Comments by "wvu05" (@wvu05) on "The Damage Report"
channel.
-
37
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chefbarona3052 1) Is this really the hill that you want to die on?
2) Okay, let's take that three gallons a year. The average bottle costs $14. There are about five bottles to the gallon, so even if that average is right, you are looking at an annual wine budget of $210. That would be like insisting that because some people buy an insane amount of running shoes that it is normal to spend thousands of dollars a year on running shoes.
3) Well, we've already established that her spending far exceeds the cost of the average wine consumer. Miles from Sideways probably didn't drop $1200 on wine for the entire trip.
4) I don't drink Starbucks or cocktails. Then again, I don't use ridiculous comparisons not to make the spending look so ridiculous.
5) I have no desire to be an oenophile, but if Marie Antoinette in Prada is going to do something ridiculous like go off on a massive wine spending spree while refusing to do her actual job and do everything in her power to add to the suffering of the poor, she deserves every bit of mockery she gets. I could get a million dollars tomorrow, and I still wouldn't use it to load up on wine, even "as an investment."
6) You can choose to defend an arrogant person all you want, but at a certain point, you start to sound like some multimillionaire talking about how he/she struggles to live off a six-figure salary.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jessestoler2828 He was very good. Back when he was still calling himself a deist, I thought he had his funniest stuff on religion ("How did the Republicans get Jesus? We should be brothers, live in peace, turn the other cheek, that's a Democrat. God, the Father, that's a Republican!") and he was actually willing to pay taxes ("We call them [police, firefighters, teachers] our heroes, but maybe we like them because they work cheap... Don't worry, applause costs you nothing."), but somewhere along the way, it seems like he leaned in to the reactionary stuff.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Philbert-s2c And she beat him by 5 1/2 points, so what does that say about him? I know party people, activists, and rank and file voters, and just about everyone considers him resigning his State Senate seat to run for President, only to drop out a few weeks later, to be proof that he isn't serious and wants to be a celebrity. Someone in another thread said that he moved to North Carolina, anyway, and he basically burned all of his bridges after Paula Jean beat him, saying that he'll never run again because the people of West Virginia don't know what is good for them. So, is this comment based on living online, or is it based on understanding?
If Ojeda changed his mind, Manchin could just (to the extent he acknowledges him at all) rub that stuff in his face, and it doesn't matter what Ojeda says. The fact that, like it or not, Manchin is a very good retail politician in a state that still values that and can call on 35 years of favors to fend off a challenge, tells me that he'll win. Any challenge has to be from someone who isn't tainted, and it will be done by people who know that it's like a dog chasing a tire. You want to scare the tire, you never want to catch it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@katieleinster179 But, as of right now, only three people are above 15%: Bernie, Biden, and (sometimes) Harris. If someone is below 15%, those votes go into the ether. Let's say that Biden flames out early (which has long been my theory), and in, say, Oklahoma, the breakdown is Bernie 40, Harris 30, Tulsi 10, other 20. Bernie would get 57% of the delegates. If she is out of the picture, and Bernie gets those votes, he gets 62.5% of the delegates. Any fake lefty who gets votes draws from Bernie, period. If Tulsi really wanted Bernie to win, she would be doing what Nina Turner is doing.
1
-
1
-
@katieleinster179 Well, there is a lot of evidence that Warren won't make it to MA, because she is getting numbers so low in New Hampshire that if those hold (I think she's at 7), her campaign will be over before it gets to MA regardless. Gillibrand is so far behind that she'll be out of the race long before it gets to NY. Harris is the one who I think will be the last opponent standing, so that is moot. I think most on the left see Beto for who he really is and only liked him when the alternative was Ted Cruz. If anything, he would he taking votes from Harris, so him staying in is a good thing. If no one gets an absolute majority, my understanding is that it will go to superdelegates, and the delegates are bound by the vote in the state for the first two rounds. So, if she does get delegates, Tulsi would make it harder for Bernie to win if you believe that it has to be round one or else. If you want Bernie Sanders to win the Democratic nomination, there is exactly one way to do so: support Bernie Sanders. Tulsi Gabbard is not doing that, so she is hurting his campaign.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Youdontneedto Seemyidentification Oh, so you like Bernie's ideas, but you're scared to push for them? Don't you get that this is WHY we keep losing even though people agree with us?
Study after study, looking at the US, the UK, and France have shown that rural voters (the very people we need to win) tend to be to the left on economics and the right socially. If the left doesn't give any reason for rural voters to vote for them, such as a full-throttled economic message, those people will go right, even hard right, every single time. Dukakis in 1988 won more counties than Obama in 2012. If we push someone who fights for working people, that person will get support. As Bill Clinton famously (and accurately) said in 2002, "Strong and wrong beats weak and right every time." Maybe we need to practice being strong and right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@machsimillian14 Manchin will never defect. Quite frankly, as incredibly frustrating as he is, he is the best you can do in a state where Trump won by 42 and 39 points. However, if he were to run in a Republican primary, the fact that he voted twice to convict Dear Leader, voted to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson, and votes with Democratic leadership about half the time would doom him in a Republican primary. Not to mention the fact that he is a third generation Democratic elected official, and that is another reason why it won't happen. The real problem is that until 2020, his vote was rarely the deciding factor, and now it is. However, it's funny how no one seems to get mad at the "moderate" Republicans who never stray from the party line when their vote is needed. And don't give me the vote to repeal the ACA, because everyone thought they had the votes to repeal with Pence as the tiebreaker until McCain switched sides at the last minute.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
MarkWeiss Okay, since you are a scientist who apparently researches everything and only gives 100% fact, you aren't even doing simple counting right, and your error rubbed off on me because I made the mistake of not thinking through your overall count. Here goes. Here is simple math.
Pelosi was named Democratic leader after the 2002 elections, meaning that 2004 was her first election as leader. Democrats held the majority after three (2006, 2008, 2018) and the minority after five (2004, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016). I hope you're not a chemist, because you'll end up blowing up your neighborhood.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1