Comments by "Stephen Hill" (@stephenhill545) on "Russian Putin challenger Boris Nadezhdin barred from election | BBC News" video.

  1. He needed an independent election commission, and an independent judiciary. He didn't have either.
    3
  2. Y'know. He might not. Call it a hunch.
    3
  3. He collected over 200,000. The "rules" only allow candidates to hand in a maximum of 105,000.
    3
  4. You obviously haven't been there. Not saying the UK is paradise, but its transport system isn't held together by fifty years old private minibuses.
    2
  5. ​why? Does mike tyson back putin?
    2
  6. Because only stupid people would fail to realise that putin is the greatest and wisest leader any country has ever had at any time in the history of the planet Earth, and marmite is delicious.
    1
  7. That he can do this is the reason He does it. How powerless do you think this makes your average russian feel. He is psychologically crushing his own population.
    1
  8. Will tucker question his commitment to free and fair elections, as the great investigative hack we know him as?
    1
  9. A euphemism Orwell would not have used.
    1
  10. I doubt tucker carlson is ideologically opposed to dictatorship as a form of governance.
    1
  11. Duntsova already did that, and got barred too.
    1
  12. Are you saying that you committed election fraud?
    1
  13. ​ @alexsilent5603 but that would mean joining a failed state.
    1
  14. ​ @Lettheflamestakeover-co5wi yes, only somebody in the pay of a foreign security service would ever oppose the policies of a government.
    1
  15. Actually we can. Britain doesn't have a presidential constitution. We elect the parties, and they elect their leaders.
    1