Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "The Russian Dude" channel.

  1. Lock them up I say. Lock.them up.
    12
  2. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  So you can't even tell it's a war! Not very clever are you. Why don't you join the great Russian army then. Lots of jobs going and they're recruiting now.
    9
  3.  @Nobleheart111  Russia has to be responsible if for no other reason than they denied it. I mean, when Russia denies something that's their way of admitting guilt. lol. Slava Ukraini.
    9
  4. ​ @BoleDaPole  Yes Russia is shelling the plant. Not it's own positions of course - even Russia is not quite that stupid - did you notice that no Russian troops were killed or injured in any of the shelling, but one Ukrainian technician was. And if you can't understand why Russia would do this then you might not be very clever (or you're high on Russian television).
    8
  5. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  Trying to spread more misinformation. Stop watching Russian television, it's addling your brain. Why don't you join the great Russian army and help.them walk over Ukraine - there are lots of vacancies and they're recruiting now. And it pays much better than trolling. Maybe you're too scared.
    8
  6. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  And you're not a master of conspiracy theories and propaganda? And trolling?
    6
  7.  @rogerhall6021  Yes agreed. He's not even trying hard, he's just trolling.
    4
  8. ​ @tompiper9276  Agreed. They could put up the final result of the referendum the day before it's held (that's how Russian elections work isn't it?)
    4
  9. The Russian navy is mostly hiding the other side of Crimea. They're scared to come too close to Ukrainian controlled areas as Ukrainians have weapons to sink them. I don't think a seaborne rescue is on unless they get really desperate and are prepared to lose ships.
    3
  10. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  Like the three day war to overrun all of Ukraine. Maybe they need you to lead the advance on Odessa.
    3
  11. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  Happy trolling at 04c a time.
    3
  12.  @Maennlichkeitsbeauftragter  Yes but we must remember that he has to do that job, otherwise he might fall out of a 6th storey window. Ahh Russia - land of the free. Or should that be "...free fall"
    3
  13.  @Anita-k  Yes he claims to be from UK, but I have my doubts. A person living in the free world, for all it's faults, would be a fool to promote the Russian way of life.
    3
  14. I like that you show on the map where each Ukrainian attack on Russian military site has occurred. This adds context for international audiences who are not familiar with Ukraine (like me). Great videos, interesting presentation. Slava Ukraini.
    2
  15. ​ @the11382  Just have a demilitarized zone like between North and South Korea. They never signed a peace treaty and that was 70 years ago.
    2
  16.  @tagorechandmeah425  No, what you have said is not true. The people in Russia are not superior. The military is inferior. Russia has proved it is not even a superpower anymore. And until they stop with their imperialist ambitions, they should be insulted, often. Orcs !! When do I start to regret?
    2
  17. Russia is weaker than expected. Ukraine is much stronger than expected (in my opinion because Zelenskii didn't run). Russia is still stronger than Ukraine but Ukraine has done so well to hold the invader from further gains, that people declare Russia weak. Hopefully Russia has now peaked (recent lack of progress suggests that might be the case),.and Ukraine can start to push them back. I doubt Ukraine will manage to push Russia all the way back to the border, but I hope they manage significant gains. And does Ukraine really want some areas of the Donbas if the locals are pro-Russian? And if the land is indefensible because of the proximity of a belligerent Russia.
    2
  18. ​​ @esmeecampbell7396  Yes, Wagnerians, Chechens and Syrians can all starve, but I expect the Syrians to freeze before the others come winter. Unfortunately I think starving Russian troops will likely kill the local civilians for their food.
    2
  19.  @esmeecampbell7396  Let us hope they do surrender, or escape across the river leaving all their gear behind.
    2
  20. You talk a lot of bollocks buddy. Russia doesn't attack abandoned schools, Russia attacks housing blocks full of residents, hospitals full of patients, stations full for waiting passengers. War crimes. Ukraine may occasionally kill a few civilians (very few, in spite of what Russia tells you). Russia kills civilians as often as possible - including over 80,000 Russian speaking civilians in Mariupol. You remember that Russia was going to save the Russian speakers from oppression and instead they killed them. Now they're doing the same in other parts of the Donbas - sending ill-equipped DPR and LPR troops to be slaughtered. If Russia cared one tiny bit about those troops they'd at least give them decent helmets and body armour, and some modern weapons. But I forget, the Russian army is almost run out of modern weaponry.
    1
  21.  @attilakiss6679  Hey Attila, where has your reply to me gone? Did you realise you were talking more bollocks and delete your reply. So tell me about the 150 civilians you claim were killed in Mariupol by Ukrainian forces. Then tell me about the 80,0000 civilians that were killed in Mariupol by Russian forces. Tell me how that makes Russia the good guys?
    1
  22.  @attilakiss6679  Gee you talk a lot of bollocks. Ukraine has Ukrainian leader who is not a western nor Russian puppet. They have a leader who was elected fairly - which is more than Russia has. Russia has a snivelling former KGB spy who only got his job because he had dirt on Yelsin, and who is so scared of any opposition that he kills, poisons or imprisons them. And about Ukraine killing civilians in the Donbas. Well, both sides killed civilians in the Donbas. But we know that Ukraine tries to avoid civilian deaths, but we have proof that Russia tries to kill civilians, such as the 80,000 mostly Russian speaking civilians killed in Mariupol. You remember the "oppressed" Russian speakers that Russia came to "save". Yeah well they shelled and bombed them.
    1
  23. Sacrificing those bridges will be a great loss, but it will be worth it if it allows Ukraine to take out all the heavy Russian equipment and most of the 20-25,000 Russian troops now isolated west of the river.
    1
  24. I think another twelve months at least - unless Putin is overthrown and Russia sues for peace.
    1
  25. I agree, it's too good to be true. Something is fishy.
    1
  26. I hope you have reached out to your uncle and his family.
    1
  27. ​​ Fun In Ukraine.  You sure write some bollocks. You are so clever you should go join Putin's unbeatable army and lead it to victory in Ukraine. There are many positions available, just call in at your local Russian Army recruiting office and they'll have you at the front line in no time. The money is much better than you get trolling here and when they send your body home to mummy she'll get a good payout. Of course if you go running home to mummy, or step on a landmine (Ukrainian or one of yours) they won't pay out.
    1
  28. I suspect it's all Russian BS and not to be taken too seriously. Ukraine frequently attacks military targets around Belgorod (in Russia) and has attacked military targets in Crimea (pseudo-Russia). Russia didn't do anything, they don't dare. Ukraine's friends still haven't supplied ATAKMS, western tanks or F16s to Ukraine, but I suspect they might if Russia does anything too provocative.
    1
  29.  @victorchinedu3216  I think the areas of Ukraine that border Russia will be the hardest to defend. Even if Ukraine can push the Russians across the border, the Russians can amass there ready to attack. I don't think the Ukrainian army is strong enough yet to repel and keep the Russians repelled in those areas. I feel that their strategy west of the Denipro river is sound. If (and it's a big if) they can manage to expel the Russians from Crimea or the Azov Sea coast up to Maripol, that's more defendable, as Ukraine could defend the coast and Russia has a shortage of landing craft.
    1
  30.  @duhni4551  Agreed, if they officially declare war they can bring in reservists and have a general mobilisation. But as I understand it, Russian reservists don't keep up regular training like most western countries do. Their reservists may not be a lot better than conscripts. Sure they will have the numbers, but hopefully not the skills. No matter what, this is going to be a hard slog for Ukraine. I hope like hell that they come out on top. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  31. Krak Head, I wouldn't trust anything you say as your sources are obviously Russian and we all know they have a problem with the truth but are very skilled at propaganda. They've obviously got you sucked in.
    1
  32. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  1. The nuclear plant didn't get shelled by Ukraine 2. Russia has not held 40% of Ukraine since March. 3. Ukraine did not lose 1700 troops in the first two days of the "counter offensive". 4. You're a Russian troll. Now go away and do something useful.
    1
  33.  Fun In Ukraine.  Huh, I just can't be bothered to check the spelling of Zapa.... just to satisfy a Russian troll.
    1
  34. I think the Russian navy is keeping them out of range of the various missiles Ukraine has waiting for them.
    1
  35.  Fun In Ukraine.  What are you doing in Staffordshire when you could be joining the great Russian army and having fun in Ukraine? Russian pays far more for fighting troops than it does for trolls. But it seems you're not prepared to join in this easy walkover of Ukraine. Obviously you don't believe in this Russian propaganda either. And I'm sure you can get Russian television wherever you are, even if it's only clips on YouTube/Telegram - unless of course you're not clever enough - as you're apparently not clever enough to work out why Russia might shell the nuclear plant.
    1
  36. I heard comment it was two missiles. What are the chances it was a Russian cruise missile and the wreckage of the Ukrainian S300 that intercepted it, that fell onto that Polish paddock? That would explain both the large crater and the presence of S300 fragments. Or am I just coming up with wacky theories?
    1
  37.  @Nobleheart111  Yes I saw you wrote that somewhere else. What I'm suggesting is that the S300 didn't miss. It hit the Russian missile and they both fell to earth (where maybe the Russian missile exploded - the S300 having already exploded on impact with the Russian missile). I have no idea if that's possible/probable, but it seems to tie up several loose ends in other theories. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  38. It still might not be a deliberate Russian attack by Russia on a NATO country, but the result of being knocked off course by the S300. I note that where the two Poles were killed is just two paddocks from the Polish-Ukrainian border.
    1
  39. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  Now even you know that's false...
    1
  40. Hey Dude. They both want the same thing, the libration of the occupied territories. It's a shame that Peskov's brain is so riddled by years of propaganda that he doesn't know who the real occupier is. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  41. ​ Fun In Ukraine.  Yeah fake Himars. Just like Russian troops are issued fake body armour (that can be easily pierced by bullets). The joke Russian army is awaiting your application to join.
    1