Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "Russia has produced more combat jets than it lost in Ukraine in 2023" video.

  1. Lets see , when was the last time anyone brought anything from Russia years ago As far being self-sufficient, FYI, as their claim as world power, they are already supposed to be Second as far power lets recap Russia has lost yet a second A-50 to Ukrainian forces The lost of AWACS in modern warfare to surface to air defense is beyond embarrassing Russia's most modern equipment is all taking modern losses in Ukraine The KA-52 and Mi-28 are supposed be flying tanks per Russia yet 60 KA-52 lost so far as well 13 Mi-28 The T-90 is supposed to be the best protected tank yet over 100 and counting destroyed and thats not counting units captured and sent to West for study The Black Sea Fleet lost yet another to Ukrainian forces, that nearly 20 ships and 1 sub lost to a country with no navy S-400, S-300, Panstir S-1, Tor, Buk, and other SAM units, again getting destroyed wholesale Russia fighting a non tier peer opponents with limited capability has seen whole sale destruction of its best weapons Now imagine if Ukraine was tier Instead of a few aircraft able to use cruise missile, try entire squadrons worth Instead of FPV drones, try gunship with helicopter launched ATGM able to shred armor in one hit instead of drones catching ships at the shore, Actually naval ship to ship combat If Russia is taking a beating like this ,they have no chance against NATO let alone the US Russia borders Ukraine yet after 3 years, they can't seal the deal The US traveled 7000 miles to Iraq twice and Afghan and hand control in weeks FYI, Russian tactical blunder was staying the separatist in eastern Ukraine instead going western Ukraine which would have allowed them to completely cut of Ukranie from the West
    3
  2.  @boikanyoonneng9170  By all means lets discuss a conflict from 63 years ago I love it when you clowns cry Vietnam Your only come is a 63 years ago hilarious with completely different weapons and tactics
    3
  3. Lay off the potato juice there buddy In a shooting war between Russia and NATO artillery is not even a foot note While Ukraine lacks capable air power, NATO has it in spades Russia is facing Ukraine with handful of Harpoon, ATACMS and Storm Shadow/SCALP Against NATO its TLAM, McND, KEPD-350, JASSM, JSOW ,JSM, SLAM-ER, LRASM plus Harpoon, ATACMS and Storm Shadow/SCALP and unlike Ukraine, NATO has very healthy stockpile and plenty of aircraft to use them
    2
  4.  @branned  logistics only make in protracted engagements Ukraine doesnt have the 190 mile range ATACMS which will allow them effective cut Russian logistics
    2
  5.  @Nordy941  Ukraine literally just cost them yet another A-50 You can't take those kinda of losses
    2
  6.  @Nordy941  So your just a propagandist FYI The A-50 wasnt a transport but AWACS The AWACS is critical part of modern integrated air defence system (IADS) The A-50 uses to communicate with S-400 sites as well MIG-31 and Su-35s equipped with R-37 With all 3 operating together, it allows for simultaneous engagement of multi targets at targets over 200 miles away That combination has been why the Ukrainian air force has been extremely limited on what they can do But most important, if Russia hopes to counter F-16s, they need A-50 flying The MIG-31 and Su-35s radar are limited in range, scope and detection and require support from the A-50 and S-400 sites With A-50s not flying and S-400 sites as well other air defense sites under constant attack Russia wont be able to keep the Ukrainian air force grounded MIG-31 and Su-35s can operate but without support, they wont last long
    2
  7.  @boikanyoonneng9170  Thats missiles failing not whole system get destroyed cope harder
    1