General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

John Vannisselroy
DW News
comments

Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "DW News" channel.

Don't sign it without security guarantees.
32
Yes indeed. Both Trump and Vance owe Ukraine an apology.
20
@babblo1389 Same logic, why would Ukraine shoot at their own people running the plant.
18
@babblo1389 Russian troll.
16
Surely you should say "Moldova WAS part of Romania". It clearly isn't at present.
15
@urbansenicar81 A defence organisation. Do you want to hear what you are?
14
@benchoflemons398 Germany isn't doing much of anything - except funding Russia. For every Euro they send to Russia for gas there should be a Euro sent to Ukraine for defence (of Ukraine and ultimately of Europe).
14
@babblo1389 Russian troll still here!
13
Obviously Azerbaijan wants a good connection to it's exclave. But I do not see that it is up to Armenia to put it right. A route might equally go through Iran or Georgia & Turkey. A route through Armenia is likely to be the quickest and easiest. A route through the Zangezur corridor would likely be the least disruptive trans-Armenia route - although it might potentially cut Armenia from Iran. It would be good politics for Armenia to allow Azerbaijan to construct a route through that corridor, but as it will be on Armenian territory it is not for Azerbaijan to make demands. And if Aremenia wants border controls on the route, that is Armenia's right. It is up to Azerbaijan to make it worth Armenia's while if it does not wish to have controls.
12
@RuskiVanka I don't think it's a sleeping bear. More likely a dying bear, striking out for a few last times before its self inflicted death.
11
Germany gives more money to Russia (used to finance its war) than any other European country, while at the same time being well down the list when it comes to supplying Ukraine arms. Sometimes it seems that Germany is on Russia's side of the conflict. Instead of asking how much do we need to protect ourselves, maybe Germany should ask how much will we need to protect ourselves if Ukraine fails. Remember that East Germany is rightfully Russian (in the eyes of a former KGB agent).
11
But Ukraine is not shelling the nuclear plant. Russia is. If you can't work that out you can't be very bright.
9
@gigikontra7023 De facto... maybe. Legally, no, definitely not. Over 50% of Canadians may be of English origin and are English speaking. That doesn't make Canada part of England. Maybe Moldova will vote to join Romania one day, for economic and/or security reasons. Until that day...
9
@davidrodriguezcastaner3931 I thought the news reader said the plant supplied power to the Ukrainian grid. But even if you are right, I doubt Ukraine would risk making half the country radioactive.
8
@viaceslavmikhailovich9825 Moscow regime people own huge mansions a superyachts in Europe, mostly bought with money stolenfrom Russian people. So what?
8
@MudThought Ukraine has right to defend itself from offensive russians.
8
Killing is never nice - but it couldn't have happened to more deserving people.
8
@cyberfunk3793 Britain and the US can get equipment to Ukraine faster than Germany. And more useful equipment. And Germany wrings it's hands.
8
@kintani26 Russia does not seem to be staying strong. It is getting weaker and is no longer the second greatest military in the world. Nor is it a superpower any more.
7
@babblo1389 I think you watch too much Russian television. Troll.
6
@johnsmith-yk6yf Russian grain is not sanctioned. Do some research before you spout rubbish.
6
If he's able to keep fighting russia then that's a good result.
6
@advancetotabletop5328 Indeed. Putin showed extreme cowardice - by fleeing to St Petersburg when Wagner were still over 100km from Moscow.
6
@jont2576 the USSR is dead. Wake up man.
5
@MudThought ...to defend itself from Putin.
5
@babblo1389 Bab Blo is bot.
5
@davids5126 Indeed, it can never be justified. But after all of russia's attacks on innocent civilians in Ukraine, it is hard to find sympathy for russia's pain.
5
Nothing Russia does makes much sense.
5
@askdiatom The answer is simple. Russia doesn't mind a nuclear meltdown in a foreign country, whereas Ukraine does mind. Especially during a war where they don't have the resources to contain the meltdown (remember Chernobyl, where the full might of the Soviet Union, in peacetime, was barely able to prevent a total disaster).
5
@Maidaseu No, but I've heard of the Donbas (correct spelling), where russia started a civil war and shelled Ukraine on a regular basis, killing innocent civilians.
5
Yes, and eastern Russia belongs to China and Mongolia, both historically and ethnically. So when Russia gives China and Mongolia back their land - only then I might support your biased opinion.
4
I agree, I hope they never catch him.
4
@alloutofbubblegum7271 Evidence! You've given all the evidence we need to spot a Russian troll.
4
@RuskiVanka You didn't hear it from me back in March, but you're hearing it from me now. The Russian military is no longer able to make significant advances on the battlefield. The Russian airforce is too scared to fly over Ukraine. The Russian navy is hiding behind Crimea (which now seems less safe than it did two days ago). If the west will give Ukraine ATAKMS and modern battle tanks Russia will be swept out of all of Ukraine in a matter of months (Crimea possiblybefore Donbas). Russia has now proved itself to be such a toxic neighbor that it must be defeated - which Ukraine is making a good job of doing considering it has one arm tied behind its back by the west.
4
@boddy212 NATO isn't sending troops to Ukraine so no point in joining up. On the other hand Russia is desperate for troops. Maybe you'd like to abandon your keyboard to join up.
4
@davids5126 "The 9/11 terrorists or Hamas attackers said the same thing as you". I find it unlikely that either group said "Now Russia knows how Ukraine feels getting Attacked unprovoked".
4
@dancotton13 Ukraine does not target civilian targets. The reason Russia attacked Ukraine is that it felt a vassal state was slipping from its control. The "NATO" bogie is a straw man. NATO is no threat to Russia, unless Russia wants to invade neighboring sovereign states (which it does of course).
4
@dancotton13 All those trains carrying tanks weren't civilian. Ukraine attacked at night when there would be almost no civilian traffic. The Kerch bridge was a legitimate military target.
4
GENETIC BEAST I think you'll find it was the Orcs. Using the same logic, why would Ukraine attack a plant run by Ukrainian workers?
4
@URboy10 Maybe you should consider an Independent Analysis, because you current analysis is flawed.
4
@babblo1389 Russian troll.
4
Stan Marsh whatever! What's your point (other than to highlight that you're a Russian troll). Slava Ukraini.
3
Not quite uniformly, Orban took the fascist option.
3
@fagreed3938 There was no Himars weapon used on the POWs. It was a Russian thermobaric weapon. You need to stop watching so much Russian television.
3
@dancotton13 There are very few people living in the Crimean bridge. Not a civilian target but a military one.
3
@daddyandy9591 Yeah but the Russian military has shown complete incompetence around nuclear plants. Look at those soldiers who dug in around Chernobyl. They're probably all dying from radiation exposure by now.
3
Ever heard of Russia trying to blame someone else for their deeds?
3
@vervetech9395 DW has never hidden that fact that Russia produces more grain than Ukraine - Your first lie. Ukrainian exports of grain (pre-war) ARE close. - Ukraine is the 5th largest exporter of wheat, exporting around 60% of what Russia exports; - Ukraine is the 4th largest exporter of maise, exporting 700% more maise that Russia exports; - Ukraine is the worlds 1st largest exporter of sunflower oil, exporting 220% as much as Russia. Your second lie. World prices are based on availability. Shortages cause price increases that many countries can't afford - so the world needs Ukrainian grain as much as it needs Russian grain - Your third lie. Try doing some fact checking before making a fool of yourself.
3
I have to say I'm not impressed by what Stephen says. He says eventually Ukraine will have to negotiate with Russia. Considering a Russian official, within the last 24 hours, said that a Russian precondition for peace negotiations is for Ukraine to hand over Kherson, Mykoliav and Odesa oblasts, to Russia !!!! Stephen also suggests that Ukraine should not be allowed to join NATO. That's hanging Ukraine out to dry, as there is no other way to guarantee Ukraine's sovereignty (Russia having broken every international agreement it ever signed regarding Ukraine).
3
@nealwhite5602 Neal White, that's not a very Russian name for a Russian troll.
3
@DRKrust492 I feel Transnistria has some legitimacy, having been established about the same time as modern Moldova was established. However it is real tempting to just invade (with Moldova's agreement) and rid that border of Russians. Also, the stockpile of Russian munitions held in Transnistria could be very helpful to Ukraine.
3
 @zelenskyy-the-blackmailerh5920 RRussian troll.
3
Temporary peace - at any price. No thanks. Trump, you can stick your extortion where the sun doesn't shine.
3
Oh dear. Silly Russian troll.
3
I hope the Gulf States promise fuel supplies but then fail to deliver - a bit like German military supplies to Ukraine.
3
@vervetech9395 Just...
2
@hakinadedeji Hmmm. Showing your ignorance.
2
@shans4167 They didn't fire on themselves. They know exactly where their own troops are so they made sure to fire somewhere else on the site. Ask yourself, why would Ukraine fire on their own citizens working at the plant (probably at gunpoint) and risk a nuclear meltdown that could make half of Ukraine uninhabitable. Then ask yourself why Russia might fire on the plant - to attempt to discredit Ukraine. What would the Russians care if there was a nuclear incident in a country far from Moscow.
2
@danielobrien8417 Russian troll. You're jumping the gun. This war is showing Russia's weaknesses, and the west will not help Russia rebuild when this war is over.
2
@kudi If you can't string a sentence together in English you should stick to commenting in your native tongue - Russian.
2
@mgronich948 Paranoid russian thinking.
2
@guystokesable I have done so, and I can assure you that russia's attacks on Ukraine are unprovoked.
2
@cjelder8321 Except that it's Russia that is shelling the ZPP. You'd have to be a bit dim not to realise that.
2
 @TheYoutubeUser69 If China gets the east coast of Russia back, it might take its attention off Taiwan (a territory that was never China's).
2
Except that Russia doesn't know the meaning of "negotiate".
2
@captainufo4587 What's you problem? And what's your point?
2
@tutotutot5193 I didn't realise you ate minerals.
2
Logistics. Ukraine can only move about 10% by land compared to by sea. Also it costs more to send by land. It will be cheaper by land when Ukraine changes it's railways from "Russian gauge" to European "Standard" gauge as it will no longer need to be transhipped at the border - but still it will cost more by land than by sea. Any many poorer nations can't afford to pay much more.
2
@yvonnerahmes9618 Yes. It's very important that any aggressor is not rewarded for their aggression.
2
@aeye9772 I think you'll find that it's Russia that is the provocateur.
2
No, it hasn't been about money. Trump is now making it about money.
2
@vervetech9395 Callous people with no moral compass don't care. The rest of use do. Slava Ukraini.
2
@СергейМонин-д7с Yes Russia always makes more demands, more threats, and uses more weapons. But one day justice will come and Russia will pay.
2
@bernardchan4090 Ukraine did NOT brutalise Crimea - that's just what Russian television tells you. The rest of your points are off topic - but what about Russia.
2
God save Ukrainians from Russia. And could he also please save Ukrainians from poor American pronunciation - Kherson has a silent 'K' you Know, as does Kharkiv. Slava Ukraini.
2
@felipe-vibor Russia is far more aggressive than USA, UK or NATO as a whole. Of these, only Russia invades other countries for the purpose of building a "greater" nation. Only Russia invades to annex territory for itself. Only Russia kills hundreds of thousands of people for its own "glory".
2
He was a very good comedian. And now he's a very good leader. Slava Ukraini.
2
There is only one country "making efforts to escalate this conflict". That country is Russia. If Russia pulls its troops from Ukraine today, this conflict will immediately de-escalate. Silly Russian troll.
2
@VadimRadtchenko Yes I trust Zelensky - far more so than Putin, Trump, Orban, or the leader of my own country.
2
I wonder if Lukashenko will take a pair of handcuffs with him tomorrow? He could apprehend an alleged war criminal. 😅
2
Roads and rail can only shift ~10% of the grains available for export - and at a much higher cost.
2
@springbloom5940 No, it's what to say to a silly Russian troll who is presenting false information and knows it is false.
2
 @hamadsebaduka They aren't in Ukraine.
2
 @hamadsebaduka Afghanistan isn't in Ukraine either.
2
@SPIDERM0OSE Yes, I want even more interactions with Ukraine, and even less with the aggressor, Russia.
2
@SPIDERM0OSE On Ukraine working towards being a responsible member of the world. And Russia being an irresponsible fascist state.
2
Europe can buy all the grain it needs. It is Africa and Asia that is vulnerable.
2
@startracksha Why are you not on a frontline?
2
I was thinking along similar lines. I'm sure Ukraine could provide AA stations (and probably has now), I was thinking along the lines of a NATO Patriot battery protecting Bulgarian airspace, and extending over the Danube.
2
 @proudlyafrican3373 I don't believe the Afgans or Iraqis are involved in this war. Please keep to the discussion.
1
@auweia5024 It means getting rid of Pootin's influence (preferably including his departure from this world)
1
@auweia5024 Pootin falling out a window, being poisoned, or being executed after a revolt, would all achieve a loss of his (minor) influence in China.
1
@auweia5024 I have not even mentioned China. Maybe you should answer your question. But why would you want to assassinate Xi anyway? He is not evil like Pootin is.
1
@proudlyafrican3373 They aren't part of discussion about the Russian attacks on Ukraine. Afghanistan and Iraqi are part of this world, just like Tierra del Fuego or the Canary Islands. But equally irrelevant to the Russian war.
1
@BLMVDV All of which are available to see on Russian television. But only fools believe what they see on Russian television. You do know that the POWs were killed by a Russian thermobaric weapon don't you.
1
@srdj23Q Bollocks. Stay away from that Russian television, it'll brainwash you.
1
@viaceslavmikhailovich9825 You've been watching Russian television again. Ask yourself, why does Russia arrest and jail anyone who says Russia has gone to war; anyone who says Russian's are dying in significant numbers? Why is any opinion that does not back the Russian narrative banned? Because Russia is hiding the truth - and you are believing what Russia is telling you. You need to get out more.
1
@davidrodriguezcastaner3931 It's now been confirmed that the plant was supplying power to Ukrainian held territory. It's also been confirmed that no Russian soldiers were killed or injured, but one Ukrainian technician was injured. That's because the Russian spotters at the plant would have told the Russian artillery where to shoot. The major damage was to the power supply to Ukrainian held territory. So it was obviously a Russian attack.
1
@masakitonguba8919 That's one possibility. Another possibility is Russia did it and blames Ukraine for sympathy. But that only one of many things pointing to it being a Russian attack.
1
@masakitonguba8919 Of course it makes sense. Why would Ukraine attack its own workers at the plant? Why would Ukraine risk a nuclear disaster that might make half of Ukraine uninhabitable? Why would Ukraine take out the electrical transmission line that lead to Ukrainian occupied territory? Now ask yourself the same questions about Russia. Russia wouldn't attack its own troops because it was the troops at the plant directing the attack. Did any Russians get wounded or killed? No, it was a Ukrainian worker that got wounded. Why would Russia risk attacking a nuclear plant? Why would they care what happens in a country far from Moscow (that they're already trying to smash). Why would Russia take out transmission lines to Ukrainian territory? Why wouldn't they. There are just so many reasons why Russia WOULD attack the plant and so few why Ukraine would. Of course if you're a Russian troll you would only support the Russian statement. Are you?
1
@masakitonguba8919 Hey Guba old chap. How's it hanging. I think your record is stuck 'cause you keep asking the same question. Maybe you need to get some of that Russian carp out of your eyes so you can read the answers.
1
I see the trolls are out today.
1
The USSR?
1
And you, apparently, are a Russian troll.
1
@hakinadedeji Still showing your ignorance.
1
@MudThought Who says? Your logic is horribly flawed.
1
@MudThought "so too palestinians. you better check you biased opinion". No. Palestinians did not invade Ukraine in 2014. You better check your biased opinion and your facts, buddy. Remember, russia is the aggressor.
1
@MudThought "does ukraine attack russia then?" No. You would have to be a fool to suggest that, because it is called defense when you attempt to repel an attacker.
1
@MudThought "are you afraid that i will make that as reference the hypocrisy of the west that the war in certain area in middle east did not start at oct last year just like ukraine but hypocritically ignore that facts?" No. As someone has already pointed out, there is no parallel with the middle east. We are afraid that you will make a fool of yourself suggesting that russia was provoked. Hypocrite.
1
@Thea-gj2or Yeah I'm more special than you.
1
@placeswelive5388 I think forastero is being real. Russia didn't seem to know where the world's worse nuclear meltdown was, and had their troops dig into the most radioactive land in the world - the red forest at Chernobyl.
1
@shans4167 You are right, large parts of Russia would most likely be affected too. That's why Russia didn't fire at the reactors, they fired at the electric transmission lines cutting power to non-occupied parts of Ukraine. Russia doesn't want Ukrainian power going to Europe as that might break the energy stranghold they have on Germany.
1
@albrathwaite7074 Logic. Why would Ukraine bomb a plant full of Ukrainian workers. Why would Ukraine risk a nuclear meltdown on Ukrainian soil. Why would Russia bomb a Ukrainian plant - because they know exactly where their troops are and can make sure none are injured, while attempting to discredit Ukraine. And it looks like a lot of suckers fell for it.
1
@Maidaseu We see that golf club caused permanent damage.
1
@throughput6674 Putin lied, Putin cheated, you troll.
1
@Crashed131963 I thought at the very least Turkey would escort the ships. I believe Russia would be reluctant to attack Turkish ships.
1
@edgarvonboltzmann7465 Lavrov is a joke. He talks nonsense. "They might use long range weapons to attack across the border into Russia". Well, what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. And as for your references to Iraq and Afghanistan, don't forget who else got their butt kicked in Afghanistan. And who carried out atrocities in Syria, Chechnya, Georgia and now in Ukraine. Remember that Putin wants to restore Russia to being a great power - even he realises it's not a great power at present. But it took this war for the rest of the world to realise Russia is a dying power - much closer to a banana republic than a great power.
1
 @Krv-y7f russian bot cannot speak good English.
1
@lisapet160 You are talking bollocks. Russian BS.
1
@danielobrien8417 Yeah,.you're a Russian troll. Try to learn to live with it.
1
@PlaYer-sn5or You silly dim-witted Russian bot. Ukraine is not shelling the ZPP. Russia is shelling the plant.
1
@PlaYer-sn5or I don't know who blew up the obsolete Nordstream pipelines. If I had to put money on it, I would guess Poland.
1
@qwikstix3 It's going to happen anyway if the Russians keep letting off explosives next to a nuclear power plant.
1
Wow. Thank you Andrie. Slava Ukraini.
1
@fagreed3938 I can imagine what they're capable of, and it doesn't include rendering their country uninhabitable. Russia, on the other hand, wouldn't care.
1
Well the Russian army certainly isn't winning and hasn't been for 10 months.
1
Why would Ukraine missiles the areas where Ukrainian workers are placed. What ??? Why would Russian trolls comment on a German news site?
1
@markbishop1138 I wasn't replying to you Mark. I was commenting on kudi's post. You can tell that by the @kudi at the start of my post. Your English seems a bit rough too, a bit like your logic.
1
@SPIDERM0OSE Silly Russian troll.
1
@kacangajaib1563 Yes of course russia DOES do unprovoked wars - in Chechnya, Georgia, Ukraine...
1
@cattymajiv Like the claims Ukraine has shelled Donbas for 10 years, killing 13,000 civilians.
1
@cattymajiv Like the claims russia invaded Donbas to protect russian speakers and ethnic russian civilians?
1
@cattymajiv ruzzian claims without absolute proof means nothing.
1
@EMP1RE917 Russia is such a great wonderful powerful country - they can insure their own ships. Or are they not a great country? Maybe Russia is a banana republic with delusions of grandeur.
1
@johnsmith-yk6yf I reread your post and I stick to my comments. Grain exports from Russia are not subject to sanctions.
1
@marioformosa4259 And Norwegian, and Finnish, and Estonian, and Latvian, and Lithuanian, and Polish bases. They are all in NATO, and due to Russian aggression they now all want NATO bases on their borders with Russia. It looks like Pootin shot himself in the foot. An "own goal".
1
@HåkonOdinsson As do I for the innocent victims of russia's unprovoked aggression in Ukraine.
1
Gerhard should remember that after the Baltic states and Poland, eastern Germany is also on the list of intended Russian conquests.
1
@Esico6 Yes I'm sure. Putin has written papers on the subject. Are you not familiar with them?
1
You don't have any friends.
1
In spite of what all the trolls are saying here, I think Poroshenko handled that interview very well. And he was right to point out that it was he who turned around Ukraine's armed forces by approaching the west and asking for military training. There are many players who contributed to Ukraine not folding in three days as Pootin expected, and undoubtedly Poroshenko is one of the leading ones. Until Pootin learns the meaning of 'meaningful negotiations' , Ukraine is negotiating in the only way Pootin understands - give them the weapons and ammunition needed to "talk" to Pootin.
1
@markharcourt2214 Thanks Mark the troll. No that's not what I am saying. Slava Ukraini.
1
@Montalva No, I think pro-west and anti-Russian sentiment among the Ukrainian voters got him into office. I don't know how competent he was once he got in, but certainly his government's defence policies show high levels of competency. There are Russian trolls who think he should have done nothing, so that Russia could eventually take Kyiv in three days.
1
@jansettler4828 So what part is wrong? Seriously, I'd like to be proved wrong on this because I'm very disappointed with the impression I have of Germany's input.
1
Don't blockage grain - Russian or Ukrainian - the world needs it. Blockade Russian oil.
1
@billcarson818 Yeah I'm looking forward to Russia's dissolution. There just aren't enough people (and over a million less workers since they started this war) for such a huge land mass. It would be better if each region had self rule, or joined a more prosperous nation such as China. But if you think Russia would be better left as is, to start more wars and kill more people, please share YOUR drugs.
1
@mickyolangi2709 Ors are dying by the hundreds every day. That's why Putin needs people from Chechnya and from prisons and old men and North Koreans to help fight the war. That's why Russian conscripts with little training are sent to war. You've been watching too much Russian television.
1
Tom Almow you are Russian troll.
1
You are right Deborah, the US is done - but not in the way you mean.
1
@dilipkumar1268 russia will dictate terms to Trump, who will try to get Zelenski to sign off. Ukraine must have security guarantees, or there will not be peace for long. Foreign forces in Ukraine, or NATO membership - there are no other alternatives to peace.
1
@nurex9029 I guess I think you're a fool if you believe that. Why would Ukraine attack a plant run by Ukrainian workers (probably at gun point) and risk a major nuclrar meltdown on Ukrainian soil? Then ask yourself why might Russia attack the nuclear plant? Russia knows where their troops are so they can avoid killing them. Russia doesn't particularly care if they cause a nuclear disaster in.a foreign country far from Moscow. Russia can makr Ukraine look bad if they can convince the world it was the Ukrainians. And when they blame each othet, well we know that Russia are the bigger liars.
1
@babblo1389 All Bab Blo should be shut down. They blow too much.
1
Yeah but Putin needs a stab proof, bullet proof vest. Slava Ukraini.
1
@raskolnikov1461 Russia deserves no respect. Under Putin it's an evil state.
1
@ГеннадийШуплецов-р8п That is a lie. There are no restrictions on Russian agricultural exports. And how could it be a monopoly when there are dozens of grain exporting nations around the world. Russia doesn't have enough food to feed it's own army - going by the number of videos in which Russian troops are spending their own money to buy food and water.
1
@chimay3 You should have said that to the Russian troops who dug trenches in the Red Forest at Chernobyl. You silly Russian troll.
1
So were they Russian or Ukrainian missiles. We know that Ukraine exaggerates, and we know the Russia lies. So Russia is less believable than Ukraine. We know that Ukraine would not like another Chernobyl on it's land, whereas we suspect that it's far enough from Moscow that Russia wouldn't care. I guess we just have to wait for the Himars fragments to be delivered from the Azov POW camp so Russia can "prove" it was Ukrainian missiles.
1
@aeye9772 You've got those figures all wrong. Where'd you get your information, Russian television?
1
@aeye9772 Russian Google = Roogle.
1
@aeye9772 Aha, yes I looked at Google. I see Russian sources say 50 killed. Other sources say different. So you're a Russian troll.
1
@The.Curious There's nothing realistic about "negotiations" with Russia. They don't even understand the meaning of the word. So you suggesting that such "negotiations" are realistic shows that you're a fool, or a Russian troll (or both).
1
@babblo1389 Why keep writing rubbish you Russian bot?
1
@aeye9772 The Ukrainians got rid of a Russian puppet president. There have been several elections since then so the current government is legitimately elected - unlike the governments of Russia and Belarus. If there is a civil war within Ukraine then that does NOT give another country the right to invade. And I've seen archive footage of Russian artillery in the disputed Donbas firing in both directions i.e. at the seperatists and at the Ukrainian government forces. That was Russia being the provocateur. Now they are the provocateur again. That you don't want to accept that is your problem - but it still makes you wrong.
1
@nealwhite5602 The 20 million dollars that Zelenskii made has nothing to do with you being a troll. You are a troll independent of Zelenskii's millions.
1
@nealwhite5602 No Neal, it means that you're a troll.
1
@nealwhite5602 Well you know what they say Neal, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, chances are it's a duck. The same applies for trolls...
1
@danielobrien8417 Russian troll. You want bullies? Look no further than the Kremlin.
1
@danielobrien8417 Easy. USA and UK don't lock people up for expressing their opinions in public. You know, like the people who peacefully protested in Moscow. USA and UK don't imprison media for telling people their country has gone to war. You know, like Mosciw does. You want to.onow something else - you're behaving like a Russian troll.
1
@ИринаЛукьяненко-ь3ъ Ukraine with be successfully de-Nazified when the last Russian solder leaves it's territory.
1
 @sandradixon6205 Sandra, your "copy and paste" button is stuck on.
1
You don't have a very good understanding of logistics. It takes thousands of trucks to do the work of one ship. That's thousands of drivers who all need to be paid. That's massive fuel usage for a country that has had it's fuel infrastructure targeted by a belligerent neighbor for 18 months. Is there road capacity? Are there trucks and drivers available? Who pays for overnight accommodation in EU countries for those drivers. And when the grains get to EU ports they have to be transhipped into ships - that should have occurred in Odesa. These massive increases in costs have to be borne by the customer. It has been estimated that overland exports (road and rail combined) can only shift ~10% of Ukraine's grain exports, with the current infrastructure.
1
@Diana1000Smiles My brain is fine. I certainly don't have the hatred she had.
1
I just heard on the news that Russia has evidence of a Ukrainian operative crossing into Russia a month ago. The operative then checked into the same apartment block that this womam lived in and observed her movements for a month. They've now searched the apartment and found papers linking the operative with the Azov battalion. They had me believing it up to the point of the Azov papers, but that have it away as a bollocks. It seems Putin's men changed their minds last minute and stopped her father from getting into the car too.
1
@@user-bo8ry9gu8z No it's not BS. It's what Russia is really doing. Why don't you take off your Russian rose tinted glasses and have a look at the real world.
1
@worldwide8587 Russia brought Russia's enemy to her doorstep. Russia has now proved to all doubters that Russia is evil.
1
@AbuBawa-sw1ut You are the clown.
1
Well that would be useful - not!
1
They're not coming back. Russia was forced to make a strategic retreat due to Ukrainian attacks on supply lines. But Pootin was right, the liberators were greeted with hugs and flowers, just like he said they would be.
1
@jaydeepvaze9513 You already said that.
1
@GP99911 If you're referring to oligarchs money and Putin's money, it's already stolen from the Russian people. The west should take it for Ukraine - that's only fair.
1
@GP99911 I don't know what you're trying to say. If you can't string a sentence together in English then restrict yourself to commenting on Russian speaking channels (where people are sufficiently brainwashed to agree with you).
1
@Johnfulkan283 If you are suggesting that 3/4 of the human race are in countries that support murder, torture, rape - then maybe we need to sanction 3/4 of the human race. Do you think we, as humans, shouldn't clean up our act a little?
1
@The-Truth_ Russia is pushing for war (I mean "special operation") in Europe. If we don't stop him in Ukraine you will soon have war in Europe. Balkans, Finland and Moldova first. Poland next. Where after that, Germany?
1
@The-Truth_ Facts are facts Don. Russia occupied Crimea and part of Donbas back in 2014. Russia attempted to occupy all of Ukraine in 2022, may yet succeed (God help us all). I would like to be able to like Russia, but that is not possible when Putin uses tactics like murder and poisoning to achieve his aims.
1
Russia accuses Ukraine of cross border attack on oil depot. I seem to recall at least three Russian cross border attacks on Ukrainian oil depots in recent days. You reap what you sow.
1
China is foolish. They should have tried to woo Taiwan. Instead, they show that they cannot be trusted. They had a 50 agreement over Hong Kong that they broke after 23 years. If this is how China acts, Taiwan should never agree to "reunification".
1
@zelenskyy-the-blackmailerh5920 Better pro-war against an aggressor than a Russian sympathiser like you.
1
It makes zero sense to people who don't know what russia does to other countries.
1
NATO may not be able to get involved, but Germany can help. Scholz sounds almost cowardly. Does he not remember that one third of Germany was part of the USSRs sphere of influence, and therefore on Putin's shopping list. Russia MUST be stopped in Ukraine or Europe is doomed.
1
@gfys756 Funny person. Russia is trying to "colonise" Ukraine, and many African countries as we write. What do you think Wagner are doing in Africa - having tea parties?
1
@fagreed3938 No. Where?
1
@kintani26 Yes soon Russia will be well done. Roasted like a pig on a stick. Slava Ukraini.
1
Logistics. Ukraine can only move about 10% by land compared to by sea. Also it costs more to send by land. It will be cheaper by land when Ukraine changes it's railways from "Russian gauge" to European "Standard" gauge as it will no longer need to be transhipped at the border - but still it will cost more by land than by sea. Any many poorer nations can't afford to pay much more.
1
Correct, it was western intelligence who tried to warn russia. It was russian arrogance that resulted in this attack.
1
A peaceful solution!?! A peaceful solution would be for Russia to stop being aggressive and keep its damn tanks in Russia. It's a bit late for peaceful solutions. How much land do you think.Ukraine should cede to Russia this time? How much next time?
1
Maybe when Putin stops sending weapons into Ukraine the west might stop sending weapons into Ukraine.
1
@bobkin611 You're assuming that Russia is innocent. It is not.
1
@AlmaWells And the beautiful Kremlin will become radioactive ash swirling in the breeze. Or glass. Why you you talk about a husband beating his wife. They could be gay - it could be a wife beating her wife. More likely they're LGBTQ. I think you always making men out as the abusive one is just sexist. You're a sexist pig.
1
@beegeebad3193 Aw come on. We've all heard that BS before. Haven't you got anything constructive to say.
1
@shazkh7753 STOP SHOUTING!! And haven't you got something worthwhile to add to the conversation instead of recycling that old BS.
1
Hopefully you don't accept Teslas anymore.
1
Zero. Like you are.
1
@fagreed3938 Of course they don't show you - especially where there's nothing to show. Though I expect there are a few collaborators having to do some fast talking. The FSB don't show off their captives either.
1
@fagreed3938 Your talking about "the eleven who surrendered without weapons". There you are wrong again. Ten were in the process of surrendering. They had not yet been checked to see if they were armed, or booby trapped, when the eleventh appeared firing a weapon. At that point it was fair to assume that the whole group were feigning surrender and I'm sure anybody who moved got shot. You'd shoot first and ask questions later in the same circumstances - or are you so silly you'd try to argue with them as they slit your throat or blew your head off.
1
@fagreed3938 Are you blind?.The last gun came out with a gun, started shooting and shot one Ukrainian. The others weren't carrying AK 74s, but they may well have had conceal knives, handguns or been booby trapped. Anyway, No.11 came out armed and shooting, thereby condeming his mates (whether they were feigning or genuine). Slava Ukraini.
1
Yes it's very clear that Russia fired the rockets. Why would Ukraine attack its own workers and try to cause a nuclear disaster on their own land? Why would Russia attack a Ukrainian nuclear power plant and risk a nuclear disaster far away from Moscow - if they could make Ukraine look bad. Yup, that's why.
1
@majedalkhoury1855 bla bla bla bla bla.
1
We know that Russia IS scared of NATO. It started this war to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO. If Russia wasn't scared of NATO then they wouldn't have cared whether or not Ukraine was a NATO member. Russia is VERY scared of NATO.
1
@URboy10 Zelenski has been to the front lines to support his troops on many occasions. Putin has never been near the frontlines because he is a coward.
1
Germany forgets that the former East Germany is likely on Putin's shopping list. They may not owe anything to Ukraine but if they don't help Ukraine win then Germany may soon be at war with Russia protecting German soil.
1
You have to pay the money before you can get it back. $500 million? Nah, $50 million at most.
1
@slmerts9955 No, he's talking about Putin.
1
@Born782 Oh dear, another Russian troll.
1
 @barbarahesford5061 Yeah. You have a problem with that? The point is he supports the government in this time of war.
1
@meso8848 Yeah, Poroshenko is the guy who set the Ukrainian military on a path whereby Ukraine was able to stand up to it's belligerently aggressive neighbor. Credit where credit is due. Do you really know who Pootin is? He's the man who stole SO MUCH from the Russian people that he is the richest man in the world. He is the man.who has had 100s of thousands of young Russian men killed or mained in a war he started, just so that he might go down in history as a new Catherine the Great. He is the man who has set Russian back several decades financially.
1
Yes, but Russia refuses to export a lot of grain. It is using both Russian and Ukrainian grain as a weapon to get more sanctions lifted.
1
@SPIDERM0OSE And how is it that you are so ****ish as to bring this up in a thread related to rail track gauge?
1
Trump is continuing to be a dictator (as is Putin).
1
@zrglow4450 And Russia wants Ukrainian land for free.
1
@manuelle844 Bollocks.
1
"So far they have used only a maximim of 20% of conventional strike capabilities, comprising land, air and sea-based platforms". Hah, you have fallen for russian disinformation. Over 30% of russian sea-based platforms have been damaged or sunk by Ukraine. Next you will be trying to tell us that russia has not yet begun to fight.
1
@Sreja Aćimović So what's Russia going to do about it? Not much. Russia is nearly out of weapons. Rusty T62 tanks are being hauled out of storage. S300 missiles are being used against ground targets. New recruits are being sent to their deaths on the frontlines without enough training, without enough equipment, and sometimes without enough food. Russia is spent. Pootin is doomed. Slava Ukraini.
1
@buravan1512 Untrue. You are attempting to spread false Russia BS.
1
@ibrahimmuhammed6210 Nobody is stopping Russia from exporting grain. Why do you believe Russian BS?
1
Why not? He was a damn good comedian and now he's a damned good leader.
1
@tommwangi4302 How can Zelenskii be just as guilty as Putin? Zelenskii didn't start a war in another country. Zelenskii rallied his people to fight off an invader. Zelenskii is a great leader for staying when he could have run.
1
@tommwangi4302 What a load of bollocks Tom. Yes Ukraine had a revolution, but the last several governments have been fairly elected by the people - which is more than you can say for Russia or Belarus.
1
@tommwangi4302 I don't know why your replies to me aren't being displayed here.
1
@davidnoelfranks1124 Hey Ford, that's an unusual name for a Russian (troll). Slava Ukraini.
1
I think that's a typo. Do you mean "Gory.." as in all the murdered civilians? You cannot seriously be praising Russia. You'd have to be a bit sick in the head to support a brutal dictator like Putin.
1
@hollywoodstories I repeat, you'd have to be a bit sick in the head to support a brutal dictator like Putin.
1
@3ascdo743 I have studied the facts and it appears that it is russia that regularly attacks innocent civilians.
1