Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1.  @officialzelensky  Not true. Ukraine did not shell Donbas civilians for eight years. Ukraine shelled Russian and Donbas military for eight years while Russians and LPR/DPR military shelled Ukrainians. You need to stop watching Russian television and get some real facts.
    9
  2.  @giggity8249  I had some hopes that Trump might have looked after the small man, but he turned out to be even more corrupt.
    6
  3.  @ewalker1057  Ukraine did not shell Donbas civilians. Stop the BS.
    5
  4. Joeseph, you been smoking those potatoes again?
    5
  5.  @johnsochacki7002  What? Like Russia going back on the Budapest agreement.
    5
  6.  @michelledavies2197  I can understand why people didn't want to vote for Hillary - she appeared to represent more of the same - corporate greed. But Trump soon revealed that he represented personal and political greed - and had/has no respect for democracy. If Trump is the answer, the question must be really bad.
    4
  7.  @fredgarvinMP  Encouraging NATO expansion.
    3
  8. During a war it's not terrorism. But targeting civilians during a war IS terrorism. And remember that Russia started the war.
    3
  9. @Hernando Cortez Are you suggesting Ukraine placed mines at the entrance to Sevastopol? Woohoo go Ukraine. But I think you're wrong.
    3
  10.  @darrenyorston  I don't believe there was anything in the grain export agreement that said either side had to stop fighting this war. I think you're making up stories buddy.
    3
  11.  @fredgarvinMP  What! You wouldn't put that past Pootin. You're a bit naive I suspect.
    3
  12. ​ @oneaboveall1895  I believe that without doubt, the Himars and M777 before them, have given the Ukrainians the edge. Given them the ability to match the Russians. Now the greater motivation of the Ukrainians is driving that advantage home. That said, there's a long way to go to reach 24 February positions, let alone pre-2014 positions, and it could all turn to custard yet. It is interesting that the Russian rep was pushing a negotiated settlement very hard. A great idea but I very much doubt the two parties are even on the same planet, let alone the same page, when it comes to bottom lines.
    3
  13. So you think Russia is justified using terrorism in Ukraine?
    2
  14.  @officialzelensky  You want my sources. Don't be a lazy person and go do your own research. And for heavens sake stop watching Russian television if you want to know what's really going on.
    2
  15.  @othwesjamabinju_  No it doesn't.
    2
  16.  @othwesjamabinju_  No it doesn't. ruSSia is not being attacked. What's it defending itself from?
    2
  17.  @mbfrod  That is correct - it is false that western Ukraine attacked Donbas nine years ago.
    2
  18.  @darrenyorston  So why are you making the ridiculous claim that Ukraine pursuing the war is the cause of Russia withdrawing from the agreement. Anyway your arguement that the attack in Sevastopol is the cause is BS. Russia had already signalled, before the attack, that it was looking to pull out of the agreement. This is just an excuse.
    2
  19.  @fredgarvinMP  No Fred. I don't know who blew up the bridge. I know who would like to blow up the bridge. I'm just saying I wouldn't put ANYTHING past Pootin.
    2
  20. Followed by every city in Russian Federation that supports Pootin.
    2
  21.  @akash5808  No we don't think USA attacked the bridge, nor do we think USA fired missiles at civilian targets in Ukraine. So my question to you is: what about USA?
    1
  22. You have a problem with people wanting to learn from their mistakes?
    1
  23.  @kudakwashemwalukanga  Silly person. They will investigate why officers allowed the meeting to occur. Was the officer in charge breaking the rules, or were the rules not clear enough? ruSSian needs to "investigate deaths of combatants" because many ruSSia widows need to be paid for husbands who are dead, but ruSSia denies their deaths.
    1
  24.  @fredgarvinMP  Come on Fred, cut the BS. When you are a toxic neighbor, your neighbors join together to protect each other from you. Why do you think Ukraine wanted to join NATO? The answer is: it was obvious that Russia was that belligerent and toxic neighbor. The current war is proof of that.
    1
  25.  @fredgarvinMP  There won't be any Tartars left shortly. Your Russian friends are sending them all off to die.
    1
  26. Similarly, the Sooner Putin is removed from power the sooner Ukrainians and ruSSians can salvage whats left of their ruined countries!
    1
  27.  @officialzelensky  Then you'll have no problem finding the truth about the start of the Donbas conflict, and you have no excuse for promoting false Russian propaganda.
    1
  28.  @officialzelensky  Sending ill-trained, ill-equipped masses into Ukraine is not sending an army.
    1
  29.  @lynnesnowball9859  What a stupid comment. Nobody believes that those oblasts are ruSSia. Not the UN. Not former Warsaw pact countries. Not BRICS countries. Not CSTO countries. Nobody recognises ruSSia's fake annexations. I'll bet even you don't believe it deep down. ruSSia is not defending itself - ruSSia is the aggressor.
    1
  30.  @ebee-s3w  Bollocks. So why isn't ruSSia attacking Finland? Answer: because NATO is no threat to ruSSia. ruSSia is the aggressor, not the defender, silly troll.
    1
  31. ​ @SportZFan4L1fe  What an idiot you are with your comment on Ukronazis. If you want to see Nazis go look in the Kremlin. Bakmut was a caldron for sure. A caldron for the Russians, where tens of thousands of Russian Wagner troops were injured, maimed or killed. It was a good ploy for Ukraine to effectively eliminate the Wagner PMC for far less loss of Ukrainian lives.
    1
  32. ​ @joshi6898  Having trouble coping Josh? You asked for his source. He gave you his source and you stupidly ignorrd him. I know you Russian trolls aren't very smart, but you don't have to make it obvious.
    1
  33.  @billnikola2463  Oh no, now we have Trump supporters here. Complete nutters, every one of you.
    1
  34.  @billnikola2463  Okay, start talking about these miles of graves. Are they as real as Trump's stolen election?
    1
  35.  @glenstewart7910  Yes, that describes Pootin perfectly.
    1
  36. You mean from Russian occupation, as NATO isn't in Ukraine - yet. And if they do go into Ukraine you and your Russian mates better go hide because you're going to get your a$$ kicked.
    1
  37.  @axiathunder9128  Yeah, maybe if ruSSia surrenders, Ukraine need not blow up so many ruSSian men and machines.
    1
  38.  @JayDubya_TheJehova  There could be nothing worse than a world dominated by autocratic despots. Fight them or die trying. If the autocratic dictators resort to nuclear weapons, they still won't win. And the death of the world will be on their hands.
    1
  39.  @JayDubya_TheJehova  Russian hands. They are, after all, the country constantly threatening the use of nuclear weapons. And as every other part of the Russian military is failing, soon Russia will have to choose between loosing the conventional war, or using nuclear weapons so that everyone looses. There is no win available to Russia. Pootin has really painted himself into a corner.
    1
  40. Because Pootin's military is too scared to try to take it out on anyone who is armed.
    1
  41.  @akhileshsinghyadav4975  Plonker.
    1
  42.  @fredgarvinMP  I'm pleased to see you don't have enough brains to join the trust.
    1
  43.  @thereligionofrationality8257  I'm still cheering. I've never seen Pootin looking so humiliated. He can't even look at the camera. I guess he knows he won't survive to Christmas. I wonder if he'll see his assassin coming.
    1
  44. Two fingers. Yeah that's what I think of Pootin too.
    1
  45. Which is why it is resisting that clown Putin.
    1
  46. Actually Hugh, there IS 'international law" whether you like it or not. It's just not very effective when it comes to catching evil leaders like Putin and Netanyahu.
    1
  47. If Russia stops, the war is over. If Ukraine stops, Ukraine is over. If you want to save lives, you need to talk to Putin.
    1
  48.  @bradnixon6220  3 Russian speakers on Crimea bridge. 80,000 Russian speaking civilians in Mariupol alone.
    1
  49.  @fredgarvinMP  They sent in Russian forces with Russian markings mostly removed. You didn't know that? Have you been living under a rock.
    1
  50.  @sayfrunner  Martin is correct of course - and you're a Russian troll.
    1