General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
verdebusterAP
Sandboxx
comments
Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.
The F-16 is a decent fighter Its record is not as impressive as the F-15Cs
20
@Just_A_Random_Desk Exactly the point The F-15 has handed MIG-29 and MIG-25 their asses more than once
18
@@phillipbanes5484 The record of the F-15 is 100 plus kills to zero losses the F-16 has both numerous kills and losses in air combat Turkey has lost a few F-16s in ACM
17
@jamesmaddison4546 The F-15 has literally proven to be itself better than F-16 in every way possible As fighter and the F-15E as strike asset still better than F-16 overall The F-15 has turned with MIG-29s more times than F-16 The Israel who have done majority of combat with F-15 and F-16 still opted for the F-15 over the F-16
6
@@phillipbanes5484 Its more than 1
3
@oot007 About half actually Initial yes but after Gulf and the Balkans
3
@brandony8691 How it is unmatched when the F-22 easily out rates with TVC and the F-15 with shear thrust to weight
3
Exercises and tests are far from reality is what people don't understand Secondly, the F-16 was designed under impression that aircraft would have to fight their way in and out of the battle space We live in modern warfare and gaining air superiority can be achieved without dogfights You knock out the enemy's defenses and attack the enemy's airfield and disable runways and taxiway, they can't scramble aircraft All you have to do is destroy the aircraft while they are on the ground There are several methods of destroying aircraft on the ground that achieves air superiority Modern air forces rely on tankers, AWACS and other C4ISTAR aircraft A special forces attack against those assets would cripple an air force Without your AWACS , its hard to coordinate, , with tankers its hard to stay air borne and without ISR , you cant' get intel You no longer need to rely on fighters for air superiority, they can carry out other vital missions The development of hypersonic weapons only furthers that
2
@jamesmaddison4546 Yet the F-15 has a vastly superior records despite F-16 claims of turn rate, wing loading and 9G turn ? Thats just a couple of examples that literally proves nothing As it says , the proof is in puddle and the F-15 is 100 kills to zero losses in ACM while the F-16 is neither
2
@jamesmaddison4546 Not bias Simple fact The F-16 has encountered migs like F-15 ,however the result was the dominating performance like F-15 The F-16 is being completely replace while F-15 is being upgraded , strange despite the quote" performance statistics " The F-15EX is being test while the USAF has not brought any F-16s since ? and only upgrading the current models till the F-35, so if the F-16 is so superior, why the did the USAF rejected replacing F-15C with F-16E/F and press forward with F-15 Here are the stats that matter F-15EX range 800 miles without CFT or tanks F-16E/F range 1000 miles with CFT and tanks The F-15EX can carry Legion pod, Dragon eye pod and Sniper XR pod all simultaneously with no loss in payload and only using up the centerline station whereas the F-16 ? The F-15EX with AMBER is you stated is truck of weapons while as F-16?? The advantages of the F-15 as series is vastly superior to F-16 in every way possible not bias fact
2
The infamous test was not true showing of the F-35 capabilities
1
Not exactly The Japanese kills were aided by the fact that the USN F4F Wildcat and Army Air Corps P-40 both vastly inferior to Zeros The kill ratio reverse when later model, F6F Hellcat, F4U Corsair and P-51 Mustang as they outperformed the zero Secondly Japanese pilots complained that the Zero 7.7mm was problematic because better armored US planes could absorb a lot damage and still fly The 20mm cannon had not problem but their ammunition was limited compared to the 7.7mm Those complaints is why the Kawanishi N1K was solely armed with 20mm cannons Lastly, for reasons on unknown, the Japanese did not rotate pilots like the US They kept them on front
1
@wedgeantilles8575 That thinking cost them dearly as without training or insight newer pilots didn't know anything about their enemy
1
@znail4675 The lack of fuel was not problem for the Japan's air force. That was only a problem for their navy Zeros only needed 300 gallons of fuel while Japanese ships needed 1200 to 3500 tons of fuel per ship The fuel for one light cruiser was enough for 133 planes The fuel for one battleship was enough for 12,611 planes
1
@williamduffy1227 And thats not counting the developments with UCAVs a hand for a stealth UCAVs again, cripple key defenses and other assets while missile and manned aircraft do the rest Even against Russia and China, their is no need to go fighter unless its for counter air operating where you wanna to draw them out
1
@staggabob The F-15 record speaks for itself
1
@brandony8691 Apart from the fact that F-15EX is vastly superior to any F-16 at all
1
@chrispalmer3096 Incorrect The F-16 was backed doored into the USAF by Fighter Mafia who erroneously claimed that F-15s large size made it inadequate for air to air combat. The F-15 and F-16 were both designed solely for air combat however the F-16 was through various blocks was adapted for multi-role while the separate F-15E was designed for multi-role. While the F-16 was dependable workhorse , the F-15E was highly valuable asset. The F-15E has nearly 3 times the range of the F-16 Even the F-16 Block 70 barely approaches the F-15E range but most importantly, the F-15E has a massive payload options compared to F-16
1
@chrisgage894 Not really High off boresight weapons have made that very problematic
1
@265justy The F-15's record says otherwise How many actual kills does the F-16 Secondly F-16s in Turkish hands have been a few times in ACM
1
@265justy The F-16 has 1 of each while the F-15 six of each
1
@265justy And your point is ?
1
@greattribulation1388 The F-15 has twice the amount of combat as the F-16
1
@greattribulation1388 Laughs in F-15E and F-15EX
1