Comments by "wvu05" (@wvu05) on "Marianne Williamson Visibly Shocked by Dave Rubin's Questions" video.

@2FadeMusic If you get her to focus, she is actually good on policy.
23
@GlobohomoGulag4678 As far as the ones most unique to her, she supports a Department of Peace, which was an idea Dennis Kucinich had about 15 years ago for trying nonviolent methods of conflict resolution. While I don't know what the final version of reparations should look like, I applaud her for taking the lead and putting a proposal forward. On the debate stage, she was the first to call the kidnapping at the border what it is.
8
@philipwipernickle4780 I couldn't agree with you more. She has had some terrible policies before and after her supposed conversion. Anyone who has supported torture will never, ever get my vote in a primary. Her excuse that she hadn't read a report about its efficacy is a terrible excuse. It was proven to be ineffective, the Army Field Manual prohibits it and has for decades, and it's a war crime. I still think her endorsement in 2016 was nothing more than trying to find a lane for her future ambitions.
2
@philipwipernickle4780 I would also include Inslee as a top tier candidate in my rankings.
1
@philipwipernickle4780 He is emphasizing the climate crisis. He did a very enlightening interview with Rachel Maddow when he announced. My top four are Bernie, Inslee, Warren, and Williamson in that order.
1
@philipwipernickle4780 Well, unless you care about the moral implications of your policy and your own humanity.
1
@Tinker-xr1gi What I mean is what the final package will look like. Will it include direct payments? Focus on communities? Will there be a comparable package for Native Americans? Things like that.
1
cassl14 If Tulsi is the peace candidate, why was Bernie the one who actually did the work to invoke the War Powers Act to rein in the efforts against Yemen?
1
@enriqueflorendo345 You mean the woman who, in an effort to defend Tulsi, said that David Duke was a fan of peace?
1
cassl14 Some people are blinded by her endorsement of Bernie. Some never bothered to look deep in her record. There are a lot of troubling things before and after her supposed conversion. She supported torture, she opposed the Iran nuclear deal. She praised Sisi for killing protesters. She praised Putin for bombing civilians in Syria and complained that Obama didn't. Oh, and she courted the support of Sheldon Adelson and did his bidding to try to get rid of his competition in the form of online gambling.
1
@enriqueflorendo345 That was more like the last straw for me. After a while, I get sick and tired of hearing someone dismiss legitimate criticisms based on someone's actual record as a "smear." Maybe that person is so blinded by loyalty to a candidate as to be incapable of making comment about that person.
1
@KingofHearts But Yang didn't destroy Rubin. Rubin got him to admit that his ultimate goal is to get rid of the existing social safety net. That is getting owned, not owning Rubin.
1