Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Hey Scott Pruitt, Grab A Dictionary And Look Up False Equivalence" video.

  1. Kim, another TYT idiot. Just because Pruitt sued the EPA is not a smear against him. So the EPA and government agencies should not be checked? I though ultra leftists wanted to audit the Pentagon? There are many contributors to the climate besides CO2. And I am still waiting for Kim to cite her sources.
    2
  2. The scientists are not lying, the media and politicians are misrepresenting them. You will be hard pressed to find scientists making a claim that climate change is a threat and we need the government to stop it. Kim is also not a scientist.
    1
  3. some body, defense spending makes up around 4% of the GDP and that value has been dropping for over 60 years.
    1
  4. " Pruitt sued the EPA 12 times only when regulations went after oil and other industries. And the information she espouses can be found very easily because of the Freedom of Information Act. You can Google "Scott Pruitt sues EPA" and come up with many credible sources. Not news agencies, but govt resoureces." I agree, now why doesn't Kim do that? Why doesn't Kim break down the court cases in how Pruitt was in the wrong? I am not saying that Pruitt suing the EPA was great, but to use it as a smear tactic against him is a poor argument and also contradicts what TYT has said about other government agencies, like the police for example.
    1
  5. Veronica, there is this big ball of burning gas nearby called the sun that contributes as well.
    1
  6. Jf H, the consensus was based on selected papers with vague interpretations of them. Also, science does not prove anything.
    1