Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.

  1. Ironically an evolved YF-23 design is what needed now
    292
  2.  @peterwebb8732  They have strangely opted for clean sheet design which again leaves the YF-23 as wasted potential
    13
  3.  @JohnFrumFromAmerica  Which is strange The NGAD shouldnt really need anything new besides new built radar and weapons bay able to hand a larger variety of weapons From the F22, they should adopt same bubble canopy , a well as modernized variant of the ALR-94 From the F-35, DAS, MADL, EOTS HMDS, Comm system and Wide area display as well as GAU-22 From the F-15EX, Its advanced processors Even though, it will use the ADVENT engine, it should be wired to accept the F-135 as well Like the F-35, there should be optional but capable non stealth mode
    6
  4.  @JohnFrumFromAmerica  Modernizing the design with today's tech would easy get the other two
    4
  5.  @JohnFrumFromAmerica  Cooling is not issue because air can be redirected from the intake while in flight The F-35 novel idea of using fuel as coolants works when the aircraft is on the ground Clean sheet and reuse both have pro and cons but as NGAD will be up there in cost it makes senses to apply massive cost saving measures and reuse has more than clean sheet
    1
  6.  @peterwebb8732  Su-57 and J-20 compared to the F-22s have very little Yes NGAD need to be more advanced but incremental approach using tech from other platform is best
    1
  7.  @lordtartarsauceb8348  My money is that grumman name will be either Avenger III or Tiger II
    1
  8.  @lordtartarsauceb8348  Which is why I hope they go with Avenger III But now that I think about it Tomcat II is the likely one F-37
    1
  9.  @viruspter1dactl  Wrong The YF-23 was prototype and just like the YF-22 was evolved to the F-22 The YF-23 would need similar adjustment
    1
  10.  @viruspter1dactl  Thats due to the fact the YF-23 to cut cost Reused parts from existing aircraft as well as the fact they didnt equip it with TVC system so yes they were able to get built faster then the YF-22
    1
  11.  @viruspter1dactl  If they actually taken the time effort it would have been
    1
  12. The F-22 design was chosen because of the NATF program where an navalised F-22 was envisoned. Secondly the F-22 used TVC while YF-23 did not As things have changed now The YF-23 design should be reused with few changes for NGAD A modernized version of the F-22s ALR-94 paired with F-35s DAS/EOTS/HMDS , wide area display, MADL as well newer radar The same advanced processors from the F-15EX Engines would be the F-35 F-135 or the ADVENT. The aircraft should be wired to accept both if needed The weapons bay needs to be redesigned to accommodate more air to ground munitions, anti ship munitions as well as the air launched variant of the SM-6 that USN is testing Same bubble canopy as the F-22 Lastly , it 2 gun design On the left a GAU-22 with 500 rounds On the right , an empty space for the DEW provision
    1