Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "FRANCE 24 English" channel.

  1. Putin was right - the liberators will be greeted with hugs and flowers. Slava Ukraini.
    45
  2. Well done team.
    12
  3. What a silly thing to say. If another country has knowledge of an impending terrorist attack, why should they not share it?
    10
  4. Yes that's right, raisins are coming back soon. Also sultanas. Food shortages will be over. Slava Ukraini.
    6
  5. ​ @out_of_the_flock---VIKALPA  Free from russian manipulation.
    3
  6.  @relaxedsnake48  I agree. I don't trust the Russians and don't know what they might do, but blowing the dam will have two negative effects for them. The east side of the Denipro is lower than the Kherson city side, so more Russian positions would get flooded than Ukrainian positions. And the intake of the canal that delivers 85% of fresh water to Crimea is next to the dam - if they blow the dam the water level will be too low to flow into the canal.
    3
  7.  @kingofbeaute8980  Yup. Tell me where to send the cheque.
    2
  8.  @gastrogubimmed8112  What's that got to do with nuclear power plants. Take your petty squawking elsewhere.
    2
  9. It would seem that the Russian government, like its military, are stuck in the 19th and 20th centuries.
    1
  10. Yup, the CIA warned them, but Putin did nothing.
    1
  11. ​​ @andrekondi1607  Ahh come on Andre. That's BS and if you don't know that then you've been watching too much Russian television. I'm free. Try saying "war" in Russia and see if you're still free.
    1
  12. Good news. Hopefully they can all go home to their families.
    1
  13.  @raymonddarhk20  No it isn't.
    1
  14. ​@naphiu849 Of course russia gives a f😢😢😢. They need the income to support their failing economy. Failing due to their warmongering.
    1
  15. ​ @JohnCSmith-lp1qr  russia plays politics with energy supplies. Remember how they stopped pumping has through Nordstream, in order to attempt to punish Europe. Now they can no longer manipulate the Baltic states. russia reaps what it sows.
    1
  16. Who did you say is shelling the plant? What proof do you have? What logic are you using?
    1
  17. Yes Putin, crossing the border to attack your neighbor IS provocative.
    1
  18. Why do you suggest Ukraine shelled the plant? Either side would like to make the other side look bad, but only Russia gains from such an attack. Ukraine would not want a nuclear disaster on their own land, making maybe half of Ukraine uninhabitable, but Russia wouldn't care as it's far frpm Moscow. Ukraine would prefer not to shell it's own workers at the plant. Russia would prefer not to shell it's own solders at the plant, but Russia knows exactly where it's solders are and can therefore shell areas away from its troops. Did you notice that no Russian troops were killed or injured - but one Ukrainian technician was hurt. The electrical supply to Ukrainian controlled areas of Ukraine was damaged. Why would Ukraine aim for that? Why would Russia aim for that? Easy question! Firing at a nuclear plant is extremely irresponsible. Storing munitions around nuclear reactors is extremely irresponsible. So far we have only confirmed one extremely irresponsible country - Russia. So I ask again, why do you think it was Ukraine that fired on.the nuclear plant?
    1
  19. ​ @wanderlust0120  What? Like a duck?
    1
  20.  @percival1217  What has Syrian oil got to do with nuclear power plants? You must be answering the wrong question.
    1
  21.  @percival1217  Well you're just saying about Syrian oil in an article about Ukrainian nuclear power plants, so you must be "just saying" in the wrong place. Please keep your comments on topic.
    1