Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "School Children Targeted With Anti-Science Propaganda" video.

  1. It is funny how this lady never criticized what was actually in the book. I read that book. It lists all of their sources for you to read and criticize.
    3
  2. This isn't illegal because of the 1st amendment. You have the right to debunk what is in that book if you don't agree with it. Kim, however, did not debunk anything in that book.
    3
  3. Sha Dow, this book had nothing to do with religion. It cited scientific journals such as Nature and Science. No where in this video did Kim debunk what was actually in the book or describe how the book is wrong.
    3
  4. William, I am a PhD candidate in physical chemistry. Why would I deny science when it is my field? Oh, and here is the book I am currently reading http://www.polaritech.ir/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Nonlinear-Optics-Boyd-Third-Edition.pdf
    2
  5. george green, I never said climate change is fake. It is happening and has been for over 4 billion years. A driving force in evolution is climate change. I find it ironic how leftist claim to support science but then ignore evolution when it comes to climate change. I agree, we should push for a clean earth, but we can't destroy our economy in doing so. "if that is the case i invite you to breath from the exhaust pipe of a running car for 5 min" Dunk your head in water for 5 minutes and see what happens. Does that mean water is 100% bad? Your argument is weak.
    2
  6. Serious Yoga, the problem is that the left has little to stand on when it comes to this issue. Yes, years ago there were deniers. But denier are a dying breed. Most on the right accept that climate change is happening and that man is playing a role. They just feel that it isn't a threat nor that government should be active in "fixing" the problem. So the left go on rants like Kim did berating their opponents without every debunking what was in the book. And their supporters clap like trained seals. The right is open for a discussion but the left, with their huge ego, want to have it their way.
    2
  7. Remember when scientists said climate change is a threat? I don't.
    2
  8. Danny, scientists and researchers cite themselves all the time. That book cites many references some from Nature and Science. http://www.polaritech.ir/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Nonlinear-Optics-Boyd-Third-Edition.pdf There is a highly credible book that is the book to read, in my opinion, on non-linear optics and is currently the book that sits by my bed which is why I pick it. If you notice Boyd cites himself. That is common as typically the field you research in does not have many researchers, thus you will cite yourself. That high school teacher that criticized the citations showed why they teach high school as they have no clue how common it is to cite yourself.
    1
  9. The "consensus" on climate change is a load of crap. Yes, climate change is happening. Yes, man is contributing. But you will be hard pressed to find scientists that will say that climate change is a threat or give you a quantitative value in how much man is contributing. People need to read the literature themselves and make up their own opinions as opposed of going off of talking points that others say.
    1