Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Lesbians Arrested For Kissing Win $80K Settlement" video.

  1. No rights were being violated here. This is a private business.
    6
  2. No right was being denied
    2
  3. It was in a private business. If a business owner doesn't like it then you need to stop. Rights only protect you from the government, not from private individuals. So no rights were being violated.
    2
  4. What about the business owner's right to happiness and free speech? So they should be silence instead?
    1
  5. From what I got in the story the business wanted them to stop and then wanted them out when they didn't stop.
    1
  6. The business owner had a decision, the cop or the lesbians. He choose the lesbians.
    1
  7. "The owner's rights weren't violated." You have a right to private property. Would you allow me to come to your home and watch TV? I doubt it. But I won't be hurting anyone. ". Don't you kiss your girlfriend? " Yes, but let us extend this. Say she gave me a BJ in a store. We are not hurting anyone?
    1
  8. "nope. you are not, have at it, i personally couldn't care less where you make babies...... terrible argument" Not a terrible argument. How about I have sex at your house? How would you feel then? "i mean, you cant murder someone in your own home and claim "but i killed him in my "private" property"" That depends. If they are a threat to you then yes. But murder laws are state laws as covered in the 10th amendment. So this isn't related since we are talking about rights here.
    1
  9. The business owner could have told the cop no, instead they agreed with the cop. This falls on the business owner. "A BJ in public is illegal" Why? I mean, freedom of expression.
    1
  10. Actually a BJ in public is illegal in a lot of places. "i will only agree with this statement when you post a video of yourself forcing an angry bigoted cop outta your home when he has a lethal weapon" I will have no problem telling a cop to leave my private residence if they don't have a warrant. If they don't listen I will get a nice settlement in court and count my money afterwards. And if the cop shoots me that would be murder.
    1
  11. "then have fun staying out my house, like everybody else" Why? I have the right to express myself. You said so yourself. After having sex on your yard I will proceed to paint a cross on your front door because of freedom of speech. And you can't stop me because that is my right. "exactly, you have the right to own property, but you dont have the right to take away anothers rights" But yet you will deny my rights by not allowing me to have sex on your yard and paint a cross on your front door. You did the exact same insult. I at least used the correct "you're" when I did it.
    1
  12. "It's illegal in most places in the US to expose your genitalia " Why? I should have freedom of expression. " Finally, businesses are not allowed to discriminate against minority groups." That depends. Nothing is in the constitution about it thus it should be a state law. "A heterosexual couple would never have been accosted in this manner, " How do you know? "thus these women's rights were violated" Name me one right and please point to me where in the constitution that is written.
    1
  13. Why are those crimes? Don't I have a freedom of expression?
    1
  14. Why didn't the business owner just tell the cop that they didn't care? With that it falls on the business owner. My source is this video alone.
    1
  15. If the business owner did not agree with the cop they would have told the cop that they didn't care.
    1
  16. Ok, forget sex. How about just watching TV in your home, or eating food. Are you the only one who does that? Or have you ever had friends over to your place to eat and hangout?
    1
  17. It is not without evidence. The business owner could have told the cop that they didn't care. This falls on the business owner. " The store broke the law." Yeah, but is the law just? That is what needs to be considered.
    1
  18. Funny how you bring up N. Korea, because your actions is similar to what N. Korea will do. That is incarcerating people they don't agree with. I am questioning the law because businesses should be allowed to discriminate, or kick out people if they want. If a business owner want to be a bigots then fine, I don't care. It will be a great way to expose to where people can decide not to go there.
    1
  19. It is a serious question. Do you ever question laws?
    1
  20. The law, in my opinion, is not great. Forced integration is no better than forced segregation. My feeling is that you would have supported Jim Crow Laws back in the day simply because they were the law.
    1
  21. Uh.....yeah they were.
    1
  22. I understand they broke the law. I am just saying the law is not just. Just like when Rosa Parks broke the law.
    1
  23. In the end the business owner didn't want it.
    1
  24. At request of the business owner.
    1
  25. The business owner could have kicked out the cop instead.
    1
  26. And if the business owner disagreed with the cop then they should have told them to stop. In the end the falls on the business owner.
    1
  27. If it doesn't receive any tax dollars then it is private
    1
  28. "either i let NOBODY have sex at my house, or i let you ALL have it at my house...... same applies here, you let EVERYONE kiss, or you let NOBODY kiss" Who is to say that the business owner would have stopped others from acting the same? You have no evidence for or against that. Dumb ass doesn't understand the law.
    1
  29. "are you really suggesting that since the buisness opening day there hasnt been a single couple kiss?" Depends. Were they caught and how obscene were they. "says the one proving to the world they have no understanding you the first amendment" I fully understand the first amendment. Nowhere does it is say a business, it says congress. I feel you need to read it again.
    1
  30. Considering how your response was "google that" and educate your self" goes to show you have no idea what you are talking about. What do you want me to look up? The rights in the constitution are in place to give people power over the government. Freedom of speech was so we can criticize the government and not be incarcerated. But if you are in my home or business and curse I can kick you out. The right to bear arms is in place to protect you from the government. Protection from private individuals are laws. So now that I educated you now you look a little less dumb.
    1