Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.

The factors that you are missing is that normally , stealth aircraft fly with reflectors to protect their stealth during non combat operations In combat, radars don't simply operate freely , They are normally targeted for destruction Their ability to operate depends on various factors. Their range and the range of the weapons used against it
710
@lgnfve Its like they never have heard of SEAD and EW
29
@trumanhw Its called an S-Ducting The intake shaped in S so the turbine blades are masked from radar detection decades old tecj
7
@pigswhen102 Radar's ability to operate depends on several factors The biggest is the capabilities of the country its uses against Israel for example is small but has developed small 3,000lbs air deployable Spike NLOS launchers with 8 missiles The NLOS can strike target up to 16 miles away. The NLOS Tomcar is very easy to knock out enemy sites on the ground US has utilized several methods ranging from special forces, Apaches, TLAM and aircraft The newest is the ADM-160 advanced aerial decoy which can act as a decoy but also act as EW jammer F-18s and F-16s can launch them from over 300 miles and use them to provide cover while missile target the site The US from past experience in the Gulf and Balkans has also upgraded the AGM-88 into very precise weapon that can be used regardless of if the target is transmitting or even if its moving So radars operating on ground depending the country has a lot of threats AWACS problem is that low flying aircraft can close distance in the right terrain So nominally you need to be normal operation, with one sensor looking for low flight targets and other for stealth AESA radar can manage but the enemy can also jam as well Both China and Russia have long range AAM for counter awacs operation however the US relies on their aircraft intercepting them first
4
@charlesrichardson8635 The irony of the F-117 lost was that most of the US military advances came from its loss so in essence, they did the US a huge favor First , the problem with Wild weasel and HARM was their ability to engage the target. Unless the target was actively transmitting, HARM and Wild Weasel were useless The newer AGM-88G has been upgraded into highly precise mini cruise able to engage targets both fixed and moving but most importantly regardless of transmission status. So even if the target is cold, the AGM-88G can still lock on to it. Secondly, targeting pods have been heavily upgraded and no longer restricted to certain aircraft, everyone has pods now Pods with advanced FLIR able to ID targets even hidden by camo from long range Third is networking tech Now EA-18Gs' radar and radar detectors located possible targets, they passed the information through datalinks to strike fighters As all Strike fighters have pods,they can visually confirm targets The F-117 lacked EW suite which would easily dealt with the missile whereas the F-22 and F-35 have state of the art EW Lastly, long range cruise missiles able to engage moving targets So the US gained quite a bit
4
@charlesrichardson8635 Serbian defenses survived by staying cold and only transmitting for short period as well inadequacy of NATO SEAD
3
@charlesrichardson8635 He got lucky then but with the advancements made because of it, Modern weapons would smoke him hundreds of miles away even if his site cold
3
@ignacio3890 who to hell is the REZONANS
2
@ExarchGaming The B-2 and F-22 are much older but thanks to lessons learned in Serbia Russian and Chinese advancements would face stiff SEAD attacks
1
@ExarchGaming it can be overcome but it also can be enhanced by use of tactics
1
@ignacio3890 Once what again what to hell are you talking about ?
1
@nedkelly9688 Lay off the drugs buddy
1
@LondonSteveLee So much misinformation in your statement, its hilarious The F-35 is not stealthier than F-22. Secondly the RAF pilots tracking the F-35 is literally moot. In potential conflict with Russia or China, the UK Typhoon's need a way to train their radar to track Su-57 and J-20s at look rang. So by training with their F-35s without the lens, gives them the training they need Third and most importantly, the other key factors are electronic warfare which can degrade radar capabilties. While the Su-57 and J-20 EW capabilities are not know The F-35s ASQ-239 which is carry over from the F-22 can detect emissions so the Typhoon's would already give itself away Lastly, the Meteor is all paper. The AIM-120 30 plus years old but has actual combat performance and kills, whereas the meteor is literally all hype
1
@Oceangai Again radars don't simply operate freely , They are normally targeted for destruction Their ability to operate depends on various factors. Their range and the range of the weapons used against it
1
@balls9052 600 people say otherwise
1