Comments by "Stephen Hill" (@stephenhill545) on "" video.

If there had been evidence of intentional genocide, of course. War of aggression is harder to prove. Arguably; there was defensive intent. And Sadaam had used chemicsl weapons and had started two wars of aggression costing 7 million lives , so there was a moral case for regime change.
3
@chrisferguson237 No; there was no genocide, nor were there territorial annexations. There was regime change, for which there was a moral case, as Hussain had started 2 wars of aggression costing 7 million lives, and had used chemical weapons on the majority Shia population.
1