Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "JDAM "Smart Bombs" are Better Than You Think" video.

  1. No, its simple limitations The Swedish Archer Artillery System and German Pzh-2000 are the fastest 155mm systems in use Even with extended range munitions that get their range out 40 miles, At the end of the day, they are limited by range and ability to be in position When artillery is there and in position, its preferred simplly because it only takes minutes With JDAM ,it depends on what assets are available on station Ukraine is showing the limitation of 155mm and mortars and shows why air support so important
    4
  2. Ukraine has all but confirmed that the next variant of the JDAM will have the GBU-53 seeker Anti-jam/anti-spoof GPS capability is good but if the seeker can switch from GPS to MMW or IR homing there is no jamming that Ironically Electro-Optical guided weapons will also be returning IR and Electro-Optical are much harder to jam because they are completely passive
    3
  3.  @richardspears5384  C-RAM and other point defense systems are Ukraine is showing have their limits Russian's Tunguska's and Panstir S1 ironically are getting smoked by artillery strikes They were designed to aircraft and cruise missiles but are completely vulnerable to 155m rounds Small FPOV drones are damaging their sensors
    2
  4. @@JimCarner Electronc warfare is going to make passive systems like TERCOM ,DSMAC and Automatic Target Recognition Unit (ATRU) top priority as means able to drop bombs and the enemy has no way to soft kill them with jamming
    1