Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Ukraine is getting CBUs and DPCIMs Now the party is really going to get started
    1
  2.  @duceposting1831  " I've seen plenty of Bradley's with turrets tossed 15+m away " We can safely say you are full shit Jack in the box is unique to Russian tanks due to the way they store ammo and the amount they carry Brady don't Jack in the box as they carry fraction of the ammo TOW missiles carry 13lbs warhead and most Bradley has 7 plus 900 rounds of 25mm T-90s for example carry 43 125mm rounds and most those rounds have between 20-30lbs warheads which is what Jack in the box with Russia tanks are so violent No to mention that Bradley rear drops down allow the explosive to channeled out the back So literally not happen on a bradley
    1
  3. Getting shot down can happy to any aircraft
    1
  4. No, the Bradley's replacement need to learn from this engagement Using 25mm fire , it was luckily able to suppress the T-90 but the larger 50mm XM913 would have been able to inflict far more damage The Bradley's replacement needs a missile able to be fired even if the IFV is moving at high speed
    1
  5.  @pepperedash4424  Exactly, so the Su-75 is just more russian hype
    1
  6.  @pepperedash4424  Despite its hype, It won't be as successful As the MiG Their reputation went to shit hence why Sukhoi is now Russia's mainstay The MIG-21 had great success in the 1960s because the US military let idiots with do zero combat experience dictate how warfare should be conducted After that experience, There was a change in thinking. That change lead to the Teens series which completely dominated Russian MiGs F-15 killed both MiG-25s and MiG-29s F-16s killed MiG-23s and MIG-21s F-18 killed MiG-21s F-14 killed MiG-23s both in US and in Iranian hands The other side MIG-25 killed single F-18 Iran lost a few F-14s Ands thats about it MiGs rep after the 60s went down hill very quickly
    1
  7. Yes but hypersonic weapons can't be recalled once launched Secondly, its called flexibitiy
    1
  8.  @monitoni7901  What people get wrong about Serbia is that F-117 did not fail What USAF failed was the aircraft supporting the F-117 The EA-6B , F-16CJ and Tornado ECR failed to destroy Serbian defenses Those planes had severe limitations which allowed Serbian defenses to survive The EA-6B had sensors but not the speed. The F-16CJ and Tornado ECR relied on the EA-6B to provide data but they had to get info from AWACS not the EA-6B The AGM-88 could only target the site if it active. Other assets in the area also could not target the sites Now the reason why the US still betting on stealth tech is they learned from Serbia The EA-18G has both sensors and speed but most importantly far more advanced sensors Three Growlers networked together can generate targeting tracks for hostile radio-frequency sources in real time. They trilaterate a target from wide area to a very, very small area. The AGM-88 has been heavily reworked so it can target site even if its cold or moving The Growler has 3 data-links to which it can transmit targeting data direct to other assets without having to go through AWACS Targeting pods are now standard on all strike assets which can visual ID targets from significant ranges allowing to find target much easier Lastly, the F-117 was designed for maximum stealth so it lacked MAWS and RWRs Thanks to AESA low probability of intercept, the F-22 and F-35 has MAWS and RWR that doesnt betray their position The US is still betting on stealth as they understood where they went wrong as for betting on hypersonic weapons Again the US is vastly superior in that Russia's Kinzhal can only be carried by MIG-31 and Tu-22M3M, One missiles on MIG-31 and 4 on the Tu-22M3M China's missiles like Russian are limited 1 to 2 missiles plane The US ARRW is designed so one missile carried F-15E and up 31 missiles on B-1B Russia's Zircon's range is 640 miles while the China' YJ-21 range 300 miles. The LRHW range is over 1700 miles Unlike China and Russia, the US has several programs in work The Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile (HACM) USAF for tactical flexibility to employ fighters to hold high-value, time-sensitive targets at risk, The Hypersonic Air-launched OASuW. HALO as carrier based hypersonci asset for the USN for F-35, F-18 and FA/XX So the US is very much ahead of the game
    1
  9.  @jetli740  And the reason those low tech missiles sites were not destroyed was its not spinning, its fact. NATO SEAD failure to suppress Serbian defenses was major factor I am going to pretend you didnt just use google as source thats hilarous beyond anything
    1
  10.  @jetli740  Adding a recall system to missile is potential weakness that enemy could exploit
    1
  11.  @jetli740  The whole point of SEAD is to eliminate the enemy's defenses and the SEAD wasn't up to the task in Serbia That same is happening in Ukraine, Russia's failure to suppress HIMARS has cost them dearly Russia's failure to secure western Ukraine has allowed Ukraine to access to more and more advanced tech and weapons Without western supply, Ukraine would have folded by April Google is as good making up its
    1
  12.  @jasonj3599  Thats still a faction of what the US has to work with
    1
  13.  @jasonj3599  Again incorrect He stated that E-3 problem is that its suffering significant obsolescence issues which is creating problems. Aircraft down for persistent maintenance issues as well persistent problems during operations The E-3 fleet is becoming operationally unreliable which has nothing to do with the J-20 capabilities The E-3 can handle the J-20 but its persistent maintenance and operational issues means that they can't be relied upon That means that newer E-2D will have to quarterback till the E-3 is replaced
    1
  14. @IMAN7THRYLOS That very unlikely First the F-35 in stealth has variety options First is 8 GBU-39 or GBU-53s are lightweight weapons designed to be as flexible as the tried and true GBU-12 but with significant better capabilites For harden targets, the F-35 can carry the JSOW C1 with the same BROACH multi-stage warhead tat SCALP uses granted, the F-35 has to close to 70 miles whereas SCALP can launch from 350 miles Secondly the F-35 internal cruise missile currently is the JSM which has 300 mile range however Lockheed has been contracted to develop a variant of the JASSM-ER that the F-35 can carry internally The key factor you are missing is that F-35 has performance for missions that dont require stealth In non stealth, they can carry 4XLRASM or JASSM-ER or 6 JSM missile up to 3 triple the load of the Rafale with comparable range
    1
  15.  Xigap  The SCALP is advanced but not that advanced
    1
  16. Its called weapons and tactics for a reason EA-18G can jam the hips radar ADM-160 can be used additional decoys and jammers The F-35 can use the AARGM-ER against the ships radar while the F-15E approaches JDAMs and finishes it off Its game changer because depending the complexity of the target The US military would not have expend 3 million dollar LRASM. Instead they can use a 120,000 at most advanced JDAM Even with complex targets, the JDAM can still be used The AARGMER which is the newest model of the AGM-88 can used against the ships radar First by the design, its seeker can home in the radar emissions and secondly because of the problems the USAF had in Serbia the AGM-88 seeker was upgraded so it could strike any target. Without radar, its AA defense is useless Secondly CIWS systems radar are not that advance and can't overcome jamming
    1
  17. Adapting JDAMs for anti-ship is not that hard to do Both the French AASM and Israel SPICE have precision seekers for 2000lbs bombs so all the USAF need to do fit seeker and datalink to 2000lbs bomb which the USAF has ample technology to choose from
    1
  18. Sniping aircraft and missiles
    1
  19. Simple Russia's Su-34 was claimed as high performance flying tank aka Hell duck yet they are being downed regularly over Ukraine Same with Su-35 , lofty claims yet get smoked over Ukraine All of Russia so called advanced assets are getting torn apart in Ukraine
    1
  20. No the F-35 is replacing the F-16s for the USAF. Possibly the A-10 as well. The NGAD/ADF/PCA is the F-22s replacement. The F-15EX gives the Air National Guard a modernized aircraft.
    1
  21. Besides the fact that USMC is not a separate force from the US Army literally wrong on every count
    1
  22. @salilpanwar6922 There is thing called SEAD, Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses Now pay attention clueless While stealthy B-21 are penetrating SEAD aircraft are attacking the enemy's defenses preventing them from locating the B-21 Currently the EA-18G needs to suppress an S-400 for at least 40 minutes while cruise missiles are in enroute, it cant do that a defending Su-35 can be on it in as little as 2 mins and the AGM-88s doesn't have the range However thanks the China and Russia hypersonic race, the US has joined in and now has the means of destroying defenses in as little as 1 min 24 seconds The newer Next Generation Jammer pods allow the EA-18G to suppress the S-400 effortlessly. Additional, the AGM-183 can cover 350 miles in 1 min 24 seconds So the EA-18G only needs to suppress the S-400 for 1 min 20 seconds which makes impossible for defending Su-35s to intercept even with R-37s FYI, you dont leave the enemy's defenses intact
    1
  23.  @ex0duzz  It reveals that design which we can see is vastly improved over the B-2
    1
  24.  @vice4996  Neither program is ready
    1
  25. The aircraft that has been destroyed is the Su-30. Most of its losses were from base attacks ,however the KA-52 has been destroyed in combat 20 plus times and counting No cares that pilots survived. the fact they were hovering in position where ATGM was able to hit them is troubling
    1
  26.  @МихаилЧерников-п2т  The destroyed on the ground are mainly damaged units that couldn't make it back to base still a shoot down Russia bragged about Mi-28 and Ka-52 being flying tanks and that myth has been busted The Apache and AH-1W have a number battle damage but returned to base secondly I will give you 3 guess why its manpad rich environment (cough cough KA-52 failure at Battle of Antonov Airport,cough cough
    1
  27.  @МихаилЧерников-п2т  Not making it back to base is still shoot down Stop trying to twist the facts ,your desperation is showing Here is the simple facts if the KA-52 had made it back to base in its damaged condition, it could have been repaired and back into service or depending on the severity of damage sent back to Kamov which again could have repaired it ,depending the damage Since it landed and was later destroyed, its a total loss which means that Russian forces have to wait for new aircraft , and rely on Mi-28s and MI-24/35 in interim both are also in double digit losses Pilot survival is not relevant if the aircraft is a complete loss
    1
  28. flex what muscles
    1
  29.  @YaMomsOyster  Same applies with Russia, how many KA-52 pilots have they lost Its months to as much as year to built a KA-52 and pilot training is 2 years minimum
    1
  30. They not, Ukraine shows how bad tactics can ruin the best of equipment Remember there was video of an Abrams getting rocked by an ATGM The reason why was that crew instead of concealing the tank properly, left it clearly exposed which allowed an enemy ATGM team to get a clear shot at it Same with the T-90 in Syria, instead properly concealing tank, the crew again left it clearly exposed which allowed an enemy ATGM team to get a clear shot The best equipment doesn't matter if you use piss poor tactics
    1
  31.  @vendomnu  yawn troll
    1
  32.  @vendomnu  Lay off the propaganda troll
    1
  33. Lay off the potato their Ivan You are assuming the F-35 wont shoot back The S-400 max missile range is 250 miles The F-35 can launch JSM from 300 miles and just like that the S-300 and S-400 are useless
    1
  34. Jack of all trades is the standard now
    1
  35. over head satellites say other wise
    1
  36.  @doggunn  Exactly point Iran claims that there was no damage and intercepted the missiles yet sat footage clearly shows they are lying
    1
  37.  Dord Dord  Which literally means nothing The Constellation class was labeled FFG(X) numbers were assigned LHX was the America class , SSN(X) is the successor to the Virginia lcass CG(X) was the proposed Ticonderoga-class replacment The Zumwalt-class destroyer carried the DD(X) name before it was renamed The ship class and X is what the USN uses before the ship is assigned a name and number
    1
  38. Number really dont matter for the USAF
    1
  39. The B-21 is designed to overcome the mistakes by B-2, B-1 and B-52 The key difference is that B-21 uses use commercial off-the-shelf tech, C4ISTAR, and radar technologies Intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and aerial reconnaissance along with command and control gear from existing programs The B-2, B-1 and B-52 all uses tech that was specifically designed for it By reusing tech from existing programs, they substantially reduce its cost
    1
  40.  @Matrix-tz5yc  Lay off the copium, there buddy
    1
  41. Turtle tanks work against drones with light warhead not against ATGMs
    1
  42.  Dord Dord  Which literally means nothing The Constellation class was labeled FFG(X) numbers were assigned LHX was the America class , SSN(X) is the successor to the Virginia lcass CG(X) was the proposed Ticonderoga-class replacment The Zumwalt-class destroyer carried the DD(X) name before it was renamed The ship class and X is what the USN uses before the ship is assigned a name and number
    1
  43.  @baodongji5138  They are welcome to try
    1
  44.  @baodongji5138  Competing with China is literally moot
    1
  45.  @baodongji5138  Again moot it called quality over quantity are all those yards the same nope can they all build ships at the same speed again no having a lot of yards literally means nothing There are no exact figures the Chinese however the USN builds destroyers considerable faster than the Chinese but most important, the USN builds nuclear subs faster than China builds its non nuclear subs
    1
  46. Because its worthless
    1
  47. Several problems but the simplest is that anti tank missiles have to make direct contact or top attack to lethal which makes interception easy anti-air missiles don't have to be near to destroy helicopter anti-air missiles have proximity fuze which allows the missile to detonate a certain distance while still being lethal to the target Example the RIM-7 90lbs warhead has 27 ft kill radius continuous-rod warheads can break helicopter blades apart Helicopters with tail rotors is another point of vulnerable , Lastly speed Anti-tank weapons normally travel at Mach 1 ish speed, anti-air missiles Mach 2 plus The Uk Starstreak travels at Mach 4 Depending on distance ,they won't have time There is video of a Mi-24 getting smoked by a MANPAD in seconds
    1
  48.  @leon19736  Lasers are being developed but they don't help
    1
  49. yah troll
    1
  50. The J-20 has some tech but not enough to compete with the F-35
    1