Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "Javelin vs NLAW - Which is the anti-tank king?" video.

Capturing hundreds doesnt mean a time the R and D alone will take months developing a countermeasure even longer but the fact that US has FGM-148G which is a completely new missile Russia capturing missiles is literally irrelvant
4
@kaiserwilhelmi7532 And the US lacking Javelin is problem because ? If US military needs to kill armor, they literally have dozens of assets to use Example MQ-9s with Hellfire and JAGMs Apache gunships with Spike NLOS, Hellfire and JAGMs F-15Es with GBU-12/38/39/53 and thats just 3 assets The odds US forces on the ground needing Javelins to kill armor is nil sunshine
3
Javelin all the way longer range multi use better optics
3
@Kaiser Wilhelm I I can't tell if you are clueless or just stupid If Russia had captured the equipment, they wouldn't be threatening countries to stop supplying Ukraine Russia has gotten its hands on few weapons and thats about it if Russia can captured weapons as you so falsely claim, there losses would be significant lower Secondly its called the Kalibr not the mess you wrote third, those missiles are only supersonic and most importantly ,there is thing called range their range is only 410 miles ding dong
1