Comments by "Stephen Hill" (@stephenhill545) on "PoliticsJOE"
channel.
-
17
-
17
-
13
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mEmory______ he didn't though. He failed to mention the ethnic cleansing carried out in the crimea, which was 96% crimean tatar in 1801, for instance, including his own active and ongoing efforts to further ethnically russify it. He ignored thd fact that the area of kursk and bilgorod, and other parts of the lower don basin,were also majority ukranian speaking until stalin conducted further deportations, and were not incorporated into the Ukranian SSR, but the Russian one. And of course what he calls novorossiya is also majority ethnic ukranian, kherson oblast 14% ethnic russian for example, not that this matters because, unlike him,Europe, , including Ukraine, regards nationality from a civil rather than an ethnic perspective, and certainly not a statist one either. The old guy is out of step with the modern world. I would feel sorry for him if he weren't a mass murderer.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CountScarlioni the "clown show" put a gaping 50 billion hole in the public finances. The clown shot occurred as a consequence of these little Englander brexiteers thinking they could borrow what they like, due to having a deluded sense of self-importance, and now our public services and key infrastructure, including the railway network, is even more under threat, and so they will, in their grubby deceitful way, try to blame the unions, asylum seekers, and any other vulnerable group they can get away with attacking, enabled by vile elements of our media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@managerialelitetoaster3456 it was supported by Russia, everyone knows that. The Minsk agreements were signed as a resultof wholee regular army russian brigades entering ukranian territory, because the insurrection was failing. As to the insurrection itself, there is no evidence from reports and surveys of the period that it was the will of the majority of citizens of the donbass oblasts to become part of the russian federation. In fact, every single major party in ukraine advocated for closer integretation with the EU. If you will allow me, I would also remind you that in december 1991 in a confirmatory referendum, 81 and 82% of the citizens of donetzk and lugansk respectively voted to join an independent ukraine, as did crimea, in terms of ethnic makeup donbass was at that time 65% ukranian and 35% ethnic russian, that migration being principally a result of the manpower demands of heavy industries which developed in the donbas from the early19. Century onwards. there is no ethnic case for separatism there. As to self-determination, when the donbass oblasts voted to join ukraine, they accepted to be governed under the ukranian constitution, which does not allow oblast to unilaterally secede. Honestly, I'm not even eastern european, but it is abundantly clear that the donbass, you.mean lugansk/donetzk I assume, has never been either majority ethnic russian nor has a majority of its citizens ever wished to be annexed by the russian federation. I fact checked myself there, and discovered a survey conducted by thevUniversity of bologna, oldest in the world by the way from 2015, which found that 3.4% of south eastern ukraine wished to join the russian federation, which explains a lot about the response of ukranisns to the invasion. I'm happy to provide you with further data, because it is a very important subject and deserves serious attention.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1