Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.

Its very much overrated like all Chinese aircraft
4
@bobsmith3983 American aircraft live up to the names while Russia and Chinese aircraft does not Case in point, Ukraine has cost Russia, 11 Su-30s, 7 Su-35 and 35 Su-34s Those represent Russia's latest aircraft and most all are in double digits
2
@bobsmith3983 Its even funnier when you realize that US made weapons are ways destroying Russia's so called air defenses with relative ease And even funnier when most of those weapons are old not new FYI clueless one, the point of making stand off weapons is you dont have contend with enemy's defenses
2
Yeah no Chinese military manufacturing is based reverse engineering from other countries The J-20 for example has been 6 engine series so far and counting. Made capable engines is area where China struggles in Now Russia also struggles as engine issues nearly derailed the Su-57 but they were trying to make engines as advanced as the newer ones the US was fielding China copied the Su-33 and didnt get it right there are several other areas but Russia is still marginally better than China
1
@sonwig5186 Yeah no The irony is Russia is why the US is heavily invested in EW and stand off weapons For starers, Russia has very little airborne EW whereas the US has EA-18G and EA-37 for airborine SEAD and jamming Ukraine can only use the AGM-88A-D which range 40-50 miles, the US currently fielding the AGM-88E and G which have considerably longer range. The AGM-88G range is over 150 miles which means it can engage an S-300 on down but most importantly is that AGM-88G is designed for internal carriage by the F-35 Thanks to Russian jamming in Ukraine, the US is no longer working on counter jamming but rather weapons to physically destroy the jammers as well other long range stand off weapons Lastly Russia's R-37 threat with MIG-31 and Su-35 is moot as the US fielding longer range missiles now
1