Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.

  1. Russia has operated units in Syria in plain view of western intel gathering aircraft since 2015 or the units operating in Ukraine, again ,in plain view of the western intel gathering assets. The US has long range cruise missiles able to attack the S-400 from over 300 miles and now the development of hypersonic weapons makes the S-400 moot
    34
  2.  adam  The way Russia uses them is not practical The way the US would is very practical Example by attacking S-400 , S-500 and bases with A-50 AWACS , USAF aircraft could attack with impunity using air launch cruise missiles as Russian forces would have no way to stop the USAF. S-300 on down are no match for newer US weapons China's defense strategy relies heavily on its DF-21/26 keep the USN carrier at bay If the USN can neutralizes the DFs, blow for blow, the PLAN, PLA and PLAAF has zero chance against the USN
    17
  3. The development hypersonic weapons and advance jamming systems makes the S-400 moot Current cruise missiles need 30 mins to cover 250 miles , EW planes can't suppress S-400 for that long The AGM-88G travels Mach 4 and covers that same distance in 5 mins hypersonic weapons can cover that distance in as little as 1 min
    16
  4. Apart from the fact that they have long range cruise missiles able to attack the S-400 from over 300 miles or the fact that Russia operated units in Syria in plain view of US intel gathering aircraft since 2015 or the units operating in Ukraine, again ,in plain view of the US intel gathering assets
    3
  5.  @jamesstreet228  Hypersonic weapons have made the MALD as moot as the S-400 a Mach 5 weapon covers 250 miles in 4 minutes , at Mach 10, its just 2 mins EW can easily suppress an S-400 for minutes or less without needing MALD
    3
  6. Its called DSMAC – Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation and Automatic target recognition (ATRU) and both been around since the 90s The newer Naval Strike Missile and AGM-158C LRASM both have advanced sensors based off the earlier DSMAC and ATRU Radar locks are coming back due to advancements with millimeter-wave (MMW) technology
    2
  7. The S-400 claim was that is 250 mile range , ability to engage both TLAMs and AGM-86s CALCM and AESA radar made it invulnerable to attack Technology has advanced and effectively render the S-400 moot The USN stated that it required 3 EA-18G with the legacy ALQ-99 pods would be able to suppress the S-400 whereas 1 EA-18G with Next Generation Jammer could do what previous required 3 planes with multiple pods Secondly the AGM-88G ability to be carried by F-35 internally ,Mach-4 speed and 190 mile range means that EA-18G only needs to suppress the S-400 3 to 5 min max Lastly, the development of hypersonic weapons also makes the S-400 moot The ARRW AGM-183A designed speed is Mach 20 but even at Mach 5 , the EA-18G would still only have to suppress the S-400 for 4 mins The long range weapons and advance jamming means that its even harder for the MIG-31 or Su-35 to get in range
    2
  8.  @EmpressCeriath  Right So instead of sending Su-24,30, 34 and 35s out of hunt for Ukrainian Self-propelled artillery which is currently beating the brakes off Russian forces, they hope that propaganda will stop Ukraine forces ? Instead of using their so called high precision missiles to knock out airports and prevent the West from supplying Ukraine ,again propaganda that western weapons are not having any effect There is a video on YT called Putin's troops brandish deadly U.S weapons seized from Ukraine's Donetsk where a Russian solider is showing off anti-tanks weapons they captured from Ukraine forces??? Ukraine forces have captured tanks, air defense equipment, EW equipment as well as key parts from Russian aircraft and sent them all to the US Yet Russia is showing off a few anti-tanks weapos
    2
  9.  @bogdagt  Smoke just about any target
    1
  10. @Roger Smodher Wrong on every count
    1
  11. @Roger Smodher Right, the US which has literally more stealth assets than all nation combined would magically how problems with Russia or China crap do you know how silly that is ?
    1
  12. @Roger Smodher Again No Su-35 or Su-57 ever got near F-22 thats literally progandana at its finest
    1
  13. @Roger Smodher Wow, you are like non spot propaganda machine of non sense
    1
  14. @@johngrey9780 ELINT and SIGLINT
    1
  15. @@johngrey9780 System are already cailberated for that speed ICBM and SLBM travel at hypersonic speed is what people seem to forget
    1
  16. @@johngrey9780 Yawn
    1
  17. @@johngrey9780 double yawn
    1
  18.  @etecarghakamallahiri432lah5  yawn
    1
  19.  @alexorehowski3387  YAAWWNNN
    1
  20.  @breadfahlifebreadfahlife9065  With the continued advanced of weapons and tactics Cost would be relatively low depending the weapons and tactics ATGM are getting long range and more portable. A coordinated SF strike where they simply put an ATGM in to radar and command truck would blind the site from incoming missiles Israel's Spike NLOS can be launched from over 30 miles away and be mounted small buggies They can salvo 4 missiles. thats the radar, command truck, missiles and other equipment out of action Ukraine is showing that strikes from the ground are far effective loitering munition more advanced that what Ukraine is using is another factor
    1
  21. Russian forces keep living a state of denial
    1