Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "" video.

Propaganda The fun fact about the Growler is that the USN has far easier ways to sink Chinese ships so they wouldnt need to use the Growler but importantly hypersonic weapons has changed that aspect To cover 300 miles, TLAMs need at least 34 plus minutes , A Growler cant suppress Chinese defenses for that long Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile (HACM) can cover that same distance in 3 mins. A growler can easily suppress Chinese defenses for that long Also realize that the EA-18G is still using the legacy ALQ-99 and still in the process of fielding the newer Next Generation Jammer That program has only fielded the Mid-Band pods, the high and low bands are still in testing So the PLAN may likely be able to overcome the older ALQ-99s pods but not the newer NGJ pods
3
@ramroddrone5449 If the USN wanted to attack PLAN ships with Growlers , it would a highly coordinated attack with multiple aircraft as well as decoys
2
If Lockheed was smart, they would develop a 2 seat variant of the F-35 that can act as a Growler
1
@kaourintintamine1383 Hence the perspective F-35E would need to be redesigned with pods for stealth and non stealth operations
1
@kaourintintamine1383 Imagine you are tracking inbound missiles and boom, this jamming appears out of nowhere and you lose track its stops and now you lost track of the missiles By the time , you get your sensors back ka frecking boom a hypersonic missile has struck your radar and communications Those subsonic cruise missile that you were tracking were actually decoys The targets that you warned were not the real targets The EA-18G can be seen from hundreds of miles away where potential EF-35E can approach and stealthy take up key positions and blind the enemy more effectively
1
The EC-130H Compass Call and the newer EA-37B They dont have flight line aircraft, just support planes far back Ideally , they should look at make EA variant of the F-16
1
@TheStormpilgrim Hence why the PLAN statement is pure propaganda
1