Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "RFU News — Reporting from Ukraine" channel.

  1.  @noone6037  "Do you really think F16s from the 70s will make a difference?". Yes.
    74
  2.  @Samuel-hd3cp  "Banderites". Hah, fool.
    73
  3.  @GusOfTheDorks  Plenty of solid evidence. Lack of ability from you Russian trolls to accept the truth.
    43
  4. The drone attacks are also well done.
    41
  5.  @Zeknif1  Not to mention cutting off the major source of fresh water to Crimea.
    38
  6. ​​​ @maninthestreet01  David is a very poor Analyst, would you say! 😂 Maybe he should drop the "yst" off the end of his name.
    32
  7.  @slyapbg  Actually, the claim that Kyiv would fall in 2-3 days was made by ruSSian media - several times.
    31
  8. ​ @TheYoutubeUser69  I take everything, everywhere, with a grain of salt - and info from Russian sources with two grains (due total unreliablity of most official Russia sources). It is still interesting, and this is one of my favourite channels.
    28
  9.  @heinrichwolfenstein7303  Yup, the ruSSians sure are.
    27
  10.  @k239_chunmoo  Fact is, if Russia hadn't attacked Ukraine, the destruction wouldn't have occurred. Russian keyboard warriors have frequently proven to be not in possession of the facts and very poor in comprehending what's happening.
    27
  11.  @JPPVESA  "Unfortunately for the Ukrainians, the russians keep pushing toward Pokrovsk" and losing thousands of troops every week doing so, whereas Ukraine has taken the same area of land in just three weeks, and for a fraction of the loses. The russian army really is that bad.
    26
  12.  @MadSwede87  Maybe ruSSia was once, but this war shows it certainly isn't a superpower any longer.
    26
  13. ruSSia doesn't know the meaning of the word "negotiate". They are willing to make demands. Ukraine is willing to tell them where to stick their demands. Slava Ukraini.
    24
  14. ​ @ВолковВладимир-ц2и  I won't watch Russian reports. Firstly I don't understand Russian. Secondly, Russian reporting, especially Igor of the MoD, is so totally unreliable that it is irrelevant. What's the point in watching Russian propaganda - I won't learn anything.
    24
  15.  @Sean-n2m  Ukrainians don't use troops for cannon fodder. That is reserved for ruSSian troops. That is why Ukraine is losing "between 100 and 200" troops per day, while ruZZia is losing between 800 & 1100 per day.
    23
  16.  @Lepocoloco  Whose plan was to be in defence for a year? Putin's plan was to take Kyiv in 3 days and all of Ukraine in two weeks - there's no "year" in that plan. Ukraine didn't intend to go to war (it was foisted upon them) - so there's no "year" in that plan either. So please explain what you are talking about.
    23
  17.  @iare19  Wow. You don't consider "mountain people from behind Urals" to be "real ruSSians". Maybe they should have a referendum to leave the ruSSian Federation then - especially as a lot live in areas that are traditionally Chinese or Mongolian. Then they wouldn't get sent to die for rich white ruSSians.
    22
  18.  @vilnis-trash  Yes indeed Swaggers. Each day this channel shows an area where Ukrainians are winning, and therefore where you ruSSians are losing.
    22
  19.  @danmorF  I don't listen to what Zelensky says, I look at the maps and at the men and equipment lost. That's how I know that you are wrong. Ukraine has already recaptured over 30% of the land stolen by ruSSia. But speaking of listening to official sources, it seems you have been listening to (and believing) the ruSSian MoD to write what you wrote. I guess you can't help being duped by ruSSian propaganda.
    20
  20. "and 1000 men have their lives thrown away" per day.
    20
  21.  @ctusser  That worries me too. Hopefully we'll have a Russian collapse before then.
    20
  22. ​ @Eric-ge5vp  Hey Eric, if 20 year old weapons won't win a war you'd better tell Pootin so he can withdraw all his T-62, T-64, T-72 and T-80 tanks from Ukraine. Ask him to send in 500 T-14 Armata tanks instead.
    18
  23.  @senatorjosephmccarthy2720  And the Russian Kinzhal was "unstoppable" - or so they thought (wrongly). Slava Ukraini.
    18
  24. Hey it's not a "stupid war", it's a Stupid Military Operation.
    18
  25.  arlekino1263  Isn't it terrible what Russia is doing to its neighbor. Why don't they just go back to Russia and leave Ukraine alone?
    18
  26.  @samgragas8467  How is ruSSia taking advantage of the failed ruSSian offensive? Ukraine is strengthened.
    17
  27. I don't know why Ukraine didn't fly the drones over Belarus. If it's good enough for Russia to use Belarusian airspace to launch missile attacks on Ukraine, then it's fair enough for Ukraine to use Belarusian airspace to attack Russia (and probably less defended).
    17
  28.  @AstroGremlinAmerican  I agree. There are still small areas of Kharkiv oblast to liberate, along with major parts of Luhansk - and poorly trained Russian troops will make a repeat of last year's gains (over 12,000sq km liberated in that area) so much easier to achieve.
    16
  29. Well done Ukraine. It looks like the ship has fallen against the side of the dock. That will take months to cut up and remove from the dock, as it will likely be impossible to float it out. I can't tell how badly the submarine is damaged, but I'm pleased to hear that two Black Sea Fleet submarines weren't in the Black Sea on 24 February last year, and so are locked out, leaving only five submarines (now four) in the Black Sea.
    16
  30. ​ @dushyantchahal2881  Yes Dushyant, and they were used in the best manner for untrained troops, or should I say untrained cannon fodder. Waves of men to overwhelm the opposition. It's a method that works if you can afford to lose men at a horrendous rate. I don't think Russia could afford to lose them at that rate. But too late now, they're mostly dead.
    16
  31. ​ @freak94able "How many"? Not as many as there are nazis in the Kremlin.
    16
  32.  @zachhan5038  I think you're being unfair to Denys. Sure his videos aren't as good as this channel. He's a Crimean, so he may be familiar with the names of some places in "mainland" Ukraine. Or possibly he has difficulty with Anglicised Ukrainian names, or names that aren't written in Cyrillic. I have no doubt he is Ukrainian.
    16
  33.  @Pisatel1912  Yup, Ukraine is done... done taking carp from ruSSia and will never again submit to being a vassal state.
    16
  34. ​ @OffendingTheOffendable It seems the USSRs military production capability within russia is also degraded.
    16
  35.  @OregonCrow  Actually it was weeks before outside help arrived in any quantity. They lasted the first two weeks on their own - against the second most powerful military in the world. It sucks to be a Russian troll.
    15
  36.  @Billballbill  What cancelled election? Silly Russian troll.
    14
  37.  @timparker4160  You do realise that you have been fooled by russian propaganda. russia is NOT winning this war. The Ukrainian army brought the russian army to a halt over a year ago, and the russian army has not taken any Ukrainian land since. The ukrainian army over that period, has liberated well over 18,000 sq km. So where and how is russia winning? You russian trolls are hilarious.
    14
  38.  @dougaltolan3017  And it keeps them off the streets (and off the battlefields).
    14
  39.  @vilnis-trash  Why would he? There's no rule to say he can't pick which battles he wants to analyse. If you don't like his content, go elsewhere. We won't miss you.
    14
  40.  @seasoninorder3695  We're not fooled by ruSSian dis-information.
    14
  41.  @tretortugas  Military Summary is not balanced. They are pro-Russian. They constantly quote Russian MoD figures (an extremely unreliable source) but seldom quote official Ukrainian sources (not that they are reliable either).
    13
  42. ​ @danielrisk5731 Wrong. This report didn't say how many Ukrainian casualties there were. Maybe there weren't any, but this report never claimed that. You're just making it up.
    13
  43.  @ahndeux  Rubbish. The US gives some good stuff. But a lot of old gear, due to be scrapped, is given to Ukraine and accounted at full value - when scrap value is more appropriate. This finances (indirectly) the purchase of new equipment for the US military. Secondly, it is a good investment, as a Ukrainian victory is necessary to avoid much higher costs later. A ruSSian victory in Ukraine will result in the strengthening of ruSSia. They will use Ukrainian people to attack the next country in line (as they currently use the people of the Donbas to attack Ukraine). As the strength of ruSSia increases, and the strength of the west diminishes with each ruSSian conquest, the cost to the US to defend itself and the west increases. Stop bitching about the cost of this war - it is insignificant to the economy of the US - pay your damned taxes, and be grateful it's not US citizens dying on the frontlines (yet).
    13
  44. ​ @louismonnier4793  I think that 18 F-16s, whereas Australia has ~41 surplus F-18s.
    13
  45.  @filippogaudio3433  As Brian says, russia took 6+ months to take the same amount of land as Ukraine has taken in 3 weeks. The russia army really is that bad.
    13
  46.  @no-bodymr6419  I don't think ruSSia will "come back". The population (only half of that of the Soviet Union) is too small for the grandious aims of people like Putin. It will be unable to support the massive costs of infrastructure in what is the world's largest country (by land mass), coupled with the costs of supporting the "second most powerful" military in the world. It's GDP is smaller than many countries with half the population. I think what we are seeing are the desperate final throws of a dying power. At best, ruSSia is just China's underling.
    13
  47. "and that the UKR have underestimated the RU army". I guess those newspapers are wrong then. The UKR expected to be fighting a guerilla war in an occupied Ukraine, but have done considerably better than that scenario. I think it would be fair to say that the UKR initially OVERestimated the RU army - as did the rest of us. Slava Ukraini.
    12
  48.  @Imperial_loyalist  You DO need his hysterical laughter.
    12
  49.  @georgelugenalt200  ruZZia is also in deep trouble - and keeps getting deeper.
    12
  50. ​ @Eric-ge5vp  "those migs will be lucky to get a shot off" - so how are those Mig 29s inferior to Ukraine's existing Mig 29s that get shots off regularly? I think you've been sniffing at the Russian propaganda machine again buddy.
    12
  51.  @Ankidoom  Who can't even capture a small village? The russians you mean.
    11
  52.  @etcetera--nine  I've stopped watching Denys, since he started reporting on the Israel-Palestine crises. I also wonder if he was one of those who paid a bribe for a medical exemption to get out of Ukraine. This is the best channel for reporting on the ruSSian invasion. He selects an area of operation each day, and gives a great analysis every time.
    11
  53. ​ @betterdonotanswer  One day you will wake up and find that you are on the front lines, about to be fed to the meat grinder.
    11
  54.  @sergevandyck  Dombas is not an Oblast, it is an area consisting of two oblasts: Donetsk and Luhansk. The referenda you speak of are not valid. For a referendum to be valid it must be free and fair - and ALL eligible voters must be able to vote - which was not the case in Kherson, Zaporzhzhia, Donetsk nor Luhansk oblasts.
    11
  55.  @vilnis-trash  "cherry-picking is not an honest reporting" Oh, so if he covers Avdiivka, then he also has to cover every other battle in Ukraine, Gaza, Yemen, etc. Oh I'm sorry I was cherry picking battles. Maybe he should also cover car accidents and polling results throughout the world, in order to report honestly. Another possibility is that you are talking BS.
    11
  56.  @JoeyP946  Yup, the Ukrainians are very impressive. Unfortunately the same can't be said for what was formerly the "second most powerful military in the world". "Not even ruzzian generals have that info". Maybe if ruzzian generals stopped punishing those who report the truth, they might gain that information. Don't blame Ukraine for the deficiencies of the ruzzian military.
    10
  57.  @brinjoness3386  How do you come to that conclusion. The US is allowed to put whatever restrictions they like on the use of donated weapons. Similarly Australia can put on as many, or as few, restrictions as they like. Maybe UA are making their own, or maybe they are using Australian made drones - it doesn't matter if Australia hasn't put restrictions on their use.
    10
  58.  @joshuabean9409  "ruSSia lost far more troops in World War 2 than anyone else, And they won that". No "they" didn't win it, the efforts of many countries won WW2 against the Nazis. The west supplied the USSR with just so much military aid, and even then the USSR struggled. The USSR is now fighting itself, as one former portion attempts to dictate it's will on another former portion - so if "they won that", what part of the former USSR will win this? Probably the part receiving western military aid - just like last time.
    10
  59. Indeed. I'm surprised the comments section isn't full of vatniks saying "but whatabout Kursk?"
    10
  60. "Ukrain is slowly loosing" - as opposed to the "rapidly losing" Putin was hoping for 665 days ago? Actually Ukraine hasn't been losing for some 16 months. In fact over that period the Ukrainian army has liberated very large sections of Ukraine - especially in Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts, including six cities - while the ruSSian army has captured exactly zero cities since July, 2022.
    10
  61.  @nathanhazlehurst484  You've been watching too much ruSSian television. Get some REAL facts.
    10
  62.  @Ridethebomb777  Is it inspirational for you when they blow their own aircraft out of the sky with an anti-aircraft missile killing ten of their own people ... in their own country ? Or are you talking about Donbas where Russia bombed and shelled their own supporters for 9 years from 2014-2021 - then continued that killing in 2022 killing tens of thousands of Russian speakers and ethnic Russian civilians in Mariupol alone.
    10
  63.  @glintongordon6811  "I sell cheap beachfront properties on the moon you know" < everything else you tell us is also lies.
    10
  64. For example, over the 5 days you list, russia probably lost 8 or 9 thousand men. Isn't it terrible when Pootin doesn't value the lives of his men.
    9
  65.  @Ankidoom  Silly ruSSian troll.
    9
  66.  @valdasdr8432  "ruSSia keeps winning non-stop" You are obviously not describing the battlefield - where the ruSSian army has had no gains for over twelve months (while the Ukrainian army has liberated massive amounts of territory over the same period). Maybe you are referring to some stupid game of espionage. How do you conclude that there's a chance for ruSSia to win? Can you show some victories? Some hospitals or schools ruSSia has targetted maybe? You know the Nazis bombed the hell out of London during WW2 and it just made the British more determined to win - and they did. We're coping just fine - how are you managing, as your outburst suggests you are stressed.
    9
  67.  @iare19  Hahahahaha "Russia has not yet started fighting truly". You have a great sense of humour. ruSSia can continue causing trouble for years to come, but as an invading force they are spent. The ruSSian army has not been able to capture any significant Ukrainian land for over a year. Not so much as one Ukrainian city in more than a year. The Ukrainian army has liberated tens of thousands of square kilometres, including six cities, over that same period.
    9
  68.  @BLaZeNhearT420  Not "Az of" the present time. Do you support the Nazi Wagners, or the Nazi Rusich, or the fascist polices of the Kremlin (that would make Adolf proud)? Ukraine have gained over 250sq km so far. Not a lot - but a lot more than the Russian army has gained in over twelve months. Add that 250sq km to the well over 18,000sq km that the Ukrainian army has liberated in the last 12 months - and Russia is looking a little sick...
    9
  69. The ruSSian MoD has been lying for a long time - maybe that's who you are referring to?
    9
  70. This report is about left bank of the Denipro, Kherson oblast. So why do you think Avdiivka and Bakhmut are in Kherson? Don't you russian trolls have maps?
    9
  71.  @QANews  Hey QANews. Within international law, communities are endowed with the inherent right to self-determination. Crimea, was denied this right, as ruSSia ran a shame referendum. Kindly note that it is also illegal under ruSSian law for communities to exercise the inherent right to self-determination endowed in the international law you refer to. Best regards.
    9
  72. ​ @JoeD-w3t Silly person. Write something sensible next time.
    9
  73. ​ @Pisatel1912 Where are the blatant lies? What you replied did not answer the question.
    9
  74.  @Rtg5637  "notwithstanding all the mindless boasting about how high Russian losses are" - Why mindless? These losses will have an effect on ruSSia's ability to continue fighting, as long as Pootin won't allow a mobilisation. And they are high, very high. Did you not boast when Ukrainian losses were high at the start of the Ukrainian counter-offensive? "barely making a dent in Russian defense lines has proven self defeating" - I don't think so. The counter-offensive has been less productive than hoped for, but it is still much larger the the entire gains of the ruSSian army over the last twelve months. The ruSSian lack of gains, for large expenditure of men and machines, better fits the description "self defeating". The Ukraine army isn't doing well at present, but it's doing a damn site between than the ruSSian army has done in a long time. Silly ruSSian troll.
    9
  75.  @vilnis-trash  "I never stated that I’m looking for honest reporting on this channel" And yet that is what you get on this channel. Not a full range of news; not the overall picture; but a specific area well reported. I get the impression you are just trying to slag this channel because it doesn't support pro-ruSSian views.
    9
  76.  @glintongordon6811  "you people keep missing the point that Russia didn't fight to hold the places they had, they just left" And the point that you miss is that forcing an invader out of "the places they had" (past tense) is a liberation of territory, and a victory.
    8
  77.  arlekino1263  Yes, isn't it terrible what the Russian fascists are doing to their neighbor. Why don't they just go back to Russia and leave Ukraine alone?
    8
  78.  @sirairili1570  Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is Britain consists of England, Scotland and Wales. The United Kingdom consists of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
    8
  79.  @freak94able  You're a bit behind the times. Russia destroyed 95% of buildings in Mariupol. That's "flatten everything". Mariupol is/was a major city. Russia also did a similar amount of destruction in Bakhmut (stop using filthy Russian names for Ukrainian cities) and Marinka. Don't you get up to date news under the rock you live under? As for Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa and Dinipro - Russia missed it's opportunity and failed to get close enough to flatten those cities - and won't get another chance because Russia is slowly but surely loosing ground in Ukraine.
    8
  80.  @BaalsMistress  To the last Russian - as appears to have happened to the Russians in the 72nd Motor Rifle Brigade.
    8
  81.  @mclukas44lol25  That's because there aren't massive Ukrainian casualties.
    8
  82.  @MikeAG333  You better go back and read your first post - and maybe edit it...
    8
  83.  @samgragas8467  Ahh, yeah, nah. You got your facts all wrong (again - sigh). Maybe you should try some fact checking on the Ukrainian losses because you are in for a big disappointment. You do realise that Putin often lies don't you?
    8
  84. All of the above.
    8
  85.  arlekino1263  Yes, isn't it terrible what the Russian fascists are doing to their neighbor. Why don't they just go back to Russia and leave Ukraine alone?
    7
  86. How's russian loses going?
    7
  87. ​@jasonpednault465 If the Ukrainians needed the weapons it would not have taken them long to bypass the codes.
    7
  88.  @diesdasananas9903  Without Pooptin hundreds of thousands of people would still be alive - and free.
    7
  89.  @mclukas44lol25  Cope man, cope. Kursk is in Ukrainian control - and you're in denial.
    7
  90. And in Syria it doesn't look good for russia.
    7
  91.  @pakjai5532  Unfortunately not possible when you have a war-monkey next door.
    7
  92.  @thethinkingman-  "from the online images the Klishchivka international airport seems to have been destroyed" along with the Russian 72nd Motor Rifle Brigade.
    7
  93.  @vilnis-trash  "you can make it look like Ukrainians are superior at every angle of this war". Only if this was the only channel you watch. You wouldn't read a doctor's report saying your hearing tests were fine, and use that to conclude your health was perfect. I'm sure most of us watch a few channels to get the larger picture.
    7
  94.  arlekino1263  Yes, isn't it terrible what the Russian fascists are doing to their neighbor. Why don't they just go back to Russia and leave Ukraine alone?
    7
  95.  @paulsto6516  Well, it is... now.
    7
  96.  @dianeandrews7873  Indeed, I'm pleased he continues his focus on Ukraine. Others, such and Denys and Jake, now dilute their videos with the israeli-Gaza conflict - while Crux, who used to do 2 or 3 videos a day on Ukraine, now seem 100% focused elsewhere (which is exactly what the ruSSians are hoping for, that we lose interest in Ukraine). Thanks for keeping up the good work RFU.
    7
  97.  @richardthomas5362  I thought they had already thinned those areas. Lucky for russia that Putin was lying about the NATO threat - if NATO really was a threat this would be the time to invade russia, while it's at its weakest.
    6
  98. ​@alangordon3283 Much better thanks. How russia doing in Syria?
    6
  99.  @nathanhazlehurst484  You are the one who has been duped Nathan. Try getting more reliable information sources.
    6
  100.  @freak94able  And how is the second most powerful military in the world doing in it's three day capture of Kyiv? Can they complete that in under a month too? Your sarcasm is so sad - but if it helps you cope, go for it.
    6
  101.  @fosphor8920  Or you could ask your overlord in the bunker beneath the Kremlin to pay.
    6
  102.  @hardtackbeans9790  Yes indeed. The ruSSian army has captured almost zero Ukrainian land in the last twelve months. The only ruSSian force that has captured land due those 12 months is the now defunct Wagner PMC.
    6
  103. Good points, but will you please stop the cutting and pasting - it gets boring on the third read.
    6
  104.  @mattcritchley5670  "It's been a matter of training both the pilots and also the engineering and support crews" The crazy thing is, the US announced money for training Ukrainian pilots on F-16s over 12 months ago. We could have had really well trained Ukrainians waiting, instead of this last minute rushed training.
    6
  105.  @dreuxbolton5725  Yes I think "that Ukraine didn't lose thousands of men and hundreds of vehicles during their offensive". Just because Pootin says it and you believe his BS, doesn't mean it's true. Ukraine probably lost hundreds of men and tens of vehicles at the beginning of their offensive, but they learned to use different tactics and are now losing half as many men as the ruSSians are losing.
    6
  106.  @dreuxbolton5725  Don't change the subject. Defend your statement - or shut up.
    6
  107. "According to the Russian Defence Ministry," Aha, there's the problem with your information. Try reliable sources.
    6
  108. Who's lies are you buying? russian MoD?
    6
  109. Those tiny pieces of land that you describe are almost insignificant. If you want to see real liberation of Ukrainian territory, look to the gains made in Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts where tens of thousands of square kilometres were regained. If you want to see real losses, look at the losses of ruSSian mem and ruSSian equipment that occur on a daily basis. When you lose 1000 men to take a field, you are not winning. Think of the wives, the mothers, the children, the brothers and sisters of those men who have been sent to slaughter by Putin and his cronies - for what? For the betterment of Putin and his buddies who have already stolen billions of roubles from the ruSSian people. Now they are steal the lives of ruSsian men - solely in order to get richer.
    6
  110.  @KTO_HUBLOT  Only 3? russia lost 82 towns in a week in Kursk.
    6
  111.  @111076tom  Why are you speculating? Why not just find the facts? The rail bridge is NOT below the road, it is mostly at the same elevation as the road, but it begins to climb earlier than the road when approaching high portions, so in many places is higher than the road. You are wrong ("why not just find the facts") about it's military value. It is the MAIN supply route for military equipment into Crimea and Kherson oblasts. There is no rail route along the shore of the Azov Sea ("why not just find the facts"). The rail line goes inland to Melotopol, then heads north towards Tokmak before heading north east into Luhansk oblast. Crimea does need huge volumes of supplies ("why not just find the facts") as that is where the Russia Black Sea fleet resupplies, and it is also the primary route for supplies into Kherson and parts of Zaporizhzhia as the only other supply route is via Tokmak which is within Ukrainian artillery range (why do I have to point this out again - because you have a closed mind due to Russian BS). & weeks into the offensive and you would like to see Ukrainian troops destroy themselves on Russian defenses. Unfortunately for Russia, Ukrainians are not that stupid. Speaking of offensives, we're now 26 weeks into the Russian winter offensive - when is it going to even start? 30,000 soldiers KIA. They must be mostly Russian soldiers because Ukraine has lost only a fraction of that number ("why not just find the facts") - expect in Pootin's mind. "Houndreds" of armoured vehicles destroyed, over one "houndred" tanks destroyed - again your are quoting Russian propaganda instead of "finding the facts". "Why did they end negotiations in Turkey last April?" because there weren't negotiations in Turkey "last April", it was April the year before ("why not just find the facts"). And the reason they ended negotiations was because in April 2022 Ukraine was still loosing to Russian forces and they wanted to cut their losses. But Boris and others pledged their support and convinced Zelenskyy that he could do better than to cede so much territory to the aggressor. And they were right. In August 2022 the Ukrainian army brought Russian army advances to a halt. Since that time the Russian army has been unable to make any significant gains in Ukraine. The Russian army has been unable to capture so much as a single Ukrainian city in those 11 months. Over the same period the Ukrainian army has liberated over 13,000sq km of Ukrainian land, including six cities. That's why. It sucks to be a Russian troll.
    6
  112. This video has nothing to do with Avdiivka. It is about the south bank of the Denipro in Kherson oblast. You are "too silly" if you don't know that Avdiivka is not in Kherson.
    6
  113.  @АндрейАвто-г2у  "but 70% of russians are now in the rear," I'd have thought 70% of russian troops are now in the ground.
    6
  114.  @elinpelin17  There isn't in your bot farm.
    5
  115. As is the rust in their stockpile.
    5
  116. ​ @realiteechecka I believe most of the RA forces in non-combat areas have already been sent to fight Ukraine. Certainly there are forces from Vladisvostok fighting in Ukraine. And the Finnish border is very thinly defended. Strange really, considering how much Putin told his people he wouldn't accept NATO on his border.
    5
  117. Ukraine isn't losing territory. If what ruSSia has achieved around Avdiivka and Marinka is significant, then the Ukrainian counter offensive was a huge success - because it took a lot more land off the ruSSian invaders, than ruSSia has achieved in its current offensive. It cannot be helped that you can't figure this riddle out, as your brain has been damaged by excessive exposure to ruSSian disinformation.
    5
  118.  @freak94able  Who's Bander? Why are you bandying some irrelevant name? Why are you living in the past?
    5
  119.  @MerryMac1000  Be fair. They said Kyiv in 2 or 3 days, and all of Ukraine in a few weeks. Either way they have failed. Slava Ukraini.
    5
  120.  @kristianjensen5877  I think you are being very unfair... ....for leaving Belarus off your list. Slava Ukraini.
    5
  121. ​ @janom2687  What special operation? Russia is in an all out war with Ukraine, and barely holding its own. Stop reading Russian comic books. Slava Ukraini.
    5
  122. ​@dadlord689 A very senseless statement you made there. You claimed the money invested in supporting Ukraine achieved nothing. It achieved the liberation of 10% of Ukraine, including six cities. An unfortunate, but apparently necessary side effect is that it also resulted in the injuring, maiming, or death of ~300,000 ruzzian men.
    5
  123.  @dannylo5875  Just stop lying please.
    5
  124. ​@stupidburp I don't think so. I think they were part of the Ukrainian Peoples Republic which existed from 1917 to 1922.
    5
  125.  @ChickityChicken  "Whole nations will be eliminated". You're talking about Belarus and the Russian Federation no doubt. It's a same but you're right, those two nations need to be eliminated as they have shown themselves to be totally irresponsible and (with constant talk of nukes) a threat to the rest of the world.
    5
  126.  @freak94able  There you are going on about some irrelevant guy who died 60+ years ago, again. What was his name again? Stalin maybe?
    5
  127. The AFU aren't interested in occupying someone else's country. Only the ruSSians think like that. So when can we expect the ruSSian army to complete it's three day march on Kyiv then?
    5
  128.  @russellhammond371  You may have to considerably shorten the list of differences if the yellow fellow gets back into office.
    5
  129.  @kaboom1655  I didn't realise Lyiv had large enough POW camps.
    5
  130.  @QANews  Hey QANews. A just peace will come in due course. A hurried peace now will save some lives in the short term, but result in a greater loss of lives in the long term. Mad Dog Pootin must be stopped first - "To save lives on all sides." Best regards.
    5
  131.  @Bakarost  You thought wrong.
    5
  132.  @RabbitShirak  True, but there are more problems. Many of the Palestinians have lived in the area now for ten or twenty generations. It's what they think of home.Yet Israel keeps squeezing them out. Where would they go if Israel were to keep on this course of disregarding their property rights?
    5
  133.  arlekino1263  Yes, isn't it terrible what the Russian fascists are doing to their neighbor. Why don't they just go back to Russia and leave Ukraine alone?
    4
  134.  @SorbusAucubaria  Unfortunately I think you are right. They have built new spans for the bridge just months ago. The next new span(s) will be quicker. If ATACMs live up to GMLRS reputation then Ukraine will be able to hit the bridge easily in the near future.
    4
  135. ​ @edward6438 You also live in fantasy land.
    4
  136.  @Neunzahn  "Ukraine is not a democratic state, nor is russia". I agree that russia is not, but I strongly disagree about Ukraine. Ukraine has had two elections and a peaceful handover of power since its Maidan revolution. I'm not suggesting it's a perfect democracy (even the US democracy is flawed) but the elections appear to have been mostly free and fair, and Ukraine was certainly trying.
    4
  137.  @ravichitgopkar5304  Have you told North Korea or Iran? That would be a better way of obtaining lasting peace.
    4
  138.  @AussieGgc  Yeah, maybe I should only watch ruSSian propaganda channels.
    4
  139.  @Noel-ji8nm  "Ukraine has suffered over 300,000 KIA since the beginning of the conflict compared to Russia's 45,000" Hah, man have you been sucked in by Russian propaganda and BS. It makes you look like a fool when you say things like that.
    4
  140.  @Noel-ji8nm  "It's Ukraine who has Nazi tattoos." I'm sure there must be one or two Ukrainians with Nazi tattoos, just as I am sure there are one or two Russian fighters with Nazi tattoos - take Prigozins right hand man for example, he's covered in Nazi tattoos. What makes Russia "Nazi" is the fascist policies now coming out of the Kremlin. You sound like a hypocrite if you ignore Russia's Rusich and other neo-Nazi groups and individuals.
    4
  141.  @TROONTRON  Aren't you TroonTron the well known Russian troll?
    4
  142. ​@yoloswagolo1 No, it's why russia is losing over 1000 troops daily, with North Korean, Iranian, and Chinese aid.
    4
  143. Do you have foto or something to prove that those aircraft are not destroyed? After all, it happened in illegally occupied territory, so how are we supposed to get photos Ivan?
    4
  144. Agreed. But until we can convince the ruSSians to go home...
    4
  145. There are plenty of channels that give an overview. Try some of them. I like the RFU format where he concentrates on one particular area each episode.
    4
  146. Same happened in Ukraine (Kharkiv, Kherson), but the orcbots keep saying russia is winning huge victories, when it's obvious that they are not.
    4
  147. ​@AdrianHernandez-np3ik When it comes to pushing BS you're doing very well.
    4
  148.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  You mean, they CLAIM to have annexed all those places, but nobody recognises their claims because the referenda were faked/tampered with, and were not free and fair.
    4
  149.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  If they don't control all the land and it's not internationally recognised, then it's NOT annexed.
    4
  150. Because there aren't any areas where russia is making significant advances. And maybe you should tell us the cost to russia of the insignificant advances they are making.
    4
  151.  @msl2299  I agree. I give up trying to understand what he's saying. But as he appears to be pushing ruSSian disinformation, I don't spend too long trying to decipher his rantings.
    4
  152. They've got some T-14s hidden somewhere. Hidden so no one finds out how poorly made they are.
    4
  153.  @timparker4160  "ok buddy, believe whatever you like." So that's it then? You claim russia is winning, but you can't give a single example of where, who, or how. You aren't very clever are you!!
    4
  154. Why? Surely that's the job of pro-ruZZian channels?
    4
  155.  @freak94able  The Ukrainian counter offensive isn't going as well as hoped. But I take consolation from the fact that it's going a lot better than the Russian winter offensive. I mean, what did the winter offensive achieve? Few settlements and some farmland for 30.000 killer or wounded soldiers? If thats success for you with the second most powerful military in the world and decades of training then I can feel sorry for you only because the whole offensive was an utter failure.
    4
  156.  @niewaznie3764  Fair comment. The whole of the rest of the world laughs at Russia. Russia was going to capture all of Donetsk by New Year - after losing thousands of Russian troops they managed to take most of Soledar. And that was after New Year... Slava Ukraini.
    4
  157. Oh come on. The T-14 is so good that not a single one has been lost on the battlefield (only on the Moscow parade ground). lol Slava Ukraini.
    4
  158. Apparently, they can.
    4
  159.  @scipioafricanus5871  I fear there needs to be some haste. Wherever the frontlines are when the rains come, will likely remain the frontlines for the winter - which will give the Orcs time to set up new minefields and Ukraine will have to start de-mining all over again. I hope I'm wrong. Slava Ukraini.
    4
  160. ​ @steveos5112 russia is losing. Cope.
    4
  161.  @yellowtunes2756  Actually, you are wrong. Putin didn't say it, but his mouthpieces did. They said Kyiv would be taken in 2-3 days on ruzzian television.
    4
  162. Whereas it has no right to attack it's neighbor...
    4
  163.  @yellowtunes2756  Nah, more BS.
    4
  164. And yet ruSSia doesn't have air supremacy - in spite of having (so called) fifth generation aircraft. Then again, ruSSia has T-14 tanks...
    4
  165.  @vilnis-trash  "maybe try reading my first comment" I usually quote the comment that I am critiquing. Do you?
    4
  166.  @yellowtunes2756  "It's when you greatly exaggerating enemy casualties" Or when you greatly downplay your own casualties, such as claiming they are about one sixth of the actual numbers. How long have you been a war propagandist?
    4
  167.  @joachimfrank4134  "Bringing the railroad tracks under fire control would be enaugh". The one and only rail track running through the "land bridge" is immediately south of Tokmak - and about 20km from Robotyne. It is probably already within fire control. There are several highways that pass through Tokmak - which will also be with fire control. Unfortunately there is one other highway - the M14 - that follows the coast. Ukraine will have to get near Melitopol to cut that one.
    4
  168. "I’m about the truth". It's a shame you're not about writing in English. Between abbreviations and americanisms - you completely lost me... You might as well have written in Arabic.
    4
  169.  @Paul-wo3qh  Actually Paul, they haven't. I have this discussion frequently with my wife. Israelites left Palestine hundreds of years ago. They only returned after WW2. I don't think any property claims are valid after that period.
    4
  170.  @fabb5  "Shoigu Confirms" With those two words you discredited everything you said.
    4
  171.  @freak94able  Ukraine is already prevailing on the battlefield. How many cities has the Russian army captured in the last year? Not even one. Ukraine has liberated 6 cities in the last year.
    3
  172.  @marvinkmooney7744  No, he's right. All they have to do is leave. We know exactly why Putin ordered the attack on Ukraine. It is because he wants to recreate a "greater russia" and losing control of Ukraine will significantly hamper that aim. I hope you are not foolish enough to think it was to protect anyone... But you are right that this channel is focused on individual areas, and does not give an overall picture. I use this channel to supplement information I get from other channels. And if you're pushing ruSSian disinformation then you are right again when you say "You wont like hearing this" - because I'm bored with the BS that ruSSian trolls are attempting to spread..
    3
  173. RFU doesn't give an overview of the war - you have to go elsewhere for that. He concentrates on certain battles and gives a very good breakdown - better than anyone else. But are the ruSSians winning or losing? If you look at equipment losses on Oryx you'll see ruSSian vehicle losses average twice what Ukraine loses (and as western armoured vehicles are designed to protect the crew, while ruSSian vehicles are not - chances are ruSSian manpower losses are much higher than 2:1). And if you look at Deep State you will find that the ruSSian army has captured NO significant areas of Ukraine in over a year - while the Ukrainian army has liberated tens of thousands of sq km of Ukraine over the same period. That is not to say the ruSSians don't have some victories, but they are minor in comparison.
    3
  174.  @mtrivelin  He did say "no strategic value other than use for humanitarian purposes". I took it to mean no strategic military value.
    3
  175. And those Australian F-18s.
    3
  176.  @bambesfresser  You are right, this year is different from last year. But your statement "The line in the north won't move until the war is actually over" is guesswork. Slava Ukraini.
    3
  177.  @Nizmo718  How do you conclude Ukraine are loosing? As others have suggested - try some critical thinking so that you don't look like a Russian troll. The Ukrainian army brought the Russian army progress to a halt nearly a year ago. Since then the Russian army has been unable to capture any significant land are in Ukraine, and not so much as a single city. In contrast, over the same period, the Ukrainian army has liberated over 13,000sq km of Ukraine, mainly in Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts, including six cities. In the last year Ukraine has taken back 30% of the land under Russian occupation. So who is winning did you say?
    3
  178.  @prevedomedved  "and it is stupid to blame someone for what everyone is doing". No I disagree. If you want to put things right you have to make a start somewhere. Your policy of turning a blind eye to everything that is wrong, is what is "stupid" and "foolish".
    3
  179.  @yellowtunes2756  "Just because Ukraine intercepts Russian rockets above cities - doesn't mean that Russia targeted civilians". Oh, so hitting the Mariupol theatre with two precision bombs (for no reason) while it had 600 women and children inside, isn't targetting cilvilians? Hypocrite.
    3
  180.  @JohnCSmith-lp1qr  "What Russian offensive.? They took the donbass and Crimea now defending" My point exactly. They took the Donbas and have not taken anything more in a year. They are not capable of gaining Ukrainian land anymore and are desperately try to hold on to what they have got. But of course, in those 12 months the Ukrainian army has liberated huge areas of Ukraine. It sucks to be a ruSSian troll.
    3
  181. ​ @scotttracy9333 Just 10 days at the current rate.
    3
  182. ​ @ForelliBoy  Ignorance is no defense.
    3
  183.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  "so according to the rfu the eastern regions of Ukraine are russian". russia can think what it likes, it doesn't make it true. In fact russia lies all the time.
    3
  184. Indeed. Putin never visits his frontline troops (too scared) and ran for St Petersburg when Prigozhin was still over 100km away (very scared).
    3
  185.  @GusOfTheDorks  Nope, that doesn't worry me in the slightest. I prefer to hear about the victories, and there seem to be a lot of them. The ruSSian army hasn't had many victories in the last twelve months so there should only be Ukrainian victories to hear about.
    3
  186. You must be looking at a ruSSian map. In the real world ruSSia has lost 10,000 men to take 0.01% of Ukraine in recent months.
    3
  187.  @anthonywilson4873  Or it's not very intelligent kobekkop.
    3
  188. Yeah, only our universe is the real one, and yours is the fake parallel one.
    3
  189.  @Bird_McBride  "I've been in a civil war zone all my life so it's not a problem for me." Yes, we can tell you have. The repeated concussion is really effecting your thoughts process.
    3
  190. Ukraine isn't getting "smoked" anywhere. russian troops on the other hand...
    3
  191. ​ @dadlord689  Oh very seriously! But I must apologize that my reply got interrupted and sent unfinished. Ukraine liberated over 20,000 Sq km of land including 6 cities with that help.
    3
  192. ​@dadlord689 you suggest that Ukraine lied to ruzzia. Even if that were true, it would be no different to the multiple lies ruzzia has told Ukraine.
    3
  193.  @joshuabean9409  "the ussr was one of the nation's that claimed victory in ww2 over Germany. They won" That's right, the country that received aid from the west was among the winners, and the same will happen in this conflict.
    3
  194.  @joshuabean9409  "The forces that were Allied with the ruSSia won." Yes, it was the forces that Allied with Ukraine who won. It was the forces who received aid from the west that won. It will be the forces that receive aid from the west that win this conflict too. "It doesn't really mean anything it only betrays your perspective" That's right, and it betrays yours as well. Slava Ukraini.
    3
  195.  @barnysadventures  Maybe I'm mistaken, but I think he said two ships sunk and one damaged.
    3
  196. Nah, stick with Ukraine. We like your reporting and would hate to see it watered down with your attention elsewhere.
    3
  197. How are they doing in Syria?
    3
  198. ​@georgebettasso1395 Although actually, the US withdrawal from Afghanistan was voluntary, but completely stuffed up. The russian withdrawal from Syria was forced. So not "just like" at all.
    3
  199.  @nathanembree9216  No, maybe you should get the Bill passed and do both - because supporting Ukraine is at least as important as the border.
    3
  200. You are correct Peter. We have all understood that ruSSia will lose the war. But Putin wants to prolong the suffering.
    3
  201.  @alec1984  "Ukraine decided to go to war with Russia with Nato backing" Well of course they did. They were attacked by imperialist ruzzia and decided not to allow themselves to be overrun without a fight - which resulted in a war. But it is ruzzia that started the war. So we know who the "Muppet" is - just look in the mirror and you'll see him too.
    3
  202.  @jebes909090  Roll on the 701st time.
    3
  203.  @senatorjosephmccarthy2720  Actually buddy, Ukraine IS governed by a democracy. Zelensky was elected in a free and fair election in 2019 and there was a peaceful transition of power.
    3
  204.  @Warren_Peace  "they are no longer the Empires that they were..." And neither is ruSSia, apparently.
    3
  205.  @johnweak6788  I think you are looking at it wrong. This channel doesn't try to cover everything. He selects Ukrainian successes and analyses them - in detail better than any other channel. He could never hope to cover the entire war in this detail - and he obviously doesn't want to dwell on the losses and defeats. But if you want to hear about them there are plenty of other channels to visit. I like upbeat and detailed presentations he gives. I wouldn't want him to change. If this was the only channel reporting on the war then your criticism would be valid - but it's not the only channel.
    3
  206. juilius8698 is desperate because ruSSians thought they'd be finished 21 months ago, but have failed badly - so he makes stupid remarks to help himself cope.
    3
  207.  @Rtg5637  "Denigrating ruSSian small achievement" - What small achievement? ruSSian army gains in the last twelve months have been so small as to not register on the map. The Ukrainian counter-offensive, small as it may be, has gained more land than the entire ruSSian army has gained in twelve months. And that's not considering the huge areas of land the Ukrainian army liberated in the Kharkiv and Kherson offensives. "overhyping Ukrainian fruitless activity" - Why fruitless? Destroying hundreds of ruSSian armoured vehicles and tanks in a week is not fruitless. Pootin has managed to send more of his own ruSSian speaking and ethnic ruSSian troops to their deaths in four days, than the number of ruSSian speaking and ethnic ruSSian civilians that died in Donbas in the eight years 2014-2021. I wouldn't call those ruSSian troop losses fruitless on the part of Ukrainians.
    3
  208. That is why you should get your info from a number of sources - to get a fuller picture.
    3
  209.  @Gerrard_Pike2008  I'm surprised a known russian troll like you can count.
    3
  210.  @QuixlorrnGrotto  "Once upon a time, "people" were cannibals, but we have made some progress...". Unfortunately it appears that ruzzians haven't made as much progress as most of the rest of us.
    3
  211. Well actually, no Ukraine is not losing ground. But you keep believing ruSSian BS if you want - we don't care if you're deluded.
    3
  212. The reports are correct. The occupied area is nearly the same, but ruSSian forces are degraded. Ukraine has been concentrating on logistics - cutting off supplies to ruSSian forces. This has been very effective in some areas - the best recent example being ruSSia's artillery capacity. A year ago in Severodonesk ruSsians were firing 10 shells for every one that Ukraine could fire. This month, Ukrainian shells fired have outnumbered ruSSian shells fired for the first time. Another example is the recent attack on helicopters in Berdyansk, which has severely reduced the ability of ruSSia to attack targets in support of ruSSian ground troops. ruSSia doesn't have "huge resources at their disposal to cover up these losses". ruSSia has to pull troops away from the front near Kupyansk in order to back forces near Avdiivka and Robotyne because they are so short of troops.. And with thousands being killed around Avdiivka there will be a shortage that cannot be filled without further recruitment.
    3
  213.  @freak94able  Stepan Bandera died over 60 years ago. He's as relevant to the current aggression by Russia, as Stalin and Lenin. You need to stop living in the past Mr Ordog. "Back to the USSR" - sorry, wrong Lennon. Any comments on the genocide being committed by Russia under Putin? Do you realise that Adolf would be proud of the fascist policies current emanating from the Kremlin.
    3
  214.  @yellowtunes2756  "it doesn't matter that Ukrainians are succeeding" Well there's a Freudian slip. Thanks for the confirmation yellowtroll2756.
    3
  215.  arlekino1263  Yes, isn't it terrible what the Russian fascists are doing to their neighbor. Why don't they just go back to Russia and leave Ukraine alone?
    3
  216.  @artiomantry  "with 30% occupied area in Ukraine". You know you look foolish when you write false information like this. ruSSia occupies just 18% of Ukraine - which means that we can dismiss anything you say as being untrue.
    3
  217.  @QANews  Hey QANews. There is no evidence to substantiate your disinformation. Regrettably, attempting to discover any fictitious validation may waste huge amounts of time and effort on my part, so I won't bother. Best of luck in your search for more propaganda, and warm regards.
    3
  218.  @frekihelviti  One important factor you have left out. That is Israel breeding more Palestinian extremists. By allowing legitimate Palestinian land owners no recourse in the law when Israeli extremists drive them off their land, and by having the US veto nearly every UN resolution on these inequities (and by Israel ignoring the few that aren't vetoed), Israel has given young Palestinians no other option than to attempt violence. This is a direct cause of Palestinian extremism. This is driving people to Hamas and other extremist groups. Tell me what you think a Palestinian driven off his land should do?
    3
  219.  @MrSlugny  "or did you make those numbers up by yourself?" Likely he did some research. Maybe you should try it.
    3
  220. Nah, they still have heaps of rusty vehicles in storage. The problem is the closer they get to the bottom of the barrel, the worse the condition and equipment on the tanks and other armoured vehicles (we've all seen the pictures of various weaponry attached to armoured fighting vehicles - Mad Max style). I wonder if the production of new tanks is effected - do they still come out of the factory with all the bits and bobs they had 18 months ago?
    2
  221.  @robkit007  Yes, what you say is all BS little Russian troll.
    2
  222. This is a report on the Kursk area. New York isn't in Kursk. What part of that don't you understand?
    2
  223.  @Andalus_EU  Nonetheless, the naval infantry from Vladivostok are in Ukraine, being depleted, instead of defending Vladisvostok. Same with russian troops from the Finnish border. Ditto russian troops form Murmansk, Armenia, Syria, Georgia... They have no business being in Ukraine - a separate sovereign nation.
    2
  224.  @Andalus_EU  "What were the marines doing in Afghanistan? Same thing." They were occupying another sovereign nation. It seems to be a russian thing".
    2
  225.  @Andalus_EU  "What were the marines doing..." So why aren't they on the Baltic or Finnish borders, keeping out the invading NATO hordes? Because Putin lied to you, NATO is not a threat. russian troops are dying for nothing.
    2
  226.  @kaboom1655  With Putin it's all about Roubles and power.
    2
  227.  @ravichitgopkar5304  Thanks for the laugh. Or do you believe that drivel you wrote?
    2
  228.  @Neunzahn  "I'm part of the west, so I like to see our interests followed, but risking a big war with russia is not in our interests". So how is capitulating to russian aggression in your "interests"?
    2
  229.  @peterlim1972  "If ruSSia can annexed the Donbass region as a part of Russia" Ahh "If". Unfortunately for ruSSia, and unfortunately for ruSSian trolls like yourself, ruSSia cannot annex the Donbas. And ruSSia does not fully control the Donbas. And nobody - I mean NOBODY - recognises the fake referenda and false annexations ruSSia claims. Nobody: Not the United Nations; not former Warsaw Pact countries; not BRICS contries, not even CSTO countries. No neutral organisations. None of ruSSia's "friends". Nobody. The annexations are a joke, and you are a victim of the joke. "and if that is not showing something, tell me what is?" You are correct, ruSSia has failed to occupy the Donbas and therefore "that is not showing something". What is showing something is that Ukraine, after 20+ years of interference and undermining by ruSSia, is still standing against the world's second most powerful military. Now that IS showing something. Slava Ukraini.
    2
  230.  @dushyantchahal2881  Gee you talk some rubbish. It appears that your hatred of the US has twisted your mind. You are morally corrupt if you support Russia, and you are $tupid if you do so only because you hate the US. I don't particularly like the US either, but I'm not so blinded that I can't see which nation is the evil one in this conflict. But you are!
    2
  231.  @abu-omaral-bakr392  Nobody can end this war now, except Russia - by removing its troops from Ukraine, all of Ukraine. Any other "peace" will leave Ukraine robbed, and Russia emboldened. It would be a temporary peace at best. This needs to be sorted now, not shoved into the background to fester.
    2
  232.  @somnia3423  It's alright, it wasn't a serious posting. @meme4one is a known ruzzian troll. He can be ignored.
    2
  233. @yoloswagolo1 "do you note realise that ukraine is on thr verge of defeat". No, I did not realise - because it's not. Do you not realise russia is on the verge of collapse?
    2
  234. @yoloswagolo1 "google how much land russia has taken in the last 3 months alone". I did. 0.05%. Just a tiny bit. SFA.
    2
  235. @yoloswagolo1 "is that why Ukraine is considering forcing 18 year old" Actually, it's not. Where do you source all your false information?
    2
  236. ​ @Mr97cobravert  Estimates are that ~700,000 have fled the country to avoid becoming "volunteers".
    2
  237. ​ @Mr97cobravert  Isn't it terrible the pain Putin has inflicted on both countries.
    2
  238. ​ @wiktorpoliszczuk1372  You're not making any sense - you must be a bot.
    2
  239.  @prevedomedved  Is ruzzia on the 'Unfriendly countries list', because it is an unfriendly country. If it's not on the list, then the list incomplete and therefore is worthless.
    2
  240. ​ @prevedomedved No. They started it in 1939 with the Treaty they signed with Hitler to divide Poland between them. Poles know the true colors of the ruzzians.
    2
  241.  @yellowtunes2756  Nah, BS.
    2
  242.  @MrSlugny  "Deadly strike on ruzzian shopping centre in Belgorod". As @yellowbelly says "Just because Ukraine intercepts ruzzian rockets above cities" this is because ruzzia intercepts Ukrainian rockets above shopping centres in Belgorod.
    2
  243.  @Imperial_loyalist  "Who is ruSSia asking for help from?" Iran, North Korea and Belarus. Russia has also withdrawn men and weaponry from Syria and Armenia. "ruSSia uses a small part of its soldiers" Not so, ruSSia is short of soldiers. ruSSia has drawn troops from the Finnish and Norwegian borders, from the far east of ruSSia, from Syria, from Armenia, and from the hinterland. That is why Prigozhin's men were able to drive, almost unhindered, from Rostov to just short of Moscow. ruSSia needs a huge mobilisation (before the elections) if it is to maintain the present frontlines. And you forget the the ruSSian army has been unable to take any significant land in Ukraine for over twelve months, while the Ukrainian army has liberated huge areas - including over 18,000sq km in Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts - over that same twelve months. You are just a silly misinformed ruSSian troll.
    2
  244.  @CCCPRusRus  Yes I like to compare Kursk to Donetsk. 1) Kursk is relatively unscathed and very suitable for Ukrainian purposes including resettlement with Ukrainian people when russia has lost the war. Donetsk is being systematically levelled. None of the town and villages are taken, they are all raized to the ground by russia. russia takes nothing worth having. 2) Both threaten essential supply routes. 3) Kursk demonstrates to russian people that Putin cannot defend them.
    2
  245. Agreed. It's a shame Putin has put everyone through this.
    2
  246.  @jacobfrederick3614  Turkey has closed the Bospherous to warships. If it's come from Iran by sea, then it's come through the canal system from the Capstan Sea. I was under the impression it was simply ferrying military supplies across the Black Sea from ruzzia, due to ongoing problems with the Kerch rail bridge (I believe some of the lightly damaged spans haven't been replaced and are weight restricted).
    2
  247.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  There's a legal process for annexation that includes free and fair ballots. That never happened - so they are not annexed.
    2
  248.  @kevinsmarts9953  Do you mean "do I think russia conducted free and fair elections when they annexed Poland?" via the Ribbentrop-Molotov Agreement. No it wasn't internationally recognised and neither Germany, nor russia, control Poland. So what was your point?
    2
  249.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  If you believe that, then you probably even believe that all those munitions were destroyed by "falling debris".
    2
  250.  @Sean-n2m  What backpedaling? Where? You don't show any in your quoted piece. Nor does it mention Zelenskyy. I think you are full of ruSSian BS. Maybe you are the one in mommy's basement?
    2
  251. You're telling me I'm LGBT?
    2
  252.  @primum_parare  Odesa (learn to spell) and Kyiv are NOT your home. Siberia, maybe.
    2
  253. ​@@markbranham7355 Wrong Mark. ruzzia made the claim. Milley merely agreed.
    2
  254.  @QANews  Hey QANews. Let me explain ONE MORE TIME to aid your comprehension. 1) It is against ruSSian law to allow communities "the fundamental right to self-determination". A sign of ruSSia's disregard for human rights. 2) Crimea DID NOT exercise its choice to join ruSSia. To do so would have required a free and fair referendum. This did not occur. 3) You (nor I) have any idea whether or not the Donbas region aspired to achieve independence. Some residents of the Donbas expressed a desire for semi or full autonomy, some did not. The last time the region had a vote on the matter was when the Donbas decided to seek independence from the USSR as PART OF UKRAINE (not as an independent region). 4) By attacking Ukraine ruSSia has demonstrated that it is not a responsible member of the global community. Being a member of the UNSC exacerbates ruSSia's irresponsibility. 5) ruSSia has never been tasked with aiding any communities in their pursuit of self-determination (where were they when Chechnya wanted self-determination?). 6) As a neighboring nation ruSSia was directly involved in causing events in the Donbas, when it had an international agreement to keep out of Ukraine. In the Partition Treaty of the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet, of 1997, ruSSia not only agreed to the sovereignty of Ukraine (an agreement it has broken), but also agreed not to interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine (another agreement it has broken). 7) ruSSia did not initiate a 'Special Operation', ruSSia initiated an invasion and a WAR against a sovereign neighbour. ruSSia had NO rights to intervene in Ukrainian affairs. ruSSia had NO mandate to intervene in Ukrainian affairs. ruSSia has demonstrated to the world that it is NOT a responsible member of the international community. So kindly cut the BS and the lies. Warmest regards and may peace be upon us all as soon as Russia leaves Ukraine.
    2
  255.  @swe1733  You are suggesting that the initial 150,000 is 100% of ruZZian forces. However, I too doubt that 1.4 is the number of ruzzian 200s. It could well be ruzzian 200s, 300s, plus those that fled the country to avoid mobilisation (said to be 500,000 - 700,000).
    2
  256. Crying? I thought Putin was always crying for a ceasefire, Ivan.
    2
  257.  @nik6759  "It’s only in your opinion, which has nothing common with the reality". Having seen the pictures of the burnt out and sunk ruSSian ship today, it seems that he is in touch with reality - and that you are the one who looks foolish.
    2
  258.  @siennavanlife9502  Dunno. I think they must have drowned in there.
    2
  259. ​ @mclukas44lol25  The first treaty with russia is the one signed in Hungary's capital, in 1994, in which russia recognised the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Source: look it up. Then there's the Partition Treaty on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet, of 1997, in which russia not only agrees to the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine, but also agrees not to interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine (Huh, I wonder why they needed that clause). Again, look it up, it's on the internet.
    2
  260.  @mclukas44lol25  Then there's the Russo-Ukrainian Friendship Treaty, of 1997, in which russia once again agrees to recognise the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Look it up.
    2
  261.  @mclukas44lol25  Then there's the Agreement of the Azov Sea and the Kerch Strait, of 2003. Source: again, look it up.
    2
  262.  @mclukas44lol25  Then there are the Minsk 1 & 2 Accords of 2014/2015 in which ALL combatants agree to halt hostilities and withdraw. See how many international treaties russia has broken. russia broke multiple friendship treaties and sent WMD to a state neighbouring NATO. You can easily see who the aggressor is - unless you are blind.
    2
  263.  @mclukas44lol25  The first treaty with russia is the one signed in Hungary's capital, in 1994, in which russia recognised the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Source: look it up.
    2
  264. Really? Silly ruSSian troll.
    2
  265.  @vladimirpaiz  The fascists already have an atomic bomb. The fascists have the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons in the world.
    2
  266.  @ak-od7mf  Maybe you don't know what a dictator is, because Putin is one. Zelensky is a good leader who visits his troops on the frontlines. Whereas Putin is gutless. He ran scared to St Petersburg when Prigozhin was still over 100km from Moscow.
    2
  267. Flying through the air carrying packages with surprises for those below. It sounds just like the real Santa Claus. lol
    2
  268.  @HellIsInfinite  True there were small losses and even some gains. It's good to see such losses of ruSSian men and equipment.
    2
  269. Yes you do seem to be emotionally damaged. Possibly, intellectually as well. Silly ruSSian troll.
    2
  270.  @kellscorner1130  Sounds like russian propaganda to me.
    2
  271.  @CyberBeep_kenshi  I have also stopped watching his videos. It was his coverage of Gaza that was the final straw.
    2
  272.  @marksimpson4215  "and training dogs" Whereas the ruzzians are training dolphins. "saw the lack of Ukrainians as a problem, they never stood a chance" Past tense? That's a bit rich 640 days into your 3 day war.
    2
  273. It's good to see Ukraine continuing to regain ground from the Orcs. By my rough calculations (using the Deep State map), Ukrainian forces have now taken an additional 1800 square kilometres east of the Oskill river (blue areas only), and around 950 square kilometres in Kherson oblast, since the beginning of the month. Slava Ukraini.
    2
  274. I hope you are right, because right now the US looks like a very unreliable ally. Ukraine is unable to trust that the US will support them "as long as it takes".
    2
  275.  @csuporj  At the current rate - ruSSia will run out of money and cannon fodder first.
    2
  276. Yes, in spite of being surrounded by reality, Putin still lies to the people. It's really appalling that he treats his ruZZian people so badly.
    2
  277.  @wai828  Very well said sir. Slava Ukraini.
    2
  278.  @freak94able  Yes, why do you side with russia?
    2
  279. Keep trying to cope.
    2
  280.  @beba5865  Delusional.
    2
  281.  @litlbit5980  The more recent parodies conducted by the ruZZians. So there were no referenda of independence, nor on joining ruZZia. Certainly none that had even the resemblence of validity.
    2
  282.  @TROONTRON  How is the spreading of mis-information going? It sucks to be a Russian troll.
    2
  283.  @mikrosixtysix  thb the russians are not winning. russia's hold of Ukrainian land has dropped from ~26% at maximum, to ~17% now. That's called "Losing".
    2
  284. Wrong conclusion.
    2
  285. Maybe. But less of them woke up this morning than yesterday morning...
    2
  286. "I hope atacms come fast!" - In access of mach 3 - apparently. lol
    2
  287.  @vilnis-trash  "quote my first comment then" I have no intention of quoting your first comment. Many others have already commented on it. If you have a problem with it you could always edit or even remove it.
    2
  288.  @vilnis-trash  "It is just what it is" And you are what you are.
    2
  289.  @hatchxable  Can't handle the truth Hatch?
    2
  290. I'm glad you've not been distracted by the war in Israel vs Hamas. That would be a great loss.
    2
  291. Yeah, I find that too. You get down to this end of the comments and it's full of ruSSian trolls going "bla bla"
    2
  292.  @malcolmhamilton5200  What a sad, moaning sod you are. Look at what's happening around the world and realise you have it so good, even if not exactly what you would like.
    2
  293.  @nickfielding5685  "Donbas and Kriema voted for inderpent from Ukraine". No they didn't.
    2
  294.  @nickfielding5685  And your spelling is as poor as your understanding of what's happening in Ukraine.
    2
  295.  arlekino1263  Yes, isn't it terrible what the Russian fascists are doing to their neighbor. Why don't they just go back to Russia and leave Ukraine alone?
    2
  296. Ukraine rotates their troops when they can because they value their people.
    2
  297.  @elliotharris3965  Same here. I hope he gets well soon. I really miss not getting an update - but everyone should take time off when needed.
    2
  298.  @CIAVE  Yes, but you'll have to wait for him to do a video on that subject. This video is about Kherson oblast.
    2
  299.  @kxng_k0Ng_  I understand only that you're a ruSsain troll. What's with the "y'all"? Can't you speak properly?
    2
  300. "according to the commander of the "Akhmat" special forces" That says it all really. @namur thinks this is a joke thread.
    2
  301.  @yellowtunes2756  "Imagine if Ukraine let go of Donbas and Crimea in 2014 instead of bombing them". And you are hanging out with liars and hypocrites as you believe this. They didn't "bomb" them. That's russian BS. Sure they fought armed separatists, but it was not one-sided - and it wouldn't have been necessary had russia not armed the separatists and fought alongside them.
    2
  302.  @yellowtunes2756  "And no-one wants to have 45 million enemies at you border." What enemies? Ukraine wasn't russia's enemy. Thousands of Ukrainians have close relatives in russia. Ukraine just wanted to go about it's business as any sovereign nation is entitled to do. But russia made an enemy of Ukraine.
    2
  303.  @yellowtunes2756  "Just like there was no russian threat to Ukraine before they decided to join NATO." - Sigh, more russian propaganda. It is exactly because russia was a threat to Ukraine that Ukraine wanted to join a defensive alliance. It is because russia is a threat that almost all the former Warsaw Pact countries wanted to join NATO. It is because russia is a threat that Geoirgia and Moldova also want to join NATO. It is because russia is a threat that Finland and Sweden joined NATO. Please, stop with your lies.
    2
  304.  @yellowtunes2756  "Just like there was no russian threat to Ukraine before they decided to join NATO." If russian is such a warm friendly peaceful country, why is it that all the Warsaw Pact countries clamored to join a defensive alliance? Why is it that former USSR republics of Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova - who know russia so well - are begging to join NATO? It is because they know russia so well that they know russia is a threat. Please stop supporting the strong in their attacks on the weak.
    2
  305.  @yellowtunes2756  No, Serbia wasn't minding its own business, it was conducting massive atrocities in other former Yugoslavian areas (remember Serbernica). No, Iraq wasn't minding its own business, it was invading another sovereign nation - Kuwait. Syria was minding its own business, but it was killing it's own people, something you falsely claim Ukraine was doing in the Donbas. Something you falsely claim justifies russia's attacks on Ukraine. The US had no business attacking Afghanistan. But you would probably agree with the US attacking Afghanistan, because you support the strong attacking the weak.
    2
  306.  @yellowtunes2756  "when I'm talking about Ukrainian bad deeds?" I ask again, what Ukrainian "bad deeds"? And no russian propaganda in your reply, just balanced facts please.
    2
  307.  @yellowtunes2756  Yes I supported when the world supported the weak in Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Yes I supported when the world supported the weak in Serbia's terrible crimes in Bosnia. But this is whataboutism. There is usually fault on both sides. But not in the case of rusia attacking Ukraine. That is just blatant aggression from russia. What Ukrainian "bad deeds"? In your reply just balanced facts please.
    2
  308.  @yellowtunes2756  "and that it doesn't matter if you support it or not". But it does matter when you spread lies to justify the strong (russia) attacking the weak (Ukraine). It also makes you, yellowtunes, a hypocrite.
    2
  309.  @yellowtunes2756  "when I'm talking about Ukrainian bad deeds?" I ask again, what Ukrainian "bad deeds"? I'm expecting a burst of russian propaganda and BS.
    2
  310.  @mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520  I have checked, but can't find anywhere by that name in Ukraine (this is a thread about Ukraine after all). I found a Korosten, and a Kovel, even a Konstantinovka. Could you tell me which oblast your Kosovka is in? Or why you are trying "whataboutism"?
    2
  311.  @ledlight1487  I have looked, but can't find anywhere by that name in Ukraine (this is a thread about Ukraine after all). I found a New York. Could you tell me which oblast your Ameryka is in? More silly "whataboutism"?
    2
  312.  @yellowtunes2756  "when I'm talking about Ukrainian bad deeds?" Again I ask, what Ukrainian "bad deeds"? I'm still expecting a load of old, long debunked, russian propaganda and lies.
    2
  313.  @ares1647  Totally "whataboutism" without addressing the OPs point. All large powers are open to abusing that power. russia, China, USA. But "What makes you so different from Russia ?". Assuming the "you" you refer to is the USA - of the three mentioned above, the US does not invade other sovereign countries and annex land for the US. However most western citizens do care about what their governments does outside their borders. And they are able to protest and try to change their governments mind (the anti-Vietnam war protests being an example). Try doing that in russia or China.
    2
  314.  @ares1647  "You alone decide what rule-based order is". Here you a talking bollocks. The "rules-based order" is part of the UN Charter, and all countries who have joined the UN have agreed to it. There is no compulsion to be a UN member - russia is free to leave any time it likes.
    2
  315.  @beba5865  What facts? You don't have any.
    1
  316.  @pnduarte4696  Mostly unsuccessful "hits". But you miss the main point: Ukraine attacks military targets in Russia - this weakens Russia. Russia attacks civilian targets in Ukraine - this angers the population and makes them more determined to defeat Russia - strengthening Ukraine. It's a Lose - Lose situation for Russia.
    1
  317.  @pnduarte4696  "You have one that is confirmed and the rest is speculation from one of worst youtuber for information." And yet you claimed successful hits in Ukraine - which is also speculative. And as it turns out - he was correct - and you were wrong. Man, it sucks to be a Russian troll.
    1
  318.  @Joaquin546  Sam is a ruSSian troll. Don't take too much notice of the disinformation he's trying to push.
    1
  319.  @unclegrandpaontrade3865  They have reached none of their stated goals for this Stupid Military Operation, and are further from reaching them than they were 20 months ago. Mostly women and children were sent out of the country for their personal safety, as the belligerent ruSSians were targetting civilians. Most will return when the ruSSian invaders are banished from Ukrainian territory. You figure of 50% is just ridiculous.
    1
  320.  @Billballbill  "The people's will can not be cancelled or delayed in a democratic free country" Actually, it can. Most democratic countries allow for the suspension of elections during times of disruption, such as war or natural disasters. What a shame Russia does not allow "The people's will" to prevail. Russia's rigged elections mean that the people are working for the president and not the opposite. What a shame Russia invaded their neighbor without good reason, thereby hampering Ukraine's ability to allow "The people's will" to prevail. Anyway, your post was obsolete before you wrote it.
    1
  321. ​​@yellowtunes2756 Hey, you can believe any bs you like - I'm just pointing out something much closer to the truth than the bs you seem to follow - snowflake.
    1
  322.  @stefannikolic4401  "Let's not forget that russia also gained millions of people from the four regions.". And yet there are very few men of fighting age to be found in the russian controlled parts of those four oblasts - because they have been sent to the front to be lost in meat waves. The same will happen to the rest of Ukraine should the russian war monkeys be allowed to succeed (sorry, I can't use the word that is almost the same a "monkey" and describes the russians best).
    1
  323.  @noone6037  Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  324.  @Noel-ji8nm  Yup Russia still losing. The Russian army hasn't been able to take any significant Ukrainian land for 12 months. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Not even a single city. The Ukrainian army, over the same period, has liberated over 13,000sq km of Ukrainian land , including six cities. Russia sucks.
    1
  325.  @freak94able  "those are levelled since 2014 but nice that you noticed after 9 years" Hah, more disinformation. ruZZian forces level that industrial area in the last few days. ruZZia levelled Mariupol last year, while most of its 400,000 civilian population was still living in it. And Pooptin claims he wants to protect ruZZian speakers and ethnic ruZZians. What a BS artist Pooptin is.
    1
  326.  @ibrahimguler6177  "Who said that? Can you share the official statement?" Yes, it was said on ruZZian television. So do you think the plan was for the Stupid Military Operation to last 666+ days - and still not take Kyiv? Wake up.
    1
  327. Why do you strongly advise people to find an alternative? Obviously you do and it's giving you pro-Russia bias. I'd call that a "FAIL" on your part.
    1
  328.  @saumyacow4435  Just wait. If there is slow progress there will be a reason why. I don't want to see Ukrainian troops rush in and get eliminated, and hopefully you don't either.
    1
  329. ​ @aleksa550 You too should try using your brain for once, vatnik.
    1
  330.  @samgragas8467  "You watched too many movies" And you Sam have watched too much ruSSian television.
    1
  331. ​@MyCaptainPugwash You've got the wrong end of the stick there buddy. I was replying to the OP. I'm a Ukraine supporter and I agree with you 100%.
    1
  332. I didn't think you ruSSian bots are allowed to call it a "war".
    1
  333.  @kellikline6359  "Russia is about to take the rest of the Donbas" (there, I spelt "Donbas" correctly for a ruSSian Dombass). If you had correct information instead of ruSSian propaganda, you wouldn't say that. ruSSia was going to take Donbas (along with the rest of Ukraine) back in February, 2022 - but failed. Then they were to take the Donbas by October, 2022 - but failed. Then Pooptin set a deadline to take the Donbas by the New Year - but the ruSSian army failed. Then he set a hugely reduced target of just taking Bakhmut by the end of March, 2023 - but the ruSSian army failed. It took until May for a separate fighting force (not the ruSSian army) to take Bakhmut. So what on Earth makes you think that this time will be any different? You may be right. The ruSSian army might take Avdiivka - at HUGE cost to ruSSia. The chances of ruSSia occupying all of the Donbas any time soon - such as Pooptin's latest target of the end of this year - are just about nil. And why do you support the aggressor in this conflict anyway? No moral compass maybe?
    1
  334.  @kellikline6359  "those of us who knew all along that Ukr didn't have the slightest chance of winning" And I bet you "knew all along" that ruSSia would take Kyiv in 3 days... Please don't make me laugh.
    1
  335.  @robkit007  Have you got a better source (and please don't quote the Russian MoD - I might rip my stitches laughing)?
    1
  336. I love how ruSSian trolls like Pisatel think ruSSia isn't losing after 600+ days of their three day capture of Kyiv - against a much weaker nation. Everyday is a nightmare for the troops on both sides - but for ruSSian troops it's extra bad because they keep getting wasted in their meatwave attacks.
    1
  337. Comment from a Pootin apologist.
    1
  338. ​ @GaryBerki "Who lnows the facts", yeah, right. Pull the other one.
    1
  339. Whereas you Adolf adorers crack me up. The amount of justification of unwarranted aggression just makes you look sad.
    1
  340.  @JohnnyBGood1970  "it's got to be killer for you to be this uninformed". Who's uninformed? You are !!! Remember it's day 761 of Putin's 3-day take over of Kyiv and two week capture of Ukraine - and still russia is 1000 days from capturing Donbas. None of russia's objectives have been achieved. ussia's foreign markets are decimated. Over 400,000 russian men are injured, maimed, or worse. Between 500,000 and 700,000 thousand young educated russians have fled the country. - And you think russia is winning !!!
    1
  341.  @yevgeny79  Because russia has used it's agents in Poland to cause disruption.
    1
  342.  @robertmarks2379  "...to start funding the destruction of Ukraine". I knew it already, but that definitely proves that you peddle ruZZian disinformation. Who did you say is causing destruction in Ukraine? And if your answer isn't "ruZZia" then you are lying or misinformed.
    1
  343.  @freak94able  Another boring ruSSian troll. And where exactly are they retreating? Somewhere deep in your propaganda addled brain they're retreating.
    1
  344. ruSSia wants to drag it out in the hope the west will loose interest - and places like the "States" will get olde No.45 back (fat chance). Expoect several more years of small Ukrainian victories and large ruSSian losses. Unless Pootin has a heart attack and his replacement pulls out of Ukraine.
    1
  345. I think you're a "ham-ass". You seem to have your presidents mixed. It is bunker boy Putin who has the superyachts. That ham-fisted ruzzian attempt to accuse Zelensky of having bought a yacht was debunked weeks ago. I guess that news didn't reach you in the bot farm - where you are protected from the truth, and fed lies instead.
    1
  346.  @kenkaniff4739  Oh dear. Another Russian troll who doesn't yet realise that Russia has had it's ass whipped.
    1
  347. Silly ruSSian troll. He didn't mention Avdiivka. This video is about Kherson oblast. Man you ruSSian trolls have poor geographic comprehension skills and a low attention span - or very poor understanding. You probably also think Moscow is a country in Africa.
    1
  348.  @robkit007  Just the sort of stupid question you'd expect from a Russian troll. Why is he missing it? Because it's missing. Why are you here?
    1
  349.  @mattfgln  Yes, russian supporters are.
    1
  350.  @mattfgln  Yes, russian supporters are.
    1
  351.  @fabb5  Silly ruZZian troll - there can be no "peace" until the aggressor is defeated. Why would you want to reward aggression?
    1
  352.  @QANews  Hey QANews. It's true that "Older men declare war" - and please note that Putin, who is considerably older than Zelenskyy, is the one who declared war. If you are so keen on peace, why are you a ruSSian supporter? Best regards.
    1
  353.  @QANews  " suggesting an attempt at silencing my voice; which is censorship." There are various views, and little consensus on whether silencing disinformation is censorship. Nevertheless there is provision on Youtube to report both 'spam' and 'misinformation'. While you promote both in your postings you are liable to be censored, justifiably. Maybe if you stuck to the truth, you would be reported less. Your lies include "for spreading peace" as you are not attempting to spread anything but a very temporary peace to allow the ruSSian warmonger to consolidate the declining gains it has as a reward for its aggression, while preparing for further war. Warmest regards and may peace be upon you once ruSSia has left Ukraine.
    1
  354. "He must be really sick" - you mean, not "man flu"? Just kidding. Get well soon.
    1
  355.  @luca-yd8jk  Yes, but think how much money he's skimming off all these new military contracts. Putin will be able to afford another mansion or two and a larger superyacht. What does he care how many Russian serfs get killed in the process.
    1
  356.  @m.2038  Because russia has attempted to invade Ukraine and is currently doing its best to destroy the country. It makes having elections hard. Why don't you tell Putin to obey international law and pull his troops out of Ukraine so they can have an election? Why Putin banning free and fair elections in russia?
    1
  357.  @QANews  Hey QANews. I'm surprised you still believe that long debunked nonsense about "genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine" - as the only country conducting such genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine is ruSSia. ruSSian shelling and bombing has killed tens of thousands of ruSSian speakers and ethnic ruSSians in Mariupol alone, probably well over 100,000. And then there's the senseless slaughter of civilians by ruSSians in other parts of Eastern Ukraine. To enable the pursuit of self-determination in the Donbas region, ruSSia should contemplate GOING HOME in order to save lives - and to allow a free and fair, UN monitored referendum. Best regards.
    1
  358. They must have been Russian battalions - because that sure isn't Ukrainian losses.
    1
  359.  @samgragas8467  You wish, Russian troll.
    1
  360.  @yellowtunes2756  Time to check your facts again. - Crimea IS part of the warzone; - If the civilians were locals going about their business as best they coulld, I would not call them stupid. If the civilians were tourists who had deliberately placed themselves in greater danger, yes I would call them stupid - no matter what nationality.
    1
  361.  @albinklein7680  What facts? 670 days into Putin's 3 day capture of Kyiv and you think ruSSia isn't losing. Deluded ruSSian troll.
    1
  362.  @ВладимирМихайленко-ю7т  There is no evidence that the planes weren't shot down. So why send out a rescue helicopter if the planes landed safely? Why stop bombing Krynky if the planes are still safe? There is a photo of a burning ship in Feodosia... But this is not an oil tanker - it is a landing ship. And you have no evidence to the contrary.
    1
  363. ​ @albinklein7680  You would not recognize a fact if you saw one. Nothing but ruzzian BS and disinformation.
    1
  364.  @QANews  Hey Q-anon. ruSSia is not a responsible member of the global community and ruSSia has no rights and no mandate to interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine. Best regards and may peace be upon us all as soon as ruSSia pulls out of Ukraine.
    1
  365.  @mirfjc  I think the second batch of 14 Challengers was delivered this week. That means the US is now 140 MBTs in arrears.
    1
  366. "Who is the liar here?" It's you apparently. Have you not tried some fact checking?
    1
  367. Goodbye.
    1
  368.  @t.n.h.ptheneohumanpatterna8334  Nope, this is the best investment the west can make. We all care about Ukraine because we know that the belligerent invader must be stopped.
    1
  369.  @Nizmo718  I do think for myself, but found that I came to the same conclusion as others - that you lack critical thinking. You may be from the UK (or not) but you are certainly a Russian troll. Yup, twelve months since the Russian army has been able to make any significant advances in Ukraine. But since the Ukrainians halted the Russian army's advance (a year ago), Ukraine has liberated over 13,000sq km of Ukrainian territory. Pure, undeniable facts (though no doubt you'll find excuses - you trolls are like that). Neither you nor I have accurate information on casualty rates for Ukrainian or Russian troops - but living in a free country you have the right to believe any fantasy you want. That includes your fantasy that weapons were being brought in through the ports of Odessa. And there are heaps of roads and railways bringing in supplies from NATO neighbours. You really are a sucker for Russian propaganda.
    1
  370.  @joostdriesens3984  I agree that it is good to compare. However, when the host quotes Russian MoD figures, but then goes on to treat them like they are facts, I know there's a problem. And when I look at the comment section I find it is full of pro-Russian sycophants who still believe nonsense such as Ukraine shelled the Donbas for 9 years killing 13,000 civilians, and other Russian propaganda.
    1
  371.  albinvega7008  I am sure that when Stepan Bandera went to the local shop he said "A loaf of bread please" - so anyone who asks for a loaf of bread is obviously a dirty nazi - by your measure. Stepan Bandera is dead, and has been for so long he's totally irrelevant - just like Lenin is totally irrelevant in this war. Maybe it's time you brought you mind to the 21st century and had a look around to see who is the most belligerent leader.
    1
  372.  albinvega7008  How many Poles did Stalin have slaughtered? How many Russian speakers and ethnic Russians did Stalin have slaughtered? How many Ukrainians did Stalin kill? Time to stop living in the past Albi.
    1
  373.  @captainsinclair7954  Maybe. But an alternative is to lay siege to Crimea. That will result in a lot less Ukrainian casualties than driving them off the territory - and will hopefully mean they get to take a lot less military equipment with them.
    1
  374.  @coreyryanselbyfullgrabe4360  Try some fact checking.
    1
  375.  @sebastianforbes1  Plenty of time. Plenty of men. Plenty of Orcs to exterminate. Plenty of Russian propaganda emanating from you.
    1
  376.  @maxbiel  But the ruSSians DON"T "have a huge amount of strategical reserves" and they are "obliged to move troops which are fighting on a given front to another, in order to fill some gaps, or strengthen the existing forces" every bit as much as Ukrainians. They do have a massive amount of military hardware - but much of the best has already been picked out and sent to the front - which is why they are now resurrecting tanks and other armour from the 1950s and 1960s.
    1
  377.  @molodecrus  so? So why do they target Ukrainian civilians?
    1
  378.  @molodecrus  "Besides ukraine was b mbing donbas for 10years." No it wasn't. How can you still write rubbish like that so many years after that was debunked. If you still believe that then you are a Dombass.
    1
  379.  @molodecrus  "if you stay inside a warzone you are dumb". What a ridiculous thing to say. Why is it a warzone Molo? Because russia unjustly and illegally crossed into Ukraine with armed troops. Belgarod and Kursk are also warzones now (due to russian actions) but russia has not been evacuated. By your reasoning russians are d mb.
    1
  380.  @molodecrus  So why do they TARGET Ukrainian civilians Molo? So why do they target Ukrainian civilians in areas where there are no troops?
    1
  381.  @molodecrus  Also if no military personal are hiding in your house, but russians want your land, you should probably think to yourself "hmmm maybe i should leave my house and go sit this one out somewhere else". Because sure as hell russians target civilians.
    1
  382.  @molodecrus  russia is now a warzone (by russia's own hand), so by your logic civilians should evacuate.
    1
  383.  @molodecrus  And I pleased you are admitting that what you said about the Donbas is just a made up russian story.
    1
  384.  @molodecrus  Why are Ukraine and russia now warzones Molo? Because russia unjustly and illegally crossed into Ukraine with armed troops. russia made them warzones and you think everyone should just go away. russia should go away.
    1
  385.  @molodecrus  What? You lived in a warzone. You know what you said about people who live in warzones - you must be d mb. Why are Ukraine and russia now warzones Molo? Because russia unjustly and illegally crossed into Ukraine with armed troops. russia made them warzones
    1
  386.  @molodecrus  What? You lived in a warzone? You said people in warzones are dumb - you know what that makes you!!
    1
  387.  @molodecrus  Why are Ukraine and russia now warzones Molo? Because russia unjustly and illegally crossed into Ukraine with armed troops. russia made them warzones.
    1
  388. ​ @molodecrus  There's nothing wrong with my program, Molo. But there's obviously something wrong with yours as you haven't been able to answer: why are Ukraine and russia now warzones Molo? Why are you so blind you can't you see that it's all because of Putin?
    1
  389. ​@molodecrus Nothing wrong with my program. Something wrong with russia's program - Ukraine in two weeks (still not achieved in 1018 days). But a bunch of armed rebels can take Syria in two weeks. And the world's second most powerful military can't save Assad.
    1
  390. ​ @molodecrus  russia loses again.
    1
  391. ​ @molodecrus  There's nothing wrong with my program.
    1
  392. ​ @molodecrus  Why are Ukraine and russia warzones Molo? Why did Putin cause them to become warzones?
    1
  393. ​ @molodecrus  Why are Ukraine and russia warzones Molo? Why did Putin cause them to become warzones?
    1
  394. ​ @molodecrus Why are russia and Ukraine now warzones Molo? Why did Putin make them warzones?
    1
  395. ​ @molodecrus  Why do you post false info about b mbings in Donbas Molo?
    1
  396. ​ @molodecrus  Why can't you cope with the fact that russia targets civilians in Ukraine Molo?
    1
  397. Can we add russian troop loses in Syria to the numbers above? Seeing as russia has tried to blame Ukraine...
    1
  398. If you dislike this channel, don't watch it. He selects one area each video and reports on that area only. His channel, so he gets to select which area. He usually selects Ukrainian successes to report on. If he decides he doesn't want to report failures, that's his choice. He doesn't make stuff up. If you don't like his style, go elsewhere. Simples.
    1
  399. No they ain't Left. In fact they are now so far Right that they are fascists.
    1
  400.  @shazam992  The US didn't promise F-16s "several months ago". I think it was only this week that Bliken said UKraine will get F-16s - without giving any timeline or quantity. And there's also been mostly bad news for the Russian army since the Ukrainian army halted their progress 12 months ago.
    1
  401.  @shazam992  No, you misunderstand. The US hasn't promised any F-16s to Ukraine - there is no "delivery in progress". Your argument will be valid only if and when the US commits to the delivery of F-16s to Ukraine. And maybe they won't. Maybe they'll give the "Okay" for Netherlands, Denmark, etc to give F-16s instead. But I do agree, the US should be giving Ukraine more and better weapons to repel the belligerent neighbor that has invaded their country.
    1
  402.  @ManiaMac1613  Thanks. They push their carp everywhere.
    1
  403.  @Mr.Clownensky  "I wonder if this ang er.. rage you ukk robots feel tow ards" It's not anger, it's frustration with the constant disinformation you ruZZian trolls keep posting.
    1
  404. Your disinformation is failing. Of course Ukraine will win against a failing ruSSian state.
    1
  405.  @Mr97cobravert  Indeed, but @yolo was suggesting something completely different - that it was Ukraine forcing 18yolds. He is wrong - again.
    1
  406.  @Mr97cobravert  "plenty of evidence of the police grabbing able men off the streets " Yeah, same in russia. Isn't it terrible the pain that Putin has inflicted on both countries.
    1
  407.  @Mr97cobravert  If they don't stop sending their "volunteers" to 200/300 in meat waves they'll need another 3.5 million. They really have a very poor regard for human life. Of course the 3.5 million isn't really accurate. They are constantly short of troops, and I doubt they've burnt through even 1 million yet. And there sure aren't 2.5 million trained troops waiting in the wings.
    1
  408. ​ @GodwinGodfather  My dream, your nightmare.
    1
  409. "What percentage of Ukraine was lost this week?". It must be less than 0.1%. How many square km? Maybe 1 sq km?
    1
  410. Because this video was on Kherson and Avdiivka isn't in Kherson. Are you not aware the RFU picks a particular area each day and gives a good breakdown of what's going on in THAT area.
    1
  411. Why do you ask?
    1
  412. No the Indian channels don't have the best reporting. They mostly push russian talking points.
    1
  413.  @sebastianforbes1  As indeed over half a million Russian families have their brother, father, husband, or son, injured, maimed or killed for what? Because Putin wants to go down in history as "Vlad the Great". Unfortunately for Russia, he is more likely to go down in history as the man who finally brought Russia to it's knees. Edit: and well over another half a million Russian families have their brother, father, husband, or son fled the country to avoid mobilization.
    1
  414. ​ @prevedomedved  In that sentence of yours that I quoted.
    1
  415.  @prevedomedved  "you're just ignorant about thousand year history before that" - and you're just ignorant about the two thousand year history before that. The other thing you are ignorant about is that the ancient history of an area is not relevant - not to signatories of the United Nations founding charter - which includes fascist ruzzia - who all agreed to abide by the boundaries in place at the end of WW2. Many areas on Earth have had multiple "owner" over the centuries. No one claim is any more valid than another. "Poles hated Russia long before 1939". Yes I have no doubt the ruzzians gave Poland reason to hate them long before 1939. "And what about 1938 when Poland occupied and annexed Trans-Olza with Hitler's support? Does that show true colors of Poland?". And what about 2014 when ruzzia occupied Donbas and Crimea and faked annexation of the latter? That really does show true colors of ruzzia. No matter how you look at this, ruzzia is in the wrong, ruzzia is the invader. You are the stupid ruzzian troll.
    1
  416.  @prevedomedved  "you're the one who started talking about rediculous land clams". No Prev, it is YOU making ridiculous land claims. Forget ancient history, it is misleading you. You are trying to justify the un-justifiable. You have been standing too close to the ruzzian propaganda machine and it has addled your brain. Why are you "talking about Russia's history start" while ignoring every other history start - as if ruzzia is something special that doesn't have to consider anyone else?
    1
  417. ​@prevedomedved Wriggling and twisting the story and trying to pretent you're neutral. You're not fooling anyone Mr ruzzian troll. We can all read what you've written in this thread, and it's obvious what you've about. No potato for you today Ivan.
    1
  418.  @Jay.Kellett  Yes I have heard of upgrades. But that's not my words. You'd better raise the issue with @noone - it was him I was quoting. edit: actually, don't bother with @noone - he's just a dombass ruzzia troll.
    1
  419. The russians using German WW2 tactics? Not surprising as the russians are fascists after all.
    1
  420.  @BIOSHOCKFOXX  He wasn't manipulated. He was given good advice by Boris. You russian shills are just upset because you didn't get an easy win and have since lost around 8% of Ukraine.
    1
  421.  @yellowtunes2756  "you can believe any nonsense you want". Correct, I can believe any nonsense I want, just as I can do some research and believe any facts I want. But you haven't presented any facts - just nonsense.
    1
  422.  @yellowtunes2756  "Russia never carpet bombed cities that weren't under active siege" - what? So it's okay to carpet bomb cities when they're under siege because the civilians can't leave?
    1
  423.  Albin-my5co  The origins of "Slava Ukraini" are irrelevant - except to a Russian troll desperate for a win. I guess that's you. You know that Adolf would be proud of the Kremlin's increasing adoption of the Third Reich's fascist policies. Slava Ukraini to you Russian Troll.
    1
  424.  Albin-my5co  Well it shows that Colonel Jacques Baud was likely hijacked by Russian influences - a lot like Ritter et al. What Colonel Jacques Baud says is not correct. But keep trying Russian troll.
    1
  425. As is your comment.
    1
  426. When you only have a finite number of systems, and they keep having to replace the ones that are Himared, traded with Iran, or used to guard Putin's palaces - eventually you don't have enough to defend the frontlines/borders. ruSSia has already brought back S-300 from Syria and the Kirul islands - which suggests they probably are getting low in numbers now.
    1
  427.  @wilbur948ie  I don't know Wilbur. With 7:1 losses at times (7 dead ruSSians per dead Ukrainian) the "battle tactics" were certainly in Ukraine's favour.
    1
  428.  @kobekkop  Silly person. You vatniks have been saying that for two years. Do you remember that Putin ordered his generals to take Donbas by October, 2022 (they failed); then by the end of 2022 (again they failed); then by the end of March, 2023 (fail); then to take just Bakhmut by May 9th (they failed again). At the current rate, ruSSia will have taken Donbas by 2084. It is obvious who is "either so naive, coping hard or baiting" - it's you Dombass.
    1
  429.  @JPPVESA  "Unfortunately for the Ukrainians, the russians keep pushing toward Pokrovsk". Unfortunately for the russians, the Ukrainians keep taking towns with minimal damage - whereas the russians only capture ruins. It it only way the russians know: destroy, destroy, destroy. Yes, the russian army really is that bad.
    1
  430. ​ @davidedbrooke9324 By Ukrainian forces.
    1
  431.  @CCCPRusRus  "Ukraine's goal has never been to capture Kursk". Actually, you have no idea what Ukraine's goals are. Remember that Kursk was once part of Ukraine, and that alone seems to be justification for it to be returned to the fold (or at least that is the justification Putin would use). Anything russians take in Donetsk is worthless - because russians have broken it in order to take it. Any morale blow in Donetsk is small compared with the morale boost gained in Kursk. The whole world is watching Kursk and support for Ukraine is growing as a direct result.
    1
  432.  @CCCPRusRus  "Ukraine's goal has never been to capture Kursk". Actually, you have no idea what Ukraine's goals are. Remember that Kursk was once part of Ukraine, and that alone seems to be justification for it to be returned to the fold (or at least that is the justification Putin would use).
    1
  433.  @CCCPRusRus  Anything russians take in Donetsk is worthless - because russians have broken it in order to take it. Any morale blow in Donetsk is small compared with the morale boost gained in Kursk. The whole world is watching Kursk and support for Ukraine is growing as a direct result.
    1
  434.  @CCCPRusRus  "You said Russia is just capturing empty fields in Donetsk". No, try improving your comprehension skills (it will help with your understanding of Putin's war too), I did NOT say that. I did say that nothing russia takes is worth having, due to russian tactics - i.e. break everything.
    1
  435.  @CCCPRusRus  "The Donetsk Ukraine have been fortifying for 10 years". The oblast or the city? The city has been controlled by russia for ten years, so I don't think Ukraine has been fortifying it. It's still worthless by the time russia takes it, because of their habit of raising everything to the ground.
    1
  436.  @CCCPRusRus  russians turn everything they touch into worthless rubble.
    1
  437.  @CCCPRusRus  What was Bakhmut worth when Wagner took it?
    1
  438.  @7171jay  Unfortunately Jake has been distracted by the Israeli conflict - wasting almost half his vlog yesterday. Just what ruSSia wants - to distract the west from Ukraine.
    1
  439. @@KittyCat-mp3rm Hello new troll. The ruSSian army advances were forced to a halt over twelve months ago. Since that time the ruSSian army has been unable to take any significant land in Ukraine. Nothing, zilch. Not so much as a single Ukrainian city. Over those same twelve months the Ukrainian army has liberated huge areas of land, including over 18,000 sq km in Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts, and including six cities. Ukraine has brought the war to ruSSian territory. Ukrainian hardware losses are a fraction of ruSSian losses - usually half ruSSia's losses in the last months, but often a quarter. Ukrainian personnel losses average a third of ruSSian personnel losses. That's what I call winning. What would you call it? Yes I'm sure you'd like to see Ukrainians rush into minefields and suffer massive losses of men and equipment - but we'll leave that foolishness to the Orcs. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  440. ​ @scotttracy9333 10 days at current loss rates.
    1
  441.  @MuhammadRidwan-pe7ny  Just like ruSSia is not in Kyiv for sure, after TWO years of their 3-day Stupid Military Operation.
    1
  442. ​ @bugwar5545  And while this was happening, how much land did russia gain in Syria?
    1
  443.  @QANews  Hey QANews. Except that you are not engaged in a "quest for peace" but merely pushing a pro-ruSSia agenda. Your other posts in this comment section give testament to that.
    1
  444. Is the US an ally? It seems they used to be, but now they only talk. This is how the US makes enemies - it promises to help "as long as it takes" and then leaves nations high and dry - and in peril. The US is unreliable. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  445.  @kellscorner1130  "and help OUR country". Sending aid to Ukraine IS helping the US. Don't give us your pro-russian BS. The US is a guarantor of Ukraine's freedom if attacked (refer the Budapest Memorandum). Or do you want to ignore agreements you signed and make the US hated in more foreign countries. And if you want the border fixed, get Mike to table the Bill.
    1
  446.  @joni8090  Stupid Russian troll. There aren't 100k Nazis in Ukraine. There are quite a few Russian Nazis in Ukraine, and a whole lot more in the Kremlin.
    1
  447. "In their own territory"? It appears they were shot down over occupied Ukrainian territory. Their own territory is in Russia.
    1
  448. "Yasinovataya-2 industrial zone was liberated by ruzzia" That is incorrect. For it to be "liberated" it would have to be freed from ruzzian occupation. Silly ruzzian troll.
    1
  449.  @NalakaHewa  No, I couldn't say that. For a start I'd have to use a lower case "r" as a belligerent nation like ruSSia doesn't deserve a capital "r". Then I'd have to change the two "ss" to capital "SS" or "zz" to indicate the Kremlin's current fascist/nazi regime. But is it occupied by ruzzia? I have yet to see verification of that.
    1
  450. Yep, the Ukrainians are that damned good.
    1
  451. ​ @Bigliever Not a patch on the ruSSians.
    1
  452.  @AleksandarMacedonian222  More defeats for ruSSia coming to dash your hopes.
    1
  453.  @111076tom  And you purposely spread misinformation Tom. It sucks to be a Russian troll Tom.
    1
  454.  @robkit007  He didn't say you were Russian. He said you are a Russian troll. You don't need to be Russian to be a Russian troll. You just have to push Russian propaganda and BS like @111076tom does, to qualify as a Russian troll.
    1
  455.  @MrThatpersonthatguy  So you are supporting 2eo-2az1's in ruSSia? I do think so. Take your fake narratives elsewhere.
    1
  456.  @amc3463  Um you mean 10 years for us watch since little green men entered Crimea.
    1
  457.  @MrThatpersonthatguy  "let Europe handle its own problems". Spoken like a true vatnik.
    1
  458.  @РостиславРоманов-р9ж  Can you not find a forum in your own language? I certainly can't be bothered translating what you type - and going by the replies you're getting, what you write isn't worth translating.
    1
  459.  @РостиславРоманов-р9ж  Daughter, why would I even bother? It is obvious from others replies to you that all you are doing is pushing Russian disinformation. Go find a forum in your own language and stop being a waste of space here.
    1
  460.  @etcetera--nine  Fair comment.
    1
  461.  @NimChimpsky69  "...He knows it wasn't a good idea said he wouldn't do any more Israel reports..." Thanks for that information. I might check out his channel again.
    1
  462. "Fake news..." is what the ruSsian MoD publish every day.
    1
  463.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  If they don't control all the land and it's not internationally recognised, then it's NOT annexed. There's a legal process for annexation that includes free and fair ballots. That never happened - so they are not annexed. I could steal your car and pretend it's mine - but it's not.
    1
  464.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  If they don't control all the land and it's not internationally recognised, then it's NOT annexed. There's a legal process for annexation that includes free and fair ballots. That never happened - so they are not annexed. I could take your car and pretend it's mine - but it's not.
    1
  465.  @kevinsmarts9953  No, you mean russia annexing Poland. You're not very Smart Kevin, as you seem to be unaware that Germany and russia annexed Poland in the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact. Yes, russia was in an alliance with Adolf.
    1
  466.  @Kerguelen.Mapping  "ik but the original comment has the rfu saying that there are a lot of updates so yea". And that's your argument to prove that russia "annexed" parts of Ukraine (which it hasn't). It seems you are trying to change the subject.
    1
  467. ​@kevinsmarts9953 Whatever Kevinnotsmart. Your point is invalid because Germany does not include Poland. I.e. it's "annexation" was unsuccessful, just as russia's "annexations" in Ukraine will ultimately be unsuccessful (and are already partially unsuccessful).
    1
  468. ​ @kevinsmarts9953 It’s also invalid because since the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, the USSR signed the UN Charter in which it agreed to not attempt to change land borders by war. The pre-UN Charter rules don't apply anymore.
    1
  469. ​ @kevinsmarts9953 It’s also invalid because russian law does not allow territory to be ceded.
    1
  470.  @kevinsmarts9953  I could be both, and waiting in the bushes for you to come out. I don't know why you butted into my discussion with Mr Mapping - especially as you had no valid points to make.
    1
  471.  @jasongarfitt1147  They only need to get within easy artillery range of that railway line, which runs just south of Tokmak - it's the only rail link between the Donbas and Crimea. That will also enable them to disrupt every highway through the land bridge except the M-14.
    1
  472.  @moiseshuerta3984  What's the hurry?
    1
  473. Unfortunately Russian jamming is a problem.
    1
  474.  @hansrajmatharu7590  You're a bit behind the times, dear Russian troll.
    1
  475. Thank you for adding your view, and your delusional opinion.
    1
  476.  @GusOfTheDorks  That's easy Gus. Firstly, RFU does not have a "hard bias towards the Ukraine", he has a focus on specific events with a bias towards Ukrainian successes. RFU does occasionally report Ukrainian losses. A "hard bias" is what you find in videos with titles such as "5 Minutes Ago, Ukraine Drives Russians All The Way Back to Moscow" - which I don't bother with. "how would you know if Russia had any victories?" I have no doubt that ruSSia has little victories from time to time, if you consider the demolition of a handful of Ukrainian armoured vehicles to be a victory. But I watch the 'Deep State' map to see where occupations and liberations are occurring. The ruSSian army has achieved ZERO land occupations in the last twelve months, while the Ukrainian army has liberated well over 18,000sq km of Ukrainian territory. That indicates to me that ruSSia has had no significant victories. Then I check 'Oryx' to see what vehicle losses there are. In recent months ruSSian vehicle losses have averaged twice the number of Ukrainian vehicle losses. That again indicates to me that ruSSia has had no significant victories. Both those sources are more reliable than Ukrainian official figures, and hugely more reliable than ruSSia's MoD fantasy figures. Knowing that, I can sit back and comfortably watch Ukrainian victories her on RFU..
    1
  477. @user-zh2cu2jk9j No, YOU are going to be very, very disappointed.
    1
  478.  @robkit007  Russian troll alert.
    1
  479.  @AlessandroGenTLe  I struggle with the Transnistria situation. In the Donbas the situation is quite straightforward. The Donbas was always part of Ukraine and when the USSR collapsed in 1991 it remained part of the newly independent Ukraine. Transnistria, on the other hand, declared independence from Moldova about the same time as Moldova declared independence from the Soviet Union. As such, I don't see that it has any less right to be separately independent - not as a part of Moldova. Its location along the border of Ukraine is unfortunate, and the Russian troops are a potential problem to both Moldova and Ukraine. But is not Transnistrian independence just as justifiable as Moldovan and Ukrainian independence?
    1
  480.  @fosphor8920  Indeed, I would rather fight for my country than private rich people. Which is why I don't understand why people like you root for Russia. I don't understand why you are all about supporting the rich people - the oligarchs and khuilo Pootin - who have stolen so much money from Russia and from Russians.
    1
  481. Which really makes me wonder why the ruZZians persist with their "propaganda that lies".
    1
  482.  @glenolsen7888  "I look at the map on this site and yes the ruSSians are moving forward like a few kilometers a day". What, just a few kilometeres !!! Is that the best you can do? Ukrainian troops have been moving 7km a day in Kursk... But seriously: some days ruSSians achieve a kilometre, some days half a field, most days nothing. But each day they lose hundreds and hundreds of soldiers to artillery, mines, drones, etc. And the ruSSian advances are only local, not "up and down the WHOLE line of contact" as you mistakenly write. Putin wanted all of Ukraine in a couple of weeks (fail); Then he wanted all of Donbas by October, 2022 (fail); Then he wanted all of Donbas by the end of 2022 (fail); Then he wanted all of Donbas by end of March, 2023 (fail); Then he wanted just Bakhmut by May 8th, 2023 (fail). The ruSSian military isn't very good is it.
    1
  483.  @Andalus_EU  "you forgot about Donbass". No I didn't forget about Donbas (it is spelt with one "s"), I was referring to significant advances. And what is the cost to russia of the insignificant advances being made in Donbas?
    1
  484.  @Andalus_EU  No he hasn't been drinking. Drinking is more of a russian thing.
    1
  485.  @primum_parare  "My YouTube doesn’t translate from pig-dog (((" Yeah we know, we have to translate from your p-d.
    1
  486. ​ @shaneb315 In your opinion...
    1
  487. ​@shaneb315 My opinion is that you are having problems coping.
    1
  488.  @ThomMorrison  I agree. They are as near to accurate as it is possible to be in the fog of war. But it is @shaneb315 who is having problems coping with your figures - claiming that they are too high - not me.
    1
  489. Putin ordered the capture of all of Donbas by October, 2022. Then he ordered the capture of Donbas by the end of 2022. Then he ordered the capture of Bakhmut by the end of March, 2023. Bakhmut was finally taken in May, 2023. They still haven't taken all of Donbas. Yup, ruzzia has dropped it's expectation by quite a long way.
    1
  490. ​@ronwhitehouse23 Ron, you are the one living in a world of make believe. If Zelenski was going to run, he would have done so when offered a ride in the first days. If Putin was going to stay and fight he wouldn't have run to St Petersburg. I wonder which country has a brave man for its leader, and which country has a coward?
    1
  491. ​ @ronwhitehouse23  He ran away to St Petersburg because he is a coward.
    1
  492. ​ @Temislaw Try to seek information from neutral sources, not obviously ruzzian propaganda sites. And do some fact checking.
    1
  493. ​ @stinkypete891  I've let that sink in. It seems to suggest that ruzzians were mass killers back then too.
    1
  494. ​ @hatchxable Oh yes ruzzia did!
    1
  495.  @hatchxable  Of course ruzzia said it was to be a 3 day operation to take Kyiv. The fact that you are useless at research is not our fault (although it is typical of ruzzians to blame everyone else). It is obvious however that you are getting all your information from ruzzian sources. Take this quote of yours for example "Russia never said anything about a 3 days military operation. The original source of those claims was the US general Mark Milei who predicted the fall of kiev" You're spelling of both Milley and Kyiv is the ruzzian spelling, revealing your sources. ruzzia restricts what you are allowed to see to ensure you only get their version of events. "it was Boris Johnson who went to Kiev and told Zelenesky not negotiate, fight! You can beat the Russians". Why are you telling us old news? Of course Boris advised Zelenski to fight. And it was good advice too. At the time Ukraine was on the back foot with ~27% of Ukraine occupied by an a-hole invader. But Boris advised that with western support Ukraine could do better. He was right, the a-hole invaders now only hold ~17% of Ukraine. So tell me, what do you think fascist ruzzia's conditions would have been for peace back then? It would, without doubt, have required Ukraine to agree to fascist ruzzia's occupation of Kharkiv, Lyhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson oblasts - minimum. Most likely Mykolaiv and Odesa oblasts would have been included in fascist ruzzia's demands too - along with Ukraine agreeing to the international recognition of Crimea as ruzzian. So you can clearly see that Boris' advice was good advice. And it was a poke in the eye for the fascist invader - which is why all you ruzzian trolls are bitter about it. I guess it sucks to be a ruzzian troll.
    1
  496.  @mitchyoung93  Of course you remember it. You were old 400 years old back then.
    1
  497. ​ @freak94able  "who died again in the millions on the eastern front?". Now you are really showing your ignorance !! How were US soldiers supposed to die on the eastern front. The USSR wouldn't even let sailors onto the wharves when they delivered US supplies to Murmansk. There wasn't the slightest gratitude to those who risked both German U-boats and atrocious conditions to deliver supplies (some ships were lost due to ice build up during the winter sailings - but USSR would not let the sailors off the ships for a little R&R). "Surely US soldiers who didn't even entered ww2 before Pearl". ruZZia didn't enter the war until 1941 either. Before that they were an ally of Germany. But it is convenient for you to forget the Molotov- von Ribbentrop Pact between USSR and Germany. At least Britain and Europe were fighting Nazi Germany from the beginning, while US was neutral - unlike USSR which was kissing Adolf's butt cheeks from 1939-41, and would have still been kissing in 1945 had Adolf not declared war on them. You really are a gullible ruzzian troll.
    1
  498.  @hatchxable  "Hitler was already defeated". I think your brain has been defeated. Adolf killed himself on 30 May, 1945 - and Germany surrendered on 8 May, 1945. If Britain and US had declared a ceasefire until after Japan's surrender, the USSR would not have received US food and munitions and USSR would certainly have been defeated. As it was Stalin had to send millions of his troops to die in meat waves to beat the Nazi$. Sometimes the ignorance of you ruzzian trolls still astounds me.
    1
  499.  @hatchxable  We can all see that your view of history is distorted by the ruzzian disinformation you have been fed (and believed - silly you). But your statement here "The Germans took 80% of their casualties against the Soviets with 85% of their army deployed in the USSR" suggests that the USSR wasn't pulling it's weight. If 85% of Germans were on the eastern front, but only 80% of German casualties were on the eastern front - then the US, UK and western allies caused a higher casualty rate of German troops than the USSR did.
    1
  500.  @gordonbriggs2345  Oh dear Gordon, another foolish ruSSian troll advocating the use of nuclear weapons. Wake up buddy, if they try that it's goodbye Russia as well.
    1
  501. If ruSSia was winning, why is it not gaining any ground? The ruSSian army hasn't captured any significant land in Ukraine since the middle of 2022 - well over a year ago. But then ruSSia isn't winning. And Ukraine isn't "losing so much ground" - something a simple fact check would reveal to anyone except the Dombass ruSSian troll.
    1
  502. Exactly. The ruzzian trolls are full of BS. Thanks.
    1
  503.  @frederikqu7717  ruSSia IS in a total war. They have stripped eastern ruSSia, the Finnish/Norwegian border, and most of the rest of ruSSia, as well as Syria and Armenia, of troops. ruSSia is fully committed and needs a massive mobilisation or they will lose more of Ukraine. And even then it will have to be WW2 style warfare where troops wait for their fellows to be killed in order to take their turn on the few guns that are available.
    1
  504.  @111076tom  Actually Tom, the Russian army has lost six cities in the last twelve months, while it has captured zero cities. Ukraine is not running, you are standing too close to the Russian propaganda machine - it is affecting your mind. You claim Russian staying power is endless, but you mean Soviet staying power. And Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. Ukraine has as much staying power as Russia. Who's Bandera? Some old git who died in the 1950s - like your messiah Joseph Stalin. Totally irrelevant - but Russian trolls have to grasp at straws when Russia is losing.
    1
  505.  @tristan583  We the good people. Not those nasty people who support Russia.
    1
  506.  @111076tom  I haven't seen any posting from you lately Tom. I'd like to thank you for desisting with the spreading false narratives and dis-information.
    1
  507.  @filippogaudio3433  There is no such thing as Ukronasties. They are a figment of your imagination, and a tool used by Putin to influence the gullible - like yourself.
    1
  508.  @filippogaudio3433  "the Russian border was undefended..". Was it? It just goes to show that russia has over extended itself - or cares nothing for the russian people. You know which other borders are undefended? The Finnish border, the border with China, and the Kuril Islands. Be prepared to lose a lot more...
    1
  509.  @filippogaudio3433  There is no such thing as Ukron__ies. They are a figment of your imagination, and a tool used by Putin to influence the gullible - like yourself.
    1
  510.  @filippogaudio3433  There is no such thing as Ukronasties. They are a figment of your imagination, and a tool used by Putin to influence the gullible - such as you.
    1
  511.  @filippogaudio3433  There is no such thing as Ukro__ies. They are a figment of your imagination, and a tool used by Putin to influence the gullible - such as you.
    1
  512.  @filippogaudio3433  What sort of lines? There are no such thing as the "N" in Ukraine. It is a myth started by Putin.
    1
  513.  @filippogaudio3433  It is a myth started by Putin for gullible people to believe.
    1
  514. Yup, and ruSSia is losing in this tiny forest.
    1
  515.  @QANews  Hey QANews. "Older men declare war." Yet here you are promoting a peace that will reward Putin for declaring war - and will result in greater loss of life later. "I present the truth" Unfortunately that is a lie. Did you not claim that western Ukraine engaged in "genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine" - which has long been debunked as mere ruSSian BS and propaganda. And yet here you are pushing that ruSSian propaganda. It seems that it is you who seeks to "choose to take the war-centric path". Best regards.
    1
  516. Sea supremacy of the BS Fleet is not possible.
    1
  517.  @wishusknight3009  You should be talking about Putin - he is the one who started this war and is the one responsible for the hundreds of thousands of deaths of Russian speakers, ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, and Russians.
    1
  518.  @stevo091  Or you could try getting lost Stevotroll...
    1
  519. ​ @Wattershed93 Not as sad as your pathetic comments.
    1
  520. The F-16s are old technology, probably better than Ukraine's Mig-29s, but certainly not the latest and greatest planes. What will give them a huge advantage is the range of modern missiles they can carry
    1
  521.  @skelafeti  Have you tried looking up the meaning of "fact"?
    1
  522. Try watching a video about Donbas - this one is about Kursk.
    1
  523.  @georgebettasso1395  "Ukrainian forces are planning to enter Russian-occupied Crimea soon". It's no worse that ruZZian forces are planning to enter Kyiv soon. And while Ukraine has failed to achieve it's target so far, it is not as far behind schedule as ruZZia is. And while you are talking about "Failed Ukraine counteroffensive" you have failed to mention that the Ukrainian "failed" counteroffensive captured more land than the failed ruZZian winter offensive of 2022-23 and the current failed ruZZian winter counteroffensive combined. Which makes you just another dumb ruZZian troll pushing disinformation.
    1
  524.  @fabb5  And "According to the ruZZian media" the SMO is going to plan. Do YOU want links.
    1
  525.  @freak94able  Freak the Russian troll is back.
    1
  526.  @chadhaire1711  "that happens when you have the facts" What a shame you don't have the fact then, silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  527. russia and north Korea? russia and Iran?
    1
  528. ​ @neilken9952 You math isn't very good. That's well over two dozen countries - and the only dictatorial country in that lot is Hungary.
    1
  529.  @yellowtunes2756  You need to do some fact checking buddy. - Russia DOES use this bridge for military purposes; - trains through Zaporizhzhia have to go through Tokmak which is within reach of Ukrainian artillery. The Kursk bridge is the ONLY rail alternative; - Crimea is NOT part of Russia. Crimea was never part of Russia, except for nine years from 1945 to 1954; - Russia's referenda and annexation of Crimea was illegal (even Russian law does not recognise referenda on independence); - No other countries recognise the annexation of Crimea (not even other former USSR 'friends') and the internationally recognised borders show Crimea as part of Ukraine; - You are a Russian troll.
    1
  530.  @timparker4160  Oh Tim, you poor deluded troll. I just read your next post and I realise just how deeply you have being tricked by the russian propaganda machine. Do you really believe that "Russia has barely commited any of it’s military force so far because Pooptin has shown incredible restraint"? Do you not know that Pootin has had to pull troops from the Norwegian and Finnish borders for this war he started? Do you not know he's had to pull troops from Murmansk and Vladivostok. From Syria and Armenia. Pootin has FULLY committed his entire army. How do you think Wagner got to within 200km of Moscow? There are almost NO russian troops left to guard russia, because they are mostly in Ukraine being defeated. Do you really believe that "Ukraine loses soldiers at a ratio of 7:1 on a good day and 10:1 on a bad" because it was the other way around at Bakhmut where russia was losing 7:1. Ukraine's advancing troops should be losing at a 3:1 ratio, but very accurate counts (Oryx) of vehicle losses show that russia is losing two vehicles for every one that UKraine loses. That would suggest russian troop losses are 2:1 - however western armoured vehicles are designed to protect their troops, so russian losses are almost certainly even higher. If your figure of 300,000 lost Ukrainian troops is correct (it isn't) then russia has lost close to 900,000 troops "Lets just come back here and talk about it in 6 months" - well funny you should say that, because the russian army has been unable to make ANY advances in the last six months, nor the six months before that, so "Yes" I'll happily come back in six months and prove to you that you have been made a fool of, by russian sources. Purrrrrr. Meow.
    1
  531.  @Bird_McBride  Unfortunately James, you don't have enough sense, nor apparently, reliable thought process to know when you are being fooled by the ruSSian propaganda machine. You grasp at false facts in your attempts to spread disinformation. Your half a million old Soviet tanks is in fact considerably less than 20,000, of which 90% are inoperable due to missing parts and deterioration. At the time ruSSia was selecting the best of these "mothballed" tanks, ruSSian tankers were complaining that if they got two tanks, one wouldn't move and the other wouldn't shoot. That concussion has obviously left you with permanent damage.
    1
  532.  @matlav84  Hey Mat, have you not noticed that the Orcs have also "lost lot of they vehicles and mens" on many days. But you are right, this war IS lost. Russia lost this war when they failed to take Kyiv in the first few weeks. And Russia has lost on all it's stated objectives: 1) De-militarize Ukkraine. LOST. Ukraine now has more weaponry and more modern weaponry than in February, 2022; 2) De-nazify Ukraine. LOST. You cannot denazify what is not nazified - but if you really want to see a fascist government, look no further than the Kremlin. Adolf would be proud of what Putin has achieved; 3) Keep NATO from Russia border. LOST. Thanks to Pootin's Stupid Military Operation, there are now more NATO countries on Russia's borders (thank-you Sweden and Finland); 4) Protect Russian speakers and ethnic Russians. LOST. 3400 civilians died in Donbas from 2014 to 2021, due to the war - as a result of the military actions of BOTH sides. Since 2022, hundreds of thousands of Russian speakers and ethnic Russians have been injured, maimed or killed in Ukraine as a direct result of Russian shelling and bombing - including tens of thousands of Russian speakers and ethnic Russian civilians killed in Mariupol alone. Russia is killing the people they claimed they would protect. So Mat, you are right, Russia has lost this war. Man it sucks to be a Russian troll.
    1
  533.  @piked261  "because the truth is hard to accept". Yup, you are here asking dumb questions because you are having trouble accepting the truth about ruSSian losses.
    1
  534. Let's see how you explain that Kherson is ruSSian forever.
    1
  535.  @ilovejesusalways  "BS at the highest level" I agree, your comments are "BS at the highest level". Typical of you ruSSian trolls.
    1
  536. If you don't like what he publishes, you can always go elsewhere 😂😂😂😂😂🤡
    1
  537. ​ @Sean-n2m  You're also just a silly ruzzian troll, apparently.
    1
  538. I'm looking forward to Russian KIA figure reaching a quarter of a million - which is only a few days away.
    1
  539.  @Pisatel1912  Dombass ruSSian troll.
    1
  540.  @fabb5  "In small cities there are not even roads..." You are describing ruSSia, not Ukraine. In small ruSSian cities there are not even toilets. But having facilities and having brains are not linked. Great scientists aren't developed on "roads". So what are you talking about?
    1
  541. As he is Ukrainian, I would suppose that he spoke Russian with a Ukrainian accent. I believe a lot of 'Russian-first-language' bilingual Ukrainians have now switched to Ukrainian. Before this brutal war they didn't see the point in changing. Now they do.
    1
  542.  @jr3213  And the man whom started it (Putin) is also so stupid.
    1
  543.  @pavel_dreit  I think you'll find the connection is that both groups are "ruSSian" - and therefore undesirables.
    1
  544.  @TrespassersW-g4l  You're just genuinely amused by the level of delusions some people have. Try looking in the mirror as I'm just genuinely amused by the level of delusions you have.
    1
  545.  @mclukas44lol25  Amazing. We call you on pushing russian lies and the best you can come up with is "where are the BMP2s?!? BMP1s????"? Who cares. Why don't you talk about the 2000 russian POWs now in Sumy. Why not discuss the 1250 sq km that Ukraine occupies in Kursk. Or the 700 sq km that is now isolated from re-supply and will soon fall.
    1
  546.  @mclukas44lol25  "Donetsk or Luhansk". But they haven't taken Donetsk or Luhansk. They didn't take Bakhmut either - they had to use a private army (Wagner) as the russian army was too inept.
    1
  547.  @mclukas44lol25  Wrong, the number is around 2000.
    1
  548.  @mclukas44lol25  Have your sources of false information not told you about the two russian relief columns that got intercepted. The first one resulted in well over 250 that are no longer "at least ALIVE".
    1
  549.  @mclukas44lol25  Tomato, apple. Why do you ask me for my source without offering your own?
    1
  550.  @mclukas44lol25  First there's the Budapest memorandum, of 1994, in which russia recognised the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Source: look it up. Then there's the Partition Treaty on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet, of 1997, in which russia not only agrees to the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine, but also agrees not to interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine (Huh, I wonder why they needed that clause). Again, look it up, it's on the internet. Then there's the Russo-Ukrainian Friendship Treaty, of 1997, in which russia once again agrees to recognise the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Look it up. Then there's the Agreement of the Azov Sea and the Kerch Strait, of 2003. Again, look it up. Then there's the russian-Ukrainian State Border Treaty of 2003/04. Look it up. Then there are the Minsk 1 & 2 Accords of 2014/2015 in which ALL combatants agree to halt hostilities and withdraw. See how many international treaties russia has broken. russia broke multiple friendship treaties and sent WMD to a state neighbouring NATO. You can easily see who the aggressor is - unless you are blind.
    1
  551.  @mclukas44lol25  First there's the Budapest memorandum, of 1994, in which russia recognised the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Source: look it up.
    1
  552.  @mclukas44lol25  First there's the Budapest Memorandum, of 1994, in which russia recognises the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Source: look it up.
    1
  553.  @mclukas44lol25  Then there's the russian-Ukrainian State Border Treaty of 2003/04. Look it up.
    1
  554.  @mclukas44lol25  First there's the Budda Pest memorandum, of 1994, in which russia recognised the sovereignty and borders of Ukraine. Source: look it up.
    1
  555.  @mclukas44lol25  "Excuses excuses, where is your source?!" Yours?
    1
  556. ​@CCCPRusRus I didn't say they did. I said russia sent WMD to a country bordering NATO.
    1
  557. ​ @CCCPRusRus why do you say giving them "back" to russia, when they weren't russia's in the first place.
    1
  558. ​ @CCCPRusRus Why would he mention Donetsk in a program about Kursk? Do you not realise they're hundreds of kilometers apart.
    1
  559. ​ @CCCPRusRus Maybe it's because russias advances in Donetsk pale into insignificance when compared with Ukraine's advances in Kursk.
    1
  560.  @mclukas44lol25  "which was broken" by russia in 2014.
    1
  561.  @mclukas44lol25  "And they also agreed on staying as a neutral block" which they still are.
    1
  562.  @vic321344  "ukraine made no progress at all, while losing 100k troops in the "counteroffensive"" More disinformation there Vic. Try some fact checking, and don't believe everything that comes out of Pooptin's mouth (in fact it's safest to believe nothing he says).
    1
  563.  @ZoomZoomMX3  "I'd like to have a few of these planes to fly with my son for fun" Just remember to take the explosives out first...
    1
  564.  @stephenglover1818  Which counter offensive has failed and is dead in the water Stephen? You're sounding like an ill-informed Russian troll. The Russian winter offensive? That failed. The Russian Kupyansk offensive? That's dead in the water. The Ukrainian counter offensive is going very slow, much slower than is desirable, but it looks like it's got through the worst of the Russian minefields and is now picking up pace. It will be a hard slog to reach the Azov Sea before the rains come - but there's a strong chance of the Russian collapse in the near future. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  565.  @QANews  Hey QANews. If you can cut and paste, so can I. A just peace will come in due course. A hurried peace now will save some lives in the short term, but result in a greater loss of lives in the long term. Mad Dog Pootin must be stopped first - "To save lives on all sides." Best regards.
    1
  566.  @QANews  Hey QANews. You don't present the truth for peace, nothing like it. You just push ruSSian BS. A just peace will come in due course. A hurried peace now will save some lives in the short term, but result in a greater loss of lives in the long term. There is plenty of time for peace later. Mad Dog Pootin must be stopped first - "To save lives on all sides." Best regards.
    1
  567.  @astroboy4651  "Till the last ukranian" is just a catch cry of Russian propagandists.
    1
  568. NATO isn't fighting in Ukraine. It is ruSSia that is where it shouldn't be.
    1
  569.  @andrefasching1332  It is sad that any kid should get hurt. It is the fault of Russia that this kid got hurt. If it wasn't for the Russian invasions of 2014 and 2022, this kid could have enjoyed a peaceful holiday in Ukrainian Crimea. The bridge is a legitimate military target and Ukrainian did time the strike for 3am as being a time when the chances of civilians being around was minimized. It is just bad luck that Russia attacked Ukraine, and that this kid's parents took him into the resulting war zone.
    1
  570.  @rayden1387  I condemn the west's unjustified invasions. I don't condemn the west's justified invasions, and there are others where I don't know whether the the invasions were justified or not. I condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine because it was not justified.
    1
  571.  @rayden1387  There was no free and fair referendum in Crimea. Therefore any "results" were invalid.
    1
  572.  @andrefasching1332  I add a lot to your "point". You are implying that it is Ukraine's fault that the kid was injured. I am clarifying that it is Russia's fault. I say again: it is sad that a kid got injured. Maybe you should go to a Russian site and complain there? Because Russia is at fault for thousands of kids being injured, maimed, taken away/kidnapped, or killed. There is nothing we can do here to stop Russia's aggression. The alternative to fighting back - capitulation - would have worse consequences for the children of Ukraine.
    1
  573.  @rayden1387  Yeah really. "What makes an invasion justified?" you tell me, you're the one supporting this invasion.
    1
  574.  @rayden1387  But more millions agree with me than agree with you, by a long shot. So you support what happened in Kosovo then. Or are you a hypocrite who supports Russian aggression as well as Serbian aggression? The UN charter does not allow the results of a trumped up referendum - which is what occurred in Crimea, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.
    1
  575.  @rayden1387  Yeah, lets take this step by step. Firstly, you're on the wrong staircase. Yugoslavia is not related to the current conflict in which Russia attacked Ukraine. Things that happened in Yugoslavia may, or may not, have been right or wrong. But one thing is very clear, Russia had no right to invade parts of Ukraine in 2014, and again had no right to invade Ukraine in 2022. Russia is in the wrong. And Russia did organise the result of the referenda - the outcome was known before the first vote was cast. No countries recognise the out come of the referenda (except Russia and a very small handful of patsie "friends"). Especially significant is that no former USSR states recognise the outcome of the referenda (with the possible exception of Belarus). It sucks to be a Russian troll.
    1
  576.  @rayden1387  What a load of distorted bollocks Ray. What happened in Yugoslavia is NOT related to what's happening in Ukraine. Not whatsoever. Only in the minds of people clutching at straws to defend the indefensible (that's you). In 2014 there was an uprising in Ukraine - a coup you call it - a popular uprising by the people of Ukraine - yet you condemn it. A new government was elected that year. A further free and fair election was held in 2019 and there was a peaceful transition of power. There is no way you can claim that the government of Ukraine is not legitimate - except in the minds of people clutching at straws to defend the indefensible (that's you again). Russia was also subject to a 'coup' but I don't think there has been a free and fair election in Russia/USSR since. Is the Russia government legitimate? Russia does not, under any circumstance, have the right to defend the oblasts of Donetsk or Luhansk - except in the minds of people clutching at straws to defend the indefensible (you again). And Russia has not done so. They have injured, maimed or killed hundreds of thousands of Russian speakers and ethic Russians in Donbas. They have bombed and shelled many Donbas cities out of existence, killing tens of thousands of Russian speakers and ethic Russians in Mariupol alone. They have emptied the Donbas of menfolk of fighting age and sent them to the front, often ill-equipped, often to die in this pointless war that Russia started. So much for "the right to defend" Donetsk or Luhansk oblasts. Lets kill everyone so they feel defended. You fool. You think it's funny that most countries of the globe don't recognise the referendum in Crimea - remember that they don't recognise the referenda, nor the annexations, in the four other Ukrainian oblasts either. I have voted in at least 10 free and fair elections referenda in my own country. What I saw of the refernda held in Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts shocked me. I have never seen such blatant coercion. That would immediately invalidate any results. If Russia had a legitimate issue with the treatment of Russian speakers in Donbas, why didn't it deal with the matter at the UN? Russia is a member of the Security Council after all. "the precedent is done" you say. Bollocks. So what you are saying is if your neighbor robs your house, then there is a precedent and all your neighbors are then allowed to rob your house. Complete bollocks. "You cannot invoke the law when it is you who have violated it." It is not me, nor my nation, that has violated. But Russia has, and you are cool with that. It sucks to be a brainwashed Russian troll.
    1
  577.  @Dallas-us6xm  And you expect the Ukrainian economy to be unaffected by an all out attack from the formerly "second most powerful military in the world" eh? You're a bit naive. But when I look at the rest of your post I see you are more than a bit naive - you've been totally sucked in by ruSSian disinformation.
    1
  578.  @ak-od7mf  Ukraine !! Yes correct - a peaceful nation forced to learn the arts of war.
    1
  579.  @ak-od7mf  And you base that on what? On the basis that Putin is a dictator you think that all presidents are the same. Zelensky is a good wartime leader who visits his troops at the frontlines. Whereas Putin is a coward who ran scared to St Petersburg when Prigozhin was still over 100km from Moscow.
    1
  580.  @ak-od7mf  "Has zelensky held elections like putin?". Like Putin - certainly not. When ruSSia is defeated Zelensky will hold free and fair elections - unlike Putin who has NOT held free or fair elections in 15 years. Rigged elections count for nothing. When a country is at war, martial law is invoked and that includes suspension of regular elections, and until such elections are held the elected president continues to legitimately hold office. If you don't know that then you know nothing. And if you want Ukraine to hold elections then ask your mate Scaredy Putin (next time you wake up next to him in bed) to pull his troops from Ukraine.
    1
  581.  @ak-od7mf  "Has zelensky held elections like putin?". Like Putin - certainly not. When ruSSia is defeated Zelensky will hold free and fair elections - unlike Putin who has NOT held free or fair elections in 15 years. Rigged elections count for nothing.
    1
  582.  @ak-od7mf  "Has zelensky held elections like putin?". Like Putin - certainly not. When a country is at war, martial law is invoked and that includes suspension of regular elections, and until such elections are held the elected president continues to legitimately hold office. If you don't know that then you know nothing.
    1
  583.  @ak-od7mf  And if you want Ukraine to hold elections then ask your mate Scaredy Putin (next time you wake up next to him in bed) to pull his troops from Ukraine.
    1
  584.  @ak-od7mf  "Has zelensky held elections like putin?". Like Putin - certainly not. If you want Ukraine to hold free and fair elections then ask your mate Scaredy Putin to pull his troops from Ukraine. Stop victim blaming.
    1
  585.  @ak-od7mf  "Have I been missing something?" Yes, enough IQ to be able to analyse what's happening.
    1
  586.  @ak-od7mf  "keep coping, they were fair." Again the problem of your missing IQ crops up. No, they were rigged.
    1
  587.  @ak-od7mf  There's that missing IQ in action again. You're unable to comprehend what anyone says.
    1
  588.  @ak-od7mf  What elections Dombass?
    1
  589.  @ak-od7mf  "Have I been missing something?" Yes, enough IQ to be able to comprehend what's said.
    1
  590.  @ak-od7mf  "And ukraine is done for". Yeah right. Ukraine has taken more ruSSian land in four days than ruSSia has taken Ukrainian land in four months.
    1
  591.  @ak-od7mf  "And ukraine is done for". Remember - ruSSia is so weakened this is the first time since WW2 that there is an invading force within ruSSian territory.
    1
  592. @Manticoruss Ukraine has had women at the front from day one. They too want to get rid of the scum that are attacking Ukraine. Apparently everything YOU know IS ruSSian propaganda.
    1
  593. Why not? Do you think they should be imprisoned? As they would be if they published ruzzian losses in the ruzzian press. But what has that got to do with Feodosia? The two ruzzian warships that got destroyed were not in Mariinka, they were is Feodosia - and this video is about Feodosia. Are you too dumb to know that?
    1
  594. ​ @pakjai5532 Nah, they tried diplomacy, but Pootin the warmonkey broke every agreement.
    1
  595.  @solinvictus7582  bot tom.
    1
  596.  @tretortugas  Yeah what a shame about that fighting in Donbas. What a shame Russia agitated the locals, armed dissenters, then sent in troops who attacked both sides to rark them up. And for what? Putin's glory? Between 500,000 and 700,000 young Russians have left the country to avoid being sent to fight in this pointless war against their neighbor. Several more hundred thousand young men have been injured, maimed or killed. All because Putin wants to go down in history as "Vlad the Great" - instead he may well go down in history as the man who finally brought Russia to it's knees. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  597.  @corn1971  Exactly. It is ruSSia's behaviour that has caused NATO expansion to the ruSSian border. It is not NATO pushing to expand, but ruSSia's neighbours begging for the protection of NATO.
    1
  598.  @georgebettasso1395  "Mike Johnson stated that MIGHT bring Ukraine aid to a vote". Or "might" not. The US is looking very unreliable at present.
    1
  599.  @brekgar89  Is that what happened to you on the streets of Moscow?
    1
  600. ​ @reireiismeme Nah, that the russians. Meet waves.
    1
  601.  @yellowtunes2756  I guess I'll have to imagine it - seeing as it is just fake ruSSian disinformation.
    1
  602.  @Gerrard_Pike2008  "They fought that very well in both Chechenya and Syria" I don't think bombing the citizens of Aleppo with chemical weapons can be called fighting well. When you have overwhelming weaponry used against mostly defenceless civilians it's more like "slaughtered" than "fought". So you can see why Ukrainians want no part of russian domination.
    1
  603.  @ilovejesusalways  Why do you keep deceiving yourself? The russian army not only failed to capture Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts ince 2014, but also failed to capture Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts since 2022. Not to mention having failed to take Kyiv in 3 days and ALL of Ukraine in two weeks. I call that success. "Only Russia is advancing" Where? in the last 12 months Ukrainian army gains are at least equal, if not greater, than russian army gains. If you want to go back another four months then Ukrainian army gains are hugely greater than russian army gains. So stop deceiving yourself, silly russian troll.
    1
  604.  @carlosandleon  And you are a propagandist from the start. This is your purpose.
    1
  605.  @Gerrard_Pike2008  You would have to be very naive to believe that most of the residents of Aleppo (and other cities ruSSia bombed to hell) were all "Al Nusra groups and all others mercenaries". But then again, you support terrorist ruSSia so you must be naive.
    1
  606.  @carlosandleon  Yes you are. You are putting a false slant on this channel. "I’m just saying it how it is" No you're not, you are trying to slag this channel, trying to make out that it is worthless. "If I want more objective news I go to speak the truth or something" Last time a supposedly "neutral" person recommended a supposedly "neutral" channel - it was obviously pro-ruSSian.
    1
  607. ​@dadlord689 "while Ukraine will get less than $80b that didn't make difference before". Silly ruzzian troll. Ukraine liberated well over 20,000 sq km as a result of foreign funding.
    1
  608. ​@dadlord689 And it is very hypocritical of you to raise the human losses, as it is the instigator of this war who is solely responsible for those losses. If ruzzia goes home those ongoing losses will stop immediately.
    1
  609. ​@dadlord689 Your reference to the Nova Kahovka dam is another example of your hypocrisy. Blaming the victim for ruZZia's destructive actions. Maybe you shouldn't sniff so deeply, the fumes that spill from the ruZZian propaganda machine.
    1
  610. ​ @dadlord689 Another stupid statement. ruzzia has failed in every aim they set in their 3 day Stupid Military Operation. Not a single aim has been achieved in 657 days. Silly ruzzian troll.
    1
  611. ​@dadlord689 No I haven't forgotten what happened in the first days of the war. Then $80b arrived and ruzzia was forced out of 10% of Ukraine. Are you really that ignorant of the facts?
    1
  612.  @joshuabean9409  "The goal is land acquisition not troop retention" Yes, isn't that a totally abhorrent attitude to human life. What a shame they are wasting all those human lives while gaining no land. The ruSSian army hasn't gained any significant land area in over a year - yet here they are effectively murdering tens of thousands of their own troops - and for what? In a futile attempt to gain some land. One of Pootin's justifications for this war was to protect ruSSian speakers and ethnic ruSSians in Donbas. Over eight years 3404 civilians were killed in the fighting in the Donbas. Pootin has killed that many ruSSian speakers and ethnic ruSSians in the Donbas in four days - his own people.
    1
  613.  @joshuabean9409  China's support will remain limited. Their desire to remain trading with the west is stronger than their desire to support an anti-US federation in decline. "It has yet to be seen how this plays out" Too true.
    1
  614.  @joshuabean9409  "I am simply not discrediting their massive contribution" No indeed, you are simply discrediting Ukraine's contribution - which "doesn't really mean anything it only betrays your perspective".
    1
  615.  @joshuabean9409  Liar. In your first post (the second post in this thread) you wrote "ruSSia lost far more troops in World War 2 than anyone else, And they won that." Further down you wrote "The forces that were Allied with the ruSSia won." Giving ruSSia sole credit for the accomplishments of the USSR is not giving Ukraine "massive" props - that is dismissing Ukraine's contribution. So I'll say it again - Liar.
    1
  616.  @joshuabean9409  "Nothing I said was untrue" Liar. You can squirm and thrash about as much as you like, but when you said "I am simply not discrediting their massive contribution" you lied because that is exactly what you were doing. There was no "implied meaning" in your statements. Your meaning was clear - you clearly stated twice that it was ruSSia that did, what the whole USSR did - thereby demeaning Ukraine's contribution. You accuse me of bias. I will happily admit I am bias against any nation that unjustly tries to invade another. But you try to pretend you are not bias. You say "ruSSia exists", but can you say "Ukraine exists"? Can you say "Ukraine has the right to exist as an independent sovereign nation without interference from ruSSia"? You are making assumptions about my reasons for watching this video. My reasons are none of your business - but let me assure you I don't need your affirmation.
    1
  617.  @joshuabean9409  You've been caught in a blatant lie. Either admit it or bow out gracefully, ruSSian troll.
    1
  618.  @niewaznie3764  You are so wrong. Hungary is part of NATO and is not helping Ukraine. So when you say all of NATO is helping Ukraine, it is not true. You say it is achieving nothing, but again you are wrong. It has already prevented Ukraine from being overrun by a belligerent neighboring state that has gone rogue. Help so far has stopping that aggressive state in its tracks. It will eventually enable Ukraine to throw the aggressor from most or all of its land. It has also considerably weakened the belligerent aggressor. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  619.  @niewaznie3764  My siciety is not being ruined by LGBT. Why would I want to ignore aggression, including the torture, rape and murder of Ukrainian civilians in order to persecute LGBR people. Surely what Russia is diing is causing enough suffering in this wirkd and yiu want me to cause more suffering. You have a very myopic view if life my son.
    1
  620.  @gabrieldunn7384  Nah, some of them are rubbish and I don't watch them anymore. But "Reporting from Ukraine" is tops. Jake and Denys next best.
    1
  621. Even the ruzzians admitted the ship was hit. Try to keep up - silly ruzzian troll.
    1
  622.  @samgragas8467  Oh Sam, you poor sad ruSSian troll. If you did even the tiniest bit of fact checking you would know that the Ukrainian army has liberated at least six cities "during 11 months". It is the ruSSian army that has failed to take so much as a single city for over twelve months. That's how it can be.
    1
  623. ​ @igbc176  Surely you are not that ill-informed Ivan?
    1
  624.  @samgragas8467  But not enough, Sam old boy.
    1
  625.  actinium2754  He didn't say Ukraine was in NATO. The US won't even be able to pay to keep it's own government running if MTG gets her way. So how is it an important member of NATO now? How can it honor its NATO obligations? Will it ever honor its NATO obligations again if the Orange man wins in November?
    1
  626.  actinium2754  He never said Ukraine was in NATO.
    1
  627.  actinium2754  "That is why Poland is receiving weapons and Ukraine is not". Incorrect. Thanks to Mike and MTG there is barely money to keep the government running. If Poland is receiving weapons it's because Poland has paid for them. Ukraine could do the same (but will likely have to find someone else to pay for them).
    1
  628.  @Voltaireish  I am very intrigued to know which sites you watch to get serious news?
    1
  629.  @Imperius12  "russia holds more then 20% of ukraine". Wrong. ruyssia holds 18.36% of Ukraine, up from 18.0% near the beginning of the year. Insignificant advances at HUGE cost in russian men and equipment. You should fact check more often
    1
  630.  @gloomy5487  "Since when is Ukraine a tiny country?" Ukraine is tiny when compared with large, and greedy for more, russia.
    1
  631. ​@Imperius12 That's correct, it's attritional warfare. The Ukrainians are attriting russian men and machinery at an accelerating pace.
    1
  632.  @Hasan-jf7by  They gave it up last time, why not this time too?
    1
  633.  @leimertseptimius1836  Better than "hoping and depending" on Russia and it's... oh that's right Russia doesn't have any friends.
    1
  634. ​ @jdee8521  "a lot of countries will get a cut of Ukraine" is straight out of the Russian propaganda handbook. There's only one country trying to get a cut of Ukraine - and that country is called Russia. Stop watching Russian television, it's addling your brain.
    1
  635.  @EndahZaheren-jw8tw  "cannot accept Ukraine totally lost and collapsed". And it's obvious that you DO think "Ukraine totally lost and collapsed", which as we all know, is untrue. So that makes you look very foolish on this international forum. Imagine showing the whole world that you have no grip on reality. Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  636. And you are the joke in the comedy show.
    1
  637.  @ZDarabos  Unfortunately the US is an unreliable ally. But I believe Japan produces Patriot missiles under license. Maybe they can be sourced from there?
    1
  638.  @QANews  Hey QANews. Why do you come here pushing a peace that ruSSia is denying Ukraine? Why not cut and paste to a pro-ruSSian channel? Warmest regards.
    1
  639.  @ArmedSpaghet  "what bad news is there?" Slow creeping ruzzian gains - albeit at a massive cost in ruzzian lives and equipment.
    1
  640.  @Beanhairlately  They will.
    1
  641.  @m.cl.ballista4642  "Ukraine already lost" - so that makes two losers in this war, because ruSSia sure isn't winning. It must be embarrassing for ruSSia to start a war, intending to win it within 14 days, and still not be winning after 665 days. I can understand that Ukraine - the victim of ruSSian aggression - is unable to beat a well prepared "mighty" russian army. But I can't begin to understand just how humiliating it is that ruSSia is unable to beat unprepared Ukraine. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  642.  @hardtackbeans9790  It is amazing that people like @nocomment believe all the ruSSian BS. Are they too dumb to do even a little fact checking? Are they so morally corrupt that they support what ruSSia is trying to do to another country? I don't understand them. But I do understand that we must continue to call out their disinformation, BS and lies.
    1
  643.  @nocomment6421  "And im not pro ruZZian". Don't kid yourself. You're pushing ruZZian propaganda - that makes you pro-ruZZian. "Russia gained the offence" If by that you mean they're winning, tell us where? They are losing thousands of men per week, along with hundreds of pieces of military equipment - and they've gained less than 20 square km (of farmland). A fraction of what Ukraine liberated. "Ukrain didnt reached tokmak". True. Due to extensive mining they made a tactical decision to avoid the stupid loss of life the ruZZians are experiencing. "and ruZZa is so big they can replace everything in no time". Untrue. Why is ruZZia sending T-55 tanks to the front? Because they CAN'T replace T-72s and T-90Ms in "no time". Same with missiles. Same with artillery shells. Etc. Yes, you sure are pushing pro-ruZZian propaganda.
    1
  644. If the US doesn't send more supplies then the ruzzians might do better. Let's hope Mike and his cronies come to their senses soon (but I'm not holding my breath).
    1
  645.  @nerdyali4154  Yes, I think you are correct. It looks like the end of democracy in the US (and the end of support for other democracies) if the GOP wins this coming election.
    1
  646.  @ImperialDiecast  Having trouble spelling "Kyiv"? Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  647. That's your opinion. Lets wait and see.
    1
  648.  @eddiemarten3381  To be fair, these figures are Ukrainian generated, and as such tend to be optimistic. I would guess the real numbers are about 2/3rds of the published figures. None-the-less, the fascist ruzzians have taken heavy losses, and on the 340th day of their 3 day Stupid Military Operation they are looking very foolish.
    1
  649.  @marksimpson4215  After three years of war 3151 civilians had died in Ukraine as a result of ruzzia's invasion. I have not yet found figures for military losses over that period. However over the first eight years of the war 3400 civilians had been killed as a direct result of the war, along with 4400 Ukrainian servicemen and 6500 ruzzian servicemen and their proxies in Donbas. Assuming the ruzzian forces were 50% Ukrainian, that would total 11,050 Ukrainian deaths and 3250 ruzzian deaths over the period 2014 - 2021 - mostly as a direct result of ruzzian interference and provocations in the Donbas region of Ukraine. Funny how Putin said in 2022 he was invading Ukraine to "protect ruZZian speakers and ethnic ruZZians" but has hugely accelerated the deaths of both.
    1
  650.  @PNH-sf4jz  One flaw in your figures is that you maintain the "46.3% M/F 53.7%" ratio even after deducting refugees to other countries. Those refugees are predominantly women and children - which would alter the ratio considerably (albeit not enough).
    1
  651.  @vksasdgaming9472  He's not like you. He isn't fooled by Russian BS like you are.
    1
  652. Nah, they delete people spreading ruSSian disinformation. Youtube policy. If you want to tell lies try a different media.
    1
  653.  @mattsmith-ri3lp  It seems that you are the clown Matt. Because statistics prove you wrong. The Russian army has been unable to make any significant gains since Ukraine halted their progress 12 months ago. The Ukrainian army, on the other hand, has liberated huge swathes of Ukrainian territory over the same period, reducing Russia's holdings by ~30%. That's called "winning". It sucks to be a Russian troll - doesn't it Matt.
    1
  654.  @olstar18  You haven't said where "here" is, but unless you're in the 3rd world you should shut up and be grateful that your tax dollars going to Ukraine are being well spent, and that it's not people from your own country having die on the battlefield. Because if we don't stop ruSSia now, it will be your own own issue soon. But as you are pushing an agenda of letting Ukraine be overrun, I guess you're just another dim witted ruSSian troll.
    1
  655.  @samgragas8467  Yeah, but the Russian army hasn't captured any land in 12 months. The Ukrainian army has liberated over 13,000sq km during that period, including 6 cities. It sucks to be a Russian troll.
    1
  656. Yes there are lots of ruSSian propagandists here. But we constantly call them on their lies.
    1
  657. ​ @georgebettasso1395  And just like USSR in Afghanistan.
    1
  658. ​ @georgebettasso1395  Explain what George? I've already answered your query.
    1
  659. ​ @georgebettasso1395  I don't agree that Afghanistan was "a major big financial blow" for the US. That loss was peanuts for the US, and only a small blow for the US military.
    1
  660.  @денисбаженов-щ1б  Yeah but, this is the biggest advance the Russian army has managed in 12 months - which is when the Ukrainian army halted Russian army progress. Since that time the Ukrainian army has liberated 13,000km of occupied land, including 6 cities. How many cities has the Russian army captured in the last 12 months? Not a single one !! You are backing the loser.
    1
  661.  @111076tom  I can take it Tom. I'll be okay in the end. I am just waiting for the fascist evil empire to fail, and its Bunker Boy - Pootin - to fall with it. Russia doesn't need to accept defeat - Russia is being defeated whether it accepts it or not. How are you going with your mis-information campaign? Have you fooled anyone?
    1
  662. This video is about Kursk. Maybe go watch a video about Donbas. But I believe russia has taken a similar amount of land over the last 6-12 months at huge cost (~100,000 men lost) as Ukraine has taken in Kursk in the last two weeks.
    1
  663.  @Racistobama  Maybe you should read the Bill. It includes border protection. You're just regurgitating Trumpist BS.
    1
  664. No it isn't Igor. The Ukrainian army brought the ruSSian army to a halt twelve months ago. Since then the ruSSian army has captured no significant Ukrainian land - nothing, not even so much as a single Ukrainian city. In that same twelve months the Ukrainian army has liberated well over 18,000sq km of Ukrainian land. That's called winning. The only "small problem" is that you have been standing too close to ruSSia's propaganda machine. Step away before it further addles your brain.
    1
  665. You are mistaken. The ruSSian army hasn't taken so much a one Ukrainian city in the last 15 months - while the Ukrainian army has liberated six cities over the same period. If we believe ruSSian trolls their winter offensive has driven the Ukrainian army to the Polish border. In fact ruSSia is losing three times the number of men that Ukraine is losing - and huge quantities of equipment.
    1
  666.  @ImperialDiecast  "i thought the comedian had fled to florida?" No he's still in the Kremlin, but Donald would welcome him to Maralago.
    1
  667. Well the Orcs certainly aren't.
    1
  668.  @rogervincent2092  I don't think you would know the truth if it fell on you. If by "Ukraine cannot win" you mean Ukrainian troops will not surround Moscow, then you are correct. But if you mean Ukraine will loose, then not so much. Every day Ukraine resists russian domination is a win for the people of Ukraine. Everyday russia loses huge quantities of men and machines, is a win for Ukraine. And if you think russia is winning, explain why this is day 997 of Putin's 72 hour taking of Kyiv.
    1
  669. You mean there is nothing to call out. If you want to call out lies and BS you should hand around the ruSSian MoD statements - you could have a field day.
    1
  670.  @Billballbill  There was not "enough time to stop this war". Russia is a warmonger. This war was always going to happen once Russia realise another former "puppet" state was slipping from it's grip. Russia also did not honor the Minsk agreements. Russian security was not under threat (that's just another bit of Russian proaganda). Russia is the only country threatening security of anyone in the region. Stop pointing the finger at Ukraine for things that Russia is also doing - it is a sure sign that you're a low IQ Russian troll.
    1
  671.  @Marc-anthony-t3n  "Ukraine has taken 0 villages or cities in Russia". Ukraine has no interest in taking villages or cities in other countries. It is ruSSia that is the rouge state that thinks it can invade other countries and steal their land. Are you really that stupid that you don't know that?
    1
  672.  @111076tom  He is looking at the numbers that actually matter Tom. It is you who are so bitter that you cannot face reality.
    1
  673.  @111076tom  Really Tom? A clown face? Is that the best you can do? The vote says Russia was wrong. Most countries in the world say Russia was wrong. Russia is the aggressor and you support Russia. Yet you sit comfortably in the west, under the protection of NATO.
    1
  674.  @111076tom  Tom, you're a bit quiet. How's the deliberate spreading of mis-information going buddy? How many civilians were killed in Donbas 2014-2021? Come on, repeat your fairy tales.
    1
  675.  @BlackyHawk95  Every package help Ukraine. Cope yourself.
    1
  676.  @andresdelacruz3864  Yeah sure Russian troll. All Russian provided videos no doubt. And we know what Russian troops do to captured Ukrainian soldiers - but you haven't got the balls to tell us.
    1
  677.  @TruthPrevail777  And being a Russian troll you would know all about "utter bullsh!t" because it's your job to spread disinformation.
    1
  678.  @yellowtunes2756  "Some random guys on TV can say whatever they want" For you to say this means you are naive or lying. You are talking about an autocratic regime where everyone (especially those who influence the public) know that they tow the line or end up imprisoned (which means sent to the frontlines for cannon fodder) or exiled. Nobody says anything that isn't the Kremlin line. "Some US president candidates were saying that US should stop supporting Ukraine" The US, for all it's faults, allows free speech. In the US "Some random guys on TV CAN say whatever they want" - for better or for worse. "Would you call me a pro Russian propagandist" I sure would, because you have demonstrated that you are.
    1
  679. "and the russian military facilities inside of russia should be considered legitimate targets". I agree. ruSSia uses North Korean and Iranian weapons across the border into Ukraine. Western nations should relax the restrictions on western weapons being used across the border into ruSSia.
    1
  680. ​@ced3098 Indeed. Were it not for corruption ruSSia might have achieved its intended 3-day conquest of its neighbor - ruSSian corruption that is.
    1
  681. ​ @williamwinstrop3918  Why do you support the ruSSian corruption that bought Putin a palace in Sochi and several superyachts, yet you make unfounded claims about corruption in Ukraine? Are you a hypocrite?
    1
  682.  @111076tom  There you go again Tom. Russian fairy stories about 9 years of killing Ukrainian children. "Where have Ukraine had an ounce of success?" you ask. Kharkiv and Kherson for a starter. Stopping the advances of the Russian army twelve months ago. Preventing the capture of Kyiv "within three days". Denying "1921, 1991, 2007 and 2014" - and yet you deny the Holodomor. You deny 2014. You deny current Russian atrocities. You deny the treaties Russian signed guaranteeing Ukrainian sovereignty. You deny that the "Referenda" in Ukraine's oblasts were invalid. Yet you sit comfortably in the west enjoying the protection of NATO.
    1
  683. And #user-su8sd8jn9c has lost all credibility.
    1
  684. ​ @danielrisk5731 Wrong again. This report didn't say how many Ukrainian casualties there were, vatnik.
    1
  685.  @fabb5  "The Ukranski counteroffensive is entering Crimea in august 2023". So that was wishful thinking. But then ruZZia also failed in ALL of it's objectives, as ruZZia was intending to enter Kyiv in ~3 days, and subdue all of Ukraine in ~2 weeks. And then there are the stated objectives of the war - none of which ruZZia has achieved - but still claims everything is going to plan. Yeah right. You'd have to be a Dombass to believe anything the ruZZian MoD tells you - and yet you do!!!
    1
  686. "What is really the status of the war" Well ruSSia thought it could take Kyiv in 3 days and all of Ukraine in two weeks. They initially captured about 26% of Ukraine, but have been severely beaten and lost over 30% of what they initially had (~9% of total). The second most powerful military in the world has been brought to a halt and forced to partially retreat by a small military using obsolete Soviet and second hand western weaponry. This channel focuses on a single area each day and reports the success in that area. If you want a summary of the total war you'll need to watch other channels too - but don't bother with pro-ruSSian channels, they're generally full of ruSSian disinformation.
    1
  687.  @julius8698  21 days!!! Try 14 days.
    1
  688.  @julius8698  is finished.
    1
  689.  @julius8698  Well, you will write such rubbish. I guess you ruSSian trolls aren't very bright.
    1
  690.  @davidhetfield6  I think that maybe you are a ruSSian troll posing as a westerner.
    1
  691.  @minimal8187  Bollocks. Don't believe everything Putin tells you.
    1
  692.  @robertmarks2379  "how many times have you wrote that speech out". Just the once actually. But I am happy to repeat it as often as necessary to get it through to your Dombass brain. "You should add that 4 European countries are refusing anymore aid". Why should I add that? I was pointing out ruSSian losses, and that has nothing to do with ruSSian losses. "refusing anymore aid and are blockading their borders with Ukraine and 3 countries are reducing aid". Again, nothing to do with ruSSian losses - I don't know why you ruSSian trolls are unable to concentrate on the subject - possibly low IQ.
    1
  693. He reports one side and he reports it accurately and honestly. You have no idea whether he is getting paid by anyone (except maybe Youtube). Are you being paid to post misinformation?
    1
  694.  @SnapWireOnlyOne  ruSSia hasn't pushed forward 20km. That would mean crossing the Dnieper, which they haven't done. Are you being paid to post misinformation?
    1
  695.  @rasheedh7043  You are the one made to look foolish by russian disinformation. Silly russian troll.
    1
  696.  @kobekkop  Your question does not make sense.
    1
  697.  @kobekkop  "and if they're still relying for NATO in every single way." No, they're not.
    1
  698.  @kobekkop  "Tell me how much aid ukraine has gotten". Why? It's not particularly relevant and some countries inflate the value of what they supply, so an accurate figure is nigh impossible. If a bullet hits you in the chest does it matter where it was made? Why don't you tell us how much aid ruSSia has gotten from Belarus, Syria, Iran and North Korea.
    1
  699.  @kobekkop  "If it was an actual 1v1, ruSSia would curbstomp ukraine in any day of the week." So your idea of international diplomacy is based on the principle of "My daddy is bigger than your daddy". Are you suggesting that all countries in the world should just submit to the most powerful country (the USA)?
    1
  700.  @kobekkop  "I mean you could tell me the quantity amount of equipment/things that ukraine has gotten from NATO themself". Or, you could look it up yourself. "Plus ruSSia hasn't received that much from those following countries...". So what. I ask again, If a bullet hits you in the chest does it matter where it was made?
    1
  701.  @kobekkop  "Yes they're, they have been getting aid from NATO since 2017". Your question was: "Tell me... ...if they're still relying for NATO in every single way." No, they're not. "they have been getting aid from NATO since 2017". I think you'll find it was 2014 when ruSSia first broke all the treaties and Ukraine asked for (and received) aid from some members of NATO.
    1
  702. Yup, ruSSia is losing manpower. Losing lots of manpower. A whole generation of ruSSian men is being wiped out by Putin's greed. Russian men are being treated as bullets - they have no value to the leaders of ruSSia who would prefer to gain more wealth by attacking a neighbour, than to look after the welfare of the ruSSian people. And dumb ruSSian trolls support Putin. How foolish!
    1
  703.  @noone6037  Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  704.  @sylviamaresca8852  Yeah, I don't understand your ass either. What does it say? He-haw.
    1
  705. ​ @beba5865 Facts. Pure facts. You should try some.
    1
  706.  @timparker4160  Ah Tim, you're back, attempting to spread disinformation with fanciful claims. Where and how is russia winning? Name a city that the russian army has captured in the last twelve months? Come on, just one. And I'll name six cities that the Ukrainian army has liberated in those same twelve months. But you can't can you - because the russian army hasn't captured a city in over twelve months - because russia is losing.
    1
  707. @@ajcm2020 I see you too are a misinformed russian troll. Since the Ukrainian army brought the russian army to a halt over a year ago, the ukrainian army has liberated well over 18,000 sq km - including six cities.
    1
  708.  @Customercf  Yeah, you just keep believing that. Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  709.  @Rtg5637  No, I didn't miss anything. I said "ruSSian army gains in the last twelve months have been so small as to not register on the map". The ruSSian army didn't take Soledar, nor Bakhmut. So I say again, the Ukrainian counter-offensive, small as it may be, has gained more land than the entire ruSSian army has gained in twelve months - in just 5 months.
    1
  710.  @Rtg5637  "when he says grey zone be sure that he again underestimates Russian progress". Sorry, but RFU has proven to be quite accurate - which is more than we can say for you.
    1
  711.  @Rtg5637  Well then you are wrong - probably mis-informed or trying to spread disinformation. The ruSSian army did not take Soledar, nor Bakhmut. It was the former Wagner that took those two locations - a force that no longer exists to bring a few victories to a dysfunctional ruSSia. What's more, you are even more inaccurate. You stated "but yesterday this channel and others said that Terrikon is a fortress that Russians can never overcome". Yesterday this channel reported on the Kherson oblast. Do you really stand by what you wrote? Is there anything else you would like to BS about? Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  712.  @Rtg5637  I haven't run out of sane arguments. Keep sending your BS and I'll keep refuting it and pointing out the truth. You were wrong about the achievements of the ruSSian army over the past twelve months (or ten months if you prefer) and you are wrong about him mentioning the Terrikon yesterday. If you post disinformation then you ARE a silly ruSSian troll. Learn to live with that.
    1
  713. As is your spelling.
    1
  714. ​​ @TheRealBillBob  Are you having difficulty concentrating? There was no mention of Zaluzhny in the video, nor in this thread, yet your tiny mind immediately flitted there. I know you Russian trolls are thick, but TRY to focus mate.
    1
  715. Will it? And did Putin tell you this in bed last night?
    1
  716. What are you even talking about, troll? Did you not watch the video, Dombass?
    1
  717.  @ZXHZ  Exactly what? There was coverage of "the offensive of the ruZZians" in the Kherson oblast. This video is about the Kherson oblast.
    1
  718.  @albinklein7680  Silly misinformed ruSSian troll.
    1
  719.  @bbourbaki  "If by keeping what they got so far". Which ruSSia hasn't. Only lost small amounts in the last year, but lost land nonetheless. "having Ukraine beg for peace". You have got to be kidding !!! Where on Earth did you get such incorrect information? Ukraine rejected any "ruSSian fake peace" at the beginning of the war. It is ruSSia that keeps saying they want peace "negotiations". The only thing Ukraine is begging for is enough weapons to kick ruSSia's ass more effectively.
    1
  720. I agree.
    1
  721.  @wishusknight3009  That was Russians running away, dear Russian troll.
    1
  722.  @robkit007  Why are you here?
    1
  723. Your argument is only valid if you accept that it is North Korea that is shelling Ukraine, and Iran that is launching drones at Ukraine.
    1
  724.  @markbryant4641  "I'm very much looking forward to hearing about the details of the negotiations that were drafted and initialled in March 22" I think you'll find they included ceeding large parts of Ukraine to ruSSia. People like Boris convinced Zelensky that Ukraine could do better with western help. And they were right - the occupied areas have reduced from ~26% of Ukraine to ~17% of Ukraine. "And it could have ended in April 2022" Yes, and the world is very lucky it didn't. We are very lucky the Zelensky and his army stayed and stood against the invader. "This invasion could have been very easily avoided" No it couldn't have been. Russia is determined to keep Ukraine under its control. The invasion could only have been avoided through loss of sovereignty or land.
    1
  725.  @PartlyXenon  "Just put our hands in front of our eyes regarding all the allegations of corruption?" We should be grateful for the corruption - without which the ruSSian army would have taken Ukraine. It was corruption that meant that ruSSian machinery was not maintained, that tyres on ruSSian military vehicles were beyond their service life, etc. Be thankful that ruSSia is one of the most corrupt nations on Earth.
    1
  726. Ukraine is chip, chipping away at Russian logistics in the occupied territories. Considering the losses on both sides it would be stupid to stop now, as cracks are already appearing. Soon the weather will force a stop anyway, lets hope Ukraine manages a big breakthrough before then.
    1
  727.  @bartoszromaniuk5594  I guess he likes Zaluzhny.
    1
  728.  @laurie9557  I have to agree with you Laurie, the AFU has more experience than any other western nation in modern warfare - at present. Every other armed force could learn from them.
    1
  729.  @zokilauda  When one country uses military force to attempt to invade another country, that is "War". Dress it any way you like, it's still war. The territory ruSSia is claiming is NOT ruSSian. In fact Belgorod (Bilhorod) has been Ukrainian not too long ago. Crimea has only been "ruSSian" for 9 years out of the last 100+ years, and Ukrainian for 69 of the last 100+ years. ruSSian citizens were not 'terrorized there at the border area" apart from when ruSSia set up terrorist organisations in the Donbas, armed them, then sent in troops to cause mayhem. It is extremely retarded and naive to think that ruSSia had justification for invading Ukraine. Please check your facts before making a fool of yourself on international forums.
    1
  730.  @cheff0161  "It's reporting what happened on 21 December". No it isn't.
    1
  731.  @ЕвгенийКоролев-ш9р  Here's something else on the public domain - in the last two years the ruSSian army has captured one Ukrainian city. Ukraine has liberated 6 Ukrainian cities. Go and see.
    1
  732. I agree. I think Pootin will use Wagner to attack a NATO country and then claim "nothing to do with me". I believe NATO should warn Pootin of the consequences of trying this stunt.
    1
  733.  @yellowtunes2756  "Ukrainian commanders send their troops on suicidal missions". Except they weren't "suicidal missions". The anti-Putin russians returned from their multiple attacks on Belgorod. The troops returned from Snake Island. The attacks on Crimea were mostly successful. There are still Ukrainian troops in Krinky. You don't mention russian commanders sending their troops in suicidal waves in Avdiivka and many, many other towns in Ukraine.
    1
  734.  @yellowtunes2756  "You gotta admit that Ukraine sacrifices their soldiers for media effect a lot". No we don't.
    1
  735.  @yellowtunes2756  "I can't think of a single time when Russia did anything for PR stunt." Short memory. Putin (the coward) is reported to have ventured to about 200km front the front lines - that was a publicity stunt.
    1
  736.  @yellowtunes2756  "I can't think of a single time when ruzzia did anything for PR stunt". Very short memory. Putin standing with a candle in memory of 130 odd Moscovites who died last week was a publicity stunt (as we know Putin does not care about the lives of his people, or he wouldn't have sent 400,000 of them to be injured, maimed, or die in Ukraine).
    1
  737.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  They were Ukrainian troops with no air support who were ambushed by the ruSSians with air power and artillery (on 24th February, 2022). Of course the ruSSians should have won in just a few weeks, or that's what would you expect (Putin did). But it didn't happen. So just how bad is the ruSSian military.
    1
  738.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Air dominance". Are you?
    1
  739.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Su 57 . Supported by advanced air defence on the ground". What Su-57s? What advanced air defence on the ground? Where is all this mythical equipment?
    1
  740.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Russian infrastructure after 2.5 years of war is still 100% intact". This must be the joke thread - or you're deluded.
    1
  741.  @wishusknight3009  I think you're right - user-ft2bt9kw7x is trolling us. Nobody could be that deluded.
    1
  742.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "The fact that ruSSian infrastructure is 100% intact". Have you tried looking up the meaning of "fact"? You base your statements on fiction. "S400, s500 physically exist they are not myth". Yes S-400 exist, but they're not very good. Only one S-500 exists, but it's not very good either as Ukraine has already wiped out several of its launchers.
    1
  743.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Firstly the Ukrainian troops had air defence cover" No it didn't, just a few old s-300s. "ruSSia put no time limit on the SMO". Maybe not, but they did expect it to be over in half a month. They are 875 days behind schedule. "The ruSSians are doing it well". Actually, no they are not. They are doing it very poorly and are an embarrassment. "in Vietnam for 11 years Afghanistan 20 years Korea 4 years". I've checked and there is no "Vietnam", "Afghanistan" nor "Korea" in Ukraine. Whataboutism - what about sticking to the subject (I did find a New York in Ukraine - if that helps you cope)
    1
  744.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Do you have alternative information that is substantiated that contradicts what the ruSSian MOD say". Just about every time the ruSSian MoD says something there is alternative information. Remember how their MoD said they had destroyed several Leopard 2 tanks - before any had arrived into Ukraine.
    1
  745.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Name parts of Russian infrastructure that have been destroyed to the point of the damage effecting the battle front. If you cannot give examples of major damage..". I don't need to. I only have to mention one single piece of ruSSian infrastructure that is less than 100% intact to prove you WRONG. "Rostov-on-Don" submarine. Crimean bridge. S-500. About 3 dozen oil refineries. The "Moskova", Numerous electrical substations in Belgorod, The list is too long, and I can't be faffed looking up more examples for a ruSSian with a deluded mind.
    1
  746.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Do you remember when a Ukrainian pilot filmed himself shooting down numerous Russian aircraft". No, I took no notice of that. But it sure fooled a lot of ruSSians - so much so they're still sore about it. Funny really. Really funny.
    1
  747.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Ukraine had a massive army before the war". No it didn't. ruSSia had a massive army before the war - shame it was useless or they might have taken Ukraine.
    1
  748.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  I ask again, have you tried looking up the meaning of "fact"?
    1
  749.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "oil refineries were repaired no loss in fuel production". Lies. Some have been repaired, most are still off line. Loss in fuel production HUGE. "Bridge slightly damaged repaired in a few days" Lies. Road section of bridge repaired after several months. Rail section still awaiting repairs and unable to carry full loads. ruSSia was using ferries for heavy military equipment (like tanks) until Ukraine damaged all ferries. "One ship lost". Lies. 28 ruSSian navy ships of the BSF lost. "S400 destroyed around six units". Lies. Only a few replaced (by plundering other areas such as the Kuril Islands and Finnish border). "Infrastructure would be electric grid, telecommunications, command and control centres" - correct. Many damaged or destroyed. Or do you think Belgorod keeps losing power because they haven't paid their power bills?
    1
  750.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  Isn't it great that Ukraine has launched a Special Military Operation in Kursk to protect Ukrainian speakers and ethnic Ukrainians from nasti russians.
    1
  751.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "By your calculations the Black Sea fleet only has ten ships left". That is very close to correct.
    1
  752.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Except millions of Ukrainians have moved to Russia in the last 10 years voluntarily." Yeah sure. You have already demonstrated that you don't know what a 'fact' is. Don't make it worse for yourself. I would comment on your other unsubstantiated points but I think you have done enough to obliterate your credibility already.
    1
  753.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Name the ships that were sunk". Don't be a lazy sod, look it up yourself. Or is ruSSia censoring the information you have access to? Now why would they do that (because they're lying).
    1
  754.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "immigration numbers are recorded". Yes, but you've already demonstrated that you don't know what a 'fact' is - so whatever you've written will be wrong. I would comment on your other unsubstantiated points but I think you have done enough to obliterate your credibility already and your humiliation is complete at your own hands.
    1
  755. And a bunch of "nizist" ruZZian trolls supporting ruZZia.
    1
  756.  @billpoul.b  We are close to nuclear war and you write like a Russian troll. Who is threatening nuclear war? Russia keeps threatening nuclear war, like a petulent child who isn't getting his way. There are no threats of nuclear war from the west. And Russia controls just 17-18% of Ukraine (including Crimea), down from 25-27% this time last year. So tell me, why doesn't Russia just go home and stop all this mayhem? This torture, rape and murder. This land grab. No.one needs this Russian aggression. Russia go home.
    1
  757.  @Hossak  "Jesus what a waste of life that ridiculousness has proven to be". Yes I agree. The whole war is a ridiculous waste of life. I find it amazing that some tyrant in a bunker below the Kremlin can cause a war in 2014 and keep feeding it for this long - with apparently no regrets that he has cost half a million lives and ruined at least a million more.
    1
  758.  @111076tom  You mean "most logistics don't go over the road part of the bridge". I can only assume Ukraine is at the limit of it's reach with these drones, and had to hit what they could. I feel sure if they'd had a choice they'd have hit the rail part of the bridge. That would have upset Russian logistics. Especially as the only other remaining rail access into Crimea is via Tokmak, which must be within range of Ukrainian artillery.
    1
  759.  @111076tom  You say that lately Pantsir-S have been very successful in shooting down HIMARS. Actually HIMARS aren't "up" - they are ground based launch systems ("why not just find the facts"). You probably mean they have been very successful shooting down GMLRS? Who says? Why are you speculating? Why not just find the facts. The Russian MoD may say that - and you appear very good at repeating Russian propaganda. But why not just find the facts. The Russian MoD is a proven source of mis-information. So what corroboration do you have to back up that claim? Any facts? Man, it sucks to be a Russian troll.
    1
  760.  @clarkkent4075  "losing more than it can ever replenish" - in your dreams boy. Ukraine is taking a hammering from the Russian Nazis, just like Britain took a hammering from the original Nazis in the early days of WW2. But who won? Ukraine will have a lot of international financial support to rebuild, along with Russia reserves (held in foreign banks), and the proceeds of the sale of Russian oligarchs illegally obtained superyachts and mansions. That won't cover everything, but it will go a long way. Ukraine will thrive once it is within the protection of the NATO alliance. Russia, on the other hand, is on it's own - unless you think North Korea has huge funds to loan Russia 😂. And the million plus Russian men who have fled Russia, or been injured/maimed/killed on the front, will take a generation or two to replace. Ukrainian troops are fighting for their freedom from Russian domination - effectively for the very existence of Ukraine. Ukrainians have determination. Russian troops are fighting for the glorification of Pootin and his greater Russia. They mostly just want to go home. Ukraine will win. It sucks to be a Russian troll.
    1
  761.  @Nizmo718  How is the anxiety in the bunker under the Kremlin?
    1
  762.  @bbourbaki  Silly deluded ruSsain troll.
    1
  763. Yes I have some news for you: Mariinka is not in Feodosia, and this video is about Feodosia. You ruzzian trolls sure are geographically challenged.
    1
  764.  @r7calvin  Yeah isn't it great!! $1.2 billion US dollars worth of damage to Russian military hardware in a week - and no civilians killed. The Russian trolls will have tight sphincters tonight.
    1
  765. ​ @sirdavidoftor3413  Yeah, it seems the Russia has a strange definition of 'liberate". Smash, destory, rape, torture, kill and burn.
    1
  766.  @slyapbg  Yes, ruSSia is about to fall - flat on their faces.
    1
  767. ​ @georgebettasso1395  You should see what those news channels have to say about russian advances in Syria.
    1
  768.  @samgragas8467  More Russian BS. 50% of the grain was going to Asia, with a very large proportion going to China. China is the largest single customer of Ukrainian grain. You Russian trolls need to get your facts checked - oh that's right, Russian trolls aren't interested in facts.
    1
  769.  @fabb5  I don't live in the States. No Mexicans entered our border yesterday - silly ruZZian troll. But then it takes a Dombass ruZZian troll to bring up the subject of the Mexican border in a video about Kherson - while at the same time failing to condemn the illegal border crossing by armed ruZZians into Ukraine.
    1
  770.  @glintongordon6811  "Take all of Donbas by end of September (2022)". "Take all of Donbas by end of the year (2022)". Take Bakhmut by end of March (this year). All orders from Putin. All failed. I too heard of Putin's order to take all of Donbas by 14 December deadline. You russian trolls sure have short memories. Too much sniffing at the russian propaganda machine can rot your brain. However, you are correct "not a single one", but plenty of multiple ones.
    1
  771.  @vladislavhrasko5194  "The main fight on Ukrainen is running in Doneck oblast now" Yes, but this video is about the Kherson front. If you were writing a book about Moscow, would you devote most of it's contents to Paris? No. So why do you expect a video about the left bank of the Denipro in Kherson to be about Avdiivka? "Cherson front is partial front for hidding large losses of ukraine combat equipment and guys including kids and women" Again you are wrong. It is ruSSia that is suffering HUGE losses of men and equipment - and is hiding it from you.
    1
  772.  @vladislavhrasko5194  "Did you know what was nazis and what was taks of Ukraina nacis during the II War. My grand parents was burned by these heroes, That are facts not more" Maybe if your grandparents had not tried to kill millions of Ukrainians in the Holodomor, then Ukrainians might not have aligned themselves with the evil Nazis in a bid to free themselves from the evil ruSSians. And again they find themselves being killed by evil ruSSians 90 years later.
    1
  773.  @howhistory5877  "but lets' not talk about that as it goes against the western narrative" says the man pushing the Russian narrative. Neither of us know the actual figures from Bakhmut, but we all know that defenders usually have considerably lower losses than attackers. And we know that human wave attacks like those used by Russian attackers are accompanied by massive losses for the attackers. So the chances that Russian losses were huge in comparison to Ukrainian losses is highly likely. Pro-Russian bloggers can do as much theorizing as they like, but without concrete evidence they are but speculating - and likely to be wrong. Anyway, it makes no difference. The Wagner group were the only force that has been able to capture any land in Ukraine for the last 12 months - and they are now gone. The Russian army has been impotent over that period - achieving only the loss of 13,000sq km in Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts. It's all downhill for Russia from here on. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  774.  @Noel-ji8nm  Yes, going by your previous posts you ARE in complete denial of reality. You do know that the Russian army has been unable to take any significant areas of Ukraine for twelve months now - while over the same period Ukraine has liberated over 13,000sq km of Ukraine. The Russian army is not winning and hasn't been for 12 months. You are in complete denial of reality. Do we need to say it one more time? You are in complete denial of reality, little Russian troll.
    1
  775. Should that not be "ruzzians Rats vs the Ukrainian Mice"?
    1
  776.  @glintongordon6811  Hey, at least I'm not stupid enough to believe the ruSSian disinformation you believe.
    1
  777.  @ehisgeorge414  Wrong. Try fact checking.
    1
  778. ​ @ehisgeorge414 Fact checking time again George. It's not 22%. And Ukraine isn't begging for negotiations. How you can get it wrong time after time beggars belief. TRY FACT CHECKING Dorkus.
    1
  779. I guess "taxidermist" is a good name for you as your ability to reason seems to be "stuffed". These reports are accurate - more accurate than just about anything else out there. RFU selects an area to analyse every video, and does it well. Yes, he does usually select Ukrainian wins - but that is his choice and does not reflect on the accuracy of his reporting. He does not claim to cover all aspects of this war - and I don't know how it is that you think he should. There are plenty of other channels that give summaries of the entire war. Nor are all the changes "in ruSSian favor" - both sides are having small wins (and therefore small losses). There is also a lot of to-and-fro. In the last year I doubt the fascist ruSSians have gained more land than the brave defenders of Ukraine - if so, any such gains are very minor.
    1
  780.  @vistakay  Bakhmut isn't militarily strategic. Bakhmut cost tens of thousands of Russian lives, far more than Ukrainian losses, so its importance is symbolic - symbolic of Russia's struggle against reality.
    1
  781.  @LordLebu  Life must be very sad when the best you can do is gloat about 50 year old tanks being the best you can send into battle.
    1
  782.  @vasiliev62  Well they pushed the Russians out of that seven square inches, and rebuffed several attempted counter attacks, killing more Russians each time. So a good day was had by all - except the Russians. Man, it must suck to be a Russian troll. Slava Ukraini.
    1
  783.  @danidurity8701  Stop with the russian talking points. Do you not feel ashamed promoting russian rubbish.
    1
  784.  @danidurity8701  Stop with the russian rubbish talking points.
    1
  785.  @no5tre55  Ukraine didn't declare war on Russia you dimwit. Russia attacked Ukraine. Russia is the aggressor. What part of reality don't you understand?
    1
  786.  @111076tom  Hey Tom. Surely you don't still believe that Russian propaganda about Ukraine killing 14,000 innocent Donbas civilians? That fairy story was debunked a long time ago. 3400 Russian speaking civilians were killed - by both sides - 2014 to 2022. Since 2022 hundreds of thousands of Russian speaking and ethnic Russian civilians have been maimed or killed by Russian forces. Tens of thousands of of Russian speaking civilians were killed in Mariupol alone. Get a grip on reality Tom. Washington pawns? Yet no comment about the Kremlin pawns who got their marching orders in the Maidan. You're looking very much like a troll who's been sucked in by Russian BS there Tom. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Iraq? In every case you are supporting dictators who brutally repressed their people. That's not to say I support the west's actions - but it perfectly illustrates your mindset. And I'm surprised you have the gaul to mention Afghanistan - where the USSR also had a Stupid Military Operation. How can that be so difficult to understand, Tom?
    1
  787. ​ @Naet2369  Bollocks.
    1
  788. ​ @Naet2369 Yeah, right! And you would know, Igor.
    1
  789. ​ @Naet2369 Only a russian agent would write such carp.
    1
  790.  @antondavidoff150  No, they are very bad soldiers. They die at a much slower rate than ruSSian soldiers. For every brave Ukrainian defender who dies, at least two ruSSian soldiers are on their way to hell. It must be a great honour to die in order to help Pootin live in luxury in one of the mansions he bought with money stolen from the ruSSian people.
    1
  791.  @blacklion8208  "BS! He's a propagandist" Nah buddy - you are the propagandist, and a ruSSian troll.
    1
  792.  @srr441  What metric you ask. How about Russia's stated aims for this war: 1) Demilitarize Ukraine - FAIL. Ukraine now has more, and more modern, weaponry than before February, 2022. 2) Keep NATO from Russia's borders - FAIL. Russia has illustrated to all it's neighbors why they need to join defensive alliances (thanks Sweden and Finland). 3) Protect Russian speakers and ethnic Russians - FAIL. Russia has killed far more Russian speakers and ethnic Russian civilians in 17 months than Ukraine and Russia combined managed to achieve in the previous 9 years (which was 3400). 4) De-nazify Ukraine - FAIL. You can't denazify what isn't nazified - but if you really want to de-nazify the region. a good place to start is the Kremlin. Russia has lost this war by all their own metrics.
    1
  793.  @AleksandarMacedonian222  Well, well, another ruSSian troll repeating all of ruSSia's disinformation word for word. Your "facts" are all so obviously wrong that I wonder why you bother - as you are fooling no one (except maybe yourself).
    1
  794.  @денисбаженов-щ1б  5-7 km forward in 40 days is better than the Russian army has achieved in the last 11 months (that's over 330 days - to help your tiny troll mind comprehend). And don't talk about cliches - I'll bet you still believe that Ukraine shelled Donbas relentlessly for 9 years and killed 13,000 civilians.
    1
  795. Yup. What ruSSia has to say on the Su34 losses is "all BS". Shame.
    1
  796. ​ @divumque  No, the poor things have to wait two weeks for ruSSian Christmas on 7 January. Two weeks! That's long enough for a competent military to invade a neighbor. What a shame the ruSSian military isn't competent and is undermined by corruption.
    1
  797.  @Quicks1lvr  You appear to be duped by russian disinformation. Where did you say russia was advancing?
    1
  798. We've been warning ruSSia for over a year, but still they don't "wake up" - it is already too late for the hundreds of thousands of injured, maimed and killed ruSSian troops.
    1
  799.  @JohnCSmith-lp1qr  "Ukraine is Winning". Well it sure isn't ruZZia that's winning 🤡.
    1
  800. ​@Omni_Shambles No so quick. The russians haven't lost the war - yet.
    1
  801. ​ @RaffaelePettinato  Very true, but at a huge cost in lost troops. Huge!
    1
  802. Yes agreed. But Putin takes no notice and keeps lying to his people.
    1
  803. As do ruSSian solders.
    1
  804.  johnnyhjohns3817  Do you know they are mostly conscripts and mobilised men. Do you know hundreds of thousands of Russian men are now injured, maimed or killed in Ukraine - and for what? For Pootin's dream of going down in history is "Vlad the Great". Instead it is likely he will go down in history as the man who brought Russia to its knees.
    1
  805. Heinrich Himmler was a fascist, just like Putin.
    1
  806. ​ @poochie5543  And who's fault is that Pooch? It is Putin who is causing all this pain on Ukrainians, russians, and North Korean.
    1
  807. Oh look, even you are using a lower-case 'r' for ruSSia. That's a good way of showing support for Ukraine. Thanks Igor.
    1
  808.  @philyaboy2235  " i just being honest" Actually, you're just lying. But as you don't count, we don't care.
    1
  809.  @samgragas8467  Silly ruSSian troll, it was ruSSia that was doing the meat assaults. Were you asleep during the video?
    1
  810. You'll find his reporting very accurate. Certainly more accurate than anything you watch on ruSSian television.
    1
  811. "ruSSia is the only country in the world's history whose army advances BACKWARD (in Kursk)."
    1
  812.  @artiomantry  No, I mean ruSSia is advancing backwards in Kursk. Yes i will wait and see what happens there - as will you. And the tears in your eyes is for the loss of ruSSian teritory. Remember, it is Putin who brought war to ruSSia. It is Putin who brought war to the ruSSian people.
    1
  813.  @artiomantry  "Be well informed......62,000 sq mi) or almost 27% of Ukraine's territory." More false information from you. More looking foolish for you. 42,000 sq miles = 18% buddy.
    1
  814. You'll have to wait for him to do a video on that subject. This video is about Kherson oblast.
    1
  815.  @QANews  Hey QANews. Why are you still pushing ruSSian BS propaganda about fictitious activities in Ukraine? Best regards.
    1
  816.  @QANews  Hey QANews. you are free to daydream about peace, while your ruSSian masters cause destruction, all you like. Ultimately, a just peace will prevail in the end. Kindest regards.
    1
  817.  @JohnCSmith-lp1qr  The troll is strong in this one. Keep repeating the ruSSian disinformation and one day maybe one person will believe you.
    1
  818.  @MikeAG333  Not everyone is your age Mike.
    1
  819.  @ahndeux  I disagree. I believe you are pushing a false narrative. "The US citizens are sick and tired of endless wars especially when its not even our war" On the contrary, US citizens are hugely supportive of this war. The budget problems are merely politicking - the only chance of US support wavering is if a certain corrupt politician gets back the presidency. But you are right when you say "Only the war mongers are profiting from this lame war" because Putin and his buddies are sure trying to profit.
    1
  820. ​@hardtackbeans9790 Yes I think you are right.
    1
  821. ​@hardtackbeans9790 Yes I think you are right.
    1
  822. You are simply ridiculous that you don't see that holding back the second most powerful military in the world for two years isn't a huge success. Not just holding back, but liberating 30% of what was initially stolen. Most pundits expected Kyiv to fall in 3 days - including most ruSSian pundits. Now there is no chance the Kyiv will fall, and a good chance that the invader will be forced out of more Ukrainian land. That's success.
    1
  823. @@Ruka.321_YT It is obvious from your use of the term "ukranazia" that you have been duped by russian propaganda. Your use of the phrase "+ all of nato" shows you have been duped again. Sucked in twice by russian BS - how embarrassing !!
    1
  824.  @FantozziUgo1001bis  "Not if your goal was..." Oh, so only russia is allowed to change it's goals. Sorry, I didn't realise. "Btw, ukraine could defend itself ONLY thanks to the military supplies from the Western countries" Oh, so every country in the world has to have 6000 nukes, and have 10,000 tanks rusting away in fields - or else they can expect to be invaded. No one is allowed assistance from other countries. Sorry, once again I didn't realise those were the rules. Maybe you better tell Pooptin to send back those Iranian drones and North Korean shells he begged for, otherwise he's breaking the rules. Silly russian troll.
    1
  825.  @CheeseLovingGuy  Putin will go down in history as the man who finally brought Russia to it's knees. The man who wrecked Russia and reduced it to a third world country (or 'countries' if it breaks up).
    1
  826.  @robertbaran9044  I agree. Something is not right. It could be as simple as a trap. But I suspect something more sinister like a dirty bomb, tactical nuke, chemical attack or blowing the dam. Let's hope I'm wrong.
    1
  827.  @moiseshuerta3984  Hey Moiese, I think your cut-and-paste is stuck on repeat.
    1
  828. The Ukrainians have been in "troubles" since their belligerent neighbour decided to invade Ukraine. But they are holding out very well against Putin's Orcs and Putin's 3 day capture of Kyiv.
    1
  829. ​ @chriswilson3009  How are russian advances in Syria doing?
    1
  830. ​@user-ho9fk5ru5t Yes, I can. And I do. Unlike you who thinks what Putin tells you to think.
    1
  831.  @АндрейАвто-г2у  Yes I can, and I do. Unlike you who can only think what you are told to think.
    1
  832.  @АндрейАвто-г2у  Yes I can. And I do. Try it sometime, instead of parroting russian lies.
    1
  833.  @АндрейАвто-г2у  Yes I can. And I do.
    1
  834.  @АндрейАвто-г2у  Silly vatnik.
    1
  835.  @RabbitShirak  It is a terrible thing that Hamas killed 1200 Israelis. Image how terrible it is that Israel killed 30,000 Palestinians in Gaza - 25 times worse than Hamas. Hamas are terrorists. So what does that make Israel? Before you answer, remember the King David Hotel in July, 1946, and tell me that Israel isn't also a terrorist state.
    1
  836.  @Paul-wo3qh  I'll accept that Paul. I just won't accept inaccuracies such as "The Jews have been in Palestine for more than 2000 years". Thank you for correcting it.
    1
  837.  @yellowtunes2756  "I was just curious if he ever said that Israel and USA must not be allowed to use "might makes right" principle and if he ever wanted to supply Palestine or Syria with weapons". Maybe you should try being curious about that in a video about Palestine or Syria. You obviously think "might makes right" (because you back russia) so you obviously think Israel is justified. I don't. Slava Ukraini and slava Palestine.
    1
  838.  @yellowtunes2756  "Because when it comes to biased people and hypocrites" such as youself - as you back "might makes right" in Ukraine.
    1
  839.  @yellowtunes2756  "I don't like when strong attacks the weak". I'm with you on that one. I don't like it when Israel attacks Palestine, when russia attacks Ukraine, when Turkey attacks Kurds, or when the Syrian-russo coalition attacks civilians in Syria. I stopped watching both Denys Davydov and Jake Broe when they came out in support of Israel's slaughter of Palestinians, and have not watched either since. Hypocrites.
    1
  840.  @yellowtunes2756  "But that's just how it is". Nah, that's a sellout. Stand up for injustice.
    1
  841.  @yellowtunes2756  "Imagine if Ukraine let go of Donbas and Crimea in 2014". That would have rewarded russia for it's aggression. But it would not have stopped further aggression by russia. Putin has stated his desires. He's not going to settle for the Donbas and Crimea - he wants half of Europe as part of his "Greater russia".
    1
  842.  @yellowtunes2756  "Weak has to act in a way that won't anger someone strong". No they don't. That's a former era that you are describing. All countries that have signed the UN Charter have agreed to put that era in the past. Challenge any countries that waver.
    1
  843.  @yellowtunes2756  "hundreds of thousands could have been alive and well". Don't condemn Ukraine for what russia is doing. How do you know they'd be alive and well? Over 400,000 russian men are injured, maimed, or worse, as a direct result of russia's unjustified attack on Ukraine. 500,000 to 700,000 have fled the country. That could have been Ukrainians dying/fleeing in russia's next war - on Georgia, Moldova, Estonia, etc.
    1
  844.  @yellowtunes2756  "But that's just how it is". I can't fathom that you believe that. I was going to suggest you are a hypocrite, but that's not quite the right term - but it's apparent you have no moral compass. You don't like when the strong attack the weak, yet you support it.
    1
  845.  @yellowtunes2756  I thought you were lying when you said "I don't like when strong attacks the weak" because here you are spouting untrue russian propaganda in support the strong (russia) attacking the weak (Ukraine). You posted this lie: "Russia sent troops to Ukraine because Ukraine kept bombing Donbas civilians with inaccurate grad missiles". I guess that makes you a hypocrite.
    1
  846.  @yellowtunes2756  "Btw, Ukraine lost half of it's population since the start of the war" - more russian propaganda. And those that have left, left because of russia's unjustifiable attacks on Ukraine. And you do know that the Ukrainian government recommended that women and children take refuge outside of Ukraine - due to russia targetting civilians. So again you are being a hypocrite by supporting the the strong attacking the weak.
    1
  847.  @yellowtunes2756  "How am I supporting it? I was opposing Ukraine attacking Donbas..." You are supporting it by spreading russian propaganda and lies, because you are trying to spread the half-story that Ukraine was attacking Donbas. Tell the whole story.
    1
  848.  @yellowtunes2756  "and Putin seems like the only person in power who's ok with negotiations". More russian propaganda. Hypocrite. russia has already said that returning Ukrainian land to Ukraine is out of the question. So what are the negotiations about then? How white the Ukrainian surrender flag is to be? Don't be a hypocrite and stop supporting the strong attacking the weak.
    1
  849.  @yellowtunes2756  "Do you want people to stop dying or not?" Of course I do. And that can only happen if russia stops its aggression - but russia is unwilling to stop being aggressive. How many Ukrainians and russians is Putin willing to sacrifice to ensure that the 1991 borders (the only borders the world recognises) are not retaken. How many casualties aren't worth it? Because remember it's russia that is causing the casualties. How many Ukrainians and russians are YOU willing to sacrifice to ensure that the 1991 borders are not retaken.
    1
  850.  @yellowtunes2756  "Russia has no reason to invade those countries because they are peaceful and aren't bombing civilians, thanks to Russia". What a laughable load of poppycock. Here you are again spreading russian propaganda. You keep supporting the strong in its attacks on the weak. You keep supporting russia in it's attempted suppression of Ukraine. How many Ukrainians are you willing to sacrifice in your hypocritical support of the strong?
    1
  851.  @yellowtunes2756  "400k according to who?" you ask, and then you spout this russian war propaganda "Ukraine lost half of it's population". According to who? Hypocrite.
    1
  852.  @yellowtunes2756  "I don't like the fact that Russia attacked Ukraine, but it doesn't mean that they had no reason to do it". See that's exactly how you spread russian lies. russia had no justifiable reason to attack Ukraine. I'll repeat for those with slow understanding - russia had NO justifiable reason to attack Ukraine.
    1
  853.  @yellowtunes2756  "What is so hypocritical about it?" You claimed above to dislike it when the strong attack the weak - yet here you are supporting the strong in their illegal, unjustifiable attack on a weaker nation. That is what is hypocritical.
    1
  854.  @yellowtunes2756  "The longer Ukraine waits - the worse their situation will be". More false russian propaganda. More hypocritical support of the strong attacking the weak. The longer Ukraine waits the better their situation will be. Because at the time of the initial talks, russia controlled ~27% of Ukraine. Currently russia controls ~18% of Ukraine. Stop supporting the strong in their attacks on the weak with such lies.
    1
  855.  @yellowtunes2756  "at the start of the war Russia was ok with discussing future of Donbas (not as part of Russia)" - but also not as part of Ukraine - even though it is Ukrainian land.
    1
  856.  @yellowtunes2756  "while their main goal was to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO". Why? What business was it of russia what a sovereign nation does? Why would the stong (russia) want to attack the weak (Ukraine) when the weak was minding it's own business. Why do you support the strng attacking the weak when you claim to dislike that? Are you a hypocrite? There was no threat to russia if Ukraine joined NATO. Putin publicly stated in 2003 that he had no objection to the Baltic states joining NATO.
    1
  857.  @yellowtunes2756  "Why am I the hypocrite because I want people to talk to each other and make peace?" No, you are a hypocrite because you want the strong (russia) to gain from attacking the weak (Ukraine) - while claiming otherwise.
    1
  858.  @yellowtunes2756  "when I'm talking about Ukrainian bad deeds?" What Ukrainian "bad deeds"? And no russian propaganda in your reply, just balanced facts please.
    1
  859.  @yellowtunes2756  "Btw, Ukraine lost half of it's population since the start of the war" - more russian propaganda. And those that have left, left because of russia's unjustifiable attacks on Ukraine. And you do know that the Ukrainian government recommended that women and children take refuge outside of Ukraine - due to russia striking civilians. So again you are being a hypocrite by supporting the the strong attacking the weak.
    1
  860.  @yellowtunes2756  "Do you want people to stop dying or not?" Of course I do. And that can only happen if russia stops its aggression - but russia is unwilling to stop being aggressive. How many Ukrainians and russians is Putin willing to sacrifice to ensure that the 1991 borders (the only borders the world recognises) are not retaken.
    1
  861.  @yellowtunes2756  "How many casualties aren't worth it?" Remember it's russia that is causing the casualties. How many Ukrainians and russians are YOU willing to sacrifice to ensure that the 1991 borders are not retaken?
    1
  862.  @yellowtunes2756  "Russia has no reason to invade those countries because they are peaceful and aren't bombing civilians, thanks to Russia". Here you are again spreading untrue russian propaganda. You keep supporting the strong in its attacks on the weak. You keep supporting russia in it's attempted suppression of Ukraine. How many Ukrainians are you willing to sacrifice in your hypocritical support of the strong?
    1
  863.  @yellowtunes2756  "It'd a person who acts in contradiction with his stated opinion/beliefs." You stated that you are against the strong attacking the weak - while at the same time supporting russia in it's attacks on a weaker Ukraine by trying to justify those attacks. That's EXACTLY the definition you describe above. So you are, by your own definition, a hypocrite.
    1
  864.  @TrickShepherd  As above.
    1
  865.  @yellowtunes2756  "That's from the top of my head and it has nothing to do with ruzzia". Ah, wrong. It has everything too do with russia. Do you not know that russia sent provocateurs into Donbas to stir up dissension. Do you know that russia then armed those dissenters. Do you know that russia then sent in it's "little green men" into the Donbas to help the dissenters attack Ukrainian forces and institutions. That was all back in 2014. russia started this war. So it has EVERYTHING to do with russia.
    1
  866.  @Slit-dl6gl  Boris Johnson gave Zelensky very good advice.
    1
  867.  @AbdulConteh-m8v  "to go back to their former borders". You are talking rubbish. There are no border changes in eastern Europe. There are foreign NATO forces ONLY where they have been invited. There is no invasion. The only country invading anyone else in Europe is russia.
    1
  868.  @AbdulConteh-m8v  "Did the US lead NATO Alliance respect the agreements they signed with the Russians". Yes. Name one agreement they broke? russia, on the other hand, has a string of broken international agreements. I'll name one: The russo-Ukrainian Friendship Treaty, of 1997, in which russia agreed to Ukraine's sovereignty and to respect the 1991 borders of Ukraine. How's russia's adherence to that one looking?
    1
  869.  @ledlight1487  "and is pretty much defunct now". Deluded russian fantasy. Ask the russia cannon-fodder on the front lines how defunct Ukraine is.
    1
  870.  @mileskino8121  Not really. The borders between the former Yugoslavia and its neighbours have not changed. The changes are additional borders, all within the territory of the former Yugoslavia. And you say NATO did it? I don't think so!!! Most of the new nations broke away from the core of the former Yugoslavia without any external pressure. I believe NATO only got involved due to some of the atrocities committed by some of the factions (esp. Serbia - remember Srebrenica).
    1
  871.  @Zorro33313  "Ukraine hadn't". Actually, yes it did. Ukraine had two free and fair elections, and a peaceful hand over of power in the previous 10 years. Of course russia has not had a free and fair election for a very long time - so it's government is not legitimate.
    1
  872.  @mileskino8121  "serbia was just defending its national security by trying to retain there land". Well that's certainly not true. Serbia used force to try to retain every province of the former Yugoslavia, with the possible exception of Slovenia. That's not "just defending its national security", that's extending well beyond any reasonable form of defending itself. Add to that the terrible war crimes committed mostly by Serbia (remember Srebrenica) and Serbia has no cause to complain about anything they lost.
    1
  873.  @WDLC1911  "Same for every other NATION". What a $tupid thing to say !!! I guess that makes russia Mongolian territory, or Kyivian, with parts Chinese.
    1
  874.  @Zorro33313  lol Yup. Using WDLC's logic, that would make russian land Mongolian territory, or Kyivian, with parts Chinese.
    1
  875.  @mileskino8121  "I literally cannot believe you just put the two together". Hey, forgive me if I can't remember all the details of the break up of Yugoslavia. You are the one who started this "whataboutism". The Kosovo situation doesn't seem right, but after the atrocities Serbia committed I have very little sympathy if they got screwed on Kosovo. I particularly remember Srebrenica.
    1
  876.  @mileskino8121  "from the bombing of yugoslavia in 1999" There was no Yugoslavia in 1999. I literally cannot believe you just put the two together. Yugoslavia broke up in 1991-92.
    1
  877.  @mileskino8121  "just shines a light on how i have no sympathy for the american police state". And yet you have sympathy for the russian Orc police state. Seems hypocritical don't you think.
    1
  878.  @mileskino8121  I remember Srebrenica where Serbians massacred 5000-8000 unarmed men and boys - deliberately and in cold blood - in just a few days. This is a considerably higher number than died due to russian and Ukrainian hostilities in the Donbas over 8 years (3400). Yet you have the audacity to complain that Serbia was wronged.
    1
  879.  @almacnaughton3688  Do you enjoy being ignored by your representative?
    1
  880. And... Dude, you know Stalin died in the 1950s, but russians still look up to him.
    1
  881.  @yellowtunes2756  Stop with the dis-infomation vatnik.
    1
  882.  @fabb5  You are really good at this "whataboutism" while deflecting from the fact that ruzzia is the fascist aggressor that is attacking Ukraine. By supporting ruzzian fascists you are the nazi supporter.
    1
  883. Not true. It is ruzzia that is attempting to bleed Ukraine dry (and failing). Why do you blame Ukraine for what Putin is causing?
    1
  884. ruzzia used 122 missiles and 36 drones in it's attack on Ukraine, resulting in the loss of 31 Ukrainian lives. Ukraine used 4 missiles in it's attack on Feodosia, resulting in the loss of 74 ruzzian troops, two ships, and a shipload of munitions. One estimate I saw put the value of the ruzzian missiles and drones at the equivilent of $1.2 billion US dollars. I think @romanpopyk's estimates of $200-300 million probably reflects his pro-ruzzian troll status (roman poppycock?).
    1
  885.  @Saints1890  You are delusionary. You write complete rubbish. "Everyone knows Ukraine has lost the war" Yeah right. You silly misinformed ruSSian troll. I think everyone knows that ruSSia has failed to take Kyiv in the predicted three days (on day 671 that's very apparent). Russia has lost ships, multiple aircraft, 5000+ men and hundreds of armoured fighting vehicles in the last week alone. And all you can say is "Ukraine has lost the war" - I repeat: you are delusionary.
    1
  886.  @QANews  Hey QANews. I'm surprised you still believe that long debunked nonsense about "genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine" - as the only country conducting such genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine is ruSSia. ruSSian shelling and bombing has killed tens of thousands of ruSSian speakers and ethnic ruSSians in Mariupol alone, probably well over 100,000. And then there's the senseless slaughter of civilians by ruSSians in other parts of Eastern Ukraine. To enable the pursuit of self-determination in the Donbas region, ruSSia should contemplate GOING HOME in order to save lives - and to allow a free and fair, UN monitored referendum. Best regards.
    1
  887.  @QANews  Hey QANews. You don't represent the truth, because you are pushing ruSSian BS propaganda about fictitious "genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine" Best regards.
    1
  888.  @QANews  Hey QANews. No he's right, you wouldn’t know the truth if it smacked you in the face. The proof is in the ruSSian disinformation you have already posted in this comments section. Warm regards.
    1
  889.  @Jerry-6947  Sorry to say this but you're wrong. Russia is losing. The Ukrainian army brought the Russian army to a halt twelve months ago. The Russian army has been unable to take any significant Ukrainian land since that time. Not so much as one city, nothing, nada, zilch. Over the same twelve months the Ukrainian army has liberated over 18,000sq km of Ukraine - including six cities. Over 30% of Russian held territory - inclusive of Crimea - has been won back from the invaders. That's called "Ukraine winning", you silly Russian troll.
    1