Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.

  1. Its pretty simple to understand. One F-15E can carry up 16 GBU-38s while a B-2 can carry to 80 Effectively 5 F-15Es or 1 B-2 More the point, bombers can mix and match their payloads. The B-1B for example can carry a mix of GBU-31s/39 plus AGM-154 and AGM-158s But most important is that bombers combat radius is far greater than strike fighters They can fly thousands of miles or orbit for hours without the need to hit the tanker F-15E, F-16s and F-18 have to top off hourly Adding conventional strike capabilities to their bombers was the smartest thing the USAF ever did
    95
  2.  @oskar6661  Not only fly but fly lundetected and only needs jamming support once its crossed into enemy airspace
    8
  3. Yes they but they arrived too late to matter When the Gulf War started, Precision munition technology had greatly advanced and they were highly effective
    3
  4. Yes it is but Ukraine doesnt have assets EA-18Gs, F-16CJ, EC-130 and Rivet Joint that can locate and destroy jammers
    2
  5. The advent of long range cruise missiles makes that narrative so much more deadly. F-22s engages the enemy fighters while EA-18G and F-16CJ knock their defenses and F-15Es knocks out bunkers and comms hub allow the bombers orbiting to launch their missiles with ease and deliver the KO blows to the enemy forces The USAF should really reconsider their position with the AGM-183
    1
  6.  @dallasyap3064  A just a few is the issue 2 B-2s is basically 10 F-15Es why commit so many planes when you dont have to
    1
  7.  @rtyrsson  As long as the F-35s and F-22s do their job it wont happen
    1