Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.

  1. Looks pretty damn good Can't wait to see rest of the angles as well as that test flight
    28
  2.  @Abdullah-mn6sw  Simple First and second generation were in WW1 3rd - WW-2 era emphasized heavier designs,substantially larger bomb loads as well newer bombsights for increased accuracy 4th gen emphasized nuclear strike with bombs and aerial refueling 4.5 added cruise missiles as well conventional strike capabilities 5th added stealth 6th Designed to use commercial off-the-shelf propulsion, C4ISTAR, and radar technologies. networked sensor-shoot capability, Intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and aerial reconnaissance along with command and control gear to enable the crew to direct other aircraft and forces. Conventionally and nuclear capable with the possibly of being optionally manned Lastly vastly improved range
    6
  3.  @zainday7173  At this point no one believes Russia's hype
    4
  4. Quote those of congressional critics of prior flawed programs, the B-21 has avoided major cost overruns and delays thanks to disciplined program management (though the first flight did get pushed back by six months). And in a real jaw-dropper, the program has reportedly come in under its $25 billion budget. Factoring in inflation, it’s half the price of the exorbitantly expensive B-2 stealth bomber it’s meant to replace Cry harder
    3
  5.  @Abdullah-mn6sw  That's the F-35 not the B-21 The F-35 does not have optionally manned Secondly the B-21 network-centric warfare capabilities are far superior to the F-35
    2
  6.  @Abdullah-mn6sw  Optionally manned bombers are designed to fly complex missions whereas what exactly is Black Hawk doing?
    2
  7.  @krashdown5814  Thats not aerial refueling.
    2
  8.  @Gearparadummies  The F-35 is only one in its class The J-20 and Su-57 literally dont compare
    2
  9.  @Gearparadummies  The F-22 was designed solely for air to air not multi role like the F-35 The F-22s air ground much like the J-20 very limited The Su-57 is just a mess all together
    2
  10.  @Defective1313  Designed to use commercial off-the-shelf propulsion, C4ISTAR, and radar technologies. networked sensor-shoot capability, Intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and aerial reconnaissance along with command and control gear to enable the crew to direct other aircraft and forces. Conventionally and nuclear capable with the possibly of being Optionally manned The Sec Def confirmed that B-21 would be considerably longer range
    2
  11.  @Defective1313  I don't think it was fluff Remember, the B-2 has been operating for over 30 years, so thats countless lessons learned as well invaluable operational experience The Raider is said to be using advanced model of the F-135 engine. The B-2 four General Electric F118 produced a combined 70,000lbs of thrust 1 F-135 alone produces 43,000lbs. If she packing 4 F-135 engines , its over 170,000lbs of thrust, thats more power than B-1 or Tu-160s That implies that its substantially faster, maybe as high as 700 mph Secondly if its the F-135, that also means it likely has the same growth options as the F-135 does for the F-35 Also consider the advances with weapons as well
    2
  12. They achieved that by using commercial off-the-shelf technology COTS as well as existing technology from other defense programs Its said that the B-21 uses an advanced derivative the F-35 F-135 engine. The B-1B uses AN/APG-83 Scalable Agile Beam Radar (SABR) same as the F-16 Right , the USAF has fitted B-1, and B-52 derivative radars from fighters So its likely that B-21 also uses derivative as of an existing radar. likely the F-35s APG-81 The B-1, B-2 and B-52 had to undergo several upgrades through out their lives for their conventional capabilities so its likely the B-21 already has the universal data bus for all USAF weapons By using COTS and existing technology from other defense programs Thats money they didn't have to spend developing new tech for the B-21 Ironically that's how they kept cost down with the YF-23, they used COTS and existing parts from other aircraft lastly , the B-2 was two Billion per copy is because procurement was cut from 165 planes to just 21 That won't happen with B-21
    1
  13. Its a 6th gen bomber
    1
  14.  @Defective1313  its different chart first and second generation were in WW1 3rd was WW-2 era emphasized heavier designs, bombs and as well newer bombsights for increased accuracy 4th gen emphasized nuclear strike with bombs and aerial refueling 4.5 added cruise missiles as well conventional strike capabilities 5th added stealth
    1
  15.  @Defective1313  The B--21 goal is to do everything the B-1, B-2 and B-52 does but better
    1
  16. Yup Thats to advances in technology, its smaller but far more effective
    1
  17.  @TinyHouseHomestead  Sorry clown thats straight from GAO cry even harder
    1
  18.  @TinyHouseHomestead  Right says that clown that can only ramble clueless
    1
  19.  @TinyHouseHomestead  cry harder troll
    1