wasted idea's.... and based on fantasies..... but people like you follow that as it is the absolute truth.... man, please wake up...... I have been thinking like a real scientist..... that is why I a believe in God... the world and the universe ONLY makes sense in the light of the Bible and Gods actions.... The logic in this universe proves the actions of a highly intelligent CREATOR... some One who INVENTED this entire universe.....that is the only thing that makes logical sense..... so YOU start thinking as a true scientist and draw everuy conclusion that LOGIC brings you and than you will find out hat yes indeed it had to be MADE/CREATED/ invented, logically put togeher... there is factually no other option... God is real and His creatoin testifies of that....
    1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497.  @TL5official  EEUH nee... geloven in God is GELOVEN in GOD en NIET in mensen Ik ben tot geloof gekomen ZONDER mensen juist Ik vertrouwde mensen niet inzake religie want iedereen verteld zijn religie en dat je daar moest wezen om dat DAT de waarheid zou moeten zijn........ dus mensen KUN je niet vertrouwen als het gaat om geloof in God... Dus redeneerde ik in 2004 ALS God werkelijk bestaat kan HIJ mij het beste antwoord geven op die vragen... dus (om het neutraal te houden) vroeg ik de schepper van Het universum om mijn ogen te openen voor de waarheid en DAT heeft Hij inderdaad gedaan en veel meer gewoon bij mij thuis; met God en ik alleen ... niemand anders..... dus nee ik ben zonder de invloed van mensen tot geloof gekomen in God omdat ik de waarheid hierover wilde weten.... mensen kunnen je van ALLES op de mouw spelden.... Dus nee juist GEEN vertrouwen in mensen en 100% vertrouwen in God DAAR gaat het om.... mensen kun je niet vertrouwen; waarom niet ? zal ik uit leggen JIJ , ja jij kunt fouten maken waar je ZELF last van hebt... bv door rood licht rijden en een fikse boete daarvoor krijgen of harder dan 50 of 100 rijden als je maar 50 of 100 km/uur mag.... en je kunt daarvoor een fikse boete krijgen... dus je hebt er ZELF last van.... Dus je kunt JEZELF soms niet eens vertrouwen.... Maar als je jezelf niet volledig kunt vertrouwen hoe kun je dan andere mensen vertrouwen... die ieder hun eigen belang hebben... het ENIGE wat je kunt doen is mensen VERTROUWEN ... GEVEN ... wetende dat ze je ooit gaan teleurstellen.... en ALS ze je teleurstellen kun je ze VERGEVEN.... dus vertrouwen GEVEN en VERGEVEN als t misgaat. ja denk daar maar eens over na....
    1
  498. 1
  499.  @AFCA1349  tuurlijk wie bij de duivel op schoot zit heeft een gruwelijke pest hekel aan alles wat met God/Jezus te maken heeft.... je bent gewoon dik vet besmet met satanische kwaadaardige demonen DAAR komt die aversie tegen God/Jezus vandaan... en hoe langer jij bij God/Jezus wegblijft ... des te heftiger en agressiever zal dat gaan worden... simpel waarom jij geeft steeds meer ruimte aan satan en zijn demonenin jouw leven en die maken daar super graag gebruik van.....met als doel... jou helemaal kapot te maken... daar is hun enige doel... dus als jij vraagt waar vandaan komt het .... ....lijden in de wereld ? Dat werk je dus zelf in de hand... hoe meer mensen als jij je afkeren van God (die ons wil beschermen) des te meer JIJ eigenhandig de deur open zet voor satan OM de ellende te veroorzaak... Dus Geef GOD niet de schuld voor JOUW rebellie tegen God en geef God niet de schuld voor de ellende die JIJZELF op deze aarde veroorzaakt...door God juist af te wijzen... hoe hardere jij God/Jezus afwijst des te heftiger JIJ ZELF bij draagt aan de ellende in de wereld ... te beginnen bij jouzelf en jouw familie (kids/kleinkids)... de duvel wil wel.... die staat te poppelen om jou en je familie in het verderf te storten.... omdat je NIET naar God/Jezus luistert... Staat allemaal in Deutronomium 28/leviticus 26... de zegen en de vloek God/Jezus wil jou en je familie juist beschermen.... maarja ..... DAT betekend dat jij naar God/Jezus zal moeten luisteren.... Dus je hebt je eigen welzijn en die van je familie (kids/kleinkids ) ZELF in de hand... aan JOU de KEUS dus..
    1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521.  @sneezyfido  zie je wel ... genegeerd door mensen; des ondanks er toch aan onderhevig... net als een natuurkracht.... je kunt het ontkennen, maar nooit ontlopen. Ook jij niet....je kunt t negeren maar niet uit de weg gaan. Net als God; mensen (zoals jij) kunnen Hem ontkennen, maar nooit ontlopen...aangezien jij en de rest van het universum deel zijn van ZIJN schepping. en dat mensen fouten maken, en foute keuzes (zoals jij nu doet) wil niet zeggen dat Gods woord niet waar is. Maar goed de meeste mensen(jij dus ook zo te lezen) zullen het op de harde confronterende manier moeten ontdekken dat God reeel is en erf zonden ook. Jij noemt het collectivistisch onzin, misbruik egoisme en haatzaaien, tja zo zijn mensen (en soms ook in kerken); zie daar de erf zonden... en JUIST daarvoor heb je Jezus nodig. Juist om het probleem der zonden te verhelpen/minimaliseren. Maar ipv er naar toe te lopen om jouw bezwaren op te helderen (door Jezus) loop je ervan weg. Terwijl je het juist zo hard nodig hebt. Jij loopt weg van de remedie die jij zo hard nodig hebt (net als iedereen). Komt omdat je misleid bent en God niet wil toelaten in je leven want je wilt alleen maar door kunnen gaan met zondigen... waardoor jouw erf zonden enkel maar toenemen en overgaan op je kinderen en kleinkinderen. je doet dus mee om het probleem enkel groter te maken. Helaas maar dat is nooit zonder kwalijke gevolgen uiteindelijk voor jou of je nazaten.... Maar goed. Ontken maar wat je wil... God is toch onvermijdelijk, God verdwijnt niet door jouw ongeloof in Hem. Dat zou Raar zijn. Gods bestaan is niet afhankelijk van jouw ge- of ongeloof in Hem. Maar daar kom je vanzelf achter.
    1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1:25 evolution ??? There is no such thing as evolution. chemicallt and physically the idea of evolution is simply impossible... nature is not able to increase information without the input of information from an intelligence. without external input of information nature is extremely limited to create some measure of order. Crystals yes, laminated currents yes (only at low flow rates) some basic organic molecules yes... But there is the limit. The imaginairy proces of evolution is supposedly driven by mutations. Mutations are real that is correct. Unfortunately for the evolutionists, mutations are driven by destructive agences (UV light, radioactive decay, cosmic radiation agressive chemicals and radioactive radiation) there is only 1 non destructive way and that is cross over mutations. it is comparable with sanblasting metal ores into a space shuttle.... that doesnt happen and it will NEVER happen. same for the imaginairy proces of evolution... there is NO way that a simple organism can evolve into a higher organism by supposed beneficial mutations. since there are NO beneficial mutations... all mutations are a) neutral... without effect b) destructive And BOTH processes are 100% against what the imaginairy proces of evolution requires. YES desatruction of DNA information has effect that ALSO include some beneficial results; but that is the same as the following: by losing your both arms you cannot burn you hands on fire anymore or be handcuffed by the police... yes that is an advantage... but at the cost of LOSING the information in having arms.... this is known as a fitness cost. And THAT is in the most of the cases what we see happening. This proces is FALSLY interpreted as progressive evolution. another form that is mistakenly interpreted as evolution is the resoration of already existing mechnisms: like was fonmd in the "regaining" of the critrus cycle by the Lenski bacteria.... this is not evolution this is gathering functional parts of broken cars to make 1 working car from scratch cars. ooh you people are SO easily misled....as long as it serves your idea's and kick God out of your systems...
    1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. Ik heb zelf OOK corona gehad... een stel voedingssupplementen en ik was er in 2weken ervan af. Geloof aan de kant zetten ?????? Iedereen zal juist aan het christelijk geloof moeten gaan omarmen juist... want dan zouden deze ellende helemaal niet hebben... corona = deutronomium 28 / leviticus 26 IN ACTIE !! en daarbij zal het niet stoppen. Hoe ongehoorzamer mensen aan God/Jezus zijn des te groter de rampen die zullen komen OOK over NL. Schop je God/Jezus aan de kant ??? dan krijg je ellende in je land !!!...en corona is daar nog maar 1 klein voorbeeldje van ! Al jaren komen steeds meer onderdelen van Deurtronomium 28/leviticus 26 op ons pad in NL !!! feitelijk. je kunt er de kranten op na slaan LETTERLIJK !! Wilde dieren; prosessie rups, wolven, terroristen, mislukte oogsten, en nu ziekten-corona, kind ontvoeringen, armoe, steeds meer misdaad, slavernij, moordaanslagen staat ALLEMAAL in deut 28/lev 26... !!!! Weet je; als je Gods zegenende handen aan de kant duwt (door je eigen ongeloof) krijg je de duvel ervoor terug... en DAT gebeurd er nu... even naar het grotere plaatje kijken.... corona is slechts een klein onderdeeltje die de NLers als vloeken over zichzelf afroepen... !!! Hoe meer mensen God van zich afduwen in ongeloof des te heftiger dit zal gaan worden. simpel en eenvoudig. God laat NIET met zich spotten. !! maar ja DAT wil niemand meer horen.. want dan word je een wappie genoemd... DUS met zo'n houding word het alleen maar erger....want wie niet horen wil.... zal het moeten voelen.. simpel zat... !!!!
    1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. @Kirrily - remember the future emotional OK then explain me these next really happend events: first) a man is being carried in into a hospital after a heart stroke. He passes away, which has been measured/monitored and later is revived again. during him being dead a nurse took out his articifical teeth. and she puts them on a shelf of some kind of closet. The man is revived and later ex-hospitalized. afetr being home for some time he gets back to the hospital and askes if nurse such and so is present. yes she is and he wants to see her. then she in quires what he wants and he says to return him his artificial teeth. he says: well you are the one who took them out of my mouth and putted them on this and that closet... she is extremely highly amazed and said: you cannot know that sir... you were DEAD that is what we checked. He said well I saw you doing it and described in extreme and correct details what happend. in other words a) this has nothing to do with emotions... just a lost item. b) people after they die are getting out of their bodies and experience is extreme high awareness what happens in their surroundings second) a young child dies due to some event and is later revived. after this event the parents and the child is visiting the doctor who was in charge during this event. during that session the child tells all who is present that she met with her older sister and described her in all details that she met with hear in a place which we know or would describe as heaven. the parents run out of the doctors room in total shock and come back later after they calmed down. they tel the doctor that they never told their daughter about this girl who was indeed exactly as the girl described and een told her name and drees collore and eyes color. the paraents had decided to tell her only after they considered her old enough about a previously born daughther who died when she was young.. and after this they gained this child/girl... these are real life stories, not made up and therefor proof of that after one dies your sould or spirit goes on in some kind of spirtual environment. many man many of these stories have been testifying about a life after we pass away and several of them have NOTHING to do with emotions and are simply practical things like the lost teeth story.... so you are wrong... in this case DEAD wrong....
    1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. @Kirrily - remember the future OOh no they know more than I do, BUT THEY are pre-occupied (confirmation bias) with the wrong idea's and wrong religious convictions (just as you are) , namely that God is no option. so they are limited in insights. And No the bible is NOT flawed in its original setup nor in its best translations (KJV - statenvertaling etc) Gods words have been proven to be correct.. That you lack knowledge of that is only yourself to blame.... the fact that you assume the bible tells us that the earth is flat is a perfect example of your ignorance... the bible never said that. on the contrairy.... meaning you have listend to lies that gave you the worng idea's of the bible and God and thus your eternal destiny. yes the Bible is divine since God gave His words to us via a bunch of people that He instructed, waht to write/tell. and yes there is s super natural realm where we ALL (including yourself) go to eventually. but there are 2 dsections in that realm, heaven and hell... question is where do you go to.... God wants you to go to heaven, satan wants you to go to hell to torture you. both are eternal both are unescapable. thats why I started about NDE's to prove that you have a wrong perspective on our lives.... and who and what we are. After you die you go either way: heaven or hell .. there is no other option.... But here on earh YOU have to make the decisive choice where you go to. My logic is as much as I can foillowing the Logic of God.. and Gods logic is supernatural and focussed on total LOVE.... the logic of people is materialistic, which I understand since I am a human, BUT that is NOT the logic that is going to last in the end. in about 1000-1500 yrs the logic of the universe stops to exist (higgs boson instability) and the universe will explode in a big bang.... EXACTLY as apostle Paul about 2000 yrs ago predicted (see 2 Peter 3 verses 10-14. and Peter Higgs found in his unstable Higgs field. It is NOT for Nothing that the Higgs particle received the name GODS particle... since it wil destroy the entire universe"on the Day of th Lord" well that is in about 1000 to 1500 yrs from now. where, according to apostle Peter the elements will melt and disintegrate in a big noise.... coincidenc you think ??? NO WAY God knows exactly what is going to happen in the future... Peter the fisherman fortold this event in his and our future Peter Higgs found it scientifically to be correct.... you see the bible is further ahead AND scientifically correct MORE than you know/think.
    1
  585. @Kirrily - remember the future on top of the Higgs boson unstability the bible fortells many more things for OUR future... a) a close to all destructive war b) nucleair explosions all over the earth (zacharia 14) c) a new ocean/sea close to Jerusalem d) people living in slavery to satan (reveation 13) e) a personly bound paying system (revelation 13) f) a stock market crash world wide g) we will see something happening to the Sun, moon and stars h) Israel being at les 10 times bigger as it is now i) the temple of God restored in Jerusalem j) well we see Israel in wars all the rtime with the countries around (zacharia 12, 13, 14) k) 1/3 of the people die off l) 1/3 of the animals die off etc etc How did the people know these details ???? well God told them so the bible is NOT just simply a book... it is Gods LIVING words... what HE says becomes reality... and THUS Gods word is ALIVE and NOT just a book filled with characters.... as most peolpe think... Now 1 or max 5 of these prophesies being true MAY be a coincident.. but 10's and 10's of these at least 2000 yrs old prophesies coming true is far far far beyond statistical coincident and MUST been known at forhand. That you have troubles to accep that is you problem... but correct science defeats secular reasonings/science. so if you still want to leave with your tail between your leggs that is your choice but at least I have told you the truth. NOT listening to what I just said is your choice but in rejecting God there are serious consequences.... you see GOD is YOUR life source.... saying NO to yourlife source is saying yes to your source of death.... thats why I keep persisting... since I know part of the consequences IF you keep rejecting God (your life source).
    1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. Sorry the AVERAGE cannot- can never- be zero, because of quantization... there is no such thing as 100% randomness, there is always a part of a smallest measure at these levels, due to quantization. Therefor it cannot be zero but a small offset value from zero. A smallest measure ontop of this averaging happens over time. So over time there is always some small non zero measure. This makes the idea of decoherence non valid, if I am correct. And over time therefor it is wobbling but never zero. Just as quantum foam; the zero point energy level its never zero. On average zero level over "longer"periods of time yes, but not measured in time. Averaging is over a longer period of time... but on very tiny time scales its non zero and in time that is what counts. Energy cannot disappear but has to reappear some where else in time sequence. Energy wise this makes also sence since IF if would be zero then the whole quantum system over time would disappear and thats is not what we see. It may be bouncing around in a macroscopic system as phonon's but dissappearing, no that makes hardly any sense. Now agreed the close to zero average lifts up the more macroscopic behaviour to be visible BUT does not entirely away with the quantum behaviour but largely. It puts it under the carpet so to say for latter times to re-appear, IF a system is broken lose to individual particles. But it was never 100% gone... on average. Just as the effects of the quantum foam are never 100% gone. The quantum foam leaves us stuck with the small but non the less presence of the Casimir effect... so same thing with the idea of decoherence.... it may be under the carpet but NOT 100% pushed aside. Quantum technically that would be impossible at least in my opinion. And my statement is also verified of course by means of the smaller and smaller getting deBroglie wavelength the bigger a particle is. Which must mean that decoherence as it is being taugh now is not entirely correct. the deBrogly wavelength proves my point.... if I am correct.
    1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. @Mike Siler1 I cant speak for others... I can only speak form myself. look how Jesus Himself adressed pharasees/scribes and money exchangers in the temple... compared to that I am a sweet teddy bear. Jesus called these people white painted grave yards with dead bones and old foxes and he kicked the whole temple square clean and all goodies He knocked over to those who stood up against Him. Compared to that I am a sweet spicy candy.... and who says I dont love you as my human fellow man ? IF I didnt I would NOT get up here to give you folks the message of being misled and lied to... Than I would leave you rotting in the lies that you believe in... as most christians do.... So by pointing you to the truth of the Bible maybe harshly ... BUT .. I at least I take the long lasting effort, away from my work, to confront you with the message you dont want to hear to begin with. Well that last part is not my problem. At least I take the responsibility to warn you people and to tell you what I tell you, inmuy best and most polite way I can ... the rest is up to you... and Nope I have not bee triggered... I deliberatly visit these type of video's on youtube JUST in order to tell you guys/dolls that you have been duked and that this is a video that is duking you even more..... what YOU do with that message is your choice... AND responsibility..... If you want and even MORE softer approach than I present to you than go to God Himself.... BUT be willing to talk to God than to begin with.... But usually you folks are NOT willing and God sent guys like me on your path.... you see GOD ONLY talks directly to people who are open minded enough to except HIS existance... God is willing to talk to you and He most probably already did... BUT you refuse to listen.... so as one of the last possible ways He sends folks like me on your path... and that means you are confronted with my type of attitudes... for the nice/gente appraoach you should have talked to God Himself way much earlier.... and If I look back in what I told you so far I have been pretty forthcomming to you... and not offencive... i remained polite... so I dont understand your attitude towards me in suggesting that I was being rude to you .......
    1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661.  Juno Donat  1 thing ???? man all misery is from the devil there are BILLIONS of things... this world is in misery cant you see ??? but Ok I'll name a few: abortion.... killing/murdering people before they are born prostitution, drugs abuse boose abuse, rape, murder genocide, child abuse, agression, segregation, racism, dictator ship, suppression extorition torture, divorces, sicknesses. all that is bad and evil is from the devil. recently corona of course... all prophesized in deutronomy 28 and leviticus 26 IF people listen God ill bless them if they dont then all these curses will come over you.... and that realy happens right as we speak....LITERALLY !!! read it: deutronomy 28 and leviticus 26... that is what you see happening in the world... right as we speak. and last but not least... YOU ..... you are in the denial state with respect to God.... you yourself are proof of satans actions in this world.. how you are finding ONLY arguments to be able (on false grounds how ever) to deny Gods existence.... why ... because THAT is what YOU want.... well the devil is very very very willing to deliver you ALL you can get to be able (on false grounds) to deny Gods existence.... the devil is very willing to help you seek informatin about finding reasons to say no to God... so even in your own life he proofs his presence... getting close right ??? getting personal right ??? yeah thats how it works... the more you want to deny God the more easier the devil will make it for you to find reasons for it......that is exactly what he wants to achieve in your life... why ?? so that he can destroy you as soon as he gets the chance.... and drag you into hell to torture you ... why ? well you (and all humans) look a bit like God, since God created you/us in HIS image and to hurt God the devil takes his revenge on you ... he is unable to hur God directly so he takes his reveng on us humans... thats why people kill eachother... by setting us up against eachother.... and the more YOU give him way.... the easier the devil can get you in his grip... just to drag you down.... by your own choice !!!!!
    1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677.  Juno Donat  and what do I care what the consensus is ???? THAT is NOTR how CORRECT science is suppose to work.... Correct science should be judged on the FACTS alone... NOT by majority of opinion.....as is happening now..... we are NO longer oin the middle ages where they tried to find making gold from lead.... we are NOW in 2020 science shouold be FACTUALL CORRECT and secular scinece is FALSE especially when it comes to our origin... abiogenesis... unproven idea evolution ... unproven idea big bang ..... unrpoven idea and all facts speak against these idea's no matter what opinions say.... and that is where craetionism comes along .. it places the facts back again in the right perpective.... that this includes the existence of "God did it" yeah that is true... and THERE LIES the HOT ISSUE .. YOU PEOPL DO NOT WANT GOD TO BE REAL... Including your good old self you dont WANT God to tell you how you should live... and THAT is heavily dishonets that based on your opinion you exclude God before you even gave Him a chance..... why well the bible is clear... due to your LUSTS you dont want God to be real.... you JUST want to DO what YOU want to do without being responsible for your actions and THAT can only be achoieved IF there would be no God to whom you have to answer... well nice for you that you WANT that...... but your desires do NOT make God go away.... He remains no matter what you believe... so better face reality about Him then being tossed in hell by Him... because you choose to be tossed in Hell. you see God has got better plans for you. IF you accept them ... and THERE comes your free choice into vision.
    1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683.  Juno Donat  evadet evolution well i am not evade or avoid it..... but eovlution si simply a impossible idea.... I will explain why it is so simple: you see the idea of evolution is floating on beneficial mutations.... they do not exist..... there is NO benecifial mutation ever reported in peer review science magazines..... how ever the 100% opposite of beneficial mutation have been peer reviewed published in science papers... millions of them..... why is that ... well beneficial muattions dont exist... and that makes sense as well... why ?? simple the agences that drive mutation are ONLY Destructive or Neutral (without effect) at best. That means that what we see is only the cause of destruction of genetic information..... NEVER has GAIN of new information in the genes been obeserved.... BUT that is EXACTLY what he idea of evoltion would need..... but what it needs is 100% invisible .. while what it does NOT need the opposite is what we in 100% of the times see.... that means there s factually no such thing as evolution..... and that is verified by the following: we only see little dogs big dogs, hairy Dogs or less hairy dogs, small tails dogs big tail dogs.... we see variation... and thats is fine ... what we do NOT see is Dogs gaining for example an umbrella tail against the rain, or humans gaining pencil fingers or cats gaining chlorophyll THAT would be REAL evolution the ADDITION of NEW genetic information.... but we dont see that factually..... if you can show me an exampe of beneficial evolution ... please tel me about it.... non has been found unless you know more than I do.... so surprice me
    1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696.  @johnlemon5904  well if all of it is no more then science tricks.... OK then I challenge you folks again and again and again.... repeat it as CORRECT science demands ... science is about observationals repeatable processes... so SCIENCE DEMANDS you folks MUST do it again in a repeatable way or it has no part in science no matter how nice graphics you can make... science demands physical proof by .. doing it repeatably again.... so far... Nothing has been repeated that confirms abiogenesis/evolution or even big bang, starformation, etc etc etc to be real part of science... you are free to BELIEVE IT !!! that is for sure !!! but then it is part of religion... not of observable provable evidence based science.... so stop indoctrinating innocent children with "silly" (heavy understatement) secular science which are no more then blatant lies... FIRST the factuall proof THEN the teachings not the other ways around. !!!! as is being done to this very day... THAT is blatant hideous indoctrination soviet style and thus highly repulsive manipulation of people... including yourself.... you have been duked my friend with "silly" idea's why ?? well liek I saidf before the devil hates you and he will tell you ANYthing that you are willing to believe in order to keep you away from God and thus from heaven..... why as I told you before he hates you asnd desires to torture you in hell.... and making people believe in lies is an easy trick for him.....folks like you believe anything that he pushes into the world. satan is the master of lies....
    1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716.  Hilmar Zonneveld  It would only make sense because in THAT case we have a drive to live and survive it gives meaning to life and something worth fighting for. IF we are no more then chemical clockwork then why defend our life against attackers we would then be nothing more then food to sustain the life of other organisms. we would be here just by coincidens without any purposeand being alife or not would not matter at all so why fight ... it would be nothing more then exchange of nutrients... and sustaining life in general. but NO living organisms defend themselves in order to stay alive..... why ???? if it is only chemistry ? there is no usefullness to defend yourself IF it is no more then nutrient exchanging.... you would be happy to be recycled in an other organism.... but no thats NOT what we see.... And we are not more than the sum of the lose components. we ONLY have added value due to the fact that we have a soul and spirit. which is worth defending. which only make sense it THAT aspect is given by a Creator who gave us this soul and spirit AND gives us a reason to fight for.... namely IF one dies our soul and spirit end up in either HEAVEN (worth FIGHTING for) or HELL worth fighting AGAINST... the whole good and evil COMES from this .... other wise fighting to stay alive would totaly make no sense ONTOP of this we humans are the ONLY advanced organisms exactly as God tells us in the bible in genesis... rule over the world and submid her (in the sense of take care of her) and YES If we are no more than chemicals there is no emotion attached to it.... just as a rock doesnt care what happens to it... chemicals are no more than dead material whoch doesnt care if it part of a living body or not... thats why individual cells exchange chemicals all over the place as our sanitairy system testifies. look at virussses... they are the closest things inbetween life and being simple chemical mechanisms/chemical robots.... They dont care what happens to the body of an infected person and that it dies ... EVEN if that means that they can not exist beyond that if they kill their host they dont care even IF that means that they have no place to go next.... THAT is how "life"would be without soul/spirit. and in this period of our existance this should be very obvious with the corona thing
    1
  717.  Hilmar Zonneveld  The ONLY thing you said is that the sum of all chemicals is MORE than the lose chemicals And what has survival for meaning otherwise than there MUST be a reason to survive .. chemicals have NO purpose to create life and they didnt chemicals left on them selves NEVER Create life... as abiogenesis falsy claimes: watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU7Lww-sBPg&t=1180s Like I said before otherwise what would there be against it to be part of a living blob that does nothing more than exchange nutrients.... so be happy then to be eaten by a lion... according to sabine and youj you are nothing more than an exchange of nutrients.... be happy ever after to be a part of eating and also BEING eaten... but NO that is NOT what life strives for... we all strive for survival and YES it does prove God... ONTOP of all proof via Near Death Experineces (NDE)....and No...... lack of oxygen or hormones is NOT what causes that, if you STUDY that subject out you know that that is NOT what causes it... what do people see in NDE's a heaven ly place OR a hellish place... INDEPENDANT of their religious back ground.... and ontop of way much more stuff that ONLY point to Gods existence..... We have a higher purpose: getting into heaven; THAT is why there is a srtuggel and fighting for LIFE.... just in order to get you into heaven... and satanm wants you in hell torturing you... so there is your struggle fight for life... THAT is our purpose..... God wants us in heaven... and NO that is NOT wishfullthinking it is reality !!!! you may not LIKE or BELIEVE it but it is true non the less correct wishing something doesnt always make it true.... BUT with respect to our lives .. we are here by divine intervention.... God CREATED US. There is also NO OTHER way how we came here..... NO BODY has created artificial life ever since Hutton, Lyell, Darwin..... proving life did NOT emerged spontaneously.... sorry you may indeed wish that and EVEN call it science but it is not.....that is reality
    1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720.  Hilmar Zonneveld  OOH then why have Rocks no life in them other then real life bacteria, insects or why doesnt the air or why is there no life on other planets they are ALL a bunch of elements gathered and bound together.... yet dont have life in them .... so your argument is silly at best..... no reproduction ??? well without that they are simpy being eaten and contribute in THAT way for sustainig your idea of life.... reprodcution is NOT important IF your vision of life is correct.... just participating even by being eaten is then enough..... no reproduction needed.. simpy existing is then enough... very machine like...... yes NDE's DO prove our purpose in life..... since it does give us a view in what lays beyond ... after we physically die..... and it shows us heaven .... or hell... which confirms the bible..... even over all ages..... You see Jeroen Bosch alredy in the 1500's painted the tunnel and meeting of beings of light in an either heavenly environment OR in a hellish environment... so it not only matters but it is over all ages.... so proven to be very relevant including in our discussion..... I dont admit what I do not agree with... so why would I ??? our purpose in life is THE most impoirtant question is these kind of discussions.... and our purpose in life is given to us by God..... Proving God created us; all aspects of our lives match with what the Bible tells us about it. also the way life is constructed proofs that ONLY a higher being could have made it.... it is infinitly too complex to emerge spontanioulsy...... for example read this: https://www.academia.edu/42979330/Is_mathematical_probability_the_same_as_physical_reality_the_power_of_the_average_and_how_life_began bunch of claims..... well that must be familiar then..... secular science doenst do any different..... they even claim we emerged from chemicals without delivcering the proof for it evers since darwin, Hutton, lyell presented their silly idea's so I am going to challenge you: 1) make us living cells (exactly as we know them) from the bare elements (CHNOSPCaNaK etc) 2) let them evolve into higher organisms like a worm (exactly as we know them) a) first or parallel in the laboratory as proof of concept b) second or parallel in real life as abiogenesis/evolution suggests has happend. You see IF LIFE is no more than a chemistry process. then science demands it to repeat it. Seculars tell us that this is scinece ... OK then do it again.... that is doing real science.....
    1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 5:10 no the quantum effects do not disappear they may chance to other quantum states but the quantum effects never disappear... since .... why would there be quantum effects to begin with.... You see quantum states alter due to interaction. Just as in qauntum entanglement. Entanglement is a way in which quantum states can change due to interactions with other objects. A measurement of a quantum behaving particle with a large instrument simply chances the quantum state WF1 of the particle into a quantum state WF2 but WF2 <<<<< WF1 because of the sheer size of the measurment instrument. So basically quantum states constantly chance due to interactions no matter how small. THAT is why entanglement experiments are so sensitive due to environmental influences. To TEST this an experiment can be designed as such: https://www.academia.edu/37049597/Collapse_or_not_to_collapse_that_is_the_question_verification_or_reject_the_interaction_of_a_wavefunction_with_a_detector_docx Let there be a 2 slit set up including an observer (*) to watch where the particle goes. The result a 2 blob pattern. Meaning that the interference patern is changed due to interaction with an measuring device. Now make extremely sure that the measuring device (*) is extremely small so that its debroglie wavelength of it is small but still measureable. Put behind 1 of the blobs another hole for a repeating the 2 slit experiment for interference and behind that a detection screen. Predicted result: the interference pattern will re-appear BUT way much smaller as in the order of magnitude of the observation instrument (* which has ben made extremely small !!) ....IF ....I am correct ( I may not be but OK...we might see that) then the wavelength/function must have SHRUNK to the smaller (in the order of magnitude of the extreme small measuring instrument) wavelength. Not collapsing BUT shrinking !!!! due to interactions and thus simply altered. This should result in a wave interference pattern that coud have been obtained by particles that have a similar wavelength as the deBroglie of the extreme small instrument has (*). I know technically this is a challenge... how to make an measuring instrument with such an extreme small dimensions/mass (*). But nowadays in the IBM moving atoms ("a boy and his atom" youtube.com/watch?v=oSCX78-8-q0&t=3s ) era this should be possible.... difficult but possible non the less.
    1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. Geloof in God/Jezus helpt weldegelijk tegen corona !! MITS je allereerst ZELF de verantwoordelijkheid neemt om je uit de gevaren zone te blijven en dus NIET persé op de Staphorstse wijze... Als christelijk gelovige (ik ook) mogen we God OOK niet op de proef stellen. Allereerst hebben we ZELF de verantwoordelijkheid om gezond te blijven. Dus maw; tenzij het niet anders kan, geen gevaar op te zoeken, denkende dat God je wel uit red. ALS je er aan gedaan hebt wat je er aan hebt kunnen doen en je bent dan NOG iets krijgt, dan helpt God je er echt wel uit als je er om bid.... maar je mag God niet uit testen daarop. Veel mn super orthodoxen doen dat wel.... zoals ook in Staphorst.. dat is NIET de juiste wijze om op God te vertrouwen. Ik breng bij Staphorst even in gedachten het stukje waar Jezus zelf door de duvel verzocht werd: satan nam Jezus mee naar het tempel dak en zei; als U Gods Zoon bent spring dan van het dak... want er staat geschreven (in het oude testament) dat God aangaande U (Jezus) Zijn engelen zal uit zenden opdat u uw voet niet aan een steen stoot. Jezus op Zijn beurt ontkent die uitspraak niet MAAR zegt Jezus: ER STAAT OOK GESCHREVEN.... Gij zult de Here Uw God NIET verzoeken.....!!! En dat is wat de staphorsters broeders/zusters even vergeten zijn, blijkbaar. In Azie was er een aantal maanden geleden OOK een kerk waar 100-den mensen bij een kwamen en kennelijk op God vertrouwde en daar is het FOUT gegaan... men heeft daar God verzocht en Hij heeft niet of bijna niet ingegrepen tav de gezondheid van mensen. beste Broeders en Zusters in Jezus... wees wijs en ga NIET God verzoeken in deze gevaarlijke tijden.... blijf thuis !!!!
    1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763.  @RoninTF2011  yeah so ? whats your point ? have you also read the part where the midjanites mistreated Israel ? I guess not ... The midianites behaved very nasty towards the Israelites EVEN after the israelites being friendly to them.... read numbers chapter 22 to chapter 25 ...but you seem to forget that part.....as most of you bible scoffers do. ALL the people that rose against Isreal were defeated since they attacked Israel without any cause.... and thus being evil against Israel and thus against Israels God..... Israels God who IS the CREATOR of the entire universe .... including you .... You see EXACTLY the same happening TODAY.... ALL countries that attack Israel TODAY are being punished JUST as in the days of OLD.... exacty as God promissed in zacharia 14 verse 3. YOU CANNOT HURT Israel/the Jews without being destroyed yourself.. you see that ALL over History..... because you are not fighting against ISRAEL... but against GOD Himself.... your creator.... If you THINK you can fight your Creator... you will unavoidably LOSE !!!! always !!!! As you see happening in the middle east right as we speak. Watch the news broadcasts and see how all countries around Israel always LOSE their fights against Israel... ALWAYS !! why well simple God fights FOR Israel/the jews. God, the creator of this Universe is the God of Israel and who ever will stand opposing God is opposing his own very life..... so on whoms side are YOU ON my friend ???? learn the lesson quickly and well for your own good. God has NOT changed
    1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772.  @margo6022  ja hij heeft ontiegelijk de schijn tegen daar ben ik het absoluut mee eens ... maar is hij DAAROM ook de dader ??? En DAAR heb ik mijn twijfels over. Ik zeg niet dat hij het NIET is, maar ook niet dat hij het WEL is.... Het is namelijk niet eenduidig, al vinden de meesten van wel.... er zitten TE veel hiaten & onduidelijkheden in. en om nu maar een dader aan te wijzen OM MAAR een dader te hebben ... dat is geen houding die in een rechts staat thuis hoort. Maar helaas doet de grote massa dat wel... hij was al veroordeeld door het grote publiek voordat er uberhaupt maar een jurist aan te pas was gekomen en DAAR erger ik me gruwlijkelijk aan mensen die NIETS weten en dan hem TOCH al aan de schandpaal nagelen... dat is geen rechtstaatt meer dat is zoals het in de middel eeuwen er aan toeging en tegenwoordig er NOG aan toe gaat in islamitische/hindu afrikaanse landen bv waar men zonder eerlijke vorm van proces gewoon word afgemaakt... soms letterlijk Is DAT DE recht staat die we willen ????? ik niet..... want WIE is er DAN nog onschuldig...? in NL is iemand ONSCHULDIG totdat het tegen deel keihard bewezen is... en in deze zaak is dat NIET JB was al door iedereen veroordeeld voordat hij uberhaupt een gevangenis deur had gezien... en DAT KAN gewoon niet..... en nu er meer bekend is is er mijns inziens TE weinig bewijs om het ook keihard te maken dat hij ook ECHT de feitelijk dader is. wat niet weg neemt dat hij de meest kans hebbende kandidaat is... dat klopt... hij heeft alles, maar dan ook alles tegen zich... maar is hij het ook ... en dat waag ik te betwijfelen.
    1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793.  @wolfgangsimons9183  fossil record ?? which one the one that all the fossils are mixed up which are 99% of the cases or the only 1% of the situations that fit with your evolutionistic idea's fossils are there due to the Noah Flood. simple. and yeah well be happy lots of animals died other wise you might have been eaten by a ferrocious dragon (which we to day call dinosaurs) ever heard of dragon slayers ?? gragons and dragon feeders, marco polo met a few in china and wrote about them as well in his journal, why would that be ? And by the Noah flood the earth layers were formed as is coalseams, oil, mountains and continental drift. It all happend within 1 year with and a large after math in which mountain ranged formed, trenches formed, the oceans got saltier, the Ice age appeared etc The whole earths geological outlook that we see right now can all be perfectly and without any flaws be explained by the World wide Flood described in the Bible and that happend about 4500 yrs ago. it even explains why we cannot marry sisters any more and why we only het 80 yrs old on average facts: 1) we still find fresh flesh tissue in dinosaur bones... if you carbon date them they are less than 40.000 yrs old. This is impossible in millions of yrs yes its longer than 6000 yrs but take into account that in the beginning there was NOT so much C14 as now, so ages are higher than expected. 2) we still find C14 in diamonds, which is impossible after millions or yrs and NO no contamination: IF it was always contamination then close those labs... 3) earth layers are deposited in matter of seconds, minutes , hours but not no millions of yrs: watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVI0VfJU81c&t=285s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wR7jg0UQ14&t=166s https://www.academia.edu/39311403/Life_An_update Just some as an appetizer...
    1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. ​ @jpe1  your wrong; evolution... bacteria becoming fishes becoming apes becoming humans is NON existing ! You see THAT requires addition of NEW genetic information and THAT is chemically and statistically IMPOSSIBLE !!! dogs producing a variety of dogs exists...but that is variety.... not evolution !!! but you will never seen in a billioin billion yrs a dog becoming a tomato...or something similar... mutations happen ! thats is correct science fact... BUT mutations are ALWAYS destructive OR Neutral (without effect) at best. Mutations will NEVRER produce a NEW species... as I showed you with your double pairs of chromosomes plant... no totaly brand new information was added.... it was alreadcy existing information that has been copied... nothing more....NO EVOLUTION It would have been evolution IF the plant gained a new genetic (genotypical) AND pheno typical features. and that didnt happen and will nevefr happen... why ask yourself why please. simple.. The supposed evolution is driven by muitations right ? well mutations are driven by argessive agences such as a) radioactive decay of elements, b) radio active radiation c) UV light d) Cosmic radiation e) agressive chemicals f) cross overs only the F version is without damaging the genetic information. all the others DESTROY genetic informations which lead to info LOSS or Being Neutral at best !!!! it wil NEVER bring new information....WHY ? ask your self why again well read this paper: https://www.academia.edu/38591420/The_4th_law_of_thermodynamics_docx and this one: https://www.academia.edu/39311403/Life_An_update and you'lll know why. ! natural selection is nothing more than a quality control step. In making cars quality controle itself NEVER makes a car to a boeing 747... it has to be designed ..... same for organisms they had to be DESIGNED before quality control happens.. quality control only MAINTAIN existing genetic information since mutated and thus SICK animals / plants will die sooner. quality control doesntt ADD NEW information.... it remove CORRUPT information, nothing more so now you are left with systems that LOSE information but at best maintain the already existing information.... THUS:.....NO EVOLUTION ! man how illogical people can be....
    1
  801.  @jpe1  Thing is have you seen what has happend to the dogs ??? they have been breeded man increadibley many times what happend ??/ they all became weaker and weaker and are infested with diseases the more they are being bred IF these higly bred organisms only show diseasses and weaknesses then HOQW onl; aerth can folks like yourself accept evolution as a reality ???? it s not ! NOBODY has seen a dog produce a non dog organism ???? its ONLY dogs the reproduce.... never seen any umbrella tail against the rain developping on them. nor chlorophyll n them... no they always remained dogs.... why ??? simple: why you are ONLY doing is redecorad the house with existing furnature.... and even break some parts of that furnature.... evolution would be IF and ONLY IF you by a brand new totaly different couch.... that never existed before ion nature, just from an excluisive designer (you see designer !!!!) but that didnt happen... itr is EVEN possible to introduce genetic material from OTHER already existing organisms.... (genetic manipulation by letting goats produce milk with spider silk in it, because the goat was genetically modified with EXISTING spider genetic materials) BUT it is NEVER newly never before existing genetic material NEVER ONly we HUMANS can make brand new genetic codeings ever since we KNOW how it works... and even THAT has to be DESIGNED and carefully planned and artificially CREATED!!!!!! jsut as GOD created US !!!!! by DESIGN !!!!!! NOt by ranmdom chances as the idea of evolution suggests. you folks follow blindy a silly unproven idea and think you are masters of the universe... sorry that job is already taken infinilty time ago by God/Jesus Christ.... did you knwo that humans know about 1000- 1400 syndromes ? 70-80% is due to genetic defects...
    1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805.  @jpe1  well you wil physically die as God planned you to die... but question is what will happen with you, your spirit/soul after that.. ??? will you LIFE for ever in heaven ... the stick with God via Jesus or will you DIE forever in hell... then remain as you are now.... you choose... but again. I have send you loads of facts that counter evolution and you dont want to hear it... fine with...your life ...your choice. Hovind is NOT a charlatan... he is correct in his argumentations the fact that he was emprisoned doesnt do away with the facts.... Many people are innocently emprisoned or unreasonably punished doesnt mean they are incorrect in what they say...if you get hungup over that than you should discard galilei galileo aswell. Nelson Mandela for example, yet he was right. Being emprisond has nothing to do with being wrong in your scientific statements. on the other hand many liars are/were free and should have been imprisoned: ernst Haeckle for example; he FAKED the embryo's for "proving" evolution correct. he deliberatly misled people on false arguments. Fatc is HIS FALSE DRAWINGS ARE STILL BEING USED.... That is NOT SCIENCE that is indoctrination. which proves that the idea of evolution only is supported by lies and NOT by true findings meaning....evolution is an idea based on LIES....YOU follow LIES, you have been DUKED DUDE...... have you made my living cells already ??? and the evolved worm thereoff ??? I am waiting...... James Tour is a Professor in organic chemistry. on top of that and due to his organis research he is also a succesfull business man. he knows a thing or 2 about organic chemistry and how to make stuff. therefor he can also TELL peolpe that for example the evolution PRE SEEDING step of abiogenesis is IMPOSSIBLE.... well if abiogenesis is IMPOSSIBLE than that rules out the exitance of evolution even without discussing the imposibilities of the suggested mechanisms of evolution. no abiogensis ? then NO evolution ! simple
    1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811.  @jpe1  hee, for the last time, since I am getting bored by your illogical arguments that make absolutly no sense. YOU assume (believe hope, pray for, wished, imagined) that evolution is ADDING NEW genetic information. THAT does NOT happen ! fatcully not happen. yes argeed, 2 organisms DNA (= genetic information) MAY get COMBINED that is true !!! BUT BOTH contribute already EXISTING DNA information, nothing new. There is THUS nothing totaly brand NEW genetic information is being added. THAT is crucial !!! it is the fundament of the idea of evolution. Both plants in your example already had existing DNA information and they happen to merge... fine ... I have NO problem with that. But it is NOT evolution !!!! it is VARIATION !!! for the so manieth repeated time. Your SUGGESTED proces of evolution is that out of NOTHING, NEW genetic information is generated that is being expressed in brand NEW features in an organism. A dog gaining an umbrella-tail against the rain for example.... THAT would be factual evolution !! And something like THAT has never happend NOR been observed ! The 100% OPPOSITE processes the BREAKING DOWN of genetic information THAT has factually been observed... by the MILLIONS !!! and THAT leads to all the variatiosn you see in biology. But it is NOT evolution it is the 100% opposing process of evolution... degeneration.. and yes this CAN ;lead to resisting anti biotics thats true !!! but it does so like you would evolve to a person losing your arms... you will never burn your fingers anymore so thewre is your advantage... but you GAINED such an advantage by LOSING genetic infomation. Not by GAINING new genetic information. For example Sickle cell anemia is exactly such a LOSS which lead to resistance against malaria... BUT these genetic losses ALWAYS go along with a FITNESS COST !!!!! these people ONLY get 40-45 yrs old and then they die. So NO evolution but a variation. Due to LOSS of genetic information. same happends when bacteria get anti-biotic resistance
    1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814.  @jpe1  predictions of the bible.. oh you want predictions from the bible OK I'll tell you some: At least 2000 yrs ago the next things were written in the bible...and finaly ....only NOW ....science and the world is catching up. bit slow in my opinion but OK. true wisedom is hard to find with people these days. The river nile will run dry...(is happening as we speak). There will be one monetairy system... is in developement as wel speak that monetairy system will FORCE every person on earth to get a mark/device on the forhead or right hand whith which you can pay without that mark you will not be able to buy or sell. (buy and sell AND it is in developement right as we speak). revelation 13. There will be an sea/ocean on the east side of Jerusalem. the mount of olives will split in 2 (whan Jesus returns). This is happening as we speak, you see there is a fault line from ethiopia all the way up to turkey and its rumbling fro quite some time now... There will be one world leader people are creating a singel religion (by putting together all world religions under 1 name) under that leader. it will be a false religion but the majority will acpept it. This is happening as we speak... ALL the jews will return to Israel (is happing right as we speak). you see the bible is a jewish book and a covenant book between the jews/christians and God within Israel as the world centre. the 3rd tempel will be build. This Is in action right as we speak - the jews are gathering all materials in order to make it happen, they just found a red heifer - red cow for the opening sacrificial rituals. There is already a pure golden menorah and some more stuff. In states that behave as enemy towards Israel there will be nucleair explosions to kill many people. zacharia 14 Many christians will lose their faith (is already happenig as we speak for at least 100 yrs now and still ongoing) people will get harsher towards each other. (and with the growing lawlessnes the love will disappear amongst people) Terrorism will rise, poverty will rise, desteroification will grow, 1/3 of all animals and plant will die. Incurable diseases will come more and more and more. just a few predictions so dont tell that the bible has no predictive things inside ... thats a lie... As I told you you have been duked... in such a way that you are blind to see the truth in the Bible.... The universe will be destroyed and all that is in it....in about 1000- 1300 yrs from now. which coincides with the Higgs field / particle (the God particle). you see the higgs filed is a metastable field and can decay any time into a stable field where all the elements and the whole universe will collapse with the release of unimaginable amounts of energy... see 2 peter 3vers 10 ... and you know God gave this information to simple fisherman who had hardly any knowledge of science. So ONLY God could have given this knowledge, since HE is the ONLY person who knows what happens in the future...
    1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 4:40 what a petty that you started to talk over darwins - idea. Since there are no dots to be connected... The only dots that can be connected are mutations vs degeneration (loss of genetic information), which is 100% the opposite of gaining new information due to mutations... or darwinian evolution. data shows us that there is factually no evolution. there is mutation, that is factual. but there is nothing like improvement of an organism due to mutatuions. on the contrairy.... organisms only get sick due to mutations, (cancer, immune system failures, allergies etc etc. Petty that the 1st part you are correct BUT made the mistake of not connecting the dots correctly when it comes to our origins.... (as all secular scientists do). Other observations: mary schweitzer observed still fresh bloodvessel tissue in supposedly 60-70 millions old dino bones. C14 analysis (done by others in similar findings) show that these bones are less then 40.000 yrs old. Please connect the dots correctly....or stop calling yourself a correct scientist.... abiogenesis: making of amino acids; yes great experiment of urey miller- but Jeffrey Bada et all showed that nature can produce 40 different amino acids... all in racemic mixtures (D&L config) .... so natur has 160 choices to pick from (including 2 reactive sides to pick from in each additional amino acid in a new to make protein). So a 50 amino acid protein has 0,5*160^50 options to choose from. with reaction times of 10^-9 sec this leads to trillions and trillions times time required then the secular age of the universe.... so please connect the dots in a correct way..... Now since Creationism explains all of the observed features in multiple diciplines (biology astronomy, physics, psychology, history, geology, sociology, healthcare, medicine, antropology etc) with a minimal amount of assumptions it is absolutely scientific and scientifically correct...
    1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. Ik weet niet of Jos wel of niet schuldig is (grote kans van wel ) de RECHTER(S) !!!!!! moeten EERST daarover uitspraak doen, maar hij is al vanaf het allereerste moment al veroordeeld door het publiek als zijnde de dader en ook nu weer. Hoe emotioneel begrijpelijk het ook is voor de familie Verstappen, word hij alweer, als schuldige neergezet ZONDER dat hij juridisch al veroordeeld is. ????????? hoe kan dat nou ??? We leven toch in een rechtsstaat ?? en hij kan ook nog in hoger beroep gaan dus het einde en zijn veroordeling (al of niet terecht) is TOTAAL nog geen uitgemaakte zaak. En toch word hij nu al veroordeeld door het grote publiek. ??????.. We leven toch niet meer in de middeleeuwen hoop ik tav rechtspraak....??? Dat is NIET hoe een rechtsstaat dient te functioneren. Ik begrijp donders goed dat het erg emotioneel is voor de familie, maar dat geeft hun en ook NIEMAND het juridisch recht om hem bij voorbaat al publiekelijk te veroordelen en dat is in heel dit proces al talloze malen gedaan !. Die man was al lang veroordeeld zonder dat er ook maar één woord tav een eerlijk proces gevoerd was, destijds al en de geschiedenis lijkt zich daarin te herhalen.... WIE O WIE is er in NL dan nog ONSCHULDIG als men al direct publiekelijk veroordeeld word ???? Waar gaat het naar toe, met een rechtsstaat als NL zou moeten zijn. Is nu de algemeen geldende opinie die iemand schuldig verklaard of het wettelijke bewijs ????? waar slaat dit op ??? Het kan zijn dat Jos schuldig is, maar TOTDAT dat bewezen EN bevestigd is door een gerechtelijke uitspraak, is hij Juridisch ONSCHULDIG.... maar hij is al door familie EN het grote publiek aan de schandpaal genageld... DAT kan zomaar niet, dat is smaad (en ook dat is een strafbaar feit) .... EERST juridisch sluitend bewijs en DAN pas schuldig of niet !.... Nu is die man al lang veroordeeld publiekelijk... waar slaat dat nu op ????????? NL is toch geen bananen republiek geworden ???
    1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921.  reindeerkid  OOH dus hebben ze RECHT op een uitspraak waarin tevens een VEROORDELING in zit ??? NEE alleen een RECHTER mag een jurisch correcte uitspraak doen en Zelfs DANNOG kan het zijn dat het gerechterlijk stysteem faalt en een onschuldige schuildig verklaard.... (niet dat dit hier het geval is... alles lijkt inderdaad te wijzen op dat JB schuldig is .... maar recht spreken is bij lange na nie zo eenvoudig als de MEDIA / PUBLIEK ons doet geloven..... dus kortom WIJ als publiek moeten onze KLEP houden zowel JIJ als ook IK... wij hebben GEEN .. totaal GEEN inbreng en ook de familie niet omdat zij OOK publiek zijn ... hoe ZUUR dat ook is !!!!! ben jij rechter ? of advocaat Ja ?? ben JIJ als rechter of advocaat er direct bij deze zaak betrokken ??? Nee... want ander was je wel in beeld als rechter of advocaat... DUS waffel houden !!!!! en de uitspraak afwachten ben jij GEEN rechter of advocaat ?? WAT THE F(*&^%^&* K doe je hier dan ???? met jou totaal nutteloze mening ????? houd gewoon je smoel..... wacht de uitspraak af... Is de familie rechter of advocaat ??? ja ? Zijn ze direct bij deze zaak betrokken ALS en IN FUNCTIE van rechter of advocaat ??? Nee ... Dan hebben ook ZIJ zich te onthouden van VEROORDELING !!!!! zijn zij GEEN rechter of advocaat ???? dan zo wie zo mond dicht houden behalve in je tijd als spreek recht en dan NOG mag er GEEN VEROORDELING uit hun verklaring komen... en DAT hebben ze wel gedaan en DAAROIM ga ik stuiteren want DAN komt het NL rechtssysteem in gedrang en gaat men voor eigen rechter spelen.... en DAT MAG NOOIT GEBEUREN NIEMAND anders dan de RECHTER mag een VEROORDELING UITSPREKEN en het hele NL publiek HEEFT zich al tegen deze man uit gesproken terwijl de rechter pas VANDAAG een uitspraak heeft gedaan en dat DEUGD NIET "trial by media" is een GROOT gevaar en mag NOOIT post vatten in NL !!! en zowel dan is NL een rimboe staat / middeleeuwse slacht partij geworden waar IEDEREEN naar willekeur veroordeeld kan GAAN worden... dus pas op wat je doet !!!! Je ondermijnt een rechts staat en dat is gevaarlijk... DAAR kom ik tegen in opstand. Nu Jos JURIDISCH schuldig is bevonden door de RECHTER !!!!!! joh leef je uit in je meningen succes ermee van mij mag je, nu mag je los... officieel ! maar dat kan pas sinds vandaag. ... zo simpel werkt het ! capice ??? en nu de uitspraak er is ..... Jos B is SCHULDIG bevonden in middels NU PAS mag je los gaan met je mening: niet eerder ! capice .....
    1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. Bijbels gezien en gesproken is de man EINDVERANTWOORDELIJK over wat een vrouw doet in zijn gezin. Anderzijds heeft de man zichzelf op te offeren voor zijn vrouw, om haar te beschermen, desnoods met zijn eigen leven. Dat zijn in onze tijd geen populaire uitspraken maar dat interesseerd God niet. Zijn wetten zijn en blijven geldig in eeuwigheid, met of zonder goedkeuring van mensen. Als een man en een vrouw eenmaal getrouwd zijn, zijn ze elkaars eigendom, waarbij de man een eindverantwoordelijke functie heeft; als het fout gaat in zijn gezin word de man als eerste van Godswege op het matje geroepen, en niet de vrouw. Dat is een praktisch feit (ook al geloven mensen dat niet). De man heeft inderdaad de eindzeggenschap/eind verantwoordelijkheid in het gezin va Godswege. de vrouw is geschapen om de man te helpen, niet anders om. Anderzijds is de man verantwoordelijk voor het beschermen van zijn gezin/vrouw. Bepaalde de man wat een vrouw moet doen ja en nee & nee en ja. Zolang de vrouw bijbels goed bezig is is er niets aan te merken door de man op de vrouw. Als de vrouw in het gezin afwijkt van wat God in de bijbel leert, zal de man, als hij er hoogte van krijgt corrigerend tegen de vrouw daarover moeten spreken om haar te overtuigen van haar ongelijk. Doet hij dat niet en zwijgt hij er over terwijl zij fout zit, dan is de man eind-verantwoordelijk voor de foute uitspraken van de vrouw bij God. Als hij zijn vrouw corrigeert en ze gaat daarmee akkoord dan is de correctie een goede geweest. Gaat ze niet akkoord, dan is ze zelf verantwoordelijk. Zeker als haar afwijken van Gods regels praktische schadelijk gevolgen heeft. Voorbeeld: adam en eva. Eva werd verleid, adam werd op t matje geroepen. ouderwets ?? nee Gods wetten veranderen nooit. Tate is een foute invloed op vele punten. Maar deels heeft hij ook gelijk en dat maakt hem in zijn uitspraken aantrekkelijk voor makkelijke te beïnvloeden zielen. Triest dat mensen daar in trappen; ik voor een deel ook. Maar dat zie je vaker; als iemand correcte dingen zegt kunnen leugens daar gemakkelijk bij insluipen. En bij Tate is dat het geval hij weet waarheid en leugens goed te mixen zodat het lijkt of dat hij altijd goede uitspraken doet en dat is dus absoluut niet zo. Wat zegt de bijbel daarover: vervloekt is hij die zijn vertrouwen op een mens stelt. gezegend is hij die zijn vertrouwen op God steld. Jeremia 17:5-8.
    1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957.  @LJPDEEP  Joh zonder God/Jezus en de kerk zou je nu leven in een land als bv india, pakistan, een armoedig afrikaans binnenlandje, etc grote kans in totale armoe, vuiligheid en viezigheid en als 10 jarig klootje vruchtjes verkopen langs de kant van de zand weg in een grote stad als bangalore, madras, kinshasah, calcutta etc etc je dankt jouw luxe aan dat NL ooit een christelijk land was.... helaas steeds minder en minder en als het aan figuren als jou ligt helemaal niet.... maar dan ga ik je jouw toekomst voor spelllen als NL helemaal goddeloos zou zijn: Dan zou je leven in een land als bv india, pakistan, afrikaanse binnen landen etc grote kans in totale armoe, vuiligheid en viezigheid en als 10 jarig klootje vruchten verkopen vanuit een aftands karretje langs de kant van de zand weg in een grote stad als bangalore, madras etc etc WAAROM ? heel simpel deutronomium 28 en leviticus 26 wat zegt God daar: wie mij LIEFheeft en doet wat Ik gebied zal worden gezegend (daar komt jouw luxe&vrijheid vandaan) wie mij HAAT (zoals jij dus nu) en NIRET doet wat IK gebied aan hem zal ik mijn zegenende handen terug trekken EN dan zal de kaalvreter/satan langs komen en die zal vloeken over u heen brengen: armoede, mislukkte oogsten en wilde dieren als u zich dan nog niet bekeerd zal ik deze last 7 keer verzwaren. vreemdelingen uit verre landen zull en komen en u terroriseren in uw eigen steden en in uw straten en ziektes waarvan u niet kunt genezen zullen over u komen enzo voort waarom zegt God ... OM U UIT TE ROEIEN ..... kijk een oms je heen in ons Nederlandje en Europa ....vriend.... dan ZIE je ZELF dat dat proces al JJJJAAARRREEENNN aan de gang is..... Goddeloosheid ook die van JOU... zorgt er voor dat Nederland ten gronde gaat.... zie DAAR de werkelijkheid van God in ONS LEVEN iedere dag.... en als mensen als jij dit NIET serieus nemen zal de ellende ALLEEN maar toenemen totdat mensen als JIJ helemal zijn uitgeroeid... DOOR GOD wel te verstaan Zo reeel is het ...... vriend dus denk even 2 keer na voor je wat zegt God/jezus beschermt ons als we bij Hem horen... en zo niet dan krijgt de duvel zijn zin.... MEER EN MEER EN MEER... aan jouw de KEUS wat je ermee gaat doen
    1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 5:00 tells us: God has inputted all perfect information and evers since the clock has been winding down... not up.... which is in line with the 3rd law of thermodynamics... as you should know... so creationism explains BETTER the observed results.... We 9all organisms) started of genetically perfect and all mutations are leading to destructive results (loss of genetic information instead of gain of genetic information). This is EXACTLY what has been observed genetically... LOSS of genetic info HAS factually been peer reviewed documented by the MILLIONS (dr Jerry Bergman) While GAINING of NEW genetic informtaion has NEVER been documented at all. !!!! there are NO known beneficial mutations ... FACT: nobody has seen a dog gaining an umbrella tail against the rain....or humans gaining pencil fingers because they write much.... or their hand become an inbuild mobile phone ..... nobody has seen a cat with a fishing net paws to catch their pray.... Now THAT would be evolution. But that is NOT what we see.....the ONLY things we see is organisms LOSING abilities.... Dogs get smaller, more fragile, noses thrue which they hardly can breath etc etc.. and there we realy should see some evolution since we breed the heck out of them....same for cats, roses and horses...but instead these animals get weaker and weaker and weaker.... Big pharma for animals profits from that BIG TIME !!!! The ONLY THING we do see factually is these animals/plants get worse off then they started....there are even LAWS to prevent breeders to do more breeding due to the vulerability of these organisms.....its not allowed anymore since breeding lead to worse animals....well THAT is common knowledge that EVERYBODY KNOW off, but CHOOSES to ignore..... in favor of a non existing evolution idea.... THAT is NOT how science is supposed to work.... evolution in what ever way is FACTUALL PSEUDO science... observation do NOT match this silly idea.... if it does Sabine: please show us the factuall proof of it...Hit us with it.....
    1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985.  @Chris_5318  still do not agree with you in total only partially.... If numbers do NOT have physical meaning you would NOT be alive... be happy that numbers do have physical meing even in the modern sense of the word like the mass of an electron, proton, Pi, e etc etc etc etc all numbers that keep coming back in modern day science and determine you being alife at all.... and yes agreed IF you chip oof 1 sand grain it is indeed 9,999999 kilo's BUT you hardly notice it in lifting it up. so from your point of view nothing fell of .. its still feels the same.... like 10 unites of a kilo an no Newton was NOT wrong... he was slightly OFF we STILL use Newtons F=GMM/r^2 that is STILL being used in 90-99% of the cases for the DETAILS newton is no longe adequate... but where it doesnt matter too much it is still used. so he wasnt wrong for the majority of cases. newton was wrong from more detailed cases... like the mercury orbits.... even Einsteins formulas do also convert to Newtons law in 90-99% of the cases. only in more extreme cases Newton doesnt apply in all details. kilograms is both physics and math since it is a unit... and yeah 999 gr of matter and 1 gram of antimatter is still 1000 grams woldnt put them together though but its still 1000 gr. the composition doesnt matter. 1000 gr of matter anti matter is still 1000 gr To some extend I agree with you that there is a limit to where math describes physics... and beyond those limits math and physics do no longer agree with eachother.... I fully agree BUT !! within these limits it perfectly matches physics.... as it should.... and these limits are about 10^100 to 10^200 down to 10^-40 to 10^-60 beyond that pure math indeed takes over agreed... and has no match in physical reality....as I have said so from the beginning
    1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 2:22 the Higgs boson proves the bible RIGHT again. what did Peter, The apostle of Jesus say: in 2 Peter3:10 he says: but the Day of the Lord will come as a thief; on that day the heavens will perish with a big noise and the elements will perish by fire .... ... 12b the day of God, due to which the heavens will persih burning and the elements will melt away in fire.. What was the higgs boson called (by a JEWISH) professor....right the GOD particle.... Now remember that the Bible is a JEWISH Book all of it. And it was PETER the apostle who made this remark. And it was PETER Higgs who discovered the Higgs Boson and the Higgs field. Coincidence ???????? NOPE ! just Gods plan to tell us people ad warn us for it... Now it turns out to be that the HIGGS field is instable and when it will decays... the entire UNIVERS (heavens) will perish by releasing ALL of its enormous energy due to which will make all the elements literally be burned in this energy release. EXACTLY as the simple fisher man Peter, by Gods inspiration wrote these predictions on paper. Now Peter predicted that this would happen at the day of the Lord. We know today that this day of the Lord will come in about 1000 to 1500 years from now. Now according to secular science this will be more tha billions of yrs from now, but I am sure that science will be clever enough to find out that this instability will NOT last billions of years, but indeed wil be more in the range of 1000's of yrs... is this all coincidence nnaaaah... dont think so......there are TOO many "coincideing facts"to be coincidentially.
    1
  1006. https://www.iflscience.com/space/hawking-believes-higgs-field-could-wipe-out-universe-should-we-be-worried/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-higgs-boson-might-spell-doom-for-the-universe/ I m not talking about our solar system.. I am talking about the complete and entire UNIVERSE.... we are currently in a false vacuum, which is a vacuum that is inbetween a real vacuum and a higher energy state of being. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum but this situation is meta stable and can be broken via somthing like quantum tunneling. If that happens the entire universe collapses to the real vacuum. Now the Higgs field plays a crucial role in this proces seemingly. well secular science predicts this to happen in billion some years from now. now we as bible believig christians know that God Will stop the entire universe by destroying it including earth and all that we know. why ?? well simple... we messed up...... so God wants to start aver again in a new heaven and a new earth. But in order to do so God has to destroy this heaven and earth first as the bible clearly teaches us. and since the bible gives us some indication that the total earths history will last about 7000 yrs and we now live in close to the 6000th year there is about 1000 yrs left. now to give a more rougher estimate lets take 1000-1500 yrs.... thats how I got it. but that God will indeed destroy heaven and earth is a fact for the future. we will not live on earth to see it, bt it will happen non the less, God said so and there for it will happen.... God does not lie about it... and it confirms with modern day science (except for the date of happening)
    1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. In the first place cells did not develope from chemicals over millions of yrs. That never happend. the supposed& suggested abiogenesis processes are way way way to complex to even fractionally have occured in the time that secular science estimates the age of the universe +/-14 billions of yrs. It would require billion to the power of billions of time much more time than that for abiogenesis be a realistic process. So abiogenesis is a LIE. that means also that evolution never took place. Since the suggested processes of evolution are in chronological order after the suggested abiogensis would have taken place. although evolution has got its own problems due to which it nevre took place. There is a simple calculation which can prove that what I am stating is correct and you can do the math yourself and check me on it: Correct science has found/proven that nature can create 41 amino acids - Urey Miller style. All exept 1 is optically active (D & L chapes). so nature has the choice of 81 choices for the first amino acid to start the formation of a protein the next step is to find the right amino acid based on which the nature has again 81 choices BUT NOW each next amino acid has 2 addditional choices to react either it reacts to the -COOH (the acidic) side of the chain or the -NH2 (the amine) side of the chain. which makes that now nature has 162 choices to make. that goes so for every next amino acid now lets simplify for easy calculation purposes. we see that nature has 0,5*(160 ^n) choices for composing a protein of n amino-acids. now the reactiontime is about 0,00 000 001 second or 1 nano second =10^-9 sec now nature has NO GOAL of making proteins meant for living organisms. so in order to find the correct ones that we encounter in our bodies. nature has to make them ALL and check them out in functionality towards each other. This aspect will how ever be left out of consideration for now. so nature has to form all proteins to check them. which means that a protein requires 0,5*(160^10) * 10^-9 sec = a 20 amino acid protein requires 0,5*(160^20)* 10^-9 sec = 6,0446*10^34 sec= 1,9167*10^27 yrs=1,9167393131891*10^18 BILLIONS of yrs and that is only if an optimal situation is established. A 50 amino acid protein requires more BILLIONS of yrs than there are atoms in the enitire universe. The smallest HUMAN protein is only 44 amnioacids !. the Biggest proteins consist of about 100.000 aminoacids.
    1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073.  @FlappySock  I am always amazed by the sheer ignorance that you people, display, while at the same time being intelligent enough to understand... OK let me ask you a simple question: what object was the very FIRST that the imaginairy processes of evolution could lay its "hands" upon ???? and where did that came from ???? dont you understand that if either abiogenesis or evolution would be a real thing that evlution is chronologically bound to what abiogenesis would have delivered ??? if abiogenesis never happened then there would never BE anthing to evolve.... see your own ignorance appearing ???? Now each suggested fantasized proces (abiogenesis and evolution) has its own problems due to which it never could have happend... Auto catalysis will NEVER be enough for gaining what is required.... never. why ? simple even catalysis would not speed things up enough to over come the sheer endless time required for any of these imaginairy processes appart from many other issues catalysis will have at best a billion fould speeding up as potential.... so 50 amino-acid proteins will not require 10^83 BILLIONS of yrs but ONLY 10^74 BILLIONS of yrs..... so how about the composition of a protein of 1000 amino acids ??? I remind you that the SECULAR estimated age of the universe is ONLY 14 billion yrs.....so your catalysis input is about 10^60 (a 1 with 60 zero's behind it or a million to the power of 10) TOO SLOW....... But I challenge you: I suggest that a) you make a living cell (exactly as we know them) from the bare elements b) that you let these cells evolve into a higher organism, lets say a worm (exactly as we know them) c) first or parallell/at the same time in the lab under utmost optimal conditions as proof of concept d) then secondly/ or at te same time in real life as supposedly happend supposedly billions of yrs ago....
    1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109.  @brandweergeest8680  mutaties zijn NOOIT voordelig en op z'n best neutraal. Kan ook nooit voordelig zijn, want mutaties worden veroorzaakt door agressieve media (radioactief verval, radio-active straling, UV straling, cosmische straling, agressieve chemicaliën, en de meest onschuldige is crossing overs). GEEN van deze alle brengt positieve verandering .. daarom vermijden we ze ook anders worden we ziek.. toch ?? Wat jij ZIET/observeerd bij honden is VARIATIE !!! Enkel en alleen door a) de afbraak van de genetische code.... er is nog NOOIT extra NIEUWE informatie aan een organisme toegevoegd. dat is nog nooit in heel de wetenschap waargenomen. B) door het her schikken van BESTAANDE informatie. Er is nog NOOIT nieuwe informatie bij gekomen door mutaties. honden zijn altijd honden gebleven en nooit door ge-evolueerd naar een nieuwe soort vruchtboom. hondn hebben ook nog nooit vleugens gekregen of zo of een staart met een paraplu tegen de regen.. DAT zou nieuwe info zijn.. maar dat is nog noiit waargenomen. Darwin en jullie dus ook interpreteren variatie (wat echt is) voor evolutie.... variatie bestaat; honden met grote of korte staarten, honden met lang of kort haar... dat is variatie. Maar geen evolutie.... je kunt variatie NIET extrapoleren naar iets wat dan evolutie genoemd word. afbraak van genetisch materiaal is miljoenen malen al waargenomen en peer reviewed gedocumenteerd. Maar dat is 100% het tegen over gestelde wat het vermeende evolutie proces nodig heeft. mutaties veranderen organismes alstijd in lager kwliteit organismen. meer ziektes, meer afwijkingen etc etc. maw DEGENERATIE !!!
    1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115.  @brandweergeest8680  jij bedoeld punt mutaties. nee sorry... mutaties zijn schadelijk.. ook punt mutaties. daarom is er ook een reparatie systeem. bovendien is er dan geen info toegevoegd alleen vercorrumpeerd. net als je je huis opnieuw inricht ....met de al aanwezige meubulair... door ze op n andere plek te zetten. dat is geen nieuwe info... bovendien schadelijk voor het maken van eiwitten want die zij daarvan afhankelijk.... Vraag je: heb je wel eens een space-shuttel in het wild gezien ?? hier of op de maan of op titan of andere manen ??? ik bedoel het heelal heeft volgens jullie miljarden jaren de tijd gehad om iets complex van simpele materialen te maken en space shuttels zijn bij lange na niet zo ingewikkeld als een levende cel. of heb je wel eens een fiets op de maan gezien or op mars, of een simpele balpen ?? nee he ??? waarom niet ?? die zijn factoren van orde simpeler dan levende cellen.... toch vinden we ze niet maar er is materieel genoeg ni het heelal om biljarden balpennen at random te laten ontstaan of fietsen of horloges of space shuttels of radio en TV apparaten die signalen naarons kunnen uitzenden..... er zijn 10^80 atomen ongeveer. toch komen we dat nergens tegen zonder dat er intelligente wezen aan te pas komen om ze te maken.... vreemd hé ?? waarom is er wel intelligentie nodig voor een simpel radiootje om signalen naar ons uit te zenden (wat nog nooit is gebeurd.... maar GEEN intelligentie nodig om een hyper super complexe levende cel te maken ??? beetje onlogisch, niet ?
    1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. Trump wakkerd NIETS aan......... IEDEREEN is verantwoordelijk voor ZIJN/HAAR eigen daden iedere "palestijn" die geweld gebruikt,.... gebruikt ZELF het geweld en niet Trump. Trump gooit geen stenen en bommen en granaten naar de Joden... dus schuld afschuiven op Trump is weer ... "GEEN eigen verantwoordelijkheid nemen" stelletje zielepoten, dat is mietjes gedrag.... zelf geen verantwoordlijkheden willen nemen en anderen continue de schuld geven van je eigen misère, als het echt de schuld van een ander is dat nog tot daaraan toe, maar als je zelf al decenia de Joden haat toedraagt en uit tracht te moorden, dan hoef je nu ook niet zielig te gaan lopen doen± het is nl nog steeds± wie Israel/de Joden zegend WORD zelf gezegend.... wie de Joden/Israel vervloekt )geweld tegen pleegd, word zelf OOK vervloekt.... dat si wat de bijbel zegd en wat we keer op keer zien terug komen in de gescheidenis van de Joden wereld wijd..... wie de Joden een warm hart toedraagt word gezegend en wie het de Joden lastig maakt zal uiteindelijk van Gods wegen het onderspit delven. dus ja... het is weer typisch arabisch gedrag... altijd anderen de schuld geven.... en maar zielig doen......en maar EU gelden vangen en voor oorlogstuig spenderen in plaats van de humanitaire hulp waarvoor het EIGENLIJK bedoeld was. oorlogstunnels maken met Humanitaire fondsen om je land op te bouwen.... maar in plaats van opbouwen breek je het eigenhandig af middel je eigen jodenhaat ....en dan het lef hebben anderen de schuld te geven van je eigen veroorzaakte ellende..... irritant volk.... toneel spelers zijn het allemaal......
    1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128.  @TAAB11  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA NO WAY ! It may be that people leave for example christianity and it has to do so as the bible predicted, since there will come in the nearby future a terrible period, in which only a few people survive, but in the end the whole world will be religious that is christian. why ? God predicted this in the bible. And so far all prediction that are valid till today have become reality. You see there are about 3000 prophesies in the bible and of them about 2500 have been fullfilled. The remaining 500 are for the future and even from them some can been SEEN being fulfilled, right as we speak. A few of them concern the return of Jesus Christ but that will go along side with a lot of terrible things. You see the devil doesnt let go easily of what he has. so he will resist the return of Jesus Christ and he will kill many many many people. satan knows that his time is close to ending and he will start kicking and screaming to prevent his punishment. During his actions he will do lots of evil stuff, to the world. Meaning only a hand full of people will be left. and this all will happen in about the next (max) 100 yrs or less. God didnt say exactly WHEN he would rerurn, He left that knowledge to Himself. And right as we speak we can see (IF you have knowledge about it) that things are about to happen. read deutronomy 28 and leviticus 26 for example. Read matthew 24, marc 13 and luke 21. these things are happening right as we speak. But christianity will never die. NEVER
    1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. Meaning of life ???????? well if you BELIEVE that you are no more then a over grown bacteria emerged by random chance there is NO PURPOSE at all But if one believes that he/she is deliberately created by a loving God then yes you DO have a factuall meaning. Loving God with all you are and your fellwo men as you love yourself…. simple Now lets examine if life is by random chance yes or no..... OK the random emerging of proteines/enzymes, there are 21 amino acids... To couple 2 amino acids it requires about 10^-10 to 10^-7 seconds; lets take 10^-10 seconds It is known that a fully functional protein/enzyme requires the exact correct position of all amino acids otherwise it does not function properly. lets assume that the availability of materials is not the limiting factor here.... and that all is freely avaialble. now with 10 amino acids there are 21^10 = 1,66798810E+13 options of these number of options only ONE is a functional combination Each reaction halfs the number of required reactions so there are 2^(10-1) reaction steps each taking 10^-10 seconds so (1,66798810E+13 / 2^9) * 10^-10 seconds = 3,25778925E+02 seconds = 0,0905 hour 20 amino acids = 2,782E+26 options = (21^20/2^19) * 10^-10 seconds = 5,30659541E+12 seconds = 0,000168271 Billions of years. 24 amino acids = 5,41081984E+31 options = (21^24/2^23) * 10^-10 seconds = 6,45019989E+16 seconds = 2,045 Billions of years Now again only 1 of these options is a fully correct functional proteine/enzyme 25 amino acids 1,13627217E+33 options = (21^25/2^24) * 10^-10 seconds = 6,77270988E+17 seconds = 21,476 Billions of years now to remind you the secular estimated age of the universe is 14,5 billion years. The smallest human proteine/enzyme is 44 amino acids big, the larges 27000 aminoacids. Lets move on 30 amino acids = 4,641E+39 options = 8,64388475E+22 seconds = 2740957,874 billion of years = 189031,5775 times the secular estimated age of the universe. And only 1 of these options is the one we are looking for. 40 amino acids = 7,74054945E+52 options of which 1 is the one we are looking for. = 1,40799774E+33 seconds = 4,46473E+16 Billions of years = 3,07913E+15 of the secular ages of the universe. 100 aminoacids = 1,66697648E+132 options of which 1 is the one we are looking for. now the chemical reaction speed brings us in to troubles as can be seen…... so OK lets do the atheists a favor and speed up the reaction rate. Lets assume that the reaction rate for the coupleing of 2 aminoacids or 2 peptide chains requires only 5,39 * 10-44 seconds….. now real scientists recognize this number to be the planck time. That, in secular science is the shortest time that can exist theoretically… below that time spend has no meaning accordig to secular scientists. of course we are entering the realm of unrealistic totally ludicrous assumpions but OK so back to our 100 amino acid protein formation by no more then random chance. 100 amino acids = 1,66697648E+132 options = (21^100/2^99) * 5,39*10^-44 seconds = 1,41791116E+59 seconds = 4,49617E+42 BILLIONS of years So random chance as secular science proposes proofs to be factuall NOT part of correct science. not even if all assumptions take to ludicrous levels Yet here we are. and judging by the next video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_tYrnv_o6A our bodies chemical mechanism are super highly sophisicated proteins/enzymes of several 100's of amino acids… one must be very religiously fanatically zealotous clung to atheism to BELIEVE that this all has come to be by nothing more then pure random chance which has no intelligence to put into the chemical processes to construct this. well I admit I BELIEVE that GOD/Jesus Christ has designed and MADE this all…. according to; BERESHIET BARA ELOHIM ET HASHAMAYIM VE-ET AHARETS; or in english In the Beginning GOD created heaven and the earth…… scientifically spoken there is no other option God bless you !!
    1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. What is the idea of evolution ??? well its going from simple cells to advanced higher organisms by mutations. OK what are mutations ? Mutations are genetic alterations due to: A) radioactive decay (C14 -> N14) B) cosmic radiation (super high energetic particles) C) UV radiation from the sun D) agressive chemicals E) radioactive radiation F) cross overs Only in the case of F) no genetic information is altered but ONLY shifted from 1 place to another place in the gene system. That others are CHANGING the information in the genetic codes and these info changes determine which proteins are being made or NOT made OR wrongly made. Now A to F is all based on RANDOM processes. And the input is highly energetic. It must be in order to make such changes. ALL except F is destructive.. It acts like sand blasting with very fine sand your house or your car your TV, or motor or any other object. and that on a constant non stoping basis. now just like with sandblasting ... IT DAMAGES what ever it touches....!!! Randomly sand-blasting your house will in 2 months-6 months destroy it completely, same what happens to our bodies by mutative agences as mentioned in A)-E) it breaks DOWN the genetic information.... Nobody has seen a car being sand blasted into a boeing 747 nor a house into a 5 store appartments. Same with our bodies..... what we DO see is more and more allergies, auto-immune sicknesses, Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB), many kinds of syndromes (Down... and about 700 types of syndromes known to man) etc etc. All due to damaged DNA information or degeneration. So that proofs that evolution is a NON EXISTING idea, except on paper in textbooks and in the minds of misled gullible people. How did we get here ? well more likely based on evidence: "In the beginning GOD created heaven and earth..." we started of perfectly created and slowely over time we are degrading. - Earliest of mankind married within the family as Neanderthales evidence shows us. which is in line with the bible. lateron genetic devormation got the better of us and we were forbidden to marry within the family as the laws of Mozes teaches us. In line with reality. - Mitochondrial DNA show that we all can be related to only 3 different mothers (and we even know the names of their husbands: Sem Cham and Japhet and grandfather: Noah - Many many other arguments..
    1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. EUREKA Problem solved: construct the next thing: a load of atomic clocks 10 to 1000 or so. Put 1 in a central spot. Now put all the other clocks (10 to 1000) - in a sphere around the central one at an exact known standard distance. Let all clocks have the exact same click/tick counter that at every tick of the clocks adds a digit. And let them run in arbirtairy starting points, of course really fast. Let the central clock fire in all directions a light pulse at the same time or not the same time but directed to each individual clock on the sphere. Note the click/tick when (at which pulse of itself) the central clock fires in which direction. Also note the number of the click/tick at which the pulse arrives at each individual clock on the sphere. OK IF ... the light speed is the same in all directions then over time (many years, since the earth is rotating around its axis and the sun and the galaxy etc) the differences in pulses (Pcentral - Psphere_clock_i where i is running from 1 to 200 if you have 200 clocks on the sphere) should remain constant no matter when you measure them. Its about the click tick differences since one can let these counters run arbitrairily. They dont necessarily need to be synchronized or even running at the same rate/pace ! as long as the change in digits is preferably (! not necessarily) the same as the central clock counter. Even if there is a slight difference in change rate, this is no issue, because it is always about the difference between the counts between Pc and Ps_c_i. THAT must remain constant or CHANGE constantly over time. IF ... However light speed is different in any direction this difference in pulses should be varying over time dramatically/significantly. Now of course each individual pulse of light should be separated in chronology from each other in an unmistakenly way. so that no errors occur over there. This is measuring light speed in a single directional way but at the same time in different directions ((the sphere) and over time since earth rotates in several ways in even other directions. There is NO 2 directional measurments per couple of clocks (central and one on the sphere) you just count the tick/click differences. my prediction: there will be no to extremely small variation at best.
    1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253.  @henkspoeltman9541  nee vriend, geloof in Jezus christus is HET medicijn. En jouw ongeloof in Jezus is mede de oorzaak van ziekten... LETTERLIJK !!! want weetje als god/jezus aande kant geschopt word door mensen trekt God ZIJN zegenende handen terug en de eerste die DAN langs konmt is de ziekmakende duvel die middels ziektes jou en je familie de hel in tracht te sleuren LETTERLIJK !!! DAT is waar deutronomium 28/leviticus 26 over gaat !! en DAT is wat we in de EU/USA wat steeds goddelozer aan het worden is, ook ECHT feitelijk zien gebeuren... sla de kranten er maar op na...als je me niet gelooft.... Ziektes nemen toe, mislukte oogsten nemen toe, wilde dieren in ons land nemen toe, terrorisme neemt toe, verwoestijning neemt toe, ontbossing neemt toe, criminalitet neemt toe, corruptie neemt toe, onrecht neem toe, verlies van vrijheid neemt toe, armoede neemt toe en ga zo maar door, inkomsten ongelijkheid neemt toe, .... en we zijn nog lang niet aan het einde daarvan.... Allemaal het directe gevolg van ONGEHOORZAAMHEID en Ongeloof in God/Jezus christus !!! waar JIJ dus OOK aan bijdraagt ! hoe ? door ongeloof en goddeloze praktijken: abortussen, euthanasie, drugs, mensenhandel, corruptie, afgoderijen, prostitutie, totaal ongeoorloofde sexuele levens-stijlen/vrijheden, diefstallen, moorden en alles wat nog meer goddeloos is. Dus corona (één van de plagen) is deels je eigen schuld vriend... door je eigen ongeloof ! Wees dus gewaarschuwd ! en BEKEER JE tot God/Jezus Christus. Dan draag je op zijn minst bij aan het herstel van Nederland/EU. Er is GEEN andere weg/manier !
    1
  1254. 1
  1255.  @henkspoeltman9541  NOPE de bijbel is VAAK geschreven door mensen die zelf in grote armoede leefde en totaal geen macht / geld hadden. Sommige wel (Noah, abraham, david, salomo) maar ook heel veel gewoon niet: Jozef (zoon van Jakob), Jeremia, Jezus, Petrus, paulus, ruth/naomi, Mozes, Gideon, simson, saul, ester/haddassah, Jonah, Amos, Josef&maria etc Neem Petrus: wat zegt ie tegen een bedelaar: GOUD OF zilver heb ik niet ... maar WAT ik heb, geef ik u , in Jezus naam sta op en wandel (de bedelaar was namelijik kreupel en kon niet lopen. nadat Petrus hem (door Gods kracht) genas, liep de man weer... en DAT (mensen genezen) doet God (in Jezus naam NOG STEEDS.... Geloof je me niet: kijk dan deze filmpjes maar eens : (invullen in youtube...) watch?v=lfm-OhgmenQ&t=12s je kunt ook zoeken op: "Simon stapt na 10 jaar uit rolstoel" Deze Simon kwam als atheist naar een stel vrienden die op dat moment op een christelijke conferentie waren. Die vrouw (in lichtblauw) die voor hem bid ken ik ook (karin). of deze: watch?v=LEqZ9qDOBoU&t=4s of zoeken op: "Janneke Vlot genezen door de kracht van God" zij heeft 17 jaar ziek op bed gelegen, en in slechts 1 gebed werd zij door God genezen... de artsen hebben haar onderzocht en noemen het een wonder... ze loopt nog steeds als een kivit. nog eentje; watch?v=QTDK_L-X6tk&t=325s of zoeken op "Transformations - Almolonga Guatemala - Revival produces Gigantic Vegetables! " Op 5 minuut 25 sec is een vrouw theresa te zien die genezen werd door 1 gebed van GANGREEN, ze lag op sterven.... en de pastoor werd er bij geroepen op het laaste moment om haar in de dood te begeleiden, maar in plaats daarvan moest hij van God/Jezus bidden voor haar genezing... en DAT gebeurde... Heel de familie kwam tot geloof daardoor... nu oa jij nog... zo zijn er talloze voorbeelden
    1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. yes biologically physically we are all alone in the entire universe. why ? well we have been deliberately created by God. uniquely. there is NO possible chemical path route via which we could have been emerged naturalistically and by random chance. To illustrate that mathe matically: nature can produce 40 amino acids al D&L config. that alone gives 1 in 80 chance to pick the correct one in constructing a new protein. on top of that each peptide has 2 reactive sides so a 10 amino acid polypeptide has a 1 in 160 chance to be arbitrarily picked and coupled to a newly growing peptide. but Nature has NO objective to create life so it must seek amongs all polypeptides the right correctly functional ones. Now nature ONLY knows about 100.000 different proteins (large polypeptides). and the smallest ones contain about 10 amino acids and the largest ones about 50.000 amino acids. that means that nature has to conjure up all possible combinations to pick out the only few functional ones. and to make it even harder: ALL peptides are consisting of L configed amino acids. Which resembles for a peptide of 1000 amino acids ALL 1000 coins falling on head or all on tail. so for a 20 amino acid peptide: nature has 0,5*(160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160*160) = 0,5*(160^20) options to pick a few corrrect ones from. now remember chemicals react typically in the order of magnitude of 10^-9 or 0,00 000 000 1 second (nano second) UNDER OPTIMAL conditions. even under catalytic conditions this can only be sped up a magnitude of max 1000.000 times. so 0,5*(160^20) * 10^-9 = 6,0446310^34 seconds = 1,91674E+27 YEARS = 1,91674E+18 BILLIONS of yrs now our universe (according to the SECULAR estimates) is ONLY 14 BILLION years so: 1.916.740.000.000.000.000 BILLION years compared to 14 BILLION years. (EVEN if that number would be correct, which according to the bible is far far far off the real age of the earth) only for a 20 amino acid poly peptide.... it gets in credibly far worse if the peptides grow larger.... and this is NOT EVEN talking about carbo hysrates, fatty acids/ lipids for membranes, the DNA, etc etc etc. thats why it is mind boggling to me that people STILL follow abiogenesis-evolution idea's ... I am flabbergasted by their ignorance about these issues...
    1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. Solution: for the 1 way speed of light: still use 2 clocks and move one of them extremly slowely. Yes Einstein is correct and the higher the speed, the bigger the gamma factor and thus the effect.. so transport the clock very slowely like 1 mm each hour Wait a full year it has moved 365*24 = 8 meters and 76 cm or 1 mm/minute and do that 1 year long it has moved 525,6 meters and start measuring. A mm per second is also ok, then it takes 11,57 days to reach 1 km. At 0,1 mm/sec it takes about 115,74 days And the gamma factor is more negligable and the slower you go the smaller it will be. So the more accurate your lightspeed measurement will be. One could do this vey accurately at the LIGO site, they have long paths in their building to do so. In that way we can also check if light speed is and remains constant over the ages. I mean IF lightspeed changes over time there is NO way to define a meter as such and so many wavelengths right ? There are people who question this and I am wondering about myself if I am one of 'm. So to verify lightspeeds constancy it MUST be verified over the time thats where physics assumption MAY (!) have gone wrong in the first place since 1983. Now LIGO is even 4KM so it would take 46,3 days and some days to measure but since the length is bigger it is more accurate. and one only need a hollow pipe at the roof of a LIGO facility, next to 2 accurate atoms clocks. and an extremely slow clock mover. wit todys technogoly... no problem, right ? Now this can be done for ALL desired directions of measuring.
    1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. @Kirrily to give you an example: let me tell you. Nature has the posibility of creating at least 40 different amino acids in Urey Miller style according to Jeffrey Bada et all. This means to start the formation of 1 functional protein of lets say 20 amino acids (ature has about 100.000 proteins ranging from a few 10's to a few 10.000 's of aminio acids), nature has to pick each time fom these 40 amino acids randomly 1 of them to add on at a new position. So a random chance of 1 in 40 to pick each time the correct one BUT each amino acid has 2 configurations, like a left and right hand a D & L configuration based on this nature has thus a random chance of 1 in 80 of picking the correct one for each new amino acid BUT each poly peptide has 2 reactive sides to choose from the NH2 side and the COOH side. so each new amno acid has 1 in 160 chance to be te correct one. except the very first amino acid (1 in 80) Now it is scientifically correct that each peptide bond is created in about 1 nano second so 10^-9 sec. Unfortunately for you people nature has NO objective to create life. by itself. That is an outside of nature desire. Therefor nature is forced to check all possible poly peptides on their functionality. so for a teeny weeny peptide of only 20 amino acids nature requires 0,5*(160^20) * 10^-9 sec = 6,04463*10^34 seconds = 1,91674E+18 BILLIONS of years to have all poly peptides being check on their funtionality and composition since nature ONLY has L configuration amino acids in its proteins. Now since your ind set is on science facts you surely know that the secular age of the universe is estimated to be 13,8 billion yrs old. but take a comparison: 1,91674E+18 BILLION years that is: 1.916,740.000.000.000.000,0 BILION YEARS To 13,8 BILLION yrs see the difference ???? our smalles human protein is 44 amino acids big... nature would require for that: 1,5186E+71 BILLIONS of yrs to find it or 151.800.000.000.000.000. 000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000. 000.000.000. 000.000.000.000.000.000.000,0 BILLLIONS of yrs 13,8 BILLIONs of yrs I cannot imagine that you dont see the difference of these numbers. catalysis I hear you thinking OK lets take that inconsideration: lets speed up the chemistry. and lets do that to ridiculous even unscientific proportions to rule out all things: lets ASSUME (incorrectly but just for the sake of argument) that the chemical reaction time is at the level of planck time so in the order of magnitude of 5,39 *10^-34 sec... which is according to science the shortest time possible. then STILL you require: 3,93875E+36 BILLIONS of yrs for a human protein of ONLY 44 amino acids. and 3,58227E+14 Billion yrs for a 30 aminoacid peptide. You like science ??? you based your opinion of science facts I agree fine with me.. But secular science facts prove to us that we could NOT have arizen without Supernatural intelligence or without supernatural intervention.... we know Him as God
    1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1