Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "Israel grounds eleven U.S.-made F-35A fighter jets. Here is why | Key Details" video.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@arcontez9327
So whole paragraph of nonsense
The F-35 has been flying since 2006 and you posted the 11 accidents it has in 16 years operation
lets compare that
The Indian air force has lost 11 Su-30MKI since 2000
oh look
On Jun 27 2018 , Sukhoi 30 MKI being tested crashes in Nashik, pilots ejected safely
4 years ago, the exact same thing happened to India's top jet
aircraft lost during test
Oh look the Rafale has also had a number of incidents
Yet again
In Sept 24, 2009
A Rafale being test again, lost
Amazing how idiots trying to knock the F-35 incidents with zero clue that the F-35s problems not unique to it
The 11 incidents you hilariously mentioned have happened to every modern air force
An issue that risks damage to the F-35's tail section if the aircraft needs to maintain supersonic speeds is not worth fixing and will instead be addressed by changing the operating parameters, the F-35 Joint Program Office told Defense News in a statement Friday.
Nice cherry picking
Lets add the complete story
Supersonic flight is not a big feature of the F-35,” Clark said. “It’s capable of it, but when you talk to F-35 pilots, they’ll say they’d fly supersonic in such limited times and cases that — while having the ability is nice because you never know when you are going to need to run away from something very fast — it’s just not a main feature for their tactics.”
In fact, going supersonic obviates the main advantages of the F-35, Clark said. “It sort of defeats all the main advantages of the F-35,” he explained. “It takes you out of stealthiness, it burns gas like crazy so you lose the range benefits of a single engine and larger fuel tank. When you go into afterburner, you are heating up the outside of your aircraft.”
As I said, a real scam and a whole pile of (barely) flying garbage.
As I said, you have zero clue
1
-
@arcontez9327
On January 4th 2022, the South Korea Air force was forced to ground its entire fleet of F-35 after a landing on the belly of one of its F-35 whose landing gear failed.
Grounding aircraft after accidents again, common and again not unique the F-35
the Pentagon admitted that the F-35 had 871 flaws that could potentially affect its performance, 8 if them classified as "critical". Along 2021 only two of these flaws were corrected, none of them from the most severe group
Again with the cherry picking
lets add the complete story
"Given that the report is not as of yet available, it is not clear what the specific elements of the deficiencies are, or what kinds of impact they may have upon F-35 mission readiness or performance. It is also at this point difficult to have a sense of how critical these may be, as some are likely to fall within the category of routine software and hardware upgrades or maintenance."
Again posting misinformation.
News flash, the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) reports carry no weight with the Pentagon or US military
The DOTE refused to approve the USAF and USMC plans yet both the USAF and USMC carried out their plans regardless
When USMC declared its F-35B IOC in 2015, DOTE objected yet nothing happened other than the USMC moving forward with their plans
POGO, GAO and others , all they can be do is criticize, object or report but make no mistake, they carry no weight
Again with the cherry picking how SK tracks their metrics is unknown
In late 2020, acting U.S. Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller had referred to the F-35 as “a piece of…
Your desperation is hilarious
First Miller was only Sec-Def for 72 days , LMAO, your source of information is someone who barely held the job for 2 and half months
Secondly ,Miller was the special forces operator , not an aviator. So again your source of information was someone who knows literally nothing about aviation
Lastly his rank was colonel
Now, if the someone with actual credentials such Jim Mattis or the current Sec Def Llyod Austin made that statement ,it would actually carry weight as both Austin and Mattis were both generals, both held commanded United States Central Command (USCENTCOM) and both held Joint commands at highest levels of the US military
Thats called credible sources
U.S Marine Corps reported In an "alarming host of problems" with "lack of progress in almost every essential area" to bring it closer to a combat ready state.
You just love posting misinformation
First , the USMC made no such statement
The actual statement reads
"U.S. Marine Corps Captain Dan Grazier highlighted “a host of alarming problems” and “the F-35’s lack of progress in nearly every essential area” to bring it closer to a combat ready state"
This article by Dan Grazier originally appeared in The Project on Government Oversight on March 19, 2019.
Just posting misinformation is all you are doing
1
-
@arcontez9327
if my evaluation coincide with that from an ex US Secretary of Defense
Yeah, thats called desperation
As stated before, that Sec Def only held the job for 72 and was not involved in military aviation so his word literally carries no weight
following several dismal reports by the Government Accountability Office on the fighter’s performance, a nearly two-hour hearing on Capitol Hill highlighted its engine issues as a particularly problematic feature.
Again, as I told you, the GAO reports carry no weight
POGO, GAO and others , all they can be do is criticize, object or report but make no mistake, they carry no weight
U.S. Marine Corps Captain Dan Grazier highlighted “
Dan Grazier is reporter and former USMC officer , again not credible
No you are posting misinformation as you not posting complete information, just the bits that happen you fit your narrative
Thats part you are not getting, nothing you have posted carries any weight
all sources you posted carry no weight
1
-
1
-
1
-
1