Youtube comments of Sam O (@samo6083).

  1. 668
  2. 373
  3. 309
  4. 108
  5. 64
  6. 44
  7. 42
  8. 40
  9. 39
  10. 37
  11. 33
  12. 32
  13. 30
  14. 30
  15. 27
  16. 27
  17. 26
  18. 23
  19. 23
  20. 22
  21. 20
  22. 19
  23. 19
  24. 18
  25. 18
  26. 16
  27. 16
  28. 16
  29. 16
  30. 15
  31. 14
  32. 14
  33. 14
  34. 13
  35. 13
  36. 13
  37. 13
  38. 13
  39. 13
  40. 12
  41. 12
  42. 12
  43. 12
  44. 12
  45. 12
  46. 12
  47. 11
  48. 11
  49. 11
  50. 11
  51. 11
  52. 10
  53. 10
  54. 10
  55. 10
  56. 10
  57. 10
  58. 10
  59. 9
  60. 9
  61. 9
  62. Β @truthxposed8975Β  https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22308-europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins-from-neanderthals/ . Actually they couldn't have been anything else but black. At least when it first started. White people didn't even exist 11k yrs ago and with the water erosion on the sphinx it was standing at least 12k yrs ago so could be much older. Everyone then was black so either way it's a black civilisation. And if you want to stick to the mainstream timeline of Egypt when it started white people likely wouldn't have even finished the process of becoming white πŸ˜‚ and if they were in Egypt they wouldn't have been white they would gave stayed black. Everyone during that time that wasnt in Europe was black and even Europeans wouldn't have been white yet πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ So the gene to become pale just surfaced in Europe when the sphinx was already standing. Scientists even agree that Neanderthals in the middle east stayed black because they were getting enough vitamin D for the sun meaning they wouldn't just turn lighter because it seems coolπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Becoming lighter isn't something people do when they are bored of being black unoπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ can your brain not comprehend it's an evolutionary phenomenon and being in Egypt wouldn't warrant lighter skin than of black people today. South Africa gets the same UV concentration as Egypt and they are still black. Put the dots together its not that hard to figure out they were obviously black them being anything other than black would literally make no sense especially on an evolutionary stand point.
    9
  63. 9
  64. 9
  65. 9
  66. 9
  67. 9
  68. 9
  69. 8
  70. 8
  71. 8
  72. 8
  73. 8
  74. 8
  75. 8
  76. 8
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 7
  81. 7
  82. 7
  83. 7
  84. 7
  85. 7
  86. 7
  87. 7
  88. 7
  89. 7
  90. 7
  91. 7
  92. 6
  93. 6
  94. 6
  95. 6
  96. 6
  97. 6
  98. 6
  99. 6
  100. 6
  101. 6
  102. 6
  103. 6
  104. 6
  105. 6
  106. 6
  107. 6
  108. 6
  109. 6
  110. 6
  111. 5
  112. 5
  113. 5
  114. 5
  115. 5
  116. 5
  117. 5
  118. 5
  119. 5
  120. 5
  121. 5
  122. 5
  123. 5
  124. 5
  125. 5
  126. 5
  127. 5
  128. 5
  129. 5
  130. 5
  131. 5
  132. 5
  133. 5
  134. 5
  135. 5
  136. 5
  137. 5
  138. 5
  139. 5
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 4
  149. 4
  150. 4
  151. 4
  152. 4
  153. 4
  154. 4
  155. 4
  156. 4
  157. 4
  158. 4
  159. 4
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 4
  164. 4
  165. 4
  166. Β @e9cw196Β  No it's not obviously more danger from the lion pride πŸ˜‚ how did you get to that conclusion? Do you think everything is about muscle and strength to make kills? If what you're saying is true lions would have a higher succes rate at 90+% but it's not it's like 30πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Do you understand why for a Lion it so low compared to an African wild dog? I'll have to dumb it down for you again. If I see a lions from a distance I'm safe. All any animal has to do is outrun it in terms of endurance but lions usually wont even attempt to chase since they know closing the gap might not get them the meal due to poor stamina. lions wait stalk, get closer to the point where a full sprint will catch them. For an African wild dog it doesn't matter what you do, you can be seen from a couple miles away and you'll still die. They can run at like 40mph longer than any animal on them plains, it's just a matter of when they'll catch you not if. I watched this video of scientists who wondered why the prey weren't scared anymore even with the presence of lions. The animals were starting to become braver and braver and strayed out their natural habitat which put the ecosystems out of balance. The scientists had to act quickly so their solution was to bring African wild dogs. When they got reintroduced the fear of that national park was restored because none of the animals would dare to be in open areas with African wild dogs. With the lions they didn't give a shitπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ African wild dogs ARE AND WILL ALWAYS BE MORE LETHAL
    4
  167. 4
  168. 4
  169. 4
  170. 4
  171. 4
  172. 4
  173. 4
  174. 4
  175. 4
  176. 4
  177. 4
  178. 4
  179. Β f you that's rightΒ  https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22308-europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins-from-neanderthals/ . Actually they couldn't have been anything else but black. At least when it first started. White people didn't even exist 11k yrs ago and with the water erosion on the sphinx it was standing at least 12k yrs ago so could be much older. Everyone then was black so either way it's a black civilisation. And if you want to stick to the mainstream timeline of Egypt when it started white people likely wouldn't have even finished the process of becoming white πŸ˜‚ and if they were in Egypt they wouldn't have been white they would gave stayed black. Everyone during that time that wasnt in Europe was black and even Europeans wouldn't have been white yet πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ So the gene to become pale just surfaced in Europe when the sphinx was already standing. Scientists even agree that Neanderthals in the middle east stayed black because they were getting enough vitamin D for the sun meaning they wouldn't just turn lighter because it seems coolπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Becoming lighter isn't something people do when they are bored of being black unoπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ can your brain not comprehend it's an evolutionary phenomenon and being in Egypt wouldn't warrant lighter skin than of black people today. South Africa gets the same UV concentration as Egypt and they are still black. Put the dots together its not that hard to figure out they were obviously black them being anything other than black would literally make no sense especially on an evolutionary stand point.
    4
  180. 4
  181. 4
  182. 4
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237. 3
  238. 3
  239. 3
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. @Ankle Bully Fam https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22308-europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins-from-neanderthals/ . Actually they couldn't have been anything else but black. At least when it first started. White people didn't even exist 11k yrs ago and with the water erosion on the sphinx it was standing at least 12k yrs ago so could be much older. Everyone then was black so either way it's a black civilisation. And if you want to stick to the mainstream timeline of Egypt when it started white people likely wouldn't have even finished the process of becoming white πŸ˜‚ and if they were in Egypt they wouldn't have been white they would gave stayed black. Everyone during that time that wasnt in Europe was black and even Europeans wouldn't have been white yet πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ So the gene to become pale just surfaced in Europe when the sphinx was already standing. Scientists even agree that Neanderthals in the middle east stayed black because they were getting enough vitamin D for the sun meaning they wouldn't just turn lighter because it seems coolπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Becoming lighter isn't something people do when they are bored of being black unoπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ can your brain not comprehend it's an evolutionary phenomenon and being in Egypt wouldn't warrant lighter skin than of black people today. South Africa gets the same UV concentration as Egypt and they are still black. Put the dots together its not that hard to figure out they were obviously black them being anything other than black would literally make no sense especially on an evolutionary stand point.
    2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. Β Andrec SΒ  https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22308-europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins-from-neanderthals/ . Actually they couldn't have been anything else but black. At least when it first started. White people didn't even exist 11k yrs ago and with the water erosion on the sphinx it was standing at least 12k yrs ago so could be much older. Everyone then was black so either way it's a black civilisation. And if you want to stick to the mainstream timeline of Egypt when it started white people likely wouldn't have even finished the process of becoming white πŸ˜‚ and if they were in Egypt they wouldn't have been white they would gave stayed black. Everyone during that time that wasnt in Europe was black and even Europeans wouldn't have been white yet πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ So the gene to become pale just surfaced in Europe when the sphinx was already standing. Scientists even agree that Neanderthals in the middle east stayed black because they were getting enough vitamin D for the sun meaning they wouldn't just turn lighter because it seems coolπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Becoming lighter isn't something people do when they are bored of being black unoπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ can your brain not comprehend it's an evolutionary phenomenon and being in Egypt wouldn't warrant lighter skin than of black people today. South Africa gets the same UV concentration as Egypt and they are still black. Put the dots together its not that hard to figure out they were obviously black them being anything other than black would literally make no sense especially on an evolutionary stand point.
    2
  393. @Gamal Nasser https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22308-europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins-from-neanderthals/ . Actually they couldn't have been anything else but black. At least when it first started. White people didn't even exist 11k yrs ago and with the water erosion on the sphinx it was standing at least 12k yrs ago so could be much older. Everyone then was black so either way it's a black civilisation. And if you want to stick to the mainstream timeline of Egypt when it started white people likely wouldn't have even finished the process of becoming white πŸ˜‚ and if they were in Egypt they wouldn't have been white they would gave stayed black. Everyone during that time that wasnt in Europe was black and even Europeans wouldn't have been white yet πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ So the gene to become pale just surfaced in Europe when the sphinx was already standing. Scientists even agree that Neanderthals in the middle east stayed black because they were getting enough vitamin D for the sun meaning they wouldn't just turn lighter because it seems coolπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Becoming lighter isn't something people do when they are bored of being black unoπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ can your brain not comprehend it's an evolutionary phenomenon and being in Egypt wouldn't warrant lighter skin than of black people today. South Africa gets the same UV concentration as Egypt and they are still black. Put the dots together its not that hard to figure out they were obviously black them being anything other than black would literally make no sense especially on an evolutionary stand point.
    2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. Β @uafc1Β  Wild dogs are very literally the biological parents of all living hyenas. If you tally up all interactions between the two species and sees who dominates / does more damage to the other physically, then wild dogs are own hyenas πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Out of all interactions I've ever seen I've only seen hyenas catch 1 dog but even then the dog was let go by 3 hyeanas in 0.5 seconds because the wild dog pack swarmed in. Hyenas have higher bite force sure but clearly that seems to be useless in the face of a wild dog pack they can never seem to get a clean hit onπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ As you can see from the vids below, hyenas are now the property of the African wild dog πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ https://youtu.be/FTHyBe3W-0Y https://youtu.be/xHuTwvubXKA https://youtu.be/eLf2VeOc5Uo https://youtu.be/BsGlTvmGqQg https://youtu.be/K09zU_29w2M https://youtu.be/1u-eUFXdSNY https://youtu.be/zIWw4naNe44 https://youtu.be/X-mvrUlJQk8 https://youtu.be/GwqJ7xfZ_uY https://youtu.be/WG5JBbjYPLM https://youtu.be/18rs2wEpdrE https://youtu.be/gJhKtfL__YM https://youtu.be/XXSOUQ4qe04 https://youtu.be/RU4d7DaGzXI https://youtu.be/GPoJtUbwicY https://youtu.be/gM6HNsL4x_w https://youtu.be/AjmZCg_sYc8 https://youtu.be/-KbIvkTY4Qs https://youtu.be/JQyeYx5upuo https://youtu.be/eLf2VeOc5Uo https://youtu.be/BsGlTvmGqQg https://youtu.be/K09zU_29w2M https://youtu.be/1u-eUFXdSNY https://youtu.be/zIWw4naNe44 https://youtu.be/X-mvrUlJQk8 https://youtu.be/GwqJ7xfZ_uY https://youtu.be/WG5JBbjYPLM https://youtu.be/fuEl3vKmbc4 https://youtu.be/18rs2wEpdrE https://youtu.be/gJhKtfL__YM https://youtu.be/XXSOUQ4qe04 https://youtu.be/RU4d7DaGzXI https://youtu.be/GPoJtUbwicY https://youtu.be/gM6HNsL4x_w https://youtu.be/jGvtsTy-nNY https://youtu.be/AjmZCg_sYc8 https://youtu.be/-KbIvkTY4Qs https://youtu.be/JQyeYx5upuo https://youtu.be/eLf2VeOc5Uo https://youtu.be/BsGlTvmGqQg https://youtu.be/K09zU_29w2M https://youtu.be/1u-eUFXdSNY https://youtu.be/zIWw4naNe44 https://youtu.be/X-mvrUlJQk8 https://youtu.be/GwqJ7xfZ_uY https://youtu.be/WG5JBbjYPLM https://youtu.be/fuEl3vKmbc4 https://youtu.be/18rs2wEpdrE https://youtu.be/gJhKtfL__YM https://youtu.be/XXSOUQ4qe04 https://youtu.be/RU4d7DaGzXI https://youtu.be/GPoJtUbwicY https://youtu.be/gM6HNsL4x_w https://youtu.be/jGvtsTy-nNY https://youtu.be/AjmZCg_sYc8 https://youtu.be/-KbIvkTY4Qs https://youtu.be/JQyeYx5upuo
    1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. Β @ashdog236Β  Wild dogs are very literally the biological parents of all living hyenas. If you tally up all interactions between the two species and sees who dominates / does more damage to the other physically, then wild dogs are own hyenas πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Out of all interactions I've ever seen I've only seen hyenas catch 1 dog but even then the dog was let go by 3 hyeanas in 0.5 seconds because the wild dog pack swarmed in. Hyenas have higher bite force sure but clearly that seems to be useless in the face of a wild dog pack they can never seem to get a clean hit onπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ As you can see from the vids below, hyenas are now the property of the African wild dog πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ https://youtu.be/FTHyBe3W-0Y https://youtu.be/mMfvFGkRKjU https://youtu.be/xHuTwvubXKA https://youtu.be/eLf2VeOc5Uo https://youtu.be/BsGlTvmGqQg https://youtu.be/K09zU_29w2M https://youtu.be/1u-eUFXdSNY https://youtu.be/zIWw4naNe44 https://youtu.be/X-mvrUlJQk8 https://youtu.be/GwqJ7xfZ_uY https://youtu.be/WG5JBbjYPLM https://youtu.be/fuEl3vKmbc4 https://youtu.be/18rs2wEpdrE https://youtu.be/gJhKtfL__YM https://youtu.be/XXSOUQ4qe04 https://youtu.be/RU4d7DaGzXI https://youtu.be/GPoJtUbwicY https://youtu.be/gM6HNsL4x_w https://youtu.be/jGvtsTy-nNY https://youtu.be/AjmZCg_sYc8 https://youtu.be/-KbIvkTY4Qs https://youtu.be/JQyeYx5upuo https://youtu.be/eLf2VeOc5Uo https://youtu.be/BsGlTvmGqQg https://youtu.be/K09zU_29w2M https://youtu.be/1u-eUFXdSNY https://youtu.be/zIWw4naNe44 https://youtu.be/X-mvrUlJQk8 https://youtu.be/GwqJ7xfZ_uY https://youtu.be/WG5JBbjYPLM https://youtu.be/fuEl3vKmbc4 https://youtu.be/18rs2wEpdrE https://youtu.be/gJhKtfL__YM https://youtu.be/XXSOUQ4qe04 https://youtu.be/RU4d7DaGzXI https://youtu.be/GPoJtUbwicY https://youtu.be/gM6HNsL4x_w https://youtu.be/jGvtsTy-nNY https://youtu.be/AjmZCg_sYc8 https://youtu.be/-KbIvkTY4Qs https://youtu.be/JQyeYx5upuo https://youtu.be/eLf2VeOc5Uo https://youtu.be/BsGlTvmGqQg https://youtu.be/K09zU_29w2M https://youtu.be/1u-eUFXdSNY https://youtu.be/zIWw4naNe44 https://youtu.be/X-mvrUlJQk8 https://youtu.be/GwqJ7xfZ_uY https://youtu.be/WG5JBbjYPLM https://youtu.be/fuEl3vKmbc4 https://youtu.be/18rs2wEpdrE https://youtu.be/gJhKtfL__YM https://youtu.be/XXSOUQ4qe04 https://youtu.be/RU4d7DaGzXI https://youtu.be/GPoJtUbwicY https://youtu.be/gM6HNsL4x_w https://youtu.be/jGvtsTy-nNY https://youtu.be/AjmZCg_sYc8 https://youtu.be/-KbIvkTY4Qs https://youtu.be/JQyeYx5upuo
    1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. Β @truthxposed8975Β  Β @Truth XposedΒ  https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22308-europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins-from-neanderthals/ . Actually they couldn't have been anything else but black. At least when it first started. White people didn't even exist 11k yrs ago and with the water erosion on the sphinx it was standing at least 12k yrs ago so could be much older. Everyone then was black so either way it's a black civilisation. And if you want to stick to the mainstream timeline of Egypt when it started white people likely wouldn't have even finished the process of becoming white πŸ˜‚ and if they were in Egypt they wouldn't have been white they would gave stayed black. Everyone during that time that wasnt in Europe was black and even Europeans wouldn't have been white yet πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ So the gene to become pale just surfaced in Europe when the sphinx was already standing. Scientists even agree that Neanderthals in the middle east stayed black because they were getting enough vitamin D for the sun meaning they wouldn't just turn lighter because it seems coolπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Becoming lighter isn't something people do when they are bored of being black unoπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ can your brain not comprehend it's an evolutionary phenomenon and being in Egypt wouldn't warrant lighter skin than of black people today. South Africa gets the same UV concentration as Egypt and they are still black. Put the dots together its not that hard to figure out they were obviously black them being anything other than black would literally make no sense especially on an evolutionary stand point.
    1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. @Pickle Rick  Bro, you're showing you have a lack of knowledge on uv levels of our beautiful planet. Check this, the source is the weather atlas. I'll quote two different countries and their average maximum UV Levels, one is Namibia where the San people primarily live and one is Egypt. So for Namibia, "The months with the highest UV index in Windhoek are January, February, October through December, with an average maximum UV index of 6." For Egypt "Sunshine In Cairo, the average sunshine in July is 11.7h. UV index The months with the highest UV index are June and July, with an average maximum UV index of 12. A UV Index of 11, and more, symbolizes an excessive health risk from exposure to the Sun's UV radiation for the ordinary person. Note: The average daily UV index of 12 in July transform into the following instructions: Take all necessary precautions, as unprotected skin can burn in minutes. Seek shade and minimize exposure to direct Sun in a period between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. when UV radiation is most intense; keep in mind that shade structures like parasols or canopies do not provide perfect sun protection. Sun-protective clothing, a long-sleeved shirt and pants, a wide-brimmed hat, and UVA and UVB-blocking sunglasses are particularly helpful in blocking UV radiation's harmful effects. Even on cloudy days, a sunscreen with a minimum 30 sun protection factor should be generously applied and frequently re-applied, including after every swim or outdoor exercise." As we can see there is a MAJOR difference. And this is why I say it makes no sense why the worldest oldest population lives in a place with half the maximum average of a place like Egypt but are much darker. THERE ARE LITERALLY WARNINGS to do with sun exposure in the middle east. The middle east has some of the highest skin cancer rates in the world with Israel being number 1 for many years until vigorous awareness campaigns on sun exposure were done. This is proof clear as day that the people there are not the natives. You don't just get lighter for the fun of it uno? Skin lightening is to adapt to low UV levels. So yes I stick by the point that it makes 0 sense for that area to be that naturally light when they have some of the highest UV levels on planet earth !!! I am eager to hear your response😊
    1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. Β @abdobelbida7170Β  want more proof they were clearly more advanced than today. The Coliseum of Memnon weighs 700 tons and was queried at a site over 400 miles away. Before it was craved into the statue from a single piece of rock it would have weighed about 1000 tons. How the hell did they take something so heavy out of the quarry?? You can't say it was just hard work because only about 200 people can fit around the site, not enough man power at all to lift it out the quarry. Secondly today we wouldn't do such a thing because lifting something 1000 tons out a quarry is impossible with today's technology. So what they do is blow up the side of the mountain, collect the material and break it down even further on site then transport it with large trucks. The largest today can carry nothing more than 500 tons. Let's not forget the trucks have to do frequent stops due to the excessive load. So how did they first get it out the quarry and then take it over 400 miles to the site where they craved granite which is about 6.5 on the hardness scale (with diamond being a 10hardest known material) with just a copper chisel. The Nile argument is flawed as the quarry site is very far from the Nile. With pyramids they say they used the Nile but if we go with their theory that it took 25 years to make that's a person laying down a block 100 tons at the base, 50-80 tons in the kings chamber and 2.5 tons on the exterior every 3 mins. That's not factoring the actual transportation of the materials up the nile which can only be transported 3 months a year in the flood seasons of the Nile. So that 25 years is out the window. The reason why they want to stick with that figure is because anymore and it doesn't fit khufus timeline and the fact he built it as a tomb. It's clearly not a tomb as not one body was ever found in it and the only thing linking it to him was a questionable piece of graffiti not even on the site of the pyramid πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚. So its function wasnt just to be a tomb and is still unknown. Either way the things I've stated above proves they had technology that surpasses our owm
    1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. Β @rickyleroy7795Β  "some dogs ain't stopping me." Some dogs? Are you mentally okay? In the wild these guys are more feared than lions, crocs and hippos. Literally seen an impala in two separate videos contemplate whether to be killed by a croc invested river or be taken apart by a pack of wild dogs. Guess what they done in both videos? They decided being killed by anything but a pack of wild dogs was better πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ These guys are nomadic, meaning they don't live in one place. They have to move constantly. Wanna know why? Their prey fears them so much that when they arrive their prey will literally migrate in a never seem before panic. Researchers have frequently said that no other predator on earth puts as much fear into prey species than a pack of wild dogs. Plus they are also the most efficient killers on earth with an almost 90% kill rate. Meaning if u are on their list its basically a guaranteed death. You saying some dogs shows you have no knowledge on these predators. Maybe its the fact you see domestic dogs everyday but in the wild they are literally top dogs. Long story short in a couple mins of you stupidly trying to fight them there wouldn't be a trace of you left to identify for your brainless efforts πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
    1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. @Generic DanΒ  One study of wolves success rate has made the world see them as bad hunters. With the figures of 14% constantly Being quoted. The wolves of that study come from yellowstone, relatively new wolves with a lack of experience. However when you bring things over to Wood buffalo national park, things are very different. These wolves have been hunting bison there for thousands of years and do it almost too good. As we know, wolves are persistence hunters meaning they aren't just like cats and try then leave. In all studies they found wolves stay with herds for up to 6 days at a time. Their hunting success rate was 100% when they stayed with a herd for 4 days or more and 73% when it was 24 hours or less. Wolves hardly ever attack once and call it a day. They are PERSISTENT!!! Judging a cats success rate the same way as a wolf's is stupid because they don't hunt the same way. ****EVIDENCE **** Source : " Wolves, Bison... ... and the Dynamics Related to the Peace-Athabasca Delta in Canada's Wood Buffalo National Park" Quote: "When the success rate was based on the wolves' prior presence with prey (Table 49), wolves succeeded in killing a bison out of a herd on 73% of the times they were with herds less than one day, and 100% when they were with herds for more than three days." "When the two latter instances were included as successful encounters, the overall success rate for wolves preying on herds increased from 73% to 79%." So when taking all hunting methods of wolves into account then their succes is around 80%, coupled with the fact they are the world's most widespread predator; this easily makes them the worlds greatest predator. The stupid thing about these figures is the fact they came from them hunting bison and in that national park they mainly prey on adult bison, WHO WEIGH UPT TO 1000KG ON AVERAGE BUT GET UP TO 1200KG!!!! Certain packs recorded 81.4% of their kills were done on adults and more specifically 51.4% were in the prime age range of 5-10 years old !!! For comparison even the best lions hunt cape buffalo (only 900kg) at a rate of 64 % calves. These wolves are much smaller and go for larger prey than lions much more often... The weight difference between Wolves( 50kg) and bison (1200kg) is 24 times. If lions had the same pound for pound capabilities then a 200kg lion would be killing a 5ton Rhino but that never happens even in prides of 40 members, showing pound for pound big cats aren't keeping up with the capabilities of wolves. Quote : "From 1978 to 1981, winter kills recorded for the Hornaday River pack consisted of 12 adult male bison, 16 adult females, three yearlings, and 17 calves. Comparison of ages of these wolf-killed bison to the estimated age structure of the population (Table 44 and 45) revealed a similar pattern of selection to that of 1971 to 1981 from "kills" reported by wardens." Mind you, bull bison are the most formidable prey in North America with even grizzley bears never attempting to take one down without losing their life. This isn't even including the fact they found wolves strategically attacking prey just to leave them just to track the very same animal a few days later when its been weakened to make the kill even easier !!! But I rest my case...
    1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. Β @nakeroDRΒ  https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22308-europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins-from-neanderthals/ . Actually they couldn't have been anything else but black. At least when it first started. White people didn't even exist 11k yrs ago and with the water erosion on the sphinx it was standing at least 12k yrs ago so could be much older. Everyone then was black so either way it's a black civilisation. And if you want to stick to the mainstream timeline of Egypt when it started white people likely wouldn't have even finished the process of becoming white πŸ˜‚ and if they were in Egypt they wouldn't have been white they would gave stayed black. Everyone during that time that wasnt in Europe was black and even Europeans wouldn't have been white yet πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ So the gene to become pale just surfaced in Europe when the sphinx was already stranding. Scientists even agree that Neanderthals in the middle east stayed black because they were getting enough vitamin D for the sun meaning they wouldn't just turn lighter because it seems coolπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Becoming lighter isn't something people do when they are bored of being black unoπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ can your brain not comprehend it's an evolutionary phenomenon and being in Egypt wouldn't warrant lighter skin than of black people today. South Africa gets the same UV concentration as Egypt and they are still black. Put the dots together its not that hard to figure out they were obviously black them being anything other than black would literally make no sense especially on an evolutionary stand point.
    1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. Β @broadbandislifeΒ  Yh I can't find the source, it's been a while since I seen it and plus YouTube deletes links anyways. But I'll explain it. There was a place in Africa that had wild dogs eradicated during the civil war and the only major predator left were lions. The effects were terrible for the environment. The prey species had lost their fear even with the lions there. The explanation from the researchers were that the prey would just avoid heavy covered areas to avoid lions and even if they didn't with around a 30% success rate the prey usually has the advantage anyways. So essentially the prey losing their fear means they roam into human areas, overgraze and stay in one area for too long meaning the land cannot recover properly. To solve the problem they brought the dogs in and seen an immediate change in their behaviour. The overgrazing stopped because the herds were constantly on the move to get away from the dogs. Dogs are nomadic meaning they have no set home and constantly go after the prey herds whereas lions just sit and wait. Another reason for the added fear was with lions you just avoid long grass or stay in the open where you can spot them. With dogs it doesn't matter if you spot them first or not, they'll run you down. Also with an almost 100% success rate, the fact they hunt twice a day (some three times) it all means the pack is killing much more and with great efficency. They say impala usually make sounds to alert the heard when they see predators but with dogs they don't do this, they just run when they see dogs due to extreme fear and self-preservation. So their natural behaviour came back with the return of the dogs
    1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. Β @broadbandislifeΒ  Below are two studies, the researchers who studied it and what year they studied it. The numbers there can't and have never been achieved by any other large predator in Africa under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES... I gave 2 sources that done their studies 18 years apart, which automatically trumps your single Wikipedia source who you haven't stated who did the studies and when πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ but even if you cab provide that Information that's one source vs my 2 making my points more credible😏 "the dogs captured at least one prey animal on 92 \%of 24 morn ing hunts and 81% of 16 evening hunts, or 88% of hunts overall (Fuller and Kat, 1990)." "Schaller (1972) reported that 95% of 65 morning hunts and 81% of 47 evening hunts, or 89% of hunts overall, were successful." Now below is a person who studied the pack sizes and their effects on their hunting success rate. The more dogs were in the pack the higher succes rate. FitzGibbon (1993) observed hunting groups of 1-3 dogs (success 24%), 4 dogs (73%), As we know they are endangered and pack sizes are at an all time low compared to 2 centuries ago when their pack size were 300+ . The rest of the predators cant even match their succes at their lowest point πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚So their succes rate is the highest on the savanna at their weakest state, that's food for thought. So this whole thing of their kills being taken is only a recent phenomenon due to humans weakening their true power. No animal is pushing 300 dogs of a kill, lions and hyenas would've been subordinates to packs of that size πŸ™ƒ
    1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. Β @broadbandislifeΒ  Shall I tell you why what you're saying completely doesn't make sense. Yes he miss classified the dogs as a subspecies of hyena, but miss classifying isn't the same as miscounting. If he could Identify the dog as a subspecies he knew that they were distinct from the Spotted hyena, him seeing them as a subspecies of hyena doesn't invalidate the number of dogs he seen in a packs. Nice try buddyπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ If I call an apple an orange and say I have 10 oranges and later someone tells me they are actually called apples it doesn't mean that there wasn't 10, just means they had a different name to ehat I thought. One what planet does misnaming something equate to the invalidation of a number count ? You're reaching at best, you just can't accept these guys were the most dominant predator in Africa πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Currently they have the highest average success of any large land carnivore in Africa with their major flaw being they can't hold kills but that doesn't really matter since they consume it fast enough to satisfy their needs before competition arrives who usually get scraps. This is evident in their high daily food consumption figures. Only 50-100 years ago that flaw of theirs wouldn't have existed making them quite literally the perfect predator with no significant competition that could come near to their capabilities to hunt or to fight when needed πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
    1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. Β @broadbandislifeΒ  Shall I tell you why what you're saying completely doesn't make sense. Yes he miss classified the dogs as a subspecies of hyena, but miss classifying isn't the same as miscounting. If he could Identify the dog as a subspecies he knew that they were distinct from the Spotted hyena, him seeing them as a subspecies of hyena doesn't invalidate the number of dogs he seen in a packs. Nice try buddyπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ If I call an apple an orange and say I have 10 oranges and later someone tells me they are actually called apples it doesn't mean that there wasn't 10, just means they had a different name to ehat I thought. One what planet does misnaming something equate to the invalidation of a number count ? You're reaching at best, you just can't accept these guys were the most dominant predator in Africa πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Currently they have the highest average success of any large land carnivore in Africa with their major flaw being they can't hold kills but that doesn't really matter since they consume it fast enough to satisfy their needs before competition arrives who usually get scraps. This is evident in their high daily food consumption figures. Only 50-100 years ago that flaw of theirs wouldn't have existed making them quite literally the perfect predator with no significant competition that could come near to their capabilities to hunt or to fight when needed πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
    1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1