Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Donald Trump On Orlando Nightclub Mass Shooting" video.

  1. Why stop at banning guns? Why not ban murder?
    55
  2. I know, my point is that these laws don't work. Murders by gun deaths have been dropping for over 20 years but here comes the talk of banning guns. Guns are clearly not the problem though.
    6
  3. A bomb is not an arm thus you don't have a right to it.
    1
  4. Ok, name me one law that would have stopped any of these mass shootings.
    1
  5. " NOBODY IS BANNING GUNS. WE SIMPLY NEED BETTER GUN CONTROL SO SOMEONE WHO IS BEING INVESTIGATED CANT BY A GUN" What kind of gun control do you want? And how would it prevent these shootings?
    1
  6. Australia has also see higher crime since the gun laws were put in place.
    1
  7. "its impossible to stop every single shooting however it would cut down drastically the amounts of killings" How? What law would have prevented this shooting and others?
    1
  8. " One, no one is talking about banning guns." Yes they are. They are talking about banning that AR15 in this video alone. " I know you guys like to pride yourselves about being logical and fact based this shows you are just dim and scared of facts" You want a fact? Gun murders have been dropping for the past 20 years while the number of guns have been increasing in this country. Guns are not the problem. " We need regulations on firearms. Like what? And how would they stop any of these shootings? "We've had decades of loose laws that allowed criminals to legally ovtain firearms. " If you are a felon you can't own a gun, that has been a law for a while. " That is a problem, why do you resist a law that would require all private firearm transfers to go through a cop shop with annual audit?" Because you have the right to your property and the right to bear arms. I don't want any of my guns to be registered so it can be followed by the government. And even if you were required to do gun sales through a cop shop criminals still won't do it. You are just creating more paper work for law abiding citizens.
    1
  9. "A specially-designed psychiatric evaluation done by certified and listed psychiatrists that gives you a PASS in order to buy a gun. If you fail it, no gun for you, period. Failed records are not kept by the State, only approved ones." So a law abiding citizen with a minor red flag should have their rights removed? Why stop there? Why not monitor those individuals as well? Keep tabs on them, search their homes. Obviously they are too much of a threat to own a gun. They are surely too much of a threat to be left alone. Would you support that? That aside, those test are not hard to fake. And you also deputize doctors to where any red flag, no matter how minor, will lead to them barring you from having a gun. No doctor wants to be responsible for allowing someone to own a gun and then they shoot up a place if that person had a red flag come up in their test. "Also, official record of every gun transfer, anual or x-anual audits of what you have, where you have it stored and a written test about legality and proficiency training." You don't want the government keeping track of the guns in the US. Also criminals won't follow that law and how would this law stop any of these shootings?
    1
  10. "Wow way to take what I proposed and run to the hills with it. The details would have to be worked on, but a "minor red flag" like a history of non-violent depression shouldn't bar you from owning a defense weapon, imo, but a history of life-threats, violent and impulsive behavior, alienation from reality, acute borderline personalities, etc...... " The problem with your proposal is how far are you willing to go? If your proposal were to be put into effect and another mass shooting happens, then what? Are you going to add more to it? That is why I said what I said. What you proposed may sound reasonable to you but in reality it is a doorway to more regulations. Someone with even the slightest of autistic characteristics can be banned from owning a gun. But if that person were to still get a hold of one illegally, like Adam Lanza, then what is the next step? Keeping surveillance on them? Or even putting them behind bars? Where does it end? " it's always "More Restrictions = Total Ban and Gun Grab from citizens"." Because there is a great chance of it leading up to that. For example look up Washington state bill SB 5737, do you think that was a "sensible restriction"? You throw out that phrase "sensible restriction" which has no standard tied to it at all. What may be "sensible" to you may not be enough to others.
    1