Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "Why Israel Uses the Massive Namer Armored Vehicle" video.

  1. Given their enemies are supplied with ATGMs, you need something like the Namer that well armored and to take a beating Plus sharing parts with the Merkava makes it very cost effective to operate
    8
  2. The Namer is an excellent transport but at 60 plus tonnes, thats hard to move around the battlefield
    6
  3.  @goodlife6277  The NAMER has Trophy APS so no kabom
    3
  4.  @goodlife6277  A Kornet, Krishantema, Konkurs, among others strangely MIA in Ukraine
    3
  5.  @goodlife6277  That would be 100 percent false The Kornet in ready fire mode weighs 140lbs thats missile weight plus tripod. The Javelin in ready fire mode weights just 50lbs thats missile weight and CLU The Korent hasnt been used as its a literally a boon in Ukraine high intensity conflict. The only missiles that Russian forces are using on the ground is the RPG-7, 29 and 32 and other disposable 1 shot models The missile you mentioned require too much time and effort to move
    2
  6.  @Mrdardas99  Talking logistics The US made Stryker only weighs 19 tons , the ACV , 24 tons and the LAV-25 13 tons Basically similar vehicles are 12-25 tons at most which logistically is easier to move
    1
  7.  @harveywallbanger3123  If you need to rapid deploy 60 tones is major issue whereas 12-25 is not if the vehicle is damaged against moving 60 tonnes requires specialized movers or other Namers or tanks moving 12-25 ton is very easy to do
    1
  8.  @Mrdardas99  You can haul them on trucks but lighter options are easier
    1
  9.  @harveywallbanger3123  The Namer armor too many trade offs its high grade protection but at also at a cost
    1