Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "Why the Army’s New $13 Million Combat Vehicle Is 'Not a Tank' | WSJ Equipped" video.

  1. Its good but it does a need CROWS with a 20mm cannon with programmable/airburst rounds for counter drone 50 cal is not going to cut it
    2
  2. The Stryker Mobile Gun System was a sound concept just poorly designed They should used the Japanese Type 16 MCV as base
    1
  3.  @benx6264  The M10 weights 42 tons while the ACV weighs 35 tons Adding 105mm to the ACV would only be 4-5 tons extra fully loaded You get the 105mm capability without having to add extra MOSs
    1
  4.  @FireAngelOfLondon  Airburst rounds for 50 is not possible the fragmentation would be nothing 20mm or 25mm have far better fragmentation
    1